Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of phthalates on bovine primary testicular culture and spermatozoa

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cytotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among environmental endocrine-active chemicals, phthalates, commonly known as plasticizers, disrupt the development of the male reproductive tract. In this study, the effects of phthalates (DIBP, BBP, DINP, DBP, DEP, DEHP and DMP) were evaluated on cultures of bovine primary male reproductive cells (n = 3) and spermatozoa (n = 4). Epididymal (caput and corpus epididymis), testicular (parenchymal and mediastinal/tubular) and vas deferens cells (VDC) were prepared from samples collected from slaughterhouse. Second part of caput epididymis which have fewer amount of principal cells, were found to be less affected compared to the first part except DEHP; while corpus epididymis was found to be more affected with IC50 values below 0.976 ng/mL (except for DEP at 4.97 ng/mL). In testicular parenchymal cells, IC50 ranged from 0.15 to 4.11 ng/mL and for mediastinum from 0.01 to 7.31 ng/mL; where cytotoxic effects were more evident in mediastinal section. Least cytotoxic and even proliferational effects (DEHP, DMP and DEP) were observed in VDC, the muscular tube carrying sperm from epididymis to the ejaculatory duct. Least spermiotoxic phthalate was DBP (3.928 ng/mL); while DINP (0.550 ng/mL) induced highest cytotoxic effect on bovine spermatozoa. Differences in the cellular structure and/or the androgen receptor distribution effect the toxicity of phthalates. Our preliminary findings on bovine spermatozoa indicate possible morphological and motility alterations; which challenges further investigation of the transition of phthalates on semen straws used in cryopreservation. Increase of exposure to environmental contaminants raise the issue of the requirement of a new perspective on reproductive health, species and tissue specific differences should further be emphasized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DIBP:

Di-isobutyl phthalate

BBP:

Butyl-benzyl phthalate

DINP:

Di‐isononyl phthalate

DBP:

Di-butyl phthalate

DEP:

Di-ethyl phthalate

DEHP:

Di-ethylhexyl phthalate

DMP:

Di-methyl phthalate

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank Ankara University Faculty of Veterinary Medicine for providing the opportunity to conduct this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the listed authors have made substantial contributions to the research design, analysis and interpretation of data and to drafting the paper and revising it critically.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayhan Filazi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare. There has been no financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yurdakok-Dikmen, B., Stelletta, C., Tekin, K. et al. Effects of phthalates on bovine primary testicular culture and spermatozoa. Cytotechnology 71, 935–947 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-019-00336-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-019-00336-z

Keywords

Navigation