Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of different culture modes for long-term expansion of neural stem cells

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cytotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neural stem cells (NSCs) can be cultured in two modes of suspension and monolayer in vitro. The cultured cells are different in both the ability to proliferate and heterogeneity. In order to find the appropriate methods for large-scale expansion of NSCs, we systematically compared the NSCs cultured in suspension with those cultured in monolayer. The forebrain tissue was removed from embryonic day 14 (E14) mice, then the tissue was dissociated into single-cell suspension by Accutase and mechanical trituration. The cells were cultured in both suspension and monolayer. The NSCs cultured in suspension and in monolayer were compared on viability, ability to proliferate and heterogeneity by fluorescent dyes, immunofluorescence and flow cytometry on DIV21 (21 days in vitro), DIV56 and DIV112, respectively. The results indicated that the NSCs cultured in both suspension and monolayer represented good viability in long-term cultures. But they displayed a distinct ability to proliferate in long-term cultures. The NSCs cultured in monolayer preceded those cultured in suspension on the ability to proliferate on DIV21 and DIV56, but no obvious difference on DIV112. The NSCs population cultured in suspension displayed more nestin-positive cells than those in monolayer during the whole process of culture. The NSCs population cultured in monolayer, however, displayed more βIII tubulin-positive cells than those in suspension in the same period. The suspension culture mode excels the monolayer culture mode for large-scale expansion of NSCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bez A, Corsini E, Curti D, Biggiogera M, Colombo A, Nicosia RF, Pagano SF, Parati EA (2003) Neurosphere and neurosphere-forming cells: morphological and ultrastructural characterization. Brain Res 993:18–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cai J, Wu Y, Mirua T, Pierce JL, Lucero MT (2002) Properties of a fetal multipotent neural stem cell (NEP Cell). Dev Biol 251:221–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gritti A, Parati EA, Cova L, Frolichsthal P, Galli R (1996) Multipotential stem cells from the adult mouse brain proliferate and self-renew in response to basic fibroblast growth factor. J Neurosci 163:1091–1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson CB, Momma S, Clarke DL, Risiling M, Lendahl U, Frisen J (1999) Identification of a neural stem cell in the adult mammalian central nervous system. Cell 96:25–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanemura Y, Mori H, Kobayashi S, Islam O, Kodama E (2002) Evaluation of in vitro proliferative activity of human fetal neural stem/progenitor cell using indirect measurements of viable cells based on cellular metabolic activity. J Neurosci Res 69:869–879

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma C, He X, Wilkie N (2001) Growth factors regulate the survival and fate of cells derived from human neurospheres. Nat Biotechnol 19:475–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mclarren FH, Svendsen CN, Meide PV, Joiy E (2001) Analysis of neural stem cells by flow cytometry: cellular differentiation modifies patterns of MHC expression. J Neuroimmunol 112:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milosevic J, Storch A, Schwarz J (2004) Spontaneous apoptosis in murine free-floating neurospheres. Exp Cell Res 294:9–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ostenfeld T, Svendsen CN (2004) Requirement for neurogenesis to proceed through the division of neuronal progenitors following differentiation of epidermal growth factor and fibroblast growth factor-2-responsive human neural stem cells. Stem Cells 22:798–811

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ostenfeld T, Caldwell MA, Prowes KR (2000) Human neural precursor cells express low levels of telomerase in vitro and show diminishing cell proliferation with extensive axonal outgrowth following transplantation. Exp Neurol 164:215–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ray J, Gage FH (1999) Neural stem cell isolation, characterization and transplantation. In: Wind U, Jahansson H (eds) Modern techniques in neuroscience research. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 340–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray J, Peterson DA, Schinstine M, Gage FH (1993) Proliferation, differentiation, and long-term culture of primary hippocampal neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:3602–3606

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds BA, Weiss S (1996) Clonal and population analyses demonstrate that an EGF-responsive mammalian embryonic CNS precursor is a stem cell. Dev Biol 175:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Svendsen CN, Borg MG, Armstrong RJE, Rosser AE, Chandran S, Ostenfeld T, Caldwell MA (1998) A new method for the rapid and long-term growth of human neural precursor cells. J Neurosci Methods 85:141–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao N (2004) The modification of the protocols of the in vitro culture of neural stem cells. M.S. thesis, Dalian University of Technology

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tian-Qing Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zheng, K., Liu, TQ., Dai, MS. et al. Comparison of different culture modes for long-term expansion of neural stem cells. Cytotechnology 52, 209–218 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-006-9037-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-006-9037-0

Keywords

Navigation