Abstract
This paper aims to work towards a factual framework to substantiate the linkage between corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting and economic activity and between CSR reporting and CO2 pollution, continent-wide. The document summarizes the conclusions of the dynamic analysis of CSR reports and the correlation analysis between CSR reports and economic—environmental variables, always using evidence from continent-level data. We draw on growth—environmental data and CSR reports from 1999 to 2017 to perform an analysis that quantifies the direction, the strength and the nature of the dependence structure between the two variables. Continents’ position according to their CSR reporting performance, CSR report trends over time, comparative schemes among continents, compose a global view on continents’ differentiation on CSR practices and strategies. Overall, the paper contributes to the understanding of how the CSR policies have been integrated and evolved worldwide.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
Data come from World Bank database (World Bank 2020a-f) and are publicly available.
Code availability
Software application and custom code in R. Custom code is available upon request.
Notes
Publicly accessible at: https://database.globalreporting.org/.
Hoeffding’s D estimates, computer output and R codes are available in the “Appendix”.
References
Ağan, Y., Kuzey, C., Acar, M., & Açıkgöz, A. (2016). The relationships between corporate social responsibility, environmental supplier development, and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 1872–1881.
Babiak, K., & Trendafilova, S. (2011). CSR and environmental responsibility: motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18, 11–24.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 717–736.
Bashtovaya, V. (2014). CSR reporting in the United States and Russia. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(1), 68–84.
Bhattacharyya, S. S. (2007). Chamera hydro-electric power project (CHEP-1), Khairi: looking beyond the horizon of hydroelectricity and profit, giving new meaning to life. Vision, 11(1), 79–93.
Boehm, S., Brei, V., & Dabhi, S. (2015). EDF Energy’s green CSR claims examined: The follies of global carbon commodity chains. Global Networks, 15(s1), S87–S107.
Bolton, S. C., Kim, R. C. H., & O’Gorman, K. D. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as a dynamic internal organizational process: A case study. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(1), 61–74.
Bowen, H. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.
Brown, H. S., De Jong, M., & Lessidrenska, T. (2009). The rise of the Global Reporting Initiative: a case of institutional entrepreneurship. Environmental Politics, 18, 182–200.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–505.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. A. (2008). Adoption of social responsibility through the expansion of existing management systems. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 108(3), 297–309.
Cetindamar, D., & Husoy, K. (2007). Corporate social responsibility practices and environmentally responsible behavior: The case of the United Nations Global Compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 163–176.
Chen, C. S., Yu, C. C., & Hu, J. S. (2018). Constructing performance measurement indicators to suggested corporate environmental responsibility framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135(C), 33–43.
Clark, M. (2013). A comparison of correlation measures. Technical report, University of Notre Dame. Resource document. Retrieved September 18, 2020, from https://m-clark.github.io/docs/CorrelationComparison.pdf.
Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: Readings and cases in a global context. New York: Routledge.
Daddi, T., Iraldo, F., Frey, M., Gallo, P., & Gianfrate, V. (2016). Regional policies and eco-industrial development: The voluntary environmental certification scheme of the eco-industrial parks in Tuscany (Italy). Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 62–70.
Etzion, D. (2007). Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-Present: Rev. Journal of Management, 33(4), 637–664.
European Commission (2011). A renewed EU Strategy 2011–2014 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Resource document. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52011DC0681. Accessed 10 June 2020.
European Commission (2017). Industry. Corporate Social Responsibility, Resource document.
Frederick, W. C. (1960). The growing concern over business responsibility. California Management Review, 2(4), 54–61.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of businesses is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, pp. 32–33.
Global Reporting Initiative (2016). Standards. GRI Standards. Resource document. Retrieved June 12, 2020, from https://www.globalreporting.org/Pages/default.aspx.
Halkos, G., & Nomikos, S. (2021). Corporate social responsibility: Trends in global reporting initiative standards. Economic Analysis and Policy, 69, 106–117.
Halkos, G. E., & Tsilika, K. D. (2019). Towards better computational tools for effective environmental policy planning. Computational Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-019-09902-1.
Halkos, G., Managi, S., & Tsilika, K. (2017). Evaluating a continent-wise situation for capital data. Economic Analysis and Policy, 55, 57–74.
Halkos, G. E., & Tsilika, K. D. (2015). A Dynamic interface for trade pattern formation in multi-regional multi-sectoral input–output modeling. Computational Economics, 46(4), 671–681.
Harrell, F. E. Jr, with contributions from Charles Dupont and many others (2020). Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous. R package version 4.4-1. Resource document. Retrieved September 18, 2020, from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc.
Heer, J., Kong, N., & Agrawala, M. (2009). Sizing the horizon: The effects of chart size and layering on the graphical perception of time series visualizations. In Proceedings of the 27th International conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI) (pp. 1303–1312).
Hoeffding, W. (1948). A non-parametric test of independence. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 19, 293–325.
Hollander, M., & Wolfe, D. A. (1999). Nonparametric statistical methods (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/corporate-social-responsibility_en. Accessed 10 June 2020.
Hu, J., Wang, S., & Xie, F. (2018). Environmental responsibility, market valuation, and firm characteristics: Evidence from China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6), 1376–1387.
ILO (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Resource document. International Labour Organization. Retrieved June 10, 2020, from https://www.ilo.org/empent/Informationresources/WCMS_101253/lang--en/index.htm.
Javed, W., McDonnel, B., & Elmqvist, N. (2010). Graphical perception of multiple time series. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6), 927–934.
Keim, D., Nietzschmann, T., Schelwies, N., Schneidewind, J., Schreck, T. & Ziegler, H. (2006). A spectral visualization system for analyzing financial time series data. Time.
Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012). Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 51–84.
Lee, B., Riche, N., Karlson, A., & Carpendale, S. (2010). Sparkclouds: Visualizing trends in tag clouds. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16(6), 1182–1189.
Leitoniene, S., & Sapkauskiene, A. (2015). Quality of corporate social responsibility information. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 334–339.
Mauri, M., Elli, T., Caviglia, G., Uboldi, G., & Azzi, M. (2017). RAWGraphs: A visualisation platform to create open outputs. In Proceedings of the 12th Biannual conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter (pp. 28:1–28:5). https://doi.org/10.1145/3125571.3125585
Nagler, T. (2019). wdm: Weighted Dependence Measures. R package version 0.2.1. Resource document. Retrieved September 18, 2020, from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wdm.
Navickas, V., & Kontautiene, R. (2012). The influence of stakeholder–company relationship on competitiveness of company. Economics and Management, 17(3), 58–67.
Ngoasong, M. Z. (2014). How international oil and gas companies respond to local content policies in petroleum-producing developing countries: A narrative enquiry. Energy Policy, 73, 471–479.
Peterson, B. G., & Carl, P. (2020). PerformanceAnalytics: Econometric Tools for Performance and Risk Analysis. R package version 2.0.4. Resource document. Retrieved September 18, 2020, from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PerformanceAnalytics.
Pucheta-Martínez, M. C., & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2018). Environmental reporting policy and corporate structures: An international analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25, 788–798.
R Development Core Team (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org
Skagerlind, H., Westman, M., & Berglund, H. (2015). Corporate social responsibility through cross-sector partnerships: Implications for civil society, the state, and the corporate sector in India. Business and Society Review, 120(2), 245–275.
Shixia, L., Panpan, X., Wei, C., Huamin, Q., Weiwei, C., & Conglei, S. (2012). RankExplorer: visualization of ranking changes in large time series data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics, 18(12), 2669–2678.
Sparkes, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: Benefits for youth in hydropower development in Laos. International Review of Education, 60(2), 261–277.
Szczepankiewicz, E. I., & Mućko, P. (2016). CSR reporting practices of Polish energy and mining companies. Sustainability, 8(2), 126.
Tableau. Academic programs. Seattle (WA): Tableau 2019.1. https://www.tableau.com/academic.
UNGC (2017). The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact. Resource document. Retrieved June 10, 2020, from https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles.
Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. The Academy of Management Review, 10, 758–769.
Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G., & Ramsay, J. (2006). Drivers of environmental behaviour in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 317–330.
Wognum, N., Bremmers, H., Trienekens, J., Van der Vorst, J., & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. (2011). Systems for sustainability and transparency of food supply chains—Current status and challenges. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25, 65–76.
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. The Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.
World Bank (2020). CO2 Emissions (kt). Atlas method [Data file]. World Development Indicators, The World Bank Group. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC
World Bank (2020). CO2 intensity (kg per kg of oil equivalent energy use). Atlas method [Data file]. World Development Indicators, The World Bank Group. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.EG.ZS
World Bank (2020). Exports of goods and services (annual % growth). Atlas method [Data file]. World Development Indicators, The World Bank Group. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.KD.ZG
World Bank (2020). Exports of goods and services (constant 2010 US$). Atlas method [Data file]. World Development Indicators, The World Bank Group. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.KD
World Bank (2020). GNI (constant 2010 US$). Atlas method [Data file]. World Development Indicators, The World Bank Group. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNP.MKTP.KD
World Bank (2020). GNI growth (annual %). Atlas method [Data file]. World Development Indicators, The World Bank Group. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNP.MKTP.KD.ZG
Zou, H., Xie, X., Meng, X., & Yang, M. (2019). The diffusion of corporate social responsibility through social network ties: From the perspective of strategic imitation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 186–198.
Acknowledgements
Thanks are due to the Editor Professor Hans Amman and to three anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments. Any errors are solely the authors’ responsibility.
Funding
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GH; conceptualization and interpretation of the results in the environmental and economics context. SN; data curation and interpretation of the results in concerns regarding environmental responsibility. KT; analytic techniques, data importation, computing and programming in R. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest/competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Hoeffding’s D Calculations
Appendix: Hoeffding’s D Calculations
Hoeffding’s D calculations for growth variables (gross national income growth (annual %), gross national income, exports of goods and services growth (annual % growth), exports of goods and services volumes correspond to GNIG, GNI$, EXPORTGR, EXPORT$ variables respectively).
1.1 Africa
1.2 Asia
1.3 Europe
1.4 Latin America and the Caribbean
1.5 Northern America
1.6 Oceania
Hoeffding’s D calculations for environmental variables (CO2 emissions (measured in kt) correspond to CO2EMS variable and CO2 intensity (in kg per kg of oil equivalent energy use) corresponds to CO2INTENS variable) in Africa.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Halkos, G., Nomikos, S. & Tsilika, K. Evidence for Novel Structures Relating CSR Reporting and Economic Welfare: Environmental Sustainability—A Continent-Level Analysis. Comput Econ 59, 415–444 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-020-10091-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-020-10091-5