Skip to main content
Log in

The Relationship Between Body Mass Index, Implicit Weight Bias, and Social Anxiety in Undergraduate Women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Peer victimization is linked to social anxiety (SA), and rates of bullying are significantly higher for individuals at higher weights. However, research has yet to examine whether implicit weight bias exacerbates this link.

Methods

This study examined the relationships between body mass index (BMI), SA, and implicit weight bias in undergraduate women (N = 186; 54.8% White; MBMI = 25.97). Participants completed questionnaires pertaining to SA, stigmatizing attitudes toward weight, and two implicit association tests (IATs) used to measure anti-fat attitudes. IATs required categorization of words into attribute category pairs good vs. bad and motivated vs. lazy.

Results

BMI and SA were not significantly related. Implicit weight bias assessed by the good/bad IAT moderated the relationship between BMI and SA. Implicit weight bias assessed by the lazy/motivated IAT moderated the relationship between BMI and SA at the trend level (p = .06). Higher BMI was associated with higher SA in individuals with high, but not low, implicit weight bias. Implicit weight bias was associated with internalization of the thin ideal but not explicit weight bias.

Conclusions

Therapeutic interventions for SA among individuals with high BMI should explore internalized weight stigma, which may take the form of implicit attitudes or beliefs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1In the present study, we chose to examine these questions in women only due to a number of gender differences in the relevant areas of research. First, there are gender differences in implicit weight identity: both men and women explicitly reported accurate appraisals of their weight, whereas men (but not women) implicitly self-identified as “light” regardless of their actual weight (Grover et al., 2003). In addition, some forms of weight stigma are more prominent in women compared to men: wage and employment discrimination and weight stigma in dating and sexual relationships were found more frequently in women compared to men (Puhl & Heuer, 2009). Additionally, studies suggest that girls and women (as compared to boys and men) are at greater risk of not being liked, having fewer friends, and having more relationship difficulties due to being at higher weights (e.g., Boyes & Latner, 2009; Penny & Haddock, 2007; Sarlio-Lahteenkorva, 2001). Thus, we chose to limit our investigation to women, who seem to be at greatest risk for stigma, exclusion, body image issues, and resulting psychopathology.

  2. A note about SA and the SA measures: The SIAS-S and SPS were used to examine prevalence rates of SAD. If an individual met the clinical cutoff on either the SIAS-S or SPS, then that individual was classified as having a probable diagnosis of SAD. The SA composite measure was utilized for all remaining analyses examining SA as a continuous construct.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard G. Heimberg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Simona C. Kaplan, Rachel M. Butler and Richard G. Heimberg have no known conflict of interest to disclose.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Animal Rights

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The content of this manuscript reports on previously unpublished work from Dr. Simona C. Kaplan’s dissertation: Kaplan, S.C. (2020). Body mass index and social anxiety: Effects of implicit weight bias and body salience in undergraduate women [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Temple University.

Positionality Statement: As our identities can influence our approach to science, the authors would like to disclose that all three authors identify as White, two authors identify as cisgender females, and one author identifies as a cisgender male.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaplan, S.C., Butler, R.M. & Heimberg, R.G. The Relationship Between Body Mass Index, Implicit Weight Bias, and Social Anxiety in Undergraduate Women. Cogn Ther Res 47, 761–771 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-023-10404-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-023-10404-6

Keywords

Navigation