Skip to main content
Log in

Relational Theory: A Refuge and Compass

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Relational theory offers a structure from which to understand and treat the interpersonal and intrapsychic legacy of severe childhood trauma. During the course of treatment, particularly with such traumatized patients, therapists are challenged to tolerate and make meaning of intense feelings in the transference-countertransference matrix. Relational theory’s ideas regarding adaptation to and perpetuation of the relational patterns of early life, dissociation of disavowed and intolerable self-states, and the inevitability of mutual enactments provide an organizing framework in which to weather and make bearable the unbearable. In addition, relational theory invites and supports the clinician in the vital task of meeting the patient’s vulnerability with his or her own authentic and vulnerable self. The following case material demonstrates the use of relational theory to find and to work at the intimate edge (Ehrenberg in Relational psychoanalysis: innovation and expansion, Analytic Press, Hillsdale, pp 3–28, 2005) where the impossible becomes possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Applegate, J. S., & Shapiro, J. R. (2005). Neurobiology for clinical social work: Theory and practice. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, L. (1996). A meeting of minds: Mutuality in psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, L. (1999). The patient’s experience of the analyst’s subjectivity. In S. Mitchell & L. Aron (Eds.), Relational psychoanalysis: The emergence of a tradition (pp. 243–268). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (1995). Like subjects, love objects: Essays on recognition and sexual difference. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (1999). Recognition and destruction: An outline of intersubjectivity. In S. Mitchell & L. Aron (Eds.), Relational psychoanalysis: The emergence of a tradition (pp. 181–210). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done-to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 63(1), 5–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss sadness and depression. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromberg, P. (1998). Speak that I may see you: Some reflections on dissociations, reality, and psychoanalytic listening. Standing in the spaces: Essays on clinical process, trauma and dissociation (pp. 241–266). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromberg, P. (2003). Something wicked this way comes: Trauma, dissociation, and conflict: The space where psychoanalysis, cognitive-science and neuroscience overlap. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 20(3), 558–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. M. (1994). Love in the afternoon: A relational reconsideration of desire and dread in the countertransference. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 4(2), 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. M. (2004). Whose bad objects are we anyway?: Repetition and our elusive love affair with evil. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 14, 711–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. M., & Frawley, M. G. (1999). Dissociative processes and transference-countertransference paradigms in the psychoanalytically oriented treatment of adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. In S. Mitchell & L. Aron (Eds.), Relational psychoanalysis: The emergence of a tradition (pp. 269–304). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, D. B. (2005). The intimate edge in therapeutic relatedness. In L. Aron & A. Harris (Eds.), Relational psychoanalysis: Innovation and expansion (pp. 3–28). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganzer, C., & Ornstein, E. D. (2008). In and out of enactments: A relational perspective on short- and long-term treatment of substance abuse. Clinical Social Work Journal, 36(2), 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. R. (1986a). The problem of analytic neutrality. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 22(1), 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. R. (1986b). Theoretical models and the analyst’s neutrality. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 22(1), 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. R., & Mitchell, S. (1983). Object relations in psychoanalytic theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, I. (1999). The patient as interpreter of the analyst’s experience. In S. Mitchell & L. Aron (Eds.), Relational psychoanalysis: The emergence of a tradition (pp. 39–77). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, L. (2008). Relational thinking: From culture to couch and couch to culture. In S. Clarke, H. Hahn, & P. Hoggett (Eds.), Object relations and social relations (pp. 1–24). London, England: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, E. A. (1992). Harry Stack Sullivan: From interpersonal psychiatry to interpersonal psychoanalysis. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 28(3), 450–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1981). Otherwise than being: Or, beyond essence. Boston, MA: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E., & Nemo, P. (1985). Ethics and infinity. Pittsburg, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroda, K. J. (2005). Show some emotion: Completing the cycle of affective communication. In L. Aron & A. Harris (Eds.), Relational psychoanalysis: Innovation and expansion (pp. 121–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis: An integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orange, D. (2010). Thinking for clinicians: Philosophical resources for contemporary psychoanalysis and the humanistic psychotherapies. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orange, D. (2011). The suffering stranger: Hermeneutics for everyday clinical practice. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbach, S. (2008). Object relations and social relations. In S. Clarke, H. Hahn, & P. Hoggett (Eds.), Object relations and social relations (pp. 25–44). London, England: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renik, O. (1999). Analytic interaction: Conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst’s irreducible subjectivity. In S. Mitchell & L. Aron (Eds.), Relational psychoanalysis: The emergence of a tradition (pp. 407–424). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schamess, G. (2012). Mutual transformation in psychotherapy. Clinical Social Work Journal, 40(1), 10–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schore, A. (2009). Right brain affect regulation: An essential mechanism of development, trauma, dissociation and psychotherapy. In D. Fosha, D. Siegel, & M. Solomon (Eds.), The healing power of emotion: Affective neuroscience, development and clinical practice (pp. 112–144). New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaeffer, Z. G. (2014). Transference, countertransference, and mutuality in Relational Social Work with college students. Clinical Social Work Journal, 42(1), 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorey, Hal S., & Snyder, C. R. (2006). The role of adult attachment in psychopathology and psychotherapy outcomes. Review of General Psychology, 10(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. B. (2004). The eye sees itself: Dissociation, enactment, and the achievement of conflict. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 40(2), 197–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, D. N. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosone, C. (2004). Relational social work: Honoring the tradition. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 74(3), 475–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walant, K. (1995). Creating the capacity for attachment: Treating addictions and the alienated self. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, D. (2007). Attachment in psychotherapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The theory of the parent infant relationship. In The maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 37–55). New York, NY: International Universities Press.

Download references

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the author has no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard

This article does not contain studies with human participants or animals performed by the author. The article does contain a clinical vignette and informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the treatment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terri Rubinstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rubinstein, T. Relational Theory: A Refuge and Compass. Clin Soc Work J 43, 398–406 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-015-0523-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-015-0523-8

Keywords

Navigation