Conservation Genetics

, Volume 14, Issue 6, pp 1243–1254 | Cite as

A species in decline: genetic diversity and conservation of the Victorian eastern barred bandicoot, Perameles gunnii

  • Andrew R. Weeks
  • Anthony van Rooyen
  • Paul Mitrovski
  • Dean Heinze
  • Amy Winnard
  • Adam D. Miller
Research Article

Abstract

The eastern barred bandicoot, Perameles gunnii, has undergone a dramatic decline in distribution and abundance on the mainland of Australia during the twentieth century. In 1988 a captive breeding program was initiated to reduce the chance of extinction. With the extinction of the last wild mainland population in the early 1990s, reintroductions from captive-bred P. gunnii have met limited success, and currently only two extant populations persist in predator proof enclosures in the State of Victoria. With ~20 years of breeding, there are concerns that the genetic diversity within the breeding program has declined and may inhibit current and future success of the program. We have used ten nuclear microsatellite loci and sequencing of two partial mitochondrial genes (cytochrome oxidase I and ATPase 6) to determine genetic diversity within current Victorian P. gunnii. These diversity estimates are compared with historic samples from the captive breeding program dating back to 1995, historic samples from the last wild mainland population found at Hamilton in 1992 and contemporary Tasmanian wild populations. Results indicate that the captive P. gunnii population in the State of Victoria has lost significant genetic diversity through time. Genetic diversity is also reduced in populations at Hamilton Community Parklands and Mount Rothwell. Samples from the last wild population at Hamilton collected in 1992, along with samples from Tasmanian P. gunnii, had significantly greater genetic diversity than contemporary mainland populations. The results are discussed with reference to management options for maintaining genetic diversity within Victorian P. gunnii, including crossing Victorian and Tasmanian P. gunnii to increase genetic diversity, adaptability and evolutionary potential.

Keywords

Conservation genetics Microsatellite Effective population size Captive breeding program 

Supplementary material

10592_2013_512_MOESM1_ESM.docx (91 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 91 kb)

References

  1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (2000) On the adaptive control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing with independent statistics. J Educ Behav Stat 25:60–83Google Scholar
  2. Blacket MJ, Robin C, Good RT, Miller AD (2012) Universal primers for fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments—an efficient and cost effective approach to genotyping by fluorescence. Mol Ecol Resour 12:456–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall K (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Crawford NG (2010) SMOGD: software for the measurement of genetic diversity. Mol Ecol Resour 10:556–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frankham R (1999) Quantitative genetics in conservation biology. Genet Res 74:237–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Eldridge MBD, Lacy RC et al (2011) Predicting the risk of outbreeding depression: critical information for managing fragmented populations. Conserv Biol 25:465–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gerlach G, Jueterbock A, Kraemer P, Deppermann J, Harmand P (2010) Calculations of population differentiation based on G(ST) and D: forget G(ST) but not all of statistics! Mol Ecol 19:3845–3852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a computer program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). http://www.unil.ch/izea/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm
  10. Hedrick PW (1995) Gene flow and genetic restoration: the Florida panther as a case study. Conserv Biol 5:996–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hedrick PW (1999) Genetics of populations, 2nd edn. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Hedrick PW, Fredrickson R (2010) Genetic rescue guidelines with examples from Mexican wolves and Florida panthers. Conserv Genet 11:615–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoffmann AA, Parsons PA (1997) Extreme environmental change and evolution. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Hood G (2002) PopTools. CSIRO, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  15. Jost L (2008) G(ST) and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol 17:4015–4026PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lewis PO, Zaykin D (2001) Genetic data analysis: computer program for the analysis of allelic data. http://hydrodictyon.eeb.uconn.edu/people/plewis/software.php 20 August 2012
  18. Lopez S, Rousset F, Shaw FH, Shaw RG, Ronce O (2009) Joint effects of inbreeding and local adaptation on the evolution of genetic load after fragmentation. Conserv Biol 23:1618–1627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA et al (2005) Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437:376–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Markert JA, Champlin DM, Gutjahr-Gobeli R, Grear JS, Kuhn A et al (2010) Population genetic diversity and fitness in multiple environments. BMC Evol Biol 10:205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meglécz E, Costedoat C, Dubut V, Gilles A, Malausa T, Pech N, Martin JF (2010) QDD: a user-friendly program to select microsatellite markers and design primers from large sequencing projects. Bioinformatics 26:403–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Menkhorst P, Richards J (2008) Perameles gunnii. In: IUCN 2010. IUCN Red List of threatened species. Version 2010.1. <www.iucnredlist.org>
  23. Mills LS, Allendorf FW (1996) The one-migrant-per-generation rule in conservation and management. Conserv Biol 10:1509–1518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitrovski P, Heinze DA, Guthridge K, Weeks AR (2005) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from the Australian endemic mountain pygmy-possum, Burramys parvus broom. Mol Ecol Notes 5:395–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Myroniuk P (1993) Eastern barred bandicoot recovery. Newsletter no. 3. Conservation and Natural Resources, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  26. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Robinson NA (1995) Implications from mitochondrial DNA for management to conserve the eastern barred bandicoot (Perameles gunnii). Conserv Biol 9:114–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Robinson NA, Murray ND, Sherwin WB (1993) VNTR loci reveal differentiation between and structure within populations of the Eastern Barred Bandicoot Perameles gunnii. Mol Ecol 2:195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S (eds) Bioinformatics methods and protocols: methods in molecular biology. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 365–386Google Scholar
  30. Sambrook J, Fritsch E, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. W.H., Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA 4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mor Biol Evol 24:1596–1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF (1992) A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132:619–633Google Scholar
  34. Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. DSE Victoria (2009) Eastern barred bandicoot (mainland) Perameles gunni (unnamed subspecies). Action statement no. 4 (revised 2009). Department of Sustainability and Environment, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  36. Weeks AR, Sgro CM, Young AG, Frankham R, Mitchell NJ et al (2011) Assessing the benefits and risks of translocation in changing environments: a genetic perspective. Evol Appl 4:709–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weir BS, Cockerham C (1984) Estimating F statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Willi Y, van Buskirk J, Hoffmann AA (2006) Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:433–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Winnard AL, Coulson G (2008) Sixteen years of Eastern Barred Bandicoot Perameles gunnii reintroductions in Victoria: a review. Pacific Conserv Biol 14:34–53Google Scholar
  40. Zenger KR, Johnston PG (2001) Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in the southern brown bandicoot (Isoodon obesulus), and their applicability to other marsupial species. Mol Ecol Notes 1:141–151Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew R. Weeks
    • 1
    • 2
  • Anthony van Rooyen
    • 2
  • Paul Mitrovski
    • 2
    • 3
  • Dean Heinze
    • 4
  • Amy Winnard
    • 5
  • Adam D. Miller
    • 2
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of GeneticsThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  2. 2.cesarParkvilleAustralia
  3. 3.Coffey EnvironmentsBurswoodAustralia
  4. 4.Invasive Species Branch, Department of Primary Industries, ParksWater and EnvironmentHobartAustralia
  5. 5.Department of ZoologyThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations