Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Disclose to Tell: a Data Design Framework for Alternative Narratives

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data visualization for alternative narratives is a powerful adversarial tool that seeks to inquire about the existing conditions of conflicts. Nowadays, data visualization is widely used in activist communication to offer data-driven counternarratives to those with dominant power. However, a study of 64 cases shows that most visualizations are far from following the open-source ethos that data activism advocates. If visualizations for alternative narratives do not open up their processes and communicate how the meaning of data is shaped and translated visually, they risk turning into black-box devices that crystallize biased representations of conflict rather than investigating them. This paper presents a data design framework for visualizations used in alternative narratives. It is presented as a methodological tool that encourages actionable data practices that promote a more critical and reflective data culture. The framework is structured in two ways of approaching the process of working with data: from the parts of the process and from the process as a whole. The first approach presents four lenses intended to materialize aspects of the process of working with and making sense of data: Open/close, Composition, Zoom, and Sanitization. The second approach proposes a self-hacking operation of disclosing the production process of the visualizations. This paper argues that visualizations for alternative narratives ought to be open artifacts that promote the democratization of re-interpretation and critical data by disclosing the design decisions that were made on the dataset, as well as its visual, and interactive representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Land Matrix, https://landmatrix.org/about/the-land-matrix-initiative/. Accessed on August 19, 2021.

  2. Citizens Police Data Project, http;//how.cpdp.works/. Accessed on August 19, 2021.

  3. Cadáveres Inmobiliarios, http://cadaveresinmobiliarios.org. Accessed on 17 September, 2017. The website is no longer available online.

  4. Existing conceptual approaches to the framework are ‘mediations’ (Gray et al. 2016), the ‘critical infovis approach to working with data’ (Dörk et al. 2013), the feminist data visualization principle of ‘[making] labour visible’ (D’Ignazio and Klein 2016), and the ethical obligation on ‘[making] the invisible visible’ (Correll 2019).

  5. Scandaglio: strumenti e pratiche per sondare la città, https://www.offtopiclab.org/scandaglio/. Accessed on 15 August, 2020.

  6. Anti-Eviction Mapping Project, https://antievictionmap.com/. Accessed 15 August, 2021.

  7. Based on personal communication exchange with an AEMP member.

  8. Cartografías de la Movilización Estudiantil, http://cartografiadelamovilizacion.cl/. Accessed on 17 November, 2017.

  9. Tarjetas Black to de Future, https://twitter.com/BlacktodeFuture. Twitter Account suspended in 2020-2021.

  10. The Virtual Watchers, https://www.virtualwatchers.de/. Accessed on 15 August, 2020.

References

  • Baack, Stefan (2015). Datafication and empowerment: How the open data movement re-articulates notions of democracy, participation, and journalism. Big Data & Society, vol. 2, no. 2, July 2015, pp. 1-11.

  • Boyd, Danah; and Kate Crawford (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, communication & society, vol. 15, no. 5, May 2012, pp. 662–679.

  • Briones, María de los Ángeles (2019). A taxonomy of data visualization projects for alternative narratives. In L. Rampino and I. Mariani (eds): Advancements in Design Research 11 PhD theses on Design as we do in POLIMI, Milano: FrancoAngelli, pp. 163–183,

  • Correll, Michael (2019). Ethical Dimensions of Visualization Research. In CHI ‘19: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, Scotland, 4 - 9 May 2019. New York: ACM Press, pp. 1–13.

  • D’Ignazio, Catherine; and Lauren Klein (2016). Feminist Data Visualization. 1st Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities. Presented at IEEE VIS, Baltimore, Maryland, USA,  23-28 October 2016https://vis4dh.dbvis.de/2016/. Accessed 17 March 2018.

  • DiSalvo, Carl (2012). Adversarial Design. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dörk, Marian; Patrick Feng; Christopher Collins; and Sheelagh Carpendale (2013). Critical InfoVis: Exploring the Politics of Visualization. In Alt.Chi 2013: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris, France, 27 April –2 May 2013, New York: ACM Press, pp. 2189-2198.

  • Escobar, Arturo (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, Paulo (2017). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Great Britain: Penguin Education, Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrys, Jennifer; Helen Pritchard; and Benjamin Barratt (2016). This Is the Other Aspect of ‘Just’ Good Enough Data. Big Data & Society, vol.1, no. 14, December 2016, pp. 1-14.

  • Gray, Jonathan (2018). Three aspects of data worlds. Krisis Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, vol. 1, no. Data Activism, 2018, pp. 4-17.

  • Gray, Jonathan; Liliana Bounegru; Stefania Milan; and Paolo Ciuccarelli (2016). Ways of seeing Data: Toward a Critical Literacy for Data Visualizations as Research Objects and Research Devices. In S. Kubitschko and A. Kaun (eds): Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research, Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 227–251.

  • Gutiérrez, Miren (2018). Data Activism and Social Change. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Pivot.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hankey, Stephanie; and Marek Tuzsynski (2017). Efficiency and Madness: Using Data and Technology to Solve Social, Environmental and Political Problems. Heinrich Böll Foundation.

  • Haraway, Donna (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, vol. 14, no. 3, 2013, pp. 575-599.

  • Kennedy, Helen; and William Allen (2016). Data Visualization as an Emerging Tool for Online Research. In N. Fielding; R. Lee and G. Blank (eds.): The Sage Handbook of Online Research Methods. London: Sage, December 2016, pp. 307-326.

  • Kennedy, Helen (2018). Living with data: Aligning data studies and data activism through a focus on everyday experiences of datafication. Krisis Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, vol. 1, no. Data Activism, 2018, pp. 18-30.

  • Kurgan, Laura (2013). Close up at a distance: Mapping, technology, and politics. New York: Zone Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kvasny, Lynette (2009). Social Reproduction and Its Applicability for Community Informatics. In J.M. Carroll (ed): Learning in Communities. Human-Computer Interaction Series, London: Springer, pp. 35–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauri, Michele; Gabriele Colombo; María de los Ángeles Briones; and Paolo Ciuccarelli (2019). Teaching the critical role of designers in the data society: the DensityDesign approach. In N. Börekçi; D. Koçyıldırım; F. Korkut; and D. Jones (eds.): DRS 2019: Proceedings of the DRS Learn X Design Insider Knowledge Conference 2019, Ankara, Turkey, 9 - 12 July 2019. Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University, pp. 183–195.

  • Milan, Stefania (2013). Social Movements and their Technologies. Wiring Social Change. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milan, Stefania; and Miren Gutiérrez (2015). Citizens’ Media Meets Big Data: The Emergence of Data Activism. Mediaciones, vol. 11, no. 14, February 2015, pp. 120-133.

  • Moll, Joana; and Cédric Parizot (2016). The Virtual Watchers. https://thenewinquiry.com/the-virtual-watchers/ The New Inquiry. Accessed 10 May 2019.

  • Mouffe, Chantal (2000). Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism? In: IHS Political Science Series, vol. 72, Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.

  • Pinney, Lulu (2020). Is literacy what we need in an unequal data society? In M. Engebretsen and H. Kennedy (eds); Data Visualization in Society. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2020, pp. 223-238.

  • Ruppert, Evelyn (2015). Doing the Transparent State: Open government data as performance indicators. In R. Rottenburg, S. E. Merry, S.J. Park, J. Mugler (eds): The World of Indicators: The Making of Governmental Knowledge through Quantification. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press, pp. 127–150.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, Edward (2006). The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire: Graphics Press, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María de los Ángeles Briones Rojas.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Briones Rojas, M.d. Disclose to Tell: a Data Design Framework for Alternative Narratives. Comput Supported Coop Work 30, 785–809 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-021-09416-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-021-09416-1

Keywords

Navigation