Skip to main content
Log in

Political Elites, “Broken Windows”, and the Commodification of Urban Space

  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article seeks to uncover the reasons for acceptance of the “broken windows” hypothesis amongst New York City’s political elite. Previous critical approaches have generally sought to challenge broken windows by showing that it is empirically suspect. While such approaches are indispensable, they tend to avoid addressing the problem of why, despite its lack of empirical support, political elites continually endorse the broken windows hypothesis as if it were an indisputable, scientifically established truth. In order to address this problem and extend the critical literature, I utilize an interpretive approach based on political memos, press releases, and other political documents from the Giuliani and Bloomberg administrations. Through an analysis of the official response to graffiti, unruly individuals and noise, I argue that broken windows is embraced by political elites insofar as it serves the interests of growth machines, which essentially seek to commodify and exploit urban spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. It is perhaps worth emphasizing that the three urban “problems” under scrutiny are devoid of any absolute meaning, which is evident insofar as not everyone interprets them in the same way. It is known, for example, that most graffiti writers develop an interest in the practice after visually encountering graffiti that other individuals have produced in public space. In these cases, graffiti is often read as a possible avenue to a new and distinct identity (Kramer 2009). More obviously, the longstanding debate over whether graffiti is art or vandalism has by no means subsided. Thus, while people may know graffiti when they see it, they do not evaluate it in the same way. In fact, most of the intellectuals who have entered this debate have claimed that graffiti constitutes “art” (see Austin 2001; Castleman 1982; Ferrell 1993; Mailer 1974; Miller 2002; Rahn 2002; Spitz 1991; Stewart 1989). In relation to “unruly individuals”, it could be said that “squeegee men”, for example, are better understood as variations of Benson’s (1983) “penny capitalists” or innovative entrepreneurs, as opposed to a threat to “quality of life”. Some might even entertain the notion that such urban figures are simply poor. Moreover, Duneier’s analysis of street vendors has shown that “disorderly” individuals are actually quite committed to creating “orderly” social relations (Duneier 1999). And, of course, one person’s noise can easily become another’s music, or even “what it means to live in a city”.

    Almost needless to add in the present context, public officials never see graffiti, unruly individuals and noise in such terms. Instead, they consistently read such urban activities as ominous warnings of impending neighborhood collapse (Kramer 2009; 2010b). Not surprisingly, it is these interpretations that tend to dominate political debate and discourse, which occurs for two closely related reasons. First, as previous literature has shown (Austin 2001; Chomsky 1989; Ericson et al. 1989; Herman and Chomsky 2002; Molotch and Lester 1974, 1975), there are strong organizational links between the political sphere and the mass-print media, which allows public officials to broadcast their world-view more readily than others. Second, through new communicative technologies, such as the Internet, political elites can independently disseminate statements in the form of press releases, public addresses, or transcribed speeches.

  2. Hence the persistent efforts to regulate access to spray paint. In 1992, Mayor Dinkins banned the sale of spray paint to those below 18 years of age (Associated Press 1992). Subsequently, in 2005, Bloomberg banned its sale to those below the age of 21 (Bloomberg 2005b). Also worth noting, storeowners in New York City must keep spray paint in a locked cage or safely out of reach of consumers.

  3. Social scientists have often found that institutions devoted to social control are not used to police objective threats. Rather, they are often used to regulate and oppress a variety of “others”. Such “otherness” may be based on “race”, class, gender, sexuality, etc. The literature along these lines is too extensive to cite, but see for example Parenti (1999), Reiman (2005), and Western (2006).

  4. The context of Bourdieu’s statement, which cannot be reproduced in full here, indicates the connection between opposition to noise and specific social classes.

  5. I have discussed these connections in much greater detail elsewhere. See especially Kramer (2009, pp. 219–225) where over 30 documents are cited in support of the point being made here.

  6. Bloomberg clearly embraces the competitive spirit between cities and, more importantly, the way in which this stance readily accepts that the city is best understood and treated as a commodity: “New York is in a fierce, worldwide competition; our strategy must be to hone our competitive advantages. We must offer the best product—and sell it, forcefully”. Also, “To oversee our promotion and marketing efforts, we’ll establish a chief Marketing Officer for the city… we’ll take advantage of our brand” (Bloomberg 2003a).

  7. Most people in New York City do not own property. According to the 2000 census, only 30.2% of New York City’s population owns their own home, which is about half the national average.

  8. It is worth noting that there are many moments in the political discourse under scrutiny where the importance of being business-friendly is emphasized. The following examples are illustrative: “We’re also getting our economy back on track by making New York a more attractive place for major corporate employers” (Bloomberg 2003d); “… we’re making New York business-friendly. That means creating the infrastructure needed for economic growth (Bloomberg 2004a); “… we’re going to invest in economic development projects, make New York the most business-friendly city in the nation…” (Bloomberg 2006).

References

  • Associated Press. (1992). Anti-graffiti law signed. New York Times, 12, B4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R., & Flint, J. (2004). Order born of chaos? The capacity for informal social control in disempowered and ‘disorganized’ neighborhoods. Politics and Policy, 33, 333–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. (2001). Taking the train: How graffiti art became an urban crisis in New York City. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. (1995). The practice of social research (7th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. (1973). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J. (1983). The penny capitalists: A study of nineteenth century working-class entrepreneurs. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg, M. R. (2002a). Mayor urges community groups to join anti-graffiti efforts and improve quality of life. July 10, press release # 180-02. Downloaded from www.nyc.gov on 22 March 2006.

  • Bloomberg, M. R. (2002b). Improving our quality of life: Operation silent night. Open Letter (October 7).

  • Bloomberg, M. R. (2002c). New York City’s best days are still ahead. Open Letter (November 25).

  • Bloomberg, M. R. (2003a). Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg delivers 2003 state of the city address. January 23, press release # 024-03.

  • Bloomberg, M. R. (2003b). Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg announces ‘queen’s plaza clean-up to improve quality of life and promote economic development. February 25, press release # 056-03.

  • Bloomberg, M. R. (2003c). Driving crime down and revitalizing neighborhoods throughout the city. Open Letter (June 22).

  • Bloomberg, M. R. (2003d). Making our city stronger neighborhood by neighborhood. Open Letter (July 20).

  • Bloomberg, M. R. (2003e). Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg outlines public safety accomplishments in 2003. December 15, press release # 359-03.

  • Bloomberg, M. R. (2004a). 2004 State of the city address by Michael R. Bloomberg. Transcript of state of the city address (January 8).

  • Bloomberg, M. R. (2004b). Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and police commissioner Ray Kelly announce New York City remains nation’s safest big city. May 24, press release # 126-04.

  • Bloomberg, M. R. (2004c). Every New Yorker deserves to be safe. Open Letter (July 11).

  • Bloomberg, M. R. (2004d). Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and NYC tourism leaders announce record 38 million visitors in 2003. August 4, press release # 214-04.

  • Bloomberg, M. R. (2004e). Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg announces historic crime reduction in 2004. December 13, press release # 345-04.

  • Bloomberg, M. R. (2005a). Mayor Bloomberg discusses crime reduction strategies at Citizen’s Crime Commission breakfast. May 2, press release # 168-05.

  • Bloomberg, M. R. (2005b). Mayor Bloomberg signs legislation to fight Graffiti. December 29, press release # 486-05.

  • Bloomberg, M. R. (2006). Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg delivers 2006 state of the city address. January 26, press release # 030-06.

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, C. R. (2002). The span of collective efficacy: Extending social disorganization theory to partner violence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 833–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castleman, C. (1982). Getting up: Subway graffiti in New York. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1989). Necessary illusions: Thought control in democratic societies. Boston, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corman, H., & Mocan, N. (2005). Carrots, sticks and broken windows. Journal of Law and Economics, 48, 235–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (1990). City of quartz: Excavating the future in Los Angeles. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2002). Dead cities and other tales. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeKeseredy, W. S., et al. (2003). Perceived collective efficacy and women’s victimization in public housing. Criminal Justice, 3, 5–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1984). Purity and danger: An analysis of the concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Ark Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duneier, M. (1999). Side walk. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (2001). The elementary forms of the religious life (C. Cosman, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1986). Travels in hyper reality. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1978). The history of manners, the civilizing process (E. Jephcott, Trans.) (Vol. 1). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1968). The condition of the working class in England. California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericson, R. V., Baranek, P. M., & Chan, J. B. L. (1989). Negotiating control: A study of news sources. Toronto: Toronto University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, J. (1993). Crimes of style: Urban graffiti and the politics of criminality. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. M., & Beveridge, A. A. (2004). ‘Bad’ neighborhoods, fast food, ‘sleazy’ business, and drug dealers: Relations between the location of licit and illicit businesses in the urban environment. Journal of Drug Issues, 34, 51–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1965). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason (R. Howard, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garofalo, J., & Laub, J. (1978). The fear of crime: Broadening our perspective. Victimology, 3, 242–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gau, J. M., & Pratt, T. C. (2008). Broken windows or window dressing? Citizens’ (In)ability to tell the difference between disorder and crime. Criminology and Public Policy, 7(2), 163–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliani, R. W. (1995–1997). Recent task force accomplishments. From Giuliani papers, office of the mayor, folder title: Police department—graffiti. Location: folder # 0141; Roll # 60696 (NYC Municipal Archives).

  • Giuliani, R. W. (1995a). Mayor Giuliani kicks off adopt-A-highway maintenance provider program. March 23, press release # 124-95. From Giuliani papers, office of the mayor, folder title: March 1995. Location: folder # 16511; Roll # 60276.

  • Giuliani, R. W. (1995b). Mayor Giuliani removes graffiti from Queens borough Bridge. July 10, press release # 375-95. From Giuliani papers, office of the mayor, folder title: Anti-graffiti task force—executive order. Location: folder # 14983; roll # 60265.

  • Giuliani, R. W. (1995c). Mayor Giuliani presents proclamation to we care about New York. August 21, press release # 455-95. From Giuliani papers, office of the mayor, folder title: August 1995. Location: folder # 16516; Roll # 60276.

  • Giuliani, R. W. (1995d). Mayor Giuliani announced community anti-graffiti clean ups in Staten Island, Gramercy Park, and East Harlem. November 6, press release # 599-95. From Giuliani papers, office of the mayor, folder title: November 1995. Location: folder # 16519; roll # 60276.

  • Giuliani, R. W. (1996). NYC (Anti-Graffiti) technology expo ‘96. Brochure found in Giuliani papers, office of the mayor, folder title: Police department—Graffiti. Location: folder # 0141; roll # 60696.

  • Giuliani, R. W. (2000). Mayor Giuliani, police commissioner Kerik announce quality of life initiative 2000. November 14, press release # 429-00. Downloaded from www.nyc.gov on 25 January 2006.

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottdiener, M. (2001). The teeming of America: American dreams, media fantasies, and themed environments. Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1980). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, et al. (Eds.), Culture, media, language. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, B. E. (1998). Reflecting on the subject: A critique of the social influence conception of deterrence, the broken windows theory, and order-maintenance policing New York style. Michigan Law Review, 97, 299–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, B. E. (2001). Illusion of order: The false promise of broken windows policing. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, B. E., & Ludwig, J. (2006). Broken windows: New evidence from New York City and a five-city social experiment. University of Chicago Law Review, 73(1), 271–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, C. M., Webb, V. J., & Schaefer, D. R. (2001). Assessment of the impact of quality-of-life policing on crime and disorder. Justice Quarterly, 18(4), 825–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelling, G. L., & Bratton, W. J. (1998). Declining crime rates: Insiders’ views of the New York City story. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 1217–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelling, G. L., & Coles, C. M. (1996). Fixing broken windows: Restoring and reducing crime in our communities. New York: Martin Kessler Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelling, G. L., & Moore, M. H. (1988). The evolving strategy of policing. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/114213.pdf.

  • Kramer, R. (2009). A social history of graffiti writing in New York City, 1990–2005. PhD dissertation, Yale University: Department of Sociology.

  • Kramer, R. (2010a). Painting with permission: Legal graffiti in New York City. Ethnography, 11(2):235–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. (2010b). Moral panics and urban growth machines: Official reactions to graffiti in New York City, 1990–2005. Qualitative Sociology, 33(3):297–311.

  • Lemire, J. (2002). Graffiti kids tagged out, cleanup tied to lower crime, Daily News, June 3, Suburban, p. 1.

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology. Boston: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1969). The elementary structures of kinship. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. A., & Salem, G. (1986). Fear of crime. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., & Molotch, H. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailer, N. (1974). The faith of graffiti. New York: Praeger. (with photographs by Mervyn Kurlansky, Jon Naar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, I. L. (2002). Aerosol kingdom: Subway painters of New York City. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: Social justice and the fight for public space. New York: Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotch, H. (1976). The city as a growth machine. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 309–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molotch, H., & Lester, M. (1974). News as purposive behavior: On the strategic use of routine events, accidents and scandals. American Sociological Review, 39(1), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molotch, H., & Lester, M. (1975). Accidental news: The great oil spill as local occurrence and national event. American Journal of Sociology, 81(2), 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parenti, C. (1999). Lockdown America: Police and prisons in the age of crisis. London: Versoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattillo, M. E. (1998). Sweet mothers and gangbangers: Crime in a black middle-class neighborhood. Social Forces, 76, 747–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahn, J. (2002). Painting without permission: Hip-Hop graffiti subculture. Connecticut: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiman, J. H. (2005). The rich get richer and the poor get prison: Ideology, Class and Criminal Justice. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabol, W. J., Coulton, C. J., & Korbin, J. E. (2004). Building community capacity for violence prevention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 322–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (1976). Culture and practical reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 603–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2001). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. (1966). Course in general linguistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, R. (2007). Class acts: Service and inequality in luxury hotels. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E., & Miller, L. L. (2004). Sources of informal social control in Chicago neighborhoods. Criminology, 42, 551–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sites, W. (2003). Remaking New York: Primitive globalization and the politics of urban community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skogan, W. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American cities. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the revanchist city. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, G. (2009). Graffiti lives: Beyond the tag in New York’s urban underground. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorkin, M. (1992). Variations on a theme park: The New American city and the end of public space. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitz, E. H. (1991). Image and insight: Essays in psychoanalysis and the arts. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires, G. (1996). Partnership and the pursuit of the private city. In S. S. Fainstein & S. Campbell (Eds.), Readings in urban theory. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Jean, P. K. B. (2007). Pockets of crime: Broken windows, collective efficacy, and the criminal point of view. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. (1989). Subway graffiti: An aesthetic study of graffiti on the subway system of New York City, 1970–1978. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York University.

  • Stokes, R. J. (2006). Business improvement districts and inner city revitalization: The case of Philadelphia’s Frankford special services district. International Journal of Public Administration, 29, 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. S. (1970). The manufacture of madness: A comparative study of the inquisition and the mental health movement. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. B. (2001). Breaking away from broken windows: Baltimore neighborhoods and the nationwide fight against crime, grime, fear, and decline. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (1990). The tourist gaze: Leisure and travel in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1899). 1934 The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York: The Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitale, A. S. (2008). City of disorder: How the quality of life campaign transformed New York politics. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, R. W. (2006). Union square park: From blight to bloom. Economic Development Journal, 5(2), 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. (2006). ‘Policies in Motion’, urban management and state restructuring: The trans-local expansion of business improvement districts. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(1), 54–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1979). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, B. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1975). Thinking about crime. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly, 249, 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, J. L. (2006). The discriminant validity of perceptual incivility measures. Justice Quarterly, 23(3), 360–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, S. (1991). Landscapes of power: From Detroit to Disney world. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Kramer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kramer, R. Political Elites, “Broken Windows”, and the Commodification of Urban Space. Crit Crim 20, 229–248 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-011-9137-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-011-9137-9

Keywords

Navigation