Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  1. Home
  2. Criminal Law Forum
  3. Article
Accountability for Corporate Human Rights Abuses: Lessons from the Possible Exercise of Dutch National Criminal Jurisdiction over Multinational Corporations
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

When Rights Enter the CSR Field: British Firms’ Engagement with Human Rights and the UN Guiding Principles

13 April 2021

Alvise Favotto & Kelly Kollman

International Economic Criminal Law

28 September 2018

Kai Ambos

The Effectiveness of Human Rights Due Diligence for Preventing Business Human Rights Abuses

25 November 2021

Robert McCorquodale & Justine Nolan

Conceptualizing Corporate Accountability in International Law: Models for a Business and Human Rights Treaty

17 October 2020

Nadia Bernaz

The EU Whistleblowing Directive: An Opportunity for (Operationalizing) Corporate Human Rights Grievance Mechanisms?

09 November 2021

Juho Saloranta

The Merowe Dam Project – When Does the Coin Flip from Legal Business Activity to Criminal Behavior? Reflections on the Concept of Guarantor’s Liablity in the Context of Transnational Business Activities

22 October 2018

Miriam Saage-Maaß

The Unrealized Potential of National Human Rights Institutions in Business and Human Rights Regulation: Conditions for Effective Engagement and Proposal for Reform

10 November 2021

René Wolfsteller

Putting the French Duty of Vigilance Law in Context: Towards Corporate Accountability for Human Rights Violations in the Global South?

24 October 2020

Almut Schilling-Vacaflor

Corporate social responsibility and accountability: a new theoretical foundation for regulating CSR

14 April 2020

Mallika Tamvada

Download PDF
  • Open Access
  • Published: 12 August 2017

Accountability for Corporate Human Rights Abuses: Lessons from the Possible Exercise of Dutch National Criminal Jurisdiction over Multinational Corporations

  • Cedric Ryngaert  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3060-94531 

Criminal Law Forum volume 29, pages 1–24 (2018)Cite this article

  • 3122 Accesses

  • 7 Citations

  • 10 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

In the implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, little emphasis has been put on the criminal law as a mechanism to hold corporations to account. From a doctrinal perspective, the main stumbling block for a more intensive use of the criminal law appears to be how to establish jurisdiction and liability with regard to corporate involvement in human rights violations in transnational supply-chains. On closer inspection, however, domestic criminal law offers surprising, although largely untested opportunities in this respect. Criminal liability could notably be based on violations of a corporate duty of care violation, whereas jurisdiction could, relatively non-controversially, be grounded on the principles of territoriality, nationality, and universality. The Dutch criminal law system is used as a case-study in this article.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Law, Utrecht University, Achter Sint Pieter 200, 3512HT, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Cedric Ryngaert

Authors
  1. Cedric Ryngaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cedric Ryngaert.

Additional information

Professor of Public International Law, Utrecht University, 3512HT Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: C.M.J.Ryngaert@uu.nl.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ryngaert, C. Accountability for Corporate Human Rights Abuses: Lessons from the Possible Exercise of Dutch National Criminal Jurisdiction over Multinational Corporations. Crim Law Forum 29, 1–24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-017-9330-y

Download citation

  • Published: 12 August 2017

  • Issue Date: March 2018

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-017-9330-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.