Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measurement of public opinions on security: the case from Malaysia

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The measurement of security perception is necessary as one of the tools to assess the effectiveness of security policies and enforcement in a country. The aim of the paper is two-fold. Firstly, the study presents an attempt to develop the Security Perception Index (PSI) based on Malaysia’s specific context. Secondly, the study purports to measure the perception of Malaysia’s security for the year 2021 using the developed PSI framework. Six domains were utilised based on the country's national policies on security and public order, such as the National Security Policy (2021–2025) and the Security and Public Order Policy (2019). A total of 15,461 samples were collected within the period of three months. The perception index score is 64.67%, which falls into the "perceived as safe" category and implies that the public perceives Malaysia as a safe country to live and work in. The scores are also calculated for each state and the Federal Territories, with Johor obtaining the highest score (72.37%) and Sabah with the lowest score (54.3%). Implications of the study include prevention and monitoring, law enforcement, and community engagement. Future studies should consider integrating secondary data such as crime, crime scene frequency, and visualisation using geographical information systems (GIS) to provide more integrated and real-time information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available on request due to privacy or other restrictions.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the research of the Malaysian Perception of Security Index 2021, funded by the Institute of Public Security of Malaysia (IPSOM), Ministry of Home Affairs (MOHA), and Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Strategic Research Partnership (SRP) research grant. The views expressed in this paper are entirely by the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of UiTM and IPSOM. All data and underlying source codes are available upon request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Sidek, N.Z.M. – Original draft, data curation, methodology, run regression, review and editing.

Shaharudin, M.R.—Original draft, data curation, methodology, run regression, review and editing.

Abdullah, W.N. – Literature review, data collection, introduction, conclusion.

Hamid, N. A.—Literature review, data collection, conclusion.

Noor, N.M.—Literature review, data collection, conclusion, findings.

Arsad, A. R.—Methodology, data collection, data analysis.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohd Rizaimy Shaharudin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sidek, N.Z.M., Shaharudin, M.R., Abdullah, W.N. et al. Measurement of public opinions on security: the case from Malaysia. Crime Law Soc Change (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-024-10145-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-024-10145-x

Keywords

Navigation