Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Examination of Crisis Intervention Teams in Rural Jurisdictions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 09 March 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

A disproportionate number of people with mental illness are involved in critical police encounters resulting in arrest and/or excessive use of force. In response, many jurisdictions have implemented Crisis Intervention Team training. This mixed method study used survey and focus group interview data to investigate Crisis Intervention Teams in rural communities in a Northeastern state in the U.S. Findings indicate that unique situational realities prevent optimal effectiveness of Crisis Intervention Teams in rural jurisdictions. Three themes emerged as clear barriers to effectiveness: (a) time and money; (b) buy-in and support for Crisis Intervention Teams; and (c) systemic barriers to adequate care. Rural-specific impediments affect each aspect and member of Crisis Intervention Teams in rural jurisdictions. Efforts to develop a specialized police response training program for rural jurisdictions should be developed and examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Notes

  1. Individuals designated to lead in the development/implementation of a CIT program in any given community; individuals should remain diplomatic, and their primary roles involve inter-agency communications, data collection and management, and the scheduling of training (Dupont et al. 2007, p. 13). Certification is suggested, and offered by CIT International.

  2. Executive steering committees consist of community stakeholders representing law enforcement, professional service providers (public welfare, human services, drug and alcohol, behavioral health), and advocates/advocacy. groups (varied, can include consumers and caregivers) who are invested in the success of CIT. They meet periodically at the lead of the CIT Coordinator, and plan curriculum, training, and community awareness opportunities.

References

Download references

Funding

Our work was funded by West Chester University’s Provost Research Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michele P. Bratina.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no known conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: In Abstract, the word "effect" was corrected as "affect" and in Results section, under “Time and Money”, the last sentence has been deleted.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 28 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bratina, M.P., Carsello, J.A., Carrero, K.M. et al. An Examination of Crisis Intervention Teams in Rural Jurisdictions. Community Ment Health J 57, 1388–1398 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-021-00797-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-021-00797-7

Keywords

Navigation