Skip to main content
Log in

Pseudobowel Perforation Following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report two cases of pneumoperitoneum following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for retained common bile duct (CBD) stones. These post-cholecystectomy patients underwent sphincterotomy, CBD clearance, and “T” tube removal at the same time. Post-procedure, both of the patients developed pneumoperitoneum. Pneumoperitoneum developed as a result of air traversing from the duodenum to the peritoneum through the ruptured “T” tube tract. “T” tube removal in the same sitting as sphincterotomy and CBD clearance may lead to pneumoperitoneum, which can be managed conservatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:909–918.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:417–423.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;48:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Colton JB, Curran CC. Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:457–467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Howard TJ, Tan T, Lehman GA, et al. Classification and management of perforations complicating endoscopic sphincterotomy. Surgery. 1999;126:658–663. (discussion 664–665).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aliperti G. Complications related to diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1996;6:379–407.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Genzlinger JL, McPhee MS, Fisher JK, et al. Significance of retroperitoneal air after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1267–1270.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dunham F, Bourgeois N, Gelin M, et al. Retroperitoneal perforations following endoscopic sphincterotomy. Clinical course and management. Endoscopy. 1982;14:92–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Della Libera F, Ferrari Junior AP. Asymptomatic pneumoperitoneum after endoscopic treatment of pseudocysts. Endoscopy. 1997;29:231–232.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mergener K, Jowell PS, Brauch MS, Baille J. Pneumoperitoneum complicating ERCP performed immediately after EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:541–542.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Enns R, Eloubedi MA, Mergener K, et al. ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management. Endoscopy. 2002;34:293–298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bar Meir S, Lang A, Shemesh E, et al. Pneumoperitoneum after insertion of endoscopic biliary stent for post cholecystectomy biliary leak. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:818–820.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, V., Singh, G., Verma, G.R. et al. Pseudobowel Perforation Following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. Dig Dis Sci 58, 1781–1783 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2538-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2538-0

Keywords

Navigation