Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Chronic Pancreatitis Criteria to the Endoscopic Secretin-Stimulated Pancreatic Function Test

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Endosonography (EUS) has emerged as a major diagnostic tool in pancreatic imaging. Direct tests of pancreatic function are considered the most sensitive and accurate method to establish a diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis (CP), particularly when imaging studies are inconclusive. The aim of this study was to compare current EUS CP criteria with our newly described, purely endoscopic, secretin-stimulated pancreatic function test (ePFT). Fifty-six patients (25 male, mean age = 44 years) who were referred for evaluation/treatment of chronic abdominal pain with or without CP underwent both EUS and ePFT. The EUS protocol included the following: (1) EUS images were obtained in a standardized fashion from both gastric and duodenal stations, and (2) EUS images were scored independently by one of three therapeutic endoscopists for 0--9 parenchymal/ductal criteria as follows: 0–3 = normal, 4–5 = equivocal, >6 = definite CP. Endoscopic pancreatic function test (ePFT) protocol included the following: (1) upper endoscopy, (2) intravenous synthetic porcine secretin (0.2 mcg/kg, ChiRhoClin, Inc.) after test dose, (3) duodenal fluid aspirated every 15 min for 1 h, and (4) autoanalyzed for [HCO3] cutpoint of 80 mEq/L. According to EUS, 33 were normal, 13 equivocal, and 10 definite for CP. The mean peak [HCO3 −] range (in mEq/L) for each group was normal CP (83.7, range = 58–118), equivocal CP (68, range = 30–88), and definite CP (56, range=19–84). Using a peak [HCO3 −] of <80 mEq/L as diagnostic for CP, the referent values (sensitivity%/specificity%) for EUS in the diagnosis of CP were normal (60/72), equivocal (36/94), and definite (26/100), respectively. An EUS score or greater than 5 had the best specificity (100%) and negative predictive value (100%). We conclude that endoscopic pancreatic function testing with secretin confirms that as EUS score increases, the peak pancreatic fluid bicarbonate decreases. We also conclude that EUS has excellent statistical inferences for diagnosing CP when at least 6 or more criteria are present. EUS as a screening test in patients with chronic abdominal pain and equivocal imaging studies may be of limited value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zuccaro G, Sivak MV. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy 1992 May, 24 Suppl 1:347--9

  2. Lees WR, Vallon AG, Denyer ME, Vahl SP, Cotton PB (1979) Prospective study of ultrasonography in chronic pancreatic disease. BMJ 1:162–164

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lees WR (1986) Endoscopic ultrasonography of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic pseudocysts. Scand J Gastroenterol 123:123–129

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sahai AV, Mishra G, Penman I, Williams D, Wallace MB, Hadzijahic N, Pearson A, Vanvelse A, Hoffman BJ, Hawes RH (2000) EUS to detect evidence of pancreatic disease in patients with persistent or nonspecific dyspepsia. Gastrointest Endosc 52:153– 159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chowdhury RS, Forsmark CE (2003) Review article: pancreatic function testing. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 17:733–750

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Conwell DL, Zuccaro Jr G, Vargo JJ, Trolli PA, VanLente F, Obuchowski N, Dumot JA, O’Laughlin C (2003) An endoscopic pancreatic function test with synthetic porcine secretin for the evaluation of chronic abdominal pain and suspected chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 57:37–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stevens T, Conwell DL, Zuccaro G, VanLente F, Khandwala F, Purich E, Vargo JJ, Fein S, Dumot JA, Trolli P, O’Laughlin C (2004) Electrolyte composition of endoscopically collected duodenal drainage fluid after synthetic porcine secretin stimulation in healthy subjects. Gastrointest Endosc 60:351–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hawes RH (2002) A clinician’s perspective on chronic pancreatitis. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2(2):57–65

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clain JE, Pearson RK (1999) Diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Is a gold standard necessary? Surg Clin North Am 79(4):829–845

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Conwell DL, Zuccaro G Jr, Vargo JJ, Morrow JB, Obuchowski N, Dumot JA, Trolli PA, Burton A, O’Laughlin C, VanLente F (2003) An endoscopic pancreatic function test with cholecystokinin-octapeptide for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 1:189–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Conwell DL, Purich E, Zuccaro G, Fein S, VanLente F, Vargo J, Dumot J, Trolli P, Tsirambidis J (2003) Preliminary observations of a randomized 2-way crossover study comparing the endoscopic pancreatic function test (ePFT) with secretin for exocrine pancreas function with and without meperidine/midazolam sedation in normal subjects. Pancreas 27(4):A412

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stevens T, Conwell DL, Purich E, et al. (2004) A prospective, randomized, cross-over trial in healthy subjects comparing endoscopic and Dreiling tube collection methods for pancreatic function testing. Pancreas 29(4):A341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Catalano MF, Lahoto S, Geenen JE, Hogan WJ (1998) Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography, and secretin test in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 48:11–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wiersema MJ, Hawes RH, Lehman GA, Kochran ML, Sherman S, Kopecky KK (1993) Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in patients with chronic abdominalo pain of suspected pancreatic origin. Endoscopy 25:555–564

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sahai AV, Zimmerman M, Aabakken L, Tarnasky PR, Cunningham JT, van Velse A, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ (1998) Prospective assessment of the ability of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose, exclude, or establish the severity of chronic pancreatitis found by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 48:18–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reddy R, Levy MJ, Smyrk TC, Chari ST (2004) Diagnosis of cystic pancreatic tumors by endoscopic ultrasound guided trucut biopsy of the cyst wall. Pancreas 29(4):A357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pitchumoni CS, Glasser M, Saran RM, Panchacharam P, Thelmo W (1984) Pancreatic fibrosis in chronic alcoholics and nonalcoholics without clinical pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 79:382–388

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Anand BS, Vij JC, Mac HS, Chowdhury V, Kumar A (1989) Effect of aging on the pancreatic ducts: a study based on endoscopic retrograde pancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 35:210–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zimmerman MJ, Mishra G, Lewin DN, Hawes RH, Coyle W, Adams DA, et al. (1997) Comparison of EUS finding with histopathology in chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 45:AB185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Raimsondo M, Imot M, DiMagno EP (2003) Rapid endoscopic secretin stimulation test and discrimination of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer from disease controls. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 1:397–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Forsmark C (2002) Chronic pancreatitis. In Sleisinger and Fordtran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. Philadelphia, Saunders, pp 943–969

Download references

Acknowledgment

Support for this research was provided by unrestricted educational research grants from Solvay Pharmaceuticals (Marietta, GA) and ChiRhoClin, Inc. (Burtonsville, MD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Pancreas Clinic, Section of Endoscopy and Pancreaticobiliary Disease, Laboratory Medicine and Biostatistics and Epidemiology and ChiRhoClin, Incorporated, Burtonsville, Maryland, USA

    Darwin L. Conwell, Gregory Zuccaro, Edward Purich, Seymour Fein, John J. Vargo, John A. Dumot, Frederick VanLente, Rocio Lopez & Patricia Trolli

  2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Desk A30, Digestive Disease Center, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, USA

    Darwin L. Conwell

Authors
  1. Darwin L. Conwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gregory Zuccaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Edward Purich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Seymour Fein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. John J. Vargo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. John A. Dumot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Frederick VanLente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Rocio Lopez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Patricia Trolli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darwin L. Conwell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conwell, D.L., Zuccaro, G., Purich, E. et al. Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound Chronic Pancreatitis Criteria to the Endoscopic Secretin-Stimulated Pancreatic Function Test. Dig Dis Sci 52, 1206–1210 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9469-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-006-9469-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation