Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Protest policing and policing protesters: Litigation in the U.S. circuit courts of appeals

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 25 April 2024

This article has been updated

Abstract

After the surge in political protests during the summer of 2020, protest rights have been thrust into the forefront of the nation’s consciousness. Specifically, questions have arisen with respect to the boundaries of the First Amendment rights of protesters, in addition to the duty of police officers to maintain public safety and order. In this article, the interpretation and application of relevant First Amendment precedents involving protest policing and the policing of protesters are examined using cases decided by the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals. Using inductive, qualitative doctrinal methods in the tradition of grounded theory, four overarching themes emerged among the caselaw: place of protest, protest permits, law enforcement misconduct, and ordinances that restrict protests. Findings from the court rulings emphasize the importance of supervision of law enforcement and adequate training of officers who police protests. While order maintenance and public safety remain critical, law enforcement must internalize the importance of their role in protecting the First Amendment right to protest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  • Abbey, C. N. (2015). Agents of change: How police and the courts misuse the law to silence mass protests. National Lawyers Guild Review, 72(2), 81–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, F. (2005). Speaking freely: Trials of the First Amendment. Viking.

  • Adamson, B. (2016). Thugs, crooks, and rebellious negroes: Racist and racialized media coverage of Michael Brown and the Ferguson demonstrations. Harvard Journal on Racial & Ethnic Justice, 32, 189–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariel, B. (2016). Increasing cooperation with the police using body worn cameras. Police Quarterly, 19(3), 326–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariel, B., Farrar, W. A., & Sutherland, A. (2015). The effect of police body-worn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(3), 509–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariel, B., Sutherland, A., Henstock, D., Young, J., Drover, P., Sykes, J., Megicks, S., & Henderson, R. (2018). Paradoxical effects of self-awareness of being observed: Testing the effect of police body-worn cameras on assaults and aggression against officers. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 14(1), 19–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin approves $2.95m settlement for teen injured by police. (2022, March 3). Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/police-austin-texas-george-floyd-36e2eaac2e02006733c7d4174b7e6d20

  • Bailey, H. (2022, March 9). Minneapolis leaders mishandled response to protests after George Floyd’s killing, new report finds. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/03/09/minneapolis-police-department-report/

  • Balsamo, M. (2022, February 25). Feds should create guidelines on less-lethal weapons. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/business-police-george-floyd-gun-politics-only-on-ap-f08ee60d35f32d832f6c5dd3f9469216

  • Bell v. Keating, 697 F.3d 445 (7th Cir. 2012).

  • Bhagwat, A. (2016). The democratic First Amendment. Northwestern University Law Review, 110(5), 1097–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borysovych, O. V., Chaiuk, T. A., & Karpova, K. S. (2020). Black Lives Matter: Race discourse and the semiotics of history reconstruction. Journal of History Culture & Art Research / Tarih Kültür ve Sanat Arastirmalari Dergisi, 9(3), 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, L., Bui, Q., & Patel, J. K. (2020, July 3). Black Lives Matter may be the largest movement in U.S. history. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/07/03/us/george-floyd-protests-crowd-size.html

  • Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969).

  • Burk v. Augusta-Richmond County, 365 F.3d 1247 (11th Cir. 2004).

  • California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. (2021). POST guidelines—crowd management, intervention and control. https://post.ca.gov/Portals/0/post_docs/publications/Crowd_Management.pdf

  • Cantwell v. State of Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940).

  • Channing, I. (2018). Policing extreme political protest: A historical evaluation of police prejudice. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 14(4), 900–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenoweth, E., & Pressman, J. (2020, October 20). Black Lives Matter protesters were overwhelmingly peaceful, our research finds. The Spokesman-Review. https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2020/oct/20/erica-chenoweth-and-jeremy-pressman-black-lives-ma/

  • Chynoweth, P. (2009). Legal research. In A. Knight, & L. Ruddock (Eds.), Advanced research methods in the built environment (pp. 28–38). Wiley.

  • Cidell, J. (2020). Mobility, protest, and legislative backlash: State-level sponsorship of antiprotest legislation in the United States in 2017. The Professional Geographer, 72(4), 556–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox v. State of Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536 (1965).

  • Cox, A. (1986). First Amendment Society, 24(1), 8–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, E. (2006). Protecting the president from protest: Using the secret service’s zone of protection to prosecute protesters. Journal of Gender Race & Justice, 9(3), 665–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, F. B. (2003). Decision making in the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals. California Law Review, 91(6), 1457–1516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross v. Mokwa, 547 F.3d 890 (8th Cir. 2008).

  • Della Porta, D., & Fillieule, O. (2004). Policing social protests. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 217–241). Blackwell Publishing.

  • Doherty, C., Kiley, J., Asheer, N., & Jordan, C. (2020, September 2). In views of U.S. democracy, widening partisan divides over freedom to peacefully protest: Majority of Americans say significant changes are needed in the ‘fundamental design and structure of American government.’ Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2020/09/02/in-views-of-u-s-democracy-widening-partisan-divides-over-freedom-to-peacefully-protest/

  • Earl, J., & Soule, S. (2006). Seeing blue: A police-centered explanation of protest policing. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 11(2), 145–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, J., Hurwitz, H. M., Mesinas, A. M., Tolan, M., & Arlotti, A. (2013). This protest will be tweeted. Information Communication & Society, 16(4), 459–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edrei v. Maguire, 892 F.3d 525 (2nd Cir. 2018).

  • Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 (1963).

  • Egan, T. M. (2002). Grounded theory research and theory building. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3), 277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Haj, T. (2014). All assemble: Order and disorder in law, politics, and culture. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(4), 949–1040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elend v. Basham, 471 F.3d 1199 (11th Cir. 2006).

  • Ely, J. H. (1975). Flag desecration: A case study in the roles of categorization and balancing in First Amendment analysis. Harvard Law Review, 88(7), 1482–1508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel, S. (2021). Regulation of context— Time, place, and manner. Constitutional law (Vol. 38th, pp. 518–554). Wolters Kluwer.

  • Endres, D., & Senda-Cook, S. (2011). Location matters: The rhetoric of place in protest. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 97(3), 257–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, L. (2013). The Iraq War ten years on: Assessing the fallout. International Affairs, 89(2), 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feiner v. New York, 340 U.S. 315 (1951).

  • Ferguson, D. (2023, April 3). Masters ’23: 20 years after protests, women still look ahead. Associated Press [AP]. https://apnews.com/article/masters-martha-burk-women-golf-suzy-whaley-46d

  • Gaffney, A. W., McCormick, D., Woolhandler, S., & Himmelstein, D. U. (2020, July 4). U.S. law enforcement crowd control tactics at anti-racism protests: A public health threat. The Lancet, 396, p. 21.

  • Gates v. Khokhar, 884 F.3d 1290 (11th Cir. 2018).

  • Gillham, P. F. (2011). Securitizing America: Strategic incapacitation and the policing of protest since the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks. Sociology Compass, 5(7), 636–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, R. (2017, July 16). Hootie Johnson, 86; fought admission of women at Masters. New York Times, p. 15A.

  • Gorringe, H., & Rosie, M. (2013). We will facilitate your protest: Experiments with liaison policing. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 7(2), 204–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grefrath, L. (2019). #LosingTheThread: Recognizing assembly rights in the new public forum. Brooklyn Law Review, 85(1), 217–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankins, K. (2022). Framing the litterbug: Picturing and policing public cleanliness in mid-twentieth century Philadelphia. Journal of Urban History, 48(6), 1383–1406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansford, J. (2018). The First Amendment freedom of assembly as a racial project. Yale Law Journal Forum, 127, 685–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman v. Thompson, 931 F.3d 471 (6th Cir. 2019).

  • Hinkle, R. K. (2015). Legal constraint in the U.S. Courts of Appeals. Journal of Politics, 77(3), 721–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, T., & Duncan, N. (2012). Defining and describing what we do: Doctrinal legal research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inazu, J. D. (2010). The forgotten freedom of assembly. Tulane Law Review, 84(3), 565–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inazu, J. D. (2012). Liberty’s refuge: The forgotten freedom of assembly. Yale University Press.

  • Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection. (2020). Law enforcement guidance for demonstrations following the 2020 election. https://www.law.georgetown.edu/icap/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2020/10/ICAP-Post-Election-Law-Enforcement-Guidance-Final.pdf

  • Jones v. Parmley, 465 F.3d 46 (2nd Cir. 2006).

  • Johnson, G. (2022). Defending the sacred into the future-defend the sacred: Native American religious freedom beyond the First Amendment, by Michael D. McNally. Princeton University Press, 2020. Pp. 400. Journal of Law and Religion, 37(1), 170–174.

  • Jones-Eversley, S., Adedoyin, A. C., Robinson, M. A., & Moore, S. E. (2017). Protesting black inequality: A commentary on the civil rights movement and Black Lives Matter. Journal of Community Practice, 25(3–4), 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalich, S., & Ahmed, S. (2020, May 30). Gov. Newsom declares state of emergency in LA on fourth day of protests. NBC Los Angeles. https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/downtown-los-angeles-protest-george-floyd-black-lives-matter-lapd/2371024/

  • Kingsley v. Hendrickson, 576 U.S. 389 (2015).

  • Korac, S. T. (2020). The late modern warfare and controversies of non-lethality. Review of International Affairs, 71(1180), 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotlowski, D. J. (2003). Alcatraz, wounded knee, and beyond: The Nixon and Ford administrations response to Native American protest. Pacific Historical Review, 72(2), 201–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, D. T. (1999). Hanging out the no vacancy sign: Eliminating the blight of vacant buildings from urban areas. New York University Law Review, 74, 1139–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaMonica, M. J. (2018). First Amendment for beginners. For Beginners LLC.

  • Law Enforcement Policy Center. (2019, April). Crowd management. International Association of Chiefs of Police. https://www.theiacp.org/sites/default/files/2020-08/Crowd%20Management%20FULL%20-%2008062020.pdf

  • Loor, K. J. P. (2019). When protest is the disaster: Constitutional implications of state and local emergency power. Seattle University Law Review, 43(1), 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, R. P. (2009). Public health, the APHA, and urban renewal. American Journal of Public Health, 99(9), 1603–1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lum, C., Koper, C. S., Wilson, D. B., Stoltz, M., Goodier, M., Eggins, E., Higginson, A., & Mazerolle, L. (2020). Body-worn cameras’ effects on police officers and citizen behavior: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 16(3), e1112.

  • Maguire, E. R. (2015). New direction in protest policing. Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 35(1), 67–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, E., Barak, M., Wells, W., & Katz, C. (2018). Attitudes towards the use of violence against police among Occupy Wall Street protesters. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 14(4), 883–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansoor, S. (2020, September 5). 93% of Black Lives Matter protests have been peaceful, new report finds. Time. https://time.com/5886348/report-peaceful-protests/

  • McCabe v. Parker, 608 F.3d 1068 (8th Cir. 2010), on remand, McCabe v. Mais, WL3938383 (N.D. Iowa 2010).

  • McCarthy, J., & McPhail, C. (1998). Places of protest: The public forum in principle and practice. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 11(2), 229–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menotti v. City of Seattle, 409 F.3d 1113 (9th Cir. 2005).

  • Meyer, D. S., & Tarrow, S. (2019). War, peace, and social movements. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, H. Kriesk, & H. J. McCammon (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (2nd ed., pp. 651–665). Wiley Blackwell.

  • Mitchell, D., & Staeheli, L. A. (2005). Permitting protest: Parsing the fine geography of dissent in America. International Journal of Urban & Regional Research, 29(4), 796–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. N. (2021). Rethinking disorderly conduct. California Law Review, 109, 1637–1702.

    Google Scholar 

  • NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co., 458 U.S. 886 (1982).

  • Newman, C. J. (2012). A requiem for protest: Anglo-American perspectives on protest post-9/11. John Marshall Law Review, 46(2), 455–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolasco, C. A. R., Vaughn, M. S., & del Carmen, R. V. (2010). Toward a new methodology for legal research in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 21(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novick, R., & Pickett, J. T. (2022). Black Lives Matter, protest policing, and voter support for police reform in Portland, Oregon. Race & Justice, Online First, https://doi.org/10.1177/21533687221117281

  • Nylund, D. (2003). Taking a slice of sexism: The controversary over the exclusionary membership practices of the Augusta National Golf Club. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 27(2), 195–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Occupy Columbia v. Haley, 738 F.3d 107 (4th Cir. 2013).

  • Okafor, V. O. (2015). Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, Eric Garner, et al.: A survey of emergent grassroots protests and public perceptions of justice. Journal of Pan African Studies, 7(8), 43–63.

  • Oritz, I., Burke, S., Berrada, M., & Cortes, H. S. (2022). World protests: A study of key protest issues in the 21st century. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Paff v. Kaltenbach, 204 F.3d 425 (3rd Cir. 2000).

  • Pahls v. Thomas, 718 F.3d 1210 (10th Cir. 2013).

  • Parker, K., Horowitz, J., & Anderson, M. (2020, June 12). Amid protests, majorities across racial and ethnic groups express support for the Black Lives Matter movement: Deep partisan divides over factors underling George Floyd demonstrations. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/06/12/amid-protests-majorities-across-racial-and-ethnic-groups-express-support-for-the-black-lives-matter-movement/

  • Perrine, A. (2001). The First Amendment versus the World Trade Organization: Emergency powers and the battle in Seattle. Washington Law Review, 76(2), 635–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, G. (2020). Promoting protesters’ compliance: The effect of general perceptions of the police versus police actions. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 15(2), 1245–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plog, K. (2020, May 31). Seattle mayor orders emergency curfew, calls upon National Guard after protests escalate. KNKX Public Radio. https://www.knkx.org/news/2020-05-30/seattle-mayor-orders-emergency-curfew-calls-upon-national-guard-after-protests-escalate

  • Ralphs, R., Medina, J., & Aldridge, J. (2009). Who needs enemies with friends like these? The importance of place for young people living in known gang areas. Journal of Youth Studies, 12(5), 483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recommendations for First Amendment-protected events for state and local law enforcement agencies. (2011). U.S. Bureau of Justice Assistance. https://ncirc.bja.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh326/files/media/document/recommendations.pdf

  • Reform America v. City of Detroit, Michigan, 37 F.4th 1138 (6th Cir. 2022).

  • Reid, J. C., & Craig, M. O. (2021). Is it a rally or a riot? Racialized media framing of 2020 protests in the United States. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 19(3–4), 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds-Stenson, H. (2018). Protesting the police: Anti-police brutality claims as a predictor of police repression of protest. Social Movement Studies, 17(1), 48–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, A. (2017). Anti-protest laws: Lock up your names. Alternative Law Journal, 42(2), 107–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schirmer v. Nagode, 621 F.3d 581 (7th Cir. 2010).

  • Schmidt, R. (2000). Red scare: FBI and the origins of anticommunism in the United States, 1919–1943. Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen.

  • Schmidt, S. J., & Babits, C. (2014). Occupy Wall Street as a curriculum of space. Journal of Social Studies Research, 38, 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroedel, J. R., & Chin, R. J. (2020). Whose lives matter: The media’s failure to cover police use of lethal force against Native Americans. Race & Justice, 10(2), 150–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seattle Affiliate of the October 22nd Coalition to Stop Police Brutality, Repression, and Criminalization of a Generation v. City of Seattle, 550 F.3d 788 (9th Cir. 2008).

  • Seligson, R. A., & Warnlof, J. S. (1972). The use of unreported cases in California. Hastings Law Journal, 24(1), 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett v. U.S., 667 F.3d 331 (4th Cir. 2012).

  • Slevin, C. (2022, April 1). $14m jury award for protesters could resonate around US. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/death-of-george-floyd-denver-protesters-jury-award-23dff0aa2a476a1cf2a1eb4b267b637d

  • Snider v. City of Cape Girardeau, 752 F.3d 1149 (8th Cir. 2014).

  • Soule, S. A., & Davenport, C. (2009). Velvet glove, iron fist, or even hand? Protest policing in the United States, 1960–1990. Mobilization: An International Journal, 14(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staggenborg, S. (2022). Social movements (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

  • Sugars, S. (2021, December 16). At least 60 journalists have sued police, following arrests, assaults at protests. Freedom of the Press Foundation. https://pressfreedomtracker.us/blog/at-least-60-journalists-have-sued-police-following-arrests-assaults-at-protests/

  • Tarrow, S. (2022). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

  • Taylor, A. (2021, November 4). Why is the world protesting so much? A new study claims to have some answers. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/11/04/protests-global-study/

  • TCR Staff. (2022a, February 28). Police need training in less lethal tools to deal with protests. The Crime Report. https://thecrimereport.org/2022/02/28/police-need-training-in-less-lethal-tools-in-dealing-with-protestsreport/#:%7e:text = The%20convergence%20of%20he%20COVID,PERF)%20in%20a%20new%20report.

  • TCR Staff. (2022b, March 10). George Floyd protests worsened by city and police response. The Crime Report. https://thecrimereport.org/2022/03/10/report-george-floyd-protests-worsened-by-police-response/

  • Terminiello v. City of Chicago, 337 U.S. 1 (1949).

  • Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989).

  • The role of state and local law enforcement at First Amendment events line officer reference card (n.d.). U.S. Bureau of Justice Assistance. https://ncirc.bja.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh326/files/media/document/Role_of_Law_Enforcement.pdf

  • Tyler, T. R. (2011). Why people cooperate. Princeton University Press.

  • U.S. v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310 (1990).

  • Vaughn, M. S. (1996). Police civil liability and the First Amendment: Retaliation against citizens who criticize and challenge the police. Crime & Delinquency, 42(1), 50–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, M. S. (1997). First Amendment civil liability against law enforcement supervisors for violating their subordinates’ rights to engage in overt political expression. Policing: An International Journal, 20(2), 270–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, M. S., & Kappeler, V. E. (1999). Law enforcement: Pissing off the police— police civil liability under the First Amendment and the fighting words doctrine. Criminal Law Bulletin, 35(6), 594–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vodak v. City of Chicago, 639 F.3d 738 (7th Cir. 2011).

  • Volcler, J. (2015). Extremely loud: Sound as a weapon. New Press.

  • Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781 (1989).

  • Webster, B., & Connors, E. F. (1993). Police methods for identifying community problems. American Journal of Police, 12(1), 75–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerland, C., Segal, J. A., Epstein, L., Cameron, C. M., & Comparato, S. (2010). Strategic defiance and compliance in the U.S. Courts of Appeals. American Journal of Political Science, 54(4), 891–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. (2017). Retaliatory arrests and the First Amendment: The chilling effects of Hartment v. Moore on the freedom of speech in the age of civilian vigilance. UCLA Law Review, 64, 1328–1371.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, Sam Houston State University, 816 17th St, PO Box 2296, Huntsville, TX, 77341-2296, USA

    Allison G. Kondrat & Michael S. Vaughn

Authors
  1. Allison G. Kondrat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael S. Vaughn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allison G. Kondrat.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: Modifications have been made to the text and references. Full information regarding the corrections made can be found in the erratum/correction for this article.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kondrat, A.G., Vaughn, M.S. Protest policing and policing protesters: Litigation in the U.S. circuit courts of appeals. Crime Law Soc Change (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-024-10147-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-024-10147-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation