Skip to main content
Log in

Interpretation Bias and Social Anxiety

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Socially anxious (SA) individuals interpret ambiguous social events negatively. It is not clear, however, whether this bias is due to general distress (e.g., depression and general anxiety) or level of social anxiety. In the current study we conducted two experiments examining interpretation bias in SA individuals using videos. Each video involved an actor or actress who approached the camera and commented on some aspect of the individual’s belongings or actions. Twenty-four (24) videos were ambiguous (e.g., “That is an interesting shirt you have on”), 24 were positive (e.g., “I really like your shoes”), and 24 were negative (e.g., “That is a horrible hair cut”). Participants were instructed to rate the emotional valance of each video as to how they would feel in that situation. SA individuals rated the valance of ambiguous social interactions as more negative than did nonanxious individuals. Moreover, SA individuals maintained this bias when compared to a high trait anxious and dysphoric control group. These findings demonstrate the unique role of social anxiety in the biased interpretation of ambiguous social interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1988). Depressive realism: Four theoretical perspectives. In L. B. Alloy (Eds). Cognitive processes in depression (pp. 223–265) New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.

  • Amir, N., Bower, E., Briks, J., & Freshman, M. (2003). Implicit memory for positive and negative social information in individuals with and without social anxiety. Cognition and Emotion, 17, 567–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amir, N., Foa, E. B., & Coles, M. (1998). Social phobics’ evaluation of ambiguous situations. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 945–957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., & Steer, R. A. (1987). Beck depression inventory manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive processes in anxiety. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5, 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constans, J. I., Penn, D. L., Ihen, G. H., & Hope, D. A. (1999). Interpretive biases for ambiguous stimuli in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 643–651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., Franklin, M. E., Perry, K. J., & Herbert, J. D. (1996). Cognitive biases in generalized social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105(3), 433–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garber, J., & Hollon, S. (1991). What can specificity designs say about causality in psychopathology research? Psychological Bulletin, 110, 129–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McNally, R. J. (2001). On the scientific status of cognitive appraisal models of anxiety disorders. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 513–521.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G., & Chapman, J. (2001). Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 40–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pozo, C., Carver, C. S., Wellens, A. R., & Scheier, M. F. (1991). Social anxiety and social perception: Construing others’ reaction to the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 355–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., Gursky, D. M., & McNally, R. J. (1986). Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency and the predictions of fearfulness. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, D., Antory, M., & Swinson, R. (2001). Interpretations for anxiety symptoms in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 129–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopa, L., & Clark, D. (2000). Social phobia and the interpretation of social events. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 273–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veljaca, K., & Rapee, R. M. (1998). Detection of negative and positive audience behaviours by socially anxious subjects. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 311–321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, & Salkovskis. (1997). Information processing in spider phobics: The stroop colour naming task may indicate strategic but not automatic attentional bias. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, S. M., & Beidel, D. C. (1988). Some further comments on the measurement of social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26, 411–413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 33, 448–457.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nader Amir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amir, N., Beard, C. & Bower, E. Interpretation Bias and Social Anxiety. Cogn Ther Res 29, 433–443 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-2834-5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-2834-5

Keywords

Navigation