Skip to main content
Log in

Youth offending and youth transitions: the power of capital in influencing change

  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neither the literature on offending nor that on desistance adequately explains the short-term nature of youth offending, young people’s propensity to desist from offending as they reach early adulthood and the importance of youth transitions in helping or hindering young people’s access to legitimate and conventional opportunities and responsibilities. It is suggested in this article that the three phases of offending—onset, maintenance and desistance—run parallel courses with the three phases of youth transitions—childhood, youth and adulthood and that both these processes are influenced by discrepancies in levels of capital for young people at each stage. In a recent Scottish study of desistance, Bourdieu’s concepts of capital are used to demonstrate the commonalities between youth offending and youth transitions and to better understand young people’s search for integration and recognition—whether this be through offending or conventionality. The article concludes that the concepts of capital and youth transitions could both be employed more usefully in the field of criminology to explain the transient nature of offending in youth and the greater likelihood of desistance once legitimate and sustainable opportunities are found to spend as well as to accumulate capital in early adulthood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term ‘taking on responsibilities’ in this context should not be confused with ‘responsibilization’, often cited in relation to restorative justice and the need for offenders to be confronted, challenged and held responsible for their actions (Raynor 2004).

  2. The term ‘generativity’ here means having the desire to care for others and to feel needed through productive and intergenerational outlets. Maruna (2001) cites a typology of generativity by Stewart et al. (1988) which includes caring for others; making a lasting contribution; concern for one’s offspring; being needed; and productivity/growth.

References

  • Barry, M. (2006). Youth offending in transition: The search of social recognition. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, A., Shapland, J., Costello, A., Holmes, D., & Muir, G. (2004). Towards desistance: Theoretical underpinnings for an empirical study. The Howard Journal, 43(4), 368–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7, 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power, edited and introduced by J.B. Thompson, translated by G. Raymond and M. Adamson, Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Byrne, C., & Trew, K. (2005). Crime orientations, social relations and involvement in crime: Patterns emerging from offenders’ accounts. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44(2), 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P., & Worrall, A. (Eds.) (1987). Gender, crime and justice. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(suppl), S95–S120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. V. (1986). The reasoning criminal. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrall, S. (Ed.) (2000). The termination of criminal careers. Aldershot: Ashgate.

  • Farrall, S., & Bowling, B. (1999). Structuration, human development and desistance from crime. British Journal of Criminology, 39(2), 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. (1986). Stepping stones to adult criminal careers. In D. Olweus, J. Blackand, & M. R. Yarrow (Eds), Development of antisocial and prosocial behaviour. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, A., & Cartmel, F. (1997). Young people and social change: Individualization and risk in late modernity. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., & Bowling, B. (1995). Young people and crime. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, J., McIvor, G., & Murray, C. (1999). Understanding offending among young people. Edinburgh: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, R. (1997). Youth, social exclusion and the millennium. In R. MacDonald (Ed.), Youth, the ‘underclass’ and social exclusion. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald R., & Marsh, J. (2005). Disconnected youth? growing up in Britain’s poor neighbourhoods. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, F. (2006). A desistance paradigm for offender management. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6(1), 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacRae, R. (2002). Becoming a Clubber: Transitions, Identities and Lifestyles, Unpublished PhD thesis, Stirling: University of Stirling.

  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matza, D. (1964). Delinquency and Drift. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, V. (2001). Young people’s explanations and experiences of social exclusion: retrieving Bourdieu’s concept of social capital. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 21(4/5/6), 37–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presdee, M. (2000). Cultural criminology and the carnival of crime. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynor, P. (2004). Opportunity, motivation and change: some findings from research on resettlement. In R. Burnett, & C. Roberts (Eds.), What Works in Probation and Youth Justice: Developing evidence-based practice. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shover, N. (1996). Great pretenders: Pursuits and careers of persistent thieves. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender: Becoming respectable. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, D., & Squires, P. (2003). ‘Adults don’t realize how sheltered they are’: A contribution to the debate on youth transitions from some voices on the margins. Journal of Youth Studies, 6(2), 145–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A. J., Franz, C., & Layton, L. (1988). The changing self: Using personal documents to study lives. Journal of Personality, 56, 41–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1967). The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndombu ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyn, J., & White, R. (1997). Rethinking youth. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monica Barry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barry, M. Youth offending and youth transitions: the power of capital in influencing change. Crit Crim 15, 185–198 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-007-9024-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-007-9024-6

Keywords

Navigation