Skip to main content
Log in

Sequential Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation Following Limited Sphincterotomy for Common Bile Duct Stones

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (EPBD) has been recently used in conjunction with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for the removal of common bile duct (CBD) stones. The present study was aimed at assessing the safety and outcome of sequential EPBD following EST for CBD stones. A total of 74 patients (43 females, mean age 41 years) with ≥10-mm stone(s) in the CBD were selected for the procedure, which included limited EST followed by EPBD with balloon dilators of 10–18 mm in size. Eleven patients had undergone EST and unsuccessful stone removal earlier. Forty-nine patients had symptoms of CBD stones, while 25 were detected on imaging. Eleven patients had previous CBD stent in situ and four had T-tube in situ. The stone size was 10–12 mm in 34, 13–14 mm in 26, and ≥15 mm in 14 patients. Thirty-one patients had a single stone, while 43 had ≥2 stones. The successful removal of stones was achieved in 68 (91.9%) patients; 62 in the first attempt, five in the second, and one in the third. Six patients were deemed to be “failures.” In two of them, the stones could be removed after mechanical lithotripsy. Complications were seen in 16 patients, with self-limiting pain in 13, self-limiting ooze in five, melaena in one, and mild pancreatitis in two. One patient had impaction of the dormia basket. We conclude that EPBD following EST is safe and effective in removing stones ≥10 mm in size in over 90% of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:909–918. doi:10.1056/NEJM199609263351301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergman JJ, van Berkel AM, Groen AK, et al. Biliary manometry, bacterial characteristics, bile composition, and histologic changes fifteen to seventeen years after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;45:400–405. doi:10.1016/S0016-5107(97)70151-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Long-term effects of endoscopic papillary balloon dilation on gallbladder motility. Dig Dis Sci. 2004;49:1803–1807. doi:10.1007/s10620-004-9574-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hakamada K, Sasaki M, Endoh M, et al. Late development of bile duct cancer after sphincteroplasty: a ten- to twenty-two-year follow-up study. Surgery. 1997;121:488–492.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tocchi A, Mazzoni G, Liotta G, et al. Late development of bile duct cancer in patients who had biliary-enteric drainage for benign disease: a follow-up study of more than 1,000 patients. Ann Surg. 2001;234:210–214. doi:10.1097/00000658-200108000-00011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Staritz M, Ewe K, Meyer ZBKH. Endoscopic papillary dilation (EPD) for the treatment of common bile duct stones and papillary stenosis. Endoscopy. 1983;15(Suppl 1):197–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gerke H, Baillie J. To cut or stretch? Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1461–1463. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40358.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Disario JA, Freeman ML, Bjorkman DJ, et al. Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:1291–1299. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.07.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsujino T, Isayama H, Komatsu Y, et al. Risk factors for pancreatitis in patients with common bile duct stones managed by endoscopic papillary balloon dilation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:38–42. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.40638.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Watanabe H, Yoneda M, Tominaga K, et al. Comparison between endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of common bile duct stones. J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:56–62. doi:10.1007/s00535-006-1969-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baron TH, Harewood GC. Endoscopic balloon dilation of the biliary sphincter compared to endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones during ERCP: a metaanalysis of randomized, controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1455–1460. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30151.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weinberg BM, Shindy W, Lo S. Endoscopic balloon sphincter dilation (sphincteroplasty) versus sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Dev. 2006;18:CD004890.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ersoz G, Tekesin O, Ozutemiz AO, et al. Biliary sphincterotomy plus dilation with a large balloon for bile duct stones that are difficult to extract. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:156–159. doi:10.1067/mge.2003.52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bang S, Kim MH, Park JY, et al. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation with large balloon after limited sphincterotomy for retrieval of choledocholithiasis. Yonsei Med J. 2006;47:805–810.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koruk I, Parlak E, Seçilmiş S, et al. Endoscopic sphincteroplasty with large balloon dilatation for extraction of difficult common bile duct stones. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:1737–1738. doi:10.1007/s10620-007-0060-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maydeo A, Bhandari S. Balloon sphincteroplasty for removing difficult bile duct stones. Endoscopy. 2007;39:958–961. doi:10.1055/s-2007-966784.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:383–393.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mac Mathuna P, White P, Clarke E, et al. Endoscopic sphincteroplasty: a novel and safe alternative to papillotomy in the management of bile duct stones. Gut. 1994;35:127–129. doi:10.1136/gut.35.1.127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mugica F, Urdapilleta G, Castiella A, et al. Selective sphincteroplasty of the papilla in cases at risk due to atypical anatomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:3106–3111.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Vlavianos P, Chopra K, Mandalia S, et al. Endoscopic balloon dilatation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy for the removal of bile duct stones: a prospective randomised trial. Gut. 2003;52:1165–1169. doi:10.1136/gut.52.8.1165.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yasuda I, Tomita E, Enya M, et al. Can endoscopic papillary balloon dilation really preserve sphincter of Oddi function? Gut. 2001;49:689–691. doi:10.1136/gut.49.5.686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rakesh Kochhar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kochhar, R., Dutta, U., Shukla, R. et al. Sequential Endoscopic Papillary Balloon Dilatation Following Limited Sphincterotomy for Common Bile Duct Stones. Dig Dis Sci 54, 1578–1581 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-008-0534-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-008-0534-1

Keywords

Navigation