Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reproductive isolation following reintroduction of Chinook salmon with alternative life histories

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Conservation Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated reproductive isolation of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) life history types that have been reintroduced to northern Idaho, USA. Analysis of 1003 samples at six microsatellite loci revealed strong reproductive isolation between ocean- and stream-type Chinook salmon (fall and summer spawn timing, respectively) within the Clearwater River sub-basin (F ST = 0.148, P < 0.00001). Very little evidence for gene flow among the two life history types was observed as assignment tests correctly assigned 99.6% of individuals in reference collections to either ocean- and steam-type Chinook salmon. Assignment of naturally reared juveniles indicated that both life history types were present with 24.1% stream-type and 75.9% ocean-type. Previous studies suggest high levels of divergence among the two life history types in natural populations, and our study verifies the persistence of reproductive isolation among types following colonization of habitat. Successful colonization of new habitat by (re)introduced species is likely influenced by diversity in life history types and this strategy has lead to naturally spawning populations in a variety of available habitats in the Clearwater River. As many populations of O. tshawytscha are listed as threatened or endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act, hope for recovery lies not only in effective management and habitat improvement, but adaptability of this species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achord S, Matthews GM, Johnson OW, Marsh DM (1996) Use of passive integrated transponder(PIT) tags to monitor migration timing of Snake River Chinook salmon smolts. N Am J Fish Manage 16:302–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beacham TD, Supernault KJ, Wetklo M, Deagle B, Labaree K, Irvine JR, Candy JR, Miller KM, Nelson RJ, Withler RE (2003) The geographic basis for population structure in the Fraser River Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Fish Bull (US) 101:229–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Beacham TD, Jonsen KL, Supernault KJ, Wetklo M, Deng L, Varnavskaya N (2006) Pacific Rim population structure of Chinook salmon as determined from microsatellite analysis. Trans Am Fish Soc 135:1604–1621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman BR, Dickhoff WW (1998) Plasticity of smolting in spring Chinook salmon: relation to growth and insulin-like growth factor-I. J Fish Bio 53:808–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell M (2001) Lateral plate evolution in the threespine stickleback: getting nowhere fast. Genetica 112–113:445–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D (2001) The control of false discovery rate under dependency. Ann Stat 29:1165–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, E, Leitzinger E (1991) Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Salmon Supplementation Studies In Idaho Rivers (Idaho Supplementation Studies) Experimental Design. Report to Bonneville Power administration, Project No. 198909800, BPA Report DOE/BP-01466–1, 200 pp

  • Brannon EL, Powell MS, Quinn TP, Talbot AJ (2004) Population structure of Columbia River Basin Chinook salmon and steelhead trout. Res Fish Sci 12:99–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger CV, Scribner KT, Spearman WJ, Swanton CO, Campton DE (2000) Genetic contribution of three introduced life history forms of sockeye salmon to colonization of Frazer Lake, Alaska. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:2096–2111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke WC, Withler RE, Shelbourn JE (1994) Inheritance of smolting phenotypes in backcrosses of hybrid stream-type X ocean-type Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Estuaries 17:13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor WP, Burge HL, Waitt R, Bjornn TC (2002) Juvenile life history of wild fall Chinook salmon in the Snake and Clearwater rivers. N Am J Fish Manage 22:703–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor WP, Sneva JG, Tiffan KF, Steinhorst RK, Ross D (2005) Two alternative juvenile life history types for fall Chinook salmon in the Snake River Basin. Trans Am Fish. Soc 134:291–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor WP, Garcia AP (2006) Prespawning movement of wild and hatchery fall Chinook salmon adults in the Snake River. Trans Am Fish Soc 135:297–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornuet JM, Piry S, Luikart G, Estoup A, Solignac M (1999) New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics 153:1989–2000

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings SA, Brannon EL, Adams KJ, Thorgaard GH (1997) Genetic analyses to establish captive breeding priorities for endangered Snake River sockeye salmon. Conserv Biol 11:662–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittman AH, Quinn TP, Nevitt GA (1996) Timing of imprinting to natural and artificial odors by coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 53:434–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne P, Bernatchez L (2002) An analytical investigation of the dynamics of inbreeding in multi-generation supportive breeding. Conserv Genet 3:47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1980) Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulate. Evolution 34:76–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1995) Multiple-trait coevolution and environmental gradients in guppies. Trends Ecol Evol 10:22–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford MJ (1998) Testing models of migration and isolation among populations of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Evolution 52:539–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford MJ (2002) Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild. Conserv. Biol. 16:815–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel OH, Soule ME (1981) Conservation and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert CH (1912) Age at maturity of Pacific coast salmon of the genus Oncorhynchus. Bull US Fish Comm 32:57–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan DM, Frankham R (2003) Dynamics of genetic adaptation to captivity. Conserv Genet 4:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices version 2.9.3. Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html

  • Hasler AD, Scholz AT (1983) Olfactory imprinting and homing in salmon: investigations into the mechanism of imprinting process. Zoophysiology, vol 14. Springer-Verlag, New York

  • Healey MC (1991) Life history of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). In: Groot C, Margolis L (eds) Pacific salmon life histories. UBC Press, Vancouver, pp 311–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick PW, Hedgecock D, Hamelberg S, Croci SJ (2000) The impact of supplementation in winter-run Chinook salmon on effective population size. J Hered 91:112–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry AP (2001) Adaptive divergence and the evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: an empirical demonstration using introduced sockeye salmon. Genetica 112/113:515–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry AP, Kinnison MT (1999) The pace of modern life: measuring rates of contemporary microevolution. Evolution 53:1637–1653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry AP, Dittman AH, Hardy RH (2000) Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. Science 290:516–518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry AP, Castric V, Kinnison MT, Quinn TP (2003) The evolution of philopatry and dispersal: homing vs. straying in salmonids. In: Hendry AP, Stearns SC (eds) Evolution illuminated: salmon and their relatives. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 52–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinnison MT, Unwin MJ, Boustead N, Quinn TP (1998) Population specific variation in body dimensions of adult Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from New Zealand and their source population, 90 years after their introduction. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:554–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnison MT, Unwin MJ, Hendry AP, Quinn TP (2001) Migratory costs and the evolution of egg size and number in introduced and indigenous salmon populations. Evolution 55:1656–1667

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kwain W, Thomas E (1984) The first evidence of spring spawning by Chinook salmon in Lake Superior. N Am J Fish Manage 4:227–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luikart G, Cornuet JM (1999) Estimating the effective number of breeders from heterozygote excess in progeny. Genetics 151:1211–1216

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall AR, Blankenship HL, Connor SP (2000) Genetic characterization of naturally spawned Snake River fall-run Chinook salmon. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:680–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIssac DO, Quinn TP (1988) Evidence for a hereditary component in homing behavior of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45:2201–2205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meffe GK, Vrijenhoek LC (1988) Conservation genetics in the management of desert fishes. Conserv Biol 2:157–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner AM, Bailey RG (1989) Salmonid colonization of new streams in Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska. Aquacult Fish Manage 20:179–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Morbey Y (2000) Protandry in Pacific salmon. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:1252–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narum SR (2006) Beyond Bonferroni: Less conservative analyses for conservation genetics. Cons Gen, DOI 10.1007/s10592-005-9056-y

  • Narum SR, Powell MS, Talbot AJ (2004) A distinctive microsatellite locus that differentiates ocean-type from stream-type Chinook salmon in the interior Columbia River Basin. Trans Am Fish Soc 133:1051–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen JB, Bentzen P, Seeb JE (1998) Characterization of seven microsatellite loci derived from pink salmon. Mol Ecol 7:1083–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen JB, Bentzen P, Banks M, Shaklee JB, Young S (2000) Microsatellites reveal population identity of individual pink salmon to allow supportive breeding of a population at risk of extinction. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:232–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhurst ZE (1950) Survey of the Columbia River an its tributaries. Special Scientific Report No. 39, Part 6. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC

  • Paetkau D, Calvert W, Stirling I, Strobeck C (1995) Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol Ecol 4:347–354

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn TP (1993) A review of homing and straying of wild and hatchery-produced salmon. Fish Res 18:29–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn TP, Fresh K (1984) Homing and straying in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from Cowlitz River Hatchery, Washington. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 41:1078–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn TP, Nemeth RS, McIsaac DO (1991) Homing and straying patterns of fall Chinook salmon in the lower Columbia River. Trans Am Fish Soc 120:150–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn TP, Nielsen JL, Gan C et al (1996) Origin and genetic structure of Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, transplanted from California to New Zealand: allozyme and mtDNA evidence. Fish Bull (US) 94:506–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn TP, Unwin MJ, Kinnison MT (2000) Evolution of temporal isolation in the wild: genetic divergence in timing of migration and breeding in introduced populations of Chinook salmon. Evolution 54:1372–1385

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn TP, Kinnison MT, Unwin MJ (2001) Evolution of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) populations in New Zealand: pattern, rate, and process. Genetica 112/113:493–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall RG, Healey MC, Dempson JB (1987) Variability in length of freshwater residence of salmon, trout, and char. Am Fish Soc Symp 1:27–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen C, Ostberg CO, Clifton DR, Holloway JL, Rodriguez RJ (2003) Identification of a genetic marker that discriminates ocean- and stream-type Chinook salmon in the Columbia River Basin. Trans Am Fish Soc 132:131–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995a) GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond M, Rousset F (1995b) Testing heterozygote excess and deficiency. Genetics 140:1413–1419

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimers PE (1973) The length of residence of juvenile fall chinook salmon in the Sixes River, Oregon. Oreg Fish Comm 4:1–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Reznick DN, Ghalambor CK (2001) The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what do empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica 112/113:183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reznick DN, Shaw FH, Rodd FH, Shaw RG (1997) Evaluation of the rate of evolution in natural populations of guppies (Poecilia reticulate). Science 275:1934–1937

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schluchter MD, Lichatowich JA (1977) Juvenile life histories of Rogue River spring Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (Walbaum), as determined by scale analysis. Information Report Series, Fisheries Number 77-5. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Corvallis, OR

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer TR, Nobriga ML, Harrell WC, Batham W, Kimmerer WJ (2001) Floodplain rearing of juvenile chinook salmon: evidence of enhanced growth and survival. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:325–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor EB (1990) Phenotypic correlates of life-history variation in juvenile Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. J Anim Ecol 59:455–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teel DJ, Milner GB, Winans GA, Grant WS (2000) Genetic population structure and origin of life history types in Chinook salmon in British Columbia, Canada. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:194–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tighe, T (2001) Clearwater fish hatchery annual report. Brood year 1999 Chinook and brood year 2000 Steelhead. Idaho Department of Fish and Game. Report # 01-23

  • Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vasemagi A, Gross R, Paaver T, Koljonen ML, Saisa M, Nilsson J (2005) Analysis of gene associated tandem repeat markers in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) populations: implications for restoration and conservation in the Baltic Sea. Conserv Genet 6:385–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Ryman N (2001) Genetic effects of multiple generations of supportive breeding. Conserv Biol 15:1619–1631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waples RS (1990) Conservation genetics of Pacific salmon. II. Effective population size and the rate of loss of genetic variability. J Hered 81:267–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Waples RS, Teel DJ, Myers JM, Marshall AR (2004) Life-history divergence in Chinook salmon: historical contingency and parallel evolution. Evolution 58:386–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson KS, Cordes JF, May B (2002) Characterization of microsatellite loci in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and cross-species amplification in other salmonids. Mol Ecol Notes 2:17–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Withler FC (1982) Transplanting Pacific salmon. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci 1079:1–27

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Scott Kellar, Mark Pishl Casey McCormack, and Carol Reuben for field collections, and Vanessa Jacobson for laboratory work. Figure 1 was provided by David Graves. The manuscript was greatly improved following comments by Eric Taylor, Jay Hesse, and anonymous reviewers. Funding for this research came from contracts 198335003 and 199403400 from the Bonneville Power Administration awarded to the Nez Perce Tribe.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shawn R. Narum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Narum, S.R., Arnsberg, W.D., Talbot, A.J. et al. Reproductive isolation following reintroduction of Chinook salmon with alternative life histories. Conserv Genet 8, 1123–1132 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-006-9268-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-006-9268-9

Keywords

Navigation