Skip to main content
Log in

Fiscal and Monetary Policy in a Basic Endogenous Growth Model

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a monetary endogenous growth model and analyse the effects of fiscal and monetary policy with real money as an argument in the utility function. We show that a balanced government budget gives a higher balanced growth rate and lower inflation than a situation with permanent public deficits. It also leads to higher welfare compared to a situation with permanent deficits when the government does not put a high weight on stabilizing debt. However, when governments run deficits with a high weight on stabilizing debt, comparative welfare effects depend on the initial conditions with respect to public debt. Further, for a given monetary policy a stricter debt policy yields higher growth, lower inflation and higher welfare. A rise in the nominal money supply can compensate the negative growth effects of a loose debt policy up to a certain point but only at the cost of higher inflation and lower welfare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See the paper by Piergallini and Rodano (2012) for further studies along this line.

  2. For an extensive survey of both empirical and theoretical studies dealing with the effects of public debt on growth, see e.g. Panizza and Presbitero (2013).

  3. Capital letters give nominal variables and lowercase letters stand for real variables. Further, we delete the time argument \(t\) as long as no unambiguity arises.

  4. The \(^{\star }\) denotes BGP values.

  5. Qualitatively, the outcome does not change for \(\gamma =0.15\). But to get plausible quantitative results we have to set \(A\) and the fiscal parameters \(\tau \) and \(t_p\) to different values then.

  6. The initial condition of \(v\) is set to \(v_0=0.5\) for the simulations in Tables 46. The qualitative outcome in those tables, however, is independent from \(v_0\) anyway.

References

  • Benhabib, J., & Farmer, R. (1994). Indeterminacy and Increasing Returns. Journal of Economic Theory, 63, 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, H. (1998). The behaviour of U.S. public debt and deficits. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 949–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincke, B., & Greiner, A. (2011). Do large industrialized economies pursue sustainable debt policies? A comparative study for Japan, Germany and the United States. Japan and the World Economy, 23, 202–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fincke, B., Greiner, A. (2011a). Debt sustainability in selected euro area countries. Empirical evidence estimating time-varying parameters. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 15(3), article 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillman, M., & Kejak, M. (2005). Contrasting Models of the effect of inflation on growth. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19, 113–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomme, P. (1993). Money and growth revisited: Measuring the costs of inflation in an endogenous growth model. Journal of Monetary Economics, 32, 51–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, A. (2008). Does it pay to have a balanced government budget? Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 164, 460–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, A. (2011). Economic growth, public debt and welfare: Comparing three budgetary rules. German Economic Review, 12, 205–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, A. (2012). Human capital formation, learning by doing and the government in the process of economic growth. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 51, 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, A. (2013). Sustainable public debt and economic growth under wage rigidity. Metroeconomica, 64, 272–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, A., & Flaschel, P. (2010). Public debt and public investment in an endogenous growth model with real wage rigidities. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 57, 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner, A., Köller, U., & Semmler, W. (2007). Debt sustainability in the European Monetary Union: Theory and empirical evidence for selected countries. Oxford Economic Papers, 59, 194–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. E., & Manuelli, R. E. (1995). Growth and the effects of inflation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 19, 1405–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeper, E. M. (1991). Equilibria under Active and Passive Monetary and Fiscal Policies. Journal of Monetary Economics, 27, 129–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panizza, U., Presbitero, A.F. (2013). Public debt and economic growth in advanced economies: A Survey. Money and Finance Research Group, Working paper no. 78.

  • Piergallini, A., Rodano, G. (2012). Public debt, distortionary taxation, and monetary policy. CEIS Tor Vergata, Research Paper Series, 10(2), no. 220.

  • Sidrauski, M. (1967). Inflation and economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 75, 796–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockman, A. C. (1981). Anticipated Inflation and the Capital Stock in a Cash-in-Advance Economy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 8, 387–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P., & Yip, C. K. (1992). Alternative approaches to money and growth. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 24, 553–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., & Zhang, J. (1998). Endogenous growth and the welfare costs of inflation: a reconsideration. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 22, 465–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfred Greiner.

Additional information

I thank two referees for valuable comments that helped to improve the paper.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Stability of the Balanced Budget Scenario

With a balanced government budget that implies \(\phi =-\theta z(k/y)\), the Jacobian of the dynamic system (23)–(25) is given by,

$$\begin{aligned} { J} = \left[ \begin{array}{c@{\quad }c@{\quad }c} {\partial \dot{x}}/{\partial x} &{} \theta x &{} -\beta x\\ {\partial \dot{z}}/{\partial x}&{} (\theta +\rho +\theta z) &{} -\beta z\\ 0 &{} 0 &{} -g \\ \end{array} \right] , \end{aligned}$$

where we also used \(\dot{v}=-v (\partial \dot{k}/{\partial k})\), \(x^{\star }/z^{\star }=\theta +\rho \) and \(v^{\star }=0\) on the BGP and the variables \(x\) and \(z\) are evaluated at the BGP. Since \({\partial \dot{x}}/{\partial x}=xC_2\) and \({\partial \dot{z}}/{\partial x}=zC_2-1\), with \(C_2=\partial (\dot{x}/x)/\partial x>0\), we get \(({\partial \dot{x}}/{\partial x})(\theta +\rho +\theta z) -\theta x({\partial \dot{z}}/{\partial x}) =xC_2(\theta +\rho )\) \(+\theta x>0\) as well as \(({\partial \dot{x}}/{\partial x})+(\theta +\rho +\theta z)>0\), so that there exists one negative eigenvalue of \(J\) given by \(-g\).\(\Box \)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greiner, A. Fiscal and Monetary Policy in a Basic Endogenous Growth Model. Comput Econ 45, 285–301 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-014-9421-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-014-9421-3

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation