Alemanno, A. (2016). Balancing free movement and public health: The case of minimum unit pricing of alcohol in Scotch Whisky. Common Market Law Review, 53, 1037–1064.
Amir, O., & Lobel, O. (2012). Liberalism and lifestyle: Informing regulatory governance with behavioural research. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 3, 17–25.
Burgess, A. (2012). “Nudging” healthy lifestyles: The UK experiments with the behavioural alternative to regulation and the market. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 3, 3–16.
Chandon, P., & Ordabayeva, N. (2009). Supersize in one dimension, downsize in three dimensions: Effects of spatial dimensionality on size perceptions and preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 46, 739–753.
Chen, H. A., & Rao, A. R. (2007). When two plus two is not equal to four: Errors in processing multiple percentage changes. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 327–340.
Chen, H. A., Marmorstein, H., Tsiros, M., & Rao, A. R. (2012). When more is less: The impact of base value neglect on consumer preferences for bonus packs over price discounts. Journal of Marketing, 76, 64–77.
Diamond, W.D. (1992). Just what is a “dollar’s worth”? Consumer reactions to price discounts vs. extra product promotions. Journal of Retailing, 68, 254–270.
Dowker, A. (2005). Individual differences in arithmetic: Implications for psychology, neuroscience and education. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.
Duivenvoorde, B. (2015). The consumer benchmarks in the unfair commercial practices directive. Cham et al.: Springer Science.
Englich, B. (2006). Blind or biased? Justitia’s susceptibility to anchoring effects in the courtroom based on given numerical representations. Law & Policy, 28, 497–514.
Franck, J.-U., & Purnhagen, K. (2014). Homo economicus, behavioural sciences, and economic regulation: On the concept of man in internal market regulation and its normative basis. In K. Mathis (Ed.), Law and economics in Europe—Foundations and applications (pp. 329–365). Dordrecht: Springer Science.
Furnham, A., & Boo, H. C. (2011). A literature review of the anchoring effect. The Journal of Socio-Economics., 40, 35–42.
Hardesty, D. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2003). Consumer evaluations of different promotion types and price presentations: The moderating role of promotional benefit level. Journal of Retailing, 79, 17–25.
Heise, M. (1999). The importance of being empirical. Pepperdine Law Review, 26, 808–834.
Helleringer, G., & Purnhagen, K. (2014). On the terms, relevance and impact of a European legal culture. In G. Helleringer & K. Purnhagen (Eds.), Towards a European Legal Culture (pp. 3–14). Munich, Oxford, Baden-Baden: C. H. Beck, Hart, Nomos.
LeBoeuf, R. A., & Shafir, E. (2006). The long and short of it: Physical anchoring effects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 393–406.
Lynch, J. G. (1982). On the external validity of experiments in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 225–239.
Mathis, K. (Ed.) (2015). European perspectives on behavioural law and economics. Cham et al.: Springer Science.
Mishra, A., & Mishra, H. (2011). The influence of price discount versus bonus pack on the preference for virtue and vice foods. Journal of Marketing Research, 48, 196–206.
Mussweiler, T., Strack, F., & Pfeiffer, T. (2000). Overcoming the inevitable anchoring effect: considering the opposite compensates for selective accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1142–1150.
Oppenheimer, D. L., LeBoeuf, R. A., & Brewer, N. T. (2008). Anchors aweigh: A demonstration of cross-modality anchoring and magnitude priming. Cognition, 106, 13–26.
Price, D. D., Bush, M., Long, S., & Harkins, S. W. (1994). A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain, 56, 217–226.
Purnhagen, K. (2015). Why do we need responsive regulation and behavioural research in EU internal market law? In K. Mathis (Ed.), European perspectives on behavioural law and economics (pp. 51-69). Cham et al.: Springer Science.
Purnhagen, K. (2017). More reality in the CJEU’s interpretation of the average consumer benchmark–also more behavioural science in unfair commercial practices? European Journal of Risk Regulation, 8.
Purnhagen, K., & Feindt, P. (2015). Making behavioural insights work for the commission’s new better regulation strategy. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 6, 361–368.
Purnhagen, K., & Schebesta, H. (2017). A case moving at the Frontiers of market access, freedom of goods, the common agricultural policy and science in court-reflections on Scotch Whisky Association. European Law Review, 54.
Robbennolt, J. K., & Studebaker, C. A. (1999). Anchoring in the courtroom: The effects of caps on punitive damages. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 353–373.
Schebesta, H., & Purnhagen, K. (2016). The behaviour of the average consumer: A little less normativity and a little more reality in Court’s case law? Reflections on Teekanne, European Law Review, 14, 590–598.
Schuck, P. H. (1989). Why don’t law professors do more empirical research? Journal of Legal Education, 39, 323–336.
Sibony, A.-L. (2015). Can EU consumer law benefit from behavioural insights?: An analysis of the Unfair Practices Directive. In K. Mathis (Ed.), European perspectives on behavioural law and economics (pp. 71–106). Cham et al.: Springer Science.
Sibony, A.-L., & Alemanno, A. (2015). The emergence of Behavioural policy-making: A European perspective. In A.-L. Sibony & A. Alemanno (Eds.), Nudge and the law—a European perspective (pp. 1–25). Oxford: Hart.
Smith, V.L., & Walker, J.M. (1993). Monetary rewards and decision cost in experimental economics. Economic Inquiry, pp. 245–261.
Smits, J. (2007). Law making in the European Union: On globalization and contract law in divergent legal cultures. Lousiana Law Review, 67, 1181–1203.
Stuyck, J. (2010). Setting the scene, chapter I. In H. Micklitz, J. Stuyck, E. Terryn, & D. Droshout (Eds.), Consumer law: Ius commune casebooks for a common law of Europe (pp. 1–68). Oxford: Hart.
Sunstein, C. (1997). Free market and social justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Trzaskowki, J. (2011). Behavioural economics, neuroscience, and the unfair commercial practices directive. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34, 377–392.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
Van Aaken, A. (2015). Judge the nudge: In search of the legal limits of paternalistic nudging in the EU. In A.-L. Sibony & A. Alemanno (Eds.), Nudge and the law—A European perspective (pp. 83–112). Oxford: Hart.
van Bavel, R., Herrmann, B, Esposito, G., & Proestakis, A. (2013). Applying behavioural sciences to EU policy-making, JRC Scientific and Policy Reports. Seville: Joint Research Center European Commission, available at http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/information_sources/docs/30092013_jrc_scientific_policy_report_en.pdf.
Vanhuele, M., & Drèze, X. (2002). Measuring the price knowledge shoppers bring to the store. Journal of Marketing, 66, 72–85.
Wansink, B., & van Ittersum, K. (2003). Bottoms up! The influence of elongation on pouring and consumption volume. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 455–463.
Weatherill, S. (2007). Who is the ‘average consumer’? In S. Weatherill & U. Bernitz (Eds.), The regulation of unfair commercial Practices under EC Directive 2005/29 (pp. 115–138). Oxford: Hart.
Whyte, G., & Sebenius, J. K. (1997). The effect of multiple anchors on anchoring in individual and group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 75–85.
Xu, Y., & Huang, J.-S. (2014). Effects of price discounts and bonus packs on online impulse buying. Social Behavior and Personality, 42, 1293–1302.
Zamir, E., & Teichman, D. (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of behavioral economics and the law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.