Aggarwal, P., & Vaidyanathan, R. (2003). Use it or lose it: Purchase acceleration effects of time-limited promotions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 2(4), 393–403.
Baker, M. J., & Churchill Jr., G. A. (1977). The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(4), 538–555.
Bazerman, M. H., Loewenstein, G. F., & White, S. B. (1992). Reversals of preference in allocation decisions: Judging an alternative versus choosing among alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(2), 220–240.
Bazerman, M. H., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Wade-Benzoni, K. A. (1998). Negotiating with yourself and losing: Understanding and managing competing internal preferences. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 225–241.
Bazerman, M. H., Moore, D. A., Tenbrunsel, A. E., Wade-Benzoni, K. A., & Blount, S. (1999). Explaining how preferences change across joint versus separate evaluation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 39(1), 41–58.
Bruner, G. C., II (2009). Marketing scales handbook: A compilation of multi-item measures for consumer behavior and advertising research, Volume 5, GCBII Productions, LLC, Fort Worth, Texas.
Campbell, M. C. (1995). When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent: The importance of balancing benefits and investments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(3), 225–254.
Chen, H. A., & Rao, A. R. (2007). When two plus two is not equal to four: Errors in processing multiple percentage changes. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 327–340.
Chen, H. A., Marmorstein, H., Tsiros, M., & Rao, A. R. (2012). When more is less: The impact of base value neglect on consumer preferences for bonus packs over price discounts. Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 64–77.
Duivenvoorde, B. (2015). The consumer benchmarks in the unfair commercial practices directive. Springer Science.
European Commission. (2016a). Consumer vulnerability across key markets in the European Union – Final report. Publications Office of the European Union https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d1af2b47-9a83-11e6-9bca-01aa75ed71a1. Accessed 17 February 2021.
European Commission. (2016b). Staff working document, guidance on the implementation/application of Directive 2005/29/ES on Unfair Commercial Practices, Brussels. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016SC0163&from=EN. Accessed 20 September 2020.
Furnham, A., & Boo, H. C. (2011). A literature review of the anchoring effect. The Journal of Socio- Economics, 40(1), 35–42.
Gabbott, M., & Clulow, V. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasive communication. In P. Kitchen (Ed.), Marketing communications: Principles and practice (pp. 172–188). International Thomson Business Press.
GPower. (2018). Retrieved on the 24th of January from: http://www.gpower.hhu.de/. Accessed Jan 2021.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
Hsee, C. K. (1996). The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 247–257.
Hsee, C. K. (1998). Less is better: When low-value options are valued more highly than high-value options. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11(2), 107–121.
Incardona, R., & Poncibò, C. (2007). The average consumer, the unfair commercial practices directive and the cognitive revolution. Journal of Consumer Policy, 30, 21–38.
Jolls, C., Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. (1998). A behavioral approach to law and economics. Stanford Law Review, 50, 1471–1550.
Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475.
Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93(2), 136–153.
Korobkin, R. B., & Ulen, T. S. (2000). Law and behavioral Science: Removing the rationality assumptions from law and economics. California Law Review, 88(4), 1051–1144.
Le Boeuf, R. A., & Shafir, E. (2006). The long and short of it: Physical anchoring effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(4), 393–406.
Lee, Y. H., & Mason, C. (1999). Responses to information incongruency in advertising: The role of expectancy, relevancy, and humor. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(2), 156–169.
Lynch Jr., J. G. (1985). Uniqueness issues in the decompositional modeling of multiattribute overall evaluations: An information integration perspective. Journal of Marketing Research, 22(1), 1–19.
Oppenheimer, D. M., LeBoeuf, R. A., & Brewer, N. T. (2008). Anchors aweigh: A demonstration of cross-modality anchoring and magnitude priming. Cognition, 106(1), 13–26.
Perloff, R. M. (1993). The dynamics of persuasion: Communication and attitudes in the 21st century. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205.
Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton University Press.
Purnhagen, K. P. (2017). More reality in the CJEU’s interpretation of the average consumer benchmark – Also more behavioural science in unfair commercial practices? European Journal of Risk Regulation, 8(2), 437–440.
Purnhagen, K. P. (2018). Regulatory validity. In H.-W. Micklitz, A.-L. Sibony, & F. Esposito (Eds.), Research methods in consumer law: A handbook (pp. 276–295). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Purnhagen, K. P., & Van Herpen, E. (2017). Can bonus packs mislead consumers? A demonstration of how behavioural consumer research can inform unfair commercial practices law on the example of the ECJ’s Mars judgement. Journal of Consumer Policy, 40, 217–234.
Purnhagen, K. P., & Wesseler J. (2020). The SAMs report “Towards a sustainable food system” bites the hand that feeds us!, European Law Blog, available at The SAMs Report “Towards a Sustainable Food System” bites the hand that feeds us!, European Law Blog (Accessed 17 February 2021).
Reisch, L. A., & Zhao, M. (2017). Behavioural economics, consumer behavior and consumer policy: State of the art. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(2), 190–206.
Schebesta, H. (2019). Control in the label: Self-declared, certified, accredited? On-pack consumer communication about compliance control in voluntary food schemes from a legal perspective. In Rott, P. (Ed.), Certification – Trust, accountability, liability (pp. 143-161). (Studies in European Economic Law and Regulation; Vol. 16). Springer.
Schebesta, H., & Purnhagen, K. P. (2016). The behaviour of the average consumer: A little less normativity and a little more reality in the Court’s case law? Reflections on Teekanne. European Law Review, 41(4), 590–598.
Schebesta, H., & Purnhagen, K. P. (2017). Is the ‘behavioural turn’ in consumer law taken by Dutch courts? Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht en handelspraktijken, 6, 272–278.
Schebesta, H., & Purnhagen, K. P. (2019). An average consumer concept of bits and pieces – Empirical evidence on the Court of Justice of the European Union’s concept of the average consumer in the UCPD. In L. de Almeida, M. C. Gamito, M. Djurovic, & K. P. Purnhagen (Eds.), The transformation of economic law: Essays in honour of Hans-W. Micklitz (pp. 13–27). Hart Publishing.
Schebesta, H., & Purnhagen, K. P. (2020). Island or ocean: Empirical evidence on the average consumer concept in the UCPD. European Review of Private Law, 28(2), 293–310.
Sibony, A. L. (2015). Can EU consumer law benefit from behavioural insights?: An analysis of the unfair practices directive. In K. Mathis (Ed.), European perspectives on behavioural law and economics (pp. 71–106). Springer Science.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioural model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.
Straetmans, G. (2016). Misleading practices, the consumer information model and consumer protection. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 5, 199–210.
Sunstein, C. (2000). Behavioral law and economics. Cambridge University Press.
Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.
Trzaskowki, J. (2011). Behavioural economics, neuroscience, and the unfair commercial practices directive. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34(3), 377–392.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Science. New Series, 185(4157), 1124–1131.
Van Boom, W. H. (2016). Unfair commercial practices. In C. Twigg-Flesner (Ed.), Research handbook on EU consumer and contract Law (Research Handbooks in European Law series) (pp. 388–405). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Van der Zee, E., & Fisher, A. R. H. (2018). Green pictograms on EU foods: A legal study informed by behavioural science. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 7(1), 15–22.
Van Exel, N. J. A., Brouwer, W. B. F., Van den Berg, B., & Koopmanschap, M. A. (2006). With a little help from an anchor discussion and evidence of anchoring effects in contingent valuation. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(5), 836–853.
Verbiest, P. (2017). Arrest canal digital: Naar een bescherming van de real life-consument bij oneerlijke handelspraktijken? Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht & Handelspraktijken, 6, 263–271.
Weatherill, S. (2007). Who is the ‘average consumer’? In S. Weatherill & U. Bernitz (Eds.), The regulation of unfair commercial Practices under EC Directive 2005/29. Hart.
Zeiler, K. (2010). Cautions on the use of economic experiments in law. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 166, 178–193.