Skip to main content
Log in

The nation-state foundations of constitutional compliance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Constitutional Political Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We bring attention to a previously overlooked determinant of de jure-de facto constitutional gaps: a polity’s transition to a nation-state. We argue that nation-statehood, predicated on the formation of a strong sense of national identity, lowers the government’s incentive to violate constitutional provisions. To test our theory, we use a recently released longitudinal database on constitutional compliance and exploit variation in the timing of countries’ attainment of nation-statehood. Our empirical findings substantiate our hypothesis. Based on our preferred estimation approach, nation-statehood bolsters both overall constitutional compliance and constitutional compliance within the subdomains of basic rights, civil rights, and property rights & the rule of law. The estimated long-run effects of nation-statehood on constitutional compliance are considerable in size. Our analysis, thus, illuminates the foundational role of nation-statehood in fostering constitutional compliance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used to produce the results in the paper are publicly available, with precise sources cited in the paper. The computer code supporting the analysis is accessible upon request from the corresponding author.

Notes

  1. Some view the establishment of the English Commonwealth in 1649 as the earliest instance of nation-state creation (Feinstein, 2023).

  2. The described sense of national identity is an individual trait shared by citizens. As such, it is fully consistent with methodological individualism, an important premise of the public choice and constitutional political economy approach (e.g., Van den Hauwe, 1999). See Akerlof and Kranton (2000) for theory and evidence on the general importance of group identity for individual decision-making and Grajzl et al. (2018) for a setting where national identity is a source of intrinsic utility for individuals.

  3. Of course, even within each of the groups of nation-states and non-nation-states there may exist considerable heterogeneity that we do not strive to unpack. In our analysis, we are only interested in assessing the average effect of nation-statehood on constitutional compliance while controlling for the pertinent polity-specific differences.

  4. In the CCCD, the corresponding variable is named cc_total.

  5. See Blume and Voigt (2007) for an empirical derivation of these categories.

  6. For example, ten years before transition to nation-statehood, we observe constitutional compliance for 9 countries, while one year before transition to nation-statehood, we observe constitutional compliance for 22 countries.

  7. This claim remains valid even post Arab Spring.

  8. Acemoglu et al. (2019) encounter an exactly analogous problem in estimating the impact of democracy on per capita output.

  9. In all specifications, the F-test rejects the null hypothesis that the coefficients on the first to fourth lag of the dependent variable are jointly equal to zero.

  10. See Cinelli et al. (2022) for an illustration of overcontrol bias.

  11. The Phillips-Perron test rejects the null hypothesis that all panels contain unit roots for each of the five considered outcome variables.

  12. This entails stacking the observations for each equation, one per each of the four constitutional domains, and then stacking the four equations. In the first step, OLS is applied equation by equation to obtain the regression residuals. In the second step, these residuals are used to estimate the full variance-covariance matrix of the system, embedding the estimated variance-covariance matrix into a standard generalized-least-squares approach.

  13. In contrast, \({\Delta CC}_{c,t-2}^{d}\), \({\Delta CC}_{c,t-3}^{d}\), and \({\Delta CC}_{c,t-4}^{d}\) (for \(s=4\)) are predetermined in (3) and thus uncorrelated with \({\Delta \varepsilon }_{ct}^{d}\).

  14. See Kraay (2015) for a general discussion of the problem of weak instruments when applying the system GMM approach. The very exercise in this subsection shows that our qualitative results are robust to alternative instrumentation strategies.

  15. A reviewer of an earlier draft of our paper noted, for example, that Ghana could be viewed as having attained nation-statehood only in 1979 (rather than 1957, as coded by WF) and Denmark only in 1864 (rather than 1849). Similarly, Norway could be viewed as having attained nation-state status already in 1857 (rather than 1905) and Sweden in 1809 (rather than 1866). Future research awaits the systematic re-assessment of the WF coding, an endeavor we did not undertake.

  16. Detailed results are available upon request.

  17. See Acemoglu et al., (2019: Sec. VI) for an analogous approach to eliciting mechanisms. Importantly, the Gutmann et al. (2023d) constitutional compliance indicators measure compliance for each country with respect to a country-specific standard defined by the country’s own constitutional provisions. As such, the construction of the Gutmann et al. (2023d) compliance measures is only minimally affected by the extensiveness of constitutional protections. Therefore, even if we find empirical evidence in favor of the candidate mechanism, there should exist a further mechanism that explains the uncovered effect of nation-statehood on constitutional compliance and that is independent of any effect arising via substantive constitutional constraints alone.

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Naidu, S., Restrepo, P., & Robinson, J. A. (2019). Democracy does cause growth. Journal of Political Economy, 127(1), 47–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity and poverty. Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G. A., & Kranton, R. E. (2000). Economics and identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 715–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, J., & Arellano, M. (2003). The time series and cross-section asymptotics of dynamic panel data estimators. Econometrica, 71(4), 1121–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blume, L., & Voigt, S. (2007). The economic effects of human rights. Kyklos, 60(4), 509–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bockstette, V., Chanda, A., & Putterman, L. (2002). States and markets: The advantage of an early start. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(4), 347–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bologna Pavlik, J., & Young, A. T. (2023). Historical representative assembly experiences and constitutionalism today. Comparative Economic Studies, Forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41294-023-00228-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. (1996). Nationalism reframed: Nationhood and the national question in the New Europe. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., & Miller, D. L. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics, methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, A., & Versteeg, M. (2020). How constitutional rights matter. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Choutagunta, A., Gutmann, J., & Voigt, S. (2023). Shocking resilience? Effects of extreme events on constitutional compliance. Journal of Institutional Economics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137423000279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinelli, C., Forney, A., & Pearl, J. (2022). A crash course in good and bad controls. Sociological Methods an Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241221099552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrova-Grajzl, V., Eastwood, J., & Grajzl, P. (2016). The longevity of national identity and national pride: Evidence from wider Europe. Research and Politics, 3(2), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, Y. (2023). Nation-state. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/nation-state

  • Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grajzl, P., Eastwood, J., & Dimitrova-Grajzl, V. (2018). Should immigrants culturally assimilate or preserve their own culture? Host-society natives’ beliefs and the longevity of national identity. Social Science Research, 75, 96–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, J., Khesali, M., & Voigt, S. (2021). Constitutional comprehensibility and the coordination of citizens: A test of the Weingast-hypothesis. The University of Chicago Law Review Online. https://lawreviewblog.uchicago.edu/2021/04/05/cv-gutmann-khesali-voigt/

  • Gutmann, J., Sarel, R., & Voigt, S. (2022). Measuring constitutional loyalty: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. ILE working paper 55.

  • Gutmann, J., & Rode, M. (2023). Are populists constitutionalists? An empirical assessment of populist constitutional compliance. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Gutmann, J., Metelska-Szaniawska, K. & Voigt, S. (2023b). Can new constitutions tighten the reins? The effect of constitutional change on constitutional compliance. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Gutmann, J., Lewczuk, A., Lewkowicz, J., & Voigt, S. (2023a). Culture and constitutional compliance. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Gutmann, J., Metelska-Szaniawska, K., & Voigt, S. (2023c). Leader characteristics and constitutional compliance. European Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2023.102423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, J., Metelska-Szaniawska, K., & Voigt, S. (2023d). The comparative constitutional compliance database. Review of International Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-023-09491-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hariri, J. G. (2012). The autocratic legacy of early statehood. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 471–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Hauwe, L. (1999). Public choice, constitutional political economy and law and economics. In: Bouckaert, B., De Geest, G. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of law and economics (Vol. 1, pp. 603–659).

  • Hobsbawm, E. J. (1990). Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programme, myth, reality. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, D. L. (2000). Ethnic groups in conflict. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J., & Smith, A. D. (Eds.). (1994). Nationalism. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraay, A. (2015). Weak instruments in growth regressions: Implications for recent cross-country evidence on inequality and growth. World Bank policy research working paper 7494.

  • Law, D. S., & Versteeg, M. (2013). Sham constitutions. California Law Review, 101(4), 863–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewkowicz, J., Metelska-Szaniawska, K., & Fałkowski, J. (2023). Political conflict, political polarization, and constitutional compliance. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Lewkowicz, J., & Lewczuk, A. (2023). Civil society and compliance with constitutions. Acta Politica, 58, 181–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417–1426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D. (2009). Practitioners’ corner: A note on too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. D. (1991). National identity. University of Nevada Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolaore, E., & Wacziarg, R. (2013). How deep are the roots of economic development? Journal of Economic Literature, 51(2), 325–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt, S. (2021). Mind the gap: Analyzing the divergence between constitutional text and constitutional reality. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 19(5), 1778–1809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingast, B. R. (1997). The political foundations of democracy and the rule of law. American Political Science Review, 91(2), 245–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A., & Feinstein, Y. (2010). The rise of the nation-state across the world, 1816 to 2001. American Sociological Review, 75(5), 764–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A., & Min, B. (2006). From empire to nation-state: Explaining wars in the modern world, 1816–2001. American Sociological Review, 71(6), 867–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(298), 348–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions. Peter Grajzl is grateful to Jon Eastwood for introducing him to ideas about national identity and for engaging in many insightful conversations.

Funding

Jerg Gutmann and Stefan Voigt gratefully acknowledge financial support as part of a joint Beethoven research project by the Polish National Science Centre (NCN, #2016/23/G/HS4/04371) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, #381589259).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All three authors contributed equally.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Grajzl.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant competing interests to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 10.

Table 10 Included countries with Wimmer and Feinstein’s (2010) year of nation-state creation

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grajzl, P., Gutmann, J. & Voigt, S. The nation-state foundations of constitutional compliance. Const Polit Econ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-023-09427-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-023-09427-8

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation