Abstract
This paper explores the effects of a group-randomized controlled trial, Community Partners in Care (CPIC), on the development of interagency networks for collaborative depression care improvement between a community engagement and planning (CEP) intervention and a resources for services (RS) intervention that provided the same content solely via technical assistance to individual programs. Both interventions consisted of a diverse set of service agencies, including health, mental health, substance abuse treatment, social services, and community-trusted organizations such as churches and parks and recreation centers. Participants in the community councils for the CEP intervention reflected a range of agency leaders, staff, and other stakeholders. Network analysis of partnerships among agencies in the CEP versus RS condition, and qualitative analysis of perspectives on interagency network changes from multiple sources, suggested that agencies in the CEP intervention exhibited greater growth in partnership capacity among themselves than did RS agencies. CEP participants also viewed the coalition development intervention both as promoting collaboration in depression services and as a meaningful community capacity building activity. These descriptive results help to identify plausible mechanisms of action for the CPIC interventions and can be used to guide development of future community engagement interventions and evaluations in under-resourced communities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alegría, M., Chatterji, P., Wells, K. B., et al. (2008). Disparity in depression treatment among racial and ethnic minority populations in the United States. Psychiatric Services, 59(11), 1264–1272.
Alexander, J. A., Weiner, B. J., Metzger, M. E., et al. (2003). Sustainability of collaborative capacity in community health partnerships. Medical Care Research and Review, 60(4_suppl), 130S–160S.
Asarnow, J. R., Jaycox, L. H., Duan, N., et al. (2005). Effectiveness of a quality improvement intervention for adolescent depression in primary care clinics: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 293(3), 311–319.
Belin, T. R., Jones, A., Tang, L., et al. (2018). Maintaining internal validity in community partnered participatory research: Experience from the Community Partners in Care Study. Ethnic Disparities, 28(Suppl), 357–364.
Borgatti, S. P. (2005). NetDraw: Graph visualization software (version 2.159). Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2016). UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis (version 6.620). Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing social networks (1st ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Castañeda, H., Nichter, M., Nichter, M., et al. (2010). Enabling and sustaining the activities of lay health influencers: lessons from a community-based tobacco cessation intervention study. Health Promotion Practice, 11(4), 483–492.
Chung, B. (2017). Building resiliency and increasing community hope (BRICH). ClinicalTrials.gov: U.S. National Library of Medicine. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01698047.
Chung, B., Jones, L., Dixon, E. L., et al. (2010). Using a community partnered participatory research approach to implement a randomized controlled trial: Planning the design of community partners in care. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 21(3), 780–795.
Chung, B., Ngo, V. K., Ong, M. K., et al. (2015). Participation in training for depression care quality improvement: A randomized trial of community engagement or technical support. Pyschiatric Services, 66(8), 831–839.
Chung, B., Ong, M., Ettner, S. L., et al. (2014). 12-Month outcomes of community engagement versus technical assistance to implement depression collaborative care: A partnered, cluster, randomized, comparative effectiveness trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 161(10_Supplement), S23–S34.
Dobransky-Fasiska, D., Nowalk, M. P., Pincus, H. A., et al. (2010). Public-academic partnerships: Improving depression care for disadvantaged adults by partnering with non-mental health agencies. Psychiatric Services, 61(2), 110–112.
Dwight-Johnson, M., Sherbourne, C. D., Liao, D., et al. (2000). Treatment preferences among depressed primary care patients. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 15(8), 527–534.
Everett, M. G., & Borgatti, S. P. (1999). The centrality of groups and classes. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 23(3), 181–201.
Foster-Fishman, P. G., Berkowitz, S. L., Lounsbury, D. W., et al. (2001). Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: A review and integrative framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 241–261.
Galea, S., Ahern, J., Nandi, A., et al. (2007). Urban neighborhood poverty and the incidence of depression in a population-based cohort study. Annals of Epidemiology, 17(3), 171–179.
González, H. M., Vega, W. A., Williams, D. R., et al. (2010). Depression care in the United States: Too little for too few. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(1), 37–46.
Health Neighborhoods. (2019). Los Angeles Department of Mental Health. Retrieved March 27, 2019, from https://dmh.lacounty.gov/about/health-neighborhoods/.
Institute of Medicine. (2003). Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Institute of Medicine. (2013). The CTSA Program at NIH: Opportunities for advancing clinical and translational research. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Jones, L., & Wells, K. B. (2007). Strategies for academic and clinician engagement in community-participatory partnered research. JAMA, 297(4), 407–410.
Jones, L., Wells, K. B., Norris, K., et al. (2009). The vision, valley, and victory of community engagement. Ethnic Disparities, 19(4 Suppl 6), S6.
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Demler, O., et al. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry., 62(6), 593–602.
Khodyakov, D., Mendel, P., Dixon, E., et al. (2009). Community Partners in Care: Leveraging community diversity to improve depression care for underserved populations. The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities and Nations, 9(2), 167–182.
Khodyakov, D., Sharif, M. Z., Dixon, E. L., et al. (2014). An implementation evaluation of the community engagement and planning intervention in the CPIC depression care improvement trial. Community Mental Health Journal, 50(3), 312–324.
Landry, C. M., Jackson, A. P., Tang, L., et al. (2016). The effects of collaborative care training on case managers’ perceived depression-related services delivery. Psychiatric Services, 68(2), 123–130.
Lasker, R. D., Weiss, E. S., & Miller, R. (2001). Partnership synergy: A practical framework for studying and strengthening the collaborative advantage. The Milbank Quarterly, 79(2), 179–205.
Lopez, A. D., Mathers, C. D., Ezzati, M., et al. (2006). Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: Systematic analysis of population health data. The Lancet., 367(9524), 1747–1757.
Mendel, P. (2008). Organizational learning and sustained improvement: The quality journey at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Organizing for quality: The improvement journeys of leading hospitals in Europe and the United States (pp. 57–82). London: Radcliffe Publishers.
Mendel, P., Fuentes, S. (2006). Partnering for mental health and substance abuse needs in Los Angeles: A community feedback report. Los Angeles, July 2006: UCLA/RAND NIMH Center for Research on Quality in Managed Care.
Mendel, P., Meredith, L. S., Schoenbaum, M., et al. (2008). Interventions in organizational and community context: A framework for building evidence on dissemination and implementation in health services research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35(1–2), 21–37.
Mendel, P., Ngo, V. K., Dixon, E., et al. (2011). Partnered evaluation of a community engagement intervention: Use of a “Kickoff” conference in a randomized trial for depression care improvement in underserved communities. Ethnic Disparities, 21(3 Suppl 1), 78–88.
Miranda, J., Chung, J. Y., Green, B. L., et al. (2003a). Treating depression in predominantly low-income young minority women: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 290(1), 57–65.
Miranda, J., Duan, N., Sherbourne, C., et al. (2003b). Improving care for minorities: Can quality improvement interventions improve care and outcomes for depressed minorities? Results of a randomized, controlled trial. Health Services Research, 38(2), 613–630.
Miranda, J., Ong, M. K., Jones, L., et al. (2013). Community-partnered evaluation of depression services for clients of community-based agencies in under-resourced communities in Los Angeles. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28(10), 1279–1287.
Neighbors, H. W., Caldwell, C., Williams, D. R., et al. (2007). Race, ethnicity, and the use of services for mental disorders: Results from the National Survey of American Life. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(4), 485–494.
Ngo, V. K., Sherbourne, C., Chung, B., et al. (2016). Community engagement compared with technical assistance to disseminate depression care among low-income, minority women: A randomized controlled effectiveness study. American Journal of Public Health, 106(10), 1833–1841.
Patel, K. K., Butler, B., & Wells, K. B. (2006). What is necessary to transform the quality of mental health care. Health Affairs (Millwood), 25(3), 681–693.
Patel, V., Weiss, H. A., Chowdhary, N., et al. (2010). Effectiveness of an intervention led by lay health counselors for depressive and anxiety disorders in primary care in Goa, India (MANAS): A cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 376(9758), 2086–2095.
Quinn, M. T., Gunter, K. E., Nocon, R. S., et al. (2013). Undergoing transformation to the patient centered medical home in safety net health centers: Perspectives from the front lines. Ethnic Disparities, 23(3), 356–362.
Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Stockdale, S. E., Tang, L., Pudilo, E., et al. (2016). Sampling and recruiting community-based programs using community-partnered participation research. Health Promotion Practice, 17(2), 254–264.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services. (2012). Behavioral health homes for people with mental health and substance use conditions: Core clinical features. Rockville, MD: SAMHSA. Retrieved March 27, 2019, from www.integration.samhsa.gov/integrated-care-models/health-homes.
Thomas, S. B., Quinn, S. C., Butler, J., et al. (2011). Toward a fourth generation of disparities research to achieve health equity. Annual Review of Public Health, 32, 399–416.
ThriveNYC. (2019). ThriveNYC: An unprecedented commitment by the City of New York to create a mental health system that works for everyone. New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. Retrieved March 27, 2019, from https://thrivenyc.cityofnewyork.us/.
Unützer, J., Katon, W., Callahan, C. M., et al. (2002). Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 288(22), 2836–2845.
Valente, T. W. (2010). Social networks and health: Models, methods, and applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wang, P. S., Demler, O., Olfson, M., et al. (2006). Changing profiles of service sectors used for mental health care in the United States. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(7), 1187–1198.
Wells, K. B., & Jones, L. (2009). “Research” in community-partnered, participatory research. JAMA, 302(3), 320–321.
Wells, K. B., Jones, L., Chung, B., et al. (2013). Community-partnered cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness trial of community engagement and planning or resources for services to address depression disparities. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 28(10), 1268–1278.
Wells, K., Sherbourne, C., Schoenbaum, M., et al. (2004). Five-year impact of quality improvement for depression: Results of a group-level randomized controlled trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 61(4), 378–386.
Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zukoski, A. P., & Shortell, S. M. (2001). Keys to building effective community partnerships. Health Forum Journal, 44(5), 22–25.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities and the parent CPIC study by grants R01MH078853, P30MH082760 and P30MH068639 from the National Institute of Mental Health. The parent CPIC study was also funded by grants 64244 from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, CMCH-12-97088 from the California Community Foundation, G08LM011058 from the National Library of Medicine, and UL1TR000124 from the NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Science UCLA CTSI. The RAND Corporation, UCLA Semel Institute and the Los Angeles County Departments of Mental Health, Public Health and Health Services provided institutional support. We thank the CPIC study’s 95 participating health care and community-based agencies, the CPIC Steering Council, and other study members who contributed to CPIC’s receipt of the Association of Clinical and Translational Science (ACTS) Team Science Award (2014) and Campus-Community Partnerships for Health Annual Award (2015) for supporting the study concept, design and implementation. We also acknowledge posthumously the contributions to study design and implementation of Loretta Jones, a community co-leader of the CPIC study, who passed away during preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No conflicts of interest to report.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Table 5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mendel, P., O’Hora, J., Zhang, L. et al. Engaging Community Networks to Improve Depression Services: A Cluster-Randomized Trial of a Community Engagement and Planning Intervention. Community Ment Health J 57, 457–469 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-020-00632-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-020-00632-5