Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Intelligent Computing Approach to Evaluating the Contribution Rate of Talent on Economic Growth

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We set out in this study to develop an intelligent computing method for the evaluation of the ‘economic contribution rate of talent’ (ECRT). We begin by constructing an indicator system for comprehensive evaluation of the talent environment and then go on to classify our (country or region) target system using our proposed GA-DE-FCM methodology. We subsequently identify total ‘human capital’ as comprising of ‘talent capital’ and ‘general labor’, which, along with ‘fixed assets’, are used as the input variables of the economic system, whilst the corresponding gross domestic product is used as the output variable. The mapping between the inputs and output is modeled in this study by a ‘fuzzy artificial neural network’ from which several fuzzy rules can be extracted. Having extracted these fuzzy rules, we subsequently go on to investigate the effect of each input factor (fixed assets, talent capital and general labor) on the level of economic growth within each category (obtained in Step 1), and then carry out an examination of the ECRT within each category, as well as that within the whole target system. The traditional methods of evaluating ECRT are not regarded as satisfactory, given that the ECRT problem is non-linear and involves lags; however, we argue that based upon intelligent computing, the model proposed here can effectively deal with these issues. The results, based upon a 2001–2010 sample of 31 provinces in mainland China, indicate that during this period, China could be classified into three categories according to the talent environment. The first category (high level talent environment) comprises of just two regions, with an average ECRT of 44.61 per cent, whilst the second category (median level talent environment) comprises of five regions, with an average ECRT of 37.57 per cent, and the third category (low level talent environment) comprises of 24 regions, with an average ECRT of 14.8 per cent. The average ECRT for China as a whole is 25.67 per cent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Lane and Pollner (2008), Iles et al. (2010) and Zhang et al. (2010).

  2. Examples include Gui et al. (1997), Gui (2009), Wang et al. (1999), Shao et al. (2001), Chen (2002), Sun (2006) and Lin and Yu (2011).

  3. \(A_{ij}\) here stands for the Gaussian fuzzy set with \(u_{ij}\) representing the cluster center and \(\sigma _{ij}\) representing the cluster width.

References

  • Bezdek, J. C. (1981). Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithm. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, E., Foulon, M., Handfield-Jones, H., Hankin, S., & Michaels, E. (1998). The war for talent. McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 44–57.

  • Chen, F. (2002). A study on the relationship between China talent capital accumulation and economic growth. Masters Dissertation, Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing.

  • Das, S., & Suganthan, P. N. (2011). Differential evolution: A survey of the state-of- the-art. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics—Part B: Cybernetics, 15(1), 4–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gui, Z. (2009). A theoretical study on the contribution rate of talent capital to economic growth. Chinese Talents, 12, 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gui, Z., Mei, J., & Lou, X. (1997). Qualified personnel and economic growth. Science and Technology Progress and Policy, 14(3), 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillaume, S., & Charnomordic, B. (2012). Fuzzy inference systems: An integrated modeling environment for collaboration between expert knowledge and data using FisPro. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 8744–8755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iles, P., Chuai, X., & Preece, D. (2010). Talent management and HRM in multinational companies in Beijing: Definitions, differences and drivers. Journal of World Business, 45, 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang, J. S. R., Sun, G. T., & Mizutani, E. (1997). Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, B. (2002). Measurement of human capital input across countries: A method based on the laborer’s income. Journal of Development Economics, 67(2), 333–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kai, M. T., & Chee, P. L. (2011). A fuzzy inference system-based criterion-referenced assessment model. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 11129–11136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, K., & Pollner, F. (2008). How to address China’s growing talent shortage. McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L., & Yu, J. (2011). A study on the contribution rate of talents capital based on Cobb-Douglas production function combined with logistic regression. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 45(1), 110–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, S., & Trigo, V. (2008). Winning the war for managerial talent in China: An empirical study. Chinese Economy, 41(3), 34–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, E., Handfield-Jones, H., & Axelrod, B. (2001). The war for talent. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, C. B., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1997). A labor-income-based measure of the value of human capital: An application to the states of the United States. Japan and the World Economy, 9(2), 159–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, W. (2002). Management decision and application of entropy theory. Beijing: Machinery Industry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323(9), 533–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, Y., Gao, J., & Tang, X. (2001). A study on talent capital and economic growth. R&D Management, 13(5), 18–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storn, R., & Price, K. (1997). Differential evolution–a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. Journal of Global Optimization, 11(4), 341–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L. (2006). A study on the contribution and development of talent capital to economic growth in Jiangsu Province. Masters Thesis, Nanjing University of Finances and Economics, Nanjing.

  • Taylor, M. (2007). China’s talent gap not something money can solve. China Staff, 13(3), 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Chen, Q., & Chen, M. (1999). The relationship between human resource and economic growth: An empirical study on Tianjin City. Economic Review, 5, 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., Cooper, W. W., Deng, H., Parker, B. R., & Ruefli, T. W. (2010). Entrepreneurial Talent and Economic Development in China. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 44, 178–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation for the support provided for this research by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers 71301030,71303061), the Humanities and Social Science Foundation at the Ministry of Education of China (Grant number 11YJCZH057) and the College Humanities and Social Science Project of Guangdong Province (Grant number 12ZS0080).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nuo Liao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, Y., Gao, S. & Liao, N. An Intelligent Computing Approach to Evaluating the Contribution Rate of Talent on Economic Growth. Comput Econ 48, 399–423 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-015-9536-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-015-9536-1

Keywords

Navigation