Abstract
Background/Objectives
Diffuse echogenicity of the pancreas, a commonly discovered finding on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), is often of undetermined significance. The goal of this study was to characterize the clinical picture and pancreatic function in patients who incidentally present with this endosonographic finding.
Methods
This was a case–control study comparing consecutive adult patients with diffuse echogenicity of the pancreas found on EUS to those who did not have known pancreas disease. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from the electronic medical record. The primary endpoint was exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) defined as fecal elastase (FE-1) < 200 μg/g.
Results
A total of 166 patients were included in this study. There were 89 patients who had diffuse echogenicity of the pancreas on EUS and FE-1 testing. There were 77 control patients with chronic diarrhea who did not have known pancreas disease but did have FE-1 testing. EPI was significantly more likely in the fatty pancreas group compared to the control group (47% vs 6%, p < 0.001). There was also a significantly greater proportion of smokers in the fatty pancreas group compared to the control group (42% vs 17%, p = 0.002). There were no other differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, including prevalence of chronic pancreatitis by Rosemont classification. On multiple logistic regression analysis controlling for multiple variables, smoking (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.15–4.43) and NAFLD (OR 3.99, 95% CI 1.09–14.70) had significant associations with EPI.
Conclusions
This study found a significantly greater amount of patients who had diffuse echogenicity of the pancreas on EUS to also have EPI. This is compared to a control group of patients without known pancreas disease. This prevalence was found in the absence of a significant association with chronic pancreatitis on EUS based on Rosemont classification. Future controlled studies are required to further investigate this relationship.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sepe PS, Ohri A, Sanaka S et al. A prospective evaluation of fatty pancreas by using EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:987–993.
Mathur A, Marine M, Lu D et al. Nonalcoholic fatty pancreas disease. HPB (Oxford) 2007;9:312–318.
Lee JS, Kim SH, Jun DW et al. Clinical implications of fatty pancreas: correlations between fatty pancreas and metabolic syndrome. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:1869–1875.
Lesmana CR, Pakasi LS, Inggriani S, Aidawati ML, Lesmana LA. Prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty pancreas disease (NAFPD) and its risk factors among adult medical check-up patients in a private hospital: a large cross sectional study. BMC Gastroenterol 2015;15:174.
Choi CW, Kim GH, Kang DH et al. Associated factors for a hyperechogenic pancreas on endoscopic ultrasound. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:4329–4334.
Pitt HA. Hepato-pancreato-biliary fat: the good, the bad and the ugly. HPB (Oxford) 2007;9:92–97.
Miyake H, Sakagami J, Yasuda H et al. Association of fatty pancreas with pancreatic endocrine and exocrine function. PLoS ONE 2018;13:e0209448.
Loser C, Mollgaard A, Folsch UR. Faecal elastase 1: a novel, highly sensitive, and specific tubeless pancreatic function test. Gut 1996;39:580–586.
Dominguez-Munoz JE, Hieronymus C, Sauerbruch T, Malfertheiner P. Fecal elastase test: evaluation of a new noninvasive pancreatic function test. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:1834–1837.
Beharry S, Ellis L, Corey M, Marcon M, Durie P. How useful is fecal pancreatic elastase 1 as a marker of exocrine pancreatic disease? J Pediatr 2002;141:84–90.
Shobassy M, Husainat N, Tabash A, Patel K, El-Serag HB, Othman MO. Endoscopic ultrasound findings in patients diagnosed with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency by low fecal elastase-1. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2019;2019:5290642.
Catalano MF, Sahai A, Levy M et al. EUS-based criteria for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: the Rosemont classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:1251–1261.
Majumder S, Philip NA, Takahashi N, Levy MJ, Singh VP, Chari ST. Fatty pancreas: should we be concerned? Pancreas 2017;46:1251–1258.
Saisho Y, Butler AE, Meier JJ et al. Pancreas volumes in humans from birth to age one hundred taking into account sex, obesity, and presence of type-2 diabetes. Clin Anat 2007;20:933–942.
Robertson MB, Choe KA, Joseph PM. Review of the abdominal manifestations of cystic fibrosis in the adult patient. Radiographics 2006;26:679–690.
Ruggiero A, Molinari F, Coccia P et al. MRI findings in Shwachman diamond syndrome. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008;50:352–354.
Kurdziel JC, Dondelinger R. Fatty infiltration of the pancreas in Shwachman’s syndrome: computed tomography demonstration. Eur J Radiol 1984;4:202–204.
Daentl DL, Frias JL, Gilbert EF, Opitz JM. The Johanson-Blizzard syndrome: case report and autopsy findings. Am J Med Genet 1979;3:129–135.
Raeder H, Haldorsen IS, Ersland L et al. Pancreatic lipomatosis is a structural marker in nondiabetic children with mutations in carboxyl-ester lipase. Diabetes 2007;56:444–449.
Wang CY, Ou HY, Chen MF, Chang TC, Chang CJ. Enigmatic ectopic fat: prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty pancreas disease and its associated factors in a Chinese population. J Am Heart Assoc 2014;3:e000297.
Begovatz P, Koliaki C, Weber K et al. Pancreatic adipose tissue infiltration, parenchymal steatosis and beta cell function in humans. Diabetologia 2015;58:1646–1655.
Kim MK, Chun HJ, Park JH et al. The association between ectopic fat in the pancreas and subclinical atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014;106:590–596.
Lim S, Bae JH, Chun EJ et al. Differences in pancreatic volume, fat content, and fat density measured by multidetector-row computed tomography according to the duration of diabetes. Acta Diabetol 2014;51:739–748.
Tushuizen ME, Bunck MC, Pouwels PJ et al. Pancreatic fat content and beta-cell function in men with and without type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007;30:2916–2921.
Heni M, Machann J, Staiger H et al. Pancreatic fat is negatively associated with insulin secretion in individuals with impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance: a nuclear magnetic resonance study. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2010;26:200–205.
Navina S, Acharya C, DeLany JP et al. Lipotoxicity causes multisystem organ failure and exacerbates acute pancreatitis in obesity. Sci Transl Med 2011;3:107ra110.
Silverman DT, Swanson CA, Gridley G et al. Dietary and nutritional factors and pancreatic cancer: a case-control study based on direct interviews. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1710–1719.
Arslan AA, Helzlsouer KJ, Kooperberg C et al. Anthropometric measures, body mass index, and pancreatic cancer: a pooled analysis from the Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Consortium (PanScan). Arch Intern Med 2010;170:791–802.
Genkinger JM, Kitahara CM, Bernstein L et al. Central adiposity, obesity during early adulthood, and pancreatic cancer mortality in a pooled analysis of cohort studies. Ann Oncol 2015;26:2257–2266.
Idilman IS, Tuzun A, Savas B et al. Quantification of liver, pancreas, kidney, and vertebral body MRI-PDFF in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Abdom Imaging 2015;40:1512–1519.
Vanga R, Tansel A, Sidiq S et al. Diagnostic performance of measurement of fecal elastase-1 in detection of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;16:1220–1228.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Mohamed O Othman is a consultant for Abbvie, Conmed, Olympus, Boston Scientific Corporation, Apollo and Nestle. Mohamed O Othman recieved research grant from Abbvie, Conmed, Kangen Pharmaceutical and Lucid Diagnostics. Isaac Raijman is a consultant for Boston Scientific Corporation and Conmed. Other authors have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Krill, J.T., Szafron, D., Elhanafi, S. et al. Endoscopic Ultrasound Finding of Diffuse Echogenicity in the Pancreas, Is It Relevant?. Dig Dis Sci 67, 3244–3251 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07181-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07181-1