Abstract
Identifying species’ extinction risks and understanding their ecological associations are considered critical steps for achieving long-term conservation of biodiversity in the face of global changes. We evaluated the potential impact of global climate change (GCC) on the co-distribution patterns of 12 Mexican endemic hummingbirds and 118 plants they used as nectar resources. Using ecological niche modeling, we estimated the species’ potential distribution areas and their degree of range overlap at present and under future scenarios (2040’s–2080’s). We then performed temporal beta diversity analyses (based on Sorensen’s index) to assess changes in community assembly over time. To determine the potential impacts of GCC on the organization of hummingbird-plant relationships, we calculated niche overlap and network size metrics. Our results showed that even if we assume that species can disperse to novel habitat areas, at least 46.2% of hummingbirds and 45.8% of plant species will face range reductions due to changes in their climate-suitability areas, which will in turn result in an increased mismatch of their co-distribution patterns. Additionally, temporal beta analyses suggested species turnover between the present and future, as well as changes in niche size and overlap for hummingbird-plant co-occurrence networks. These changes could lead to the formation of novel assemblages through species reshuffling, with a tendency to the specialization of networks. These results emphasize that we should not expect uniform or matched responses among species and regions into the future. Therefore, analyses of species’ co-occurrence are needed to accomplish the long-term protection of important ecosystem services such as pollination.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Able K (2000) Handbook of the birds of the world, Volume 5, Barn-Owls to Hummingbirds Josep del Hoyo Andrew Elliott Jordi Sargatal. Auk 117:532–534. https://doi.org/10.2307/4089742
Aiello-Lammens ME, Boria RA, Radosavljevic A et al (2015) spThin: an R package for spatial thinning of species occurrence records for use in ecological niche models. Ecography 38:541–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01132
Alkishe AA, Peterson AT, Samy AM (2017) Climate change influences on the potential geographic distribution of the disease vector tick Ixodes ricinus. PLoS ONE 12:e0189092. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189092
Altshuler DL, Dudley R, McGuire JA (2004) Resolution of a paradox: hummingbird flight at high elevation does not come without a cost. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:17731–17736. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0405260101
Anderson RP, Lew D, Peterson AT (2003) Evaluating predictive models of species’ distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecol Model 162:211–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00349-6
Antoniazzi R, García-Franco J, Janda M et al (2020) Diurnal foraging ant–tree co-occurrence networks are similar between canopy and understorey in a Neotropical rain forest. Biotropica 52:717–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12773
Araújo MB, Anderson RP, Márcia Barbosa A et al (2019) Standards for distribution models in biodiversity assessments. Sci Adv 5:eaat4858. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat4858
Araújo MB, Luoto M (2007) The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:743–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00359.x
Araújo MB, Rozenfeld A, Rahbek C, Marquet PA (2011) Using species co-occurrence networks to assess the impacts of climate change. Ecography 34:897–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.06919.x
Arizmendi Arriaga MC del, Berlanga H (2014) Colibríes de México y Norteamérica, 1st edn. CONABIO, México
Barve N, Barve V, Jiménez-Valverde A et al (2011) The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. Ecol Model 222:1810–1819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.02.011
Barve N, Barve V (2016) ENMGadgets: tools for pre and post processing in ENM workflow. R package version 0.0.14. https://github.com/narayanibarve/ENMGadgets. Accessed 15 February 2021
Bascompte J, Jordano P (2013) Mutualistic networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey
Beck J, Böller M, Erhardt A, Schwanghart W (2014) Spatial bias in the GBIF database and its effect on modeling species’ geographic distributions. Ecol Inform 19:10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.11.002
Bivand R, Lewin-Koh N, Pebesma E, et al (2016) Package ‘maptools’, tools for reading and handling spatial objects. R package version 0.9–2. https://cran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2017–12–21/web/packages/maptools/index.html. Accessed March 15, 2022
Blanchet FG, Cazelles K, Gravel D (2020) Co-occurrence is not evidence of ecological interactions. Ecol Lett 23:1050–1063. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13525
Blois JL, Zarnetske PL, Fitzpatrick MC, Finnegan S (2013) Climate change and the past, present, and future of biotic interactions. Science 341:499–504. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237184
Blüthgen N, Menzel F, Blüthgen N (2006) Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecol 6:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6785-6-9
Boucher O, Servonnat J, Albright AL et al (2020) Presentation and evaluation of the IPSL-CM6A-LR climate model. J Adv Model Earth Syst 12:e2019MS002010. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS002010
Broennimann O, Thuiller W, Hughes G et al (2006) Do geographic distribution, niche property and life form explain plants’ vulnerability to global change? Glob Change Biol 12:1079–1093. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01157.x
Buermann W, Chaves JA, Dudley R et al (2011) Projected changes in elevational distribution and flight performance of montane Neotropical hummingbirds in response to climate change. Glob Change Biol 17:1671–1680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02330.x
Buzato S, Sazima M, Sazima I (2000) Hummingbird-pollinated floras at three Atlantic Forest sites1. Biotropica 32:824–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2000.tb00621.x
Campbell LP, Luther C, Moo-Llanes D et al (2015) Climate change influences on global distributions of dengue and chikungunya virus vectors. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 370:20140135. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0135
CaraDonna PJ, Petry WK, Brennan RM et al (2017) Interaction rewiring and the rapid turnover of plant–pollinator networks. Ecol Lett 20:385–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12740
Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR (2018) The misunderstood sixth mass extinction. Science 360:1080–1081. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau0191
Chamberlain S, Barve V, Mcglinn D, et al (2021) rgbif: interface to the global biodiversity information facility API. R package version 3.5.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgbif. Accessed 9 February 2021
Chávez-González E, Vizentin-Bugoni J, Vázquez DP et al (2020) Drivers of the structure of plant–hummingbird interaction networks at multiple temporal scales. Oecologia 193:913–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04727-4
Chesser RT, Billerman SM, Burns KJ et al (2020) Sixty-first supplement to the American Ornithological Society’s check-list of North American birds. Auk 137:ukaa030. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/ukaa030
Cobos ME, Peterson AT, Barve N, Osorio-Olvera L (2019) kuenm: an R package for detailed development of ecological niche models using Maxent. PeerJ 7:e6281. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6281
Correa-Lima APA, Varassin IG, Barve N, Zwiener VP (2019) Spatio-temporal effects of climate change on the geographical distribution and flowering phenology of hummingbird-pollinated plants. Ann Bot 124:389–398. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcz079
Corro EJ, Ahuatzin DA, Jaimes AA et al (2019) Forest cover and landscape heterogeneity shape ant–plant co-occurrence networks in human-dominated tropical rainforests. Landsc Ecol 34:93–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0747-4
Corro EJ, Villalobos F, Lira-Noriega A, et al (2021) Current climate and latitude shape the structure of bat-fruit interaction networks throughout the Neotropical region. Écoscience 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2021.2007644
Crimmins SM, Dobrowski SZ, Greenberg JA et al (2011) Changes in climatic water balance drive downhill shifts in plant species’ optimum elevations. Science 331:324–327. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199040
Cuervo-Robayo AP, Ureta C, Gómez-Albores MA et al (2020) One hundred years of climate change in Mexico. PLoS ONE 15:e0209808. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209808
Dalsgaard B, Magård E, Fjeldså J et al (2011) Specialization in plant-hummingbird networks is associated with species richness, contemporary precipitation and quaternary climate-change velocity. PLoS ONE 6:e25891. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025891
Dicks LV, Viana B, Bommarco R et al (2016) Ten policies for pollinators. Science 354:975–976. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai9226
Dinerstein E, Olson D, Joshi A et al (2017) An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. Bioscience 67:534–545. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix014
Dormann CF, Frund J, Bluthgen N, Gruber B (2009) Indices, graphs and null models: analyzing bipartite ecological networks. Open Ecol J 2:7–24. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874213000902010007
Dormann CF, Frund J, Bluthgen N, et al (2021) Package bipartite: visualising bipartite networks and calculating some (ecological) indices. R package version 2.16. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/bipartite/index.html. Accessed 13 November 2021
Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP et al (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x
Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T et al (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists: statistical explanation of MaxEnt. Divers Distrib 17:43–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
Escobar LE, Lira-Noriega A, Medina-Vogel G, Townsend Peterson A (2014) Potential for spread of the white-nose fungus (Pseudogymnoascus destructans) in the Americas: use of Maxent and NicheA to assure strict model transference. Geospat Health 9:221. https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2014.19
Fajardo J, Corcoran D, Roehrdanz PR et al (2020) GCM compare R: a web application to assess differences and assist in the selection of general circulation models for climate change research. Methods Ecol Evol 11:656–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13360
Fick SE, Hijmans RJ (2017) WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 37:4302–4315. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086
García-Callejas D, Molowny-Horas R, Araújo MB (2018) The effect of multiple biotic interaction types on species persistence. Ecology 99:2327–2337. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2465
García-Callejas D, Molowny-Horas R, Araújo MB, Gravel D (2019) Spatial trophic cascades in communities connected by dispersal and foraging. Ecology 100:e02820. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2820
Gorostiague P, Sajama J, Ortega-Baes P (2018) Will climate change cause spatial mismatch between plants and their pollinators? A test using Andean cactus species. Biol Conserv 226:247–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.003
Graham LJ, Weinstein BG, Supp SR, Graham CH (2017) Future geographic patterns of novel and disappearing assemblages across three dimensions of diversity: a case study with Ecuadorian hummingbirds. Divers Distrib 23:944–954. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12587
Hanspach J, Kühn I, Schweiger O et al (2011) Geographical patterns in prediction errors of species distribution models: patterns in prediction error. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 20:779–788. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00649.x
Hegland SJ, Nielsen A, Lázaro A et al (2009) How does climate warming affect plant-pollinator interactions? Ecol Lett 12:184–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01269.x
Heinen JH, Rahbek C, Borregaard MK (2020) Conservation of species interactions to achieve self-sustaining ecosystems. Ecography 43:1603–1611. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04980
Hijmans R, van Etten J, Cheng J, et al (2015) Raster: geographic data analysis and modeling. R package version 2.5–2. https://cran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2016–01–28/web/packages/raster/index.html. Accessed 9 February 2021
Infante SD, Lara C, Arizmendi MC (2020a) Temporal dynamics of the hummingbird-plant interaction network of a dry forest in Chamela, Mexico: a 30-year follow-up after two hurricanes. PeerJ 8:e8338. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8338
Infante SD, Lara C, Arizmendi MC (2020b) Land-use change in a Mexican dry forest promotes species turnover and increases nestedness in plant-hummingbird networks: are exotic plants taking over? Trop Conserv Sci 13:1940082920978952. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082920978952
Jordano P (2016a) Chasing Ecological Interactions PLOS Biol 14:e1002559. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002559
Jordano P (2016b) Sampling networks of ecological interactions. Funct Ecol 30:1883–1893. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12763
Karger DN, Conrad O, Böhner J et al (2017) Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Sci Data 4:170122. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.122
Kovács-Hostyánszki A, Espíndola A, Vanbergen AJ et al (2017) Ecological intensification to mitigate impacts of conventional intensive land use on pollinators and pollination. Ecol Lett 20:673–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12762
Kübler D, Hildebrandt P, Günter S et al (2016) Assessing the importance of topographic variables for the spatial distribution of tree species in a tropical mountain forest. Erdkunde 70:19–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01687.x
Linder HP (2001) Plant diversity and endemism in sub-Saharan tropical Africa. J Biogeogr 28:169–182
Linhart YB, Feinsinger P (1980) Plant-hummingbird interactions: effects of island size and degree of specialization on pollination. J Ecol 68:745–760. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259454
Liu C, White M, Newell G (2013) Selecting thresholds for the prediction of species occurrence with presence-only data. J Biogeogr 40:778–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12058
López-Segoviano G, Arenas-Navarro M, Vega E, del Arizmendi MC (2018) Hummingbird migration and flowering synchrony in the temperate forests of northwestern Mexico. PeerJ 6:e5131. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5131
Lovejoy TE, Hannah L (2019) Biodiversity and climate change: transforming the biosphere. Yale University Press
Luna P, Villalobos F, Escobar F et al (2022) Global trends in the trophic specialisation of flower-visitor networks are explained by current and historical climate. Ecol Lett 25:113–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13910
McConkey KR, O’Farrill G (2015) Cryptic function loss in animal populations. Trends Ecol Evol 30:182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.01.006
McKinney A, Caradonna P, Inouye D et al (2012) Asynchronous changes in phenology of migrating broad-tailed hummingbirds and their early-season nectar resources. Ecology 93:1987–1993. https://doi.org/10.2307/41739255
Merow C, Smith MJ, Edwards TC et al (2014) What do we gain from simplicity versus complexity in species distribution models? Ecography 37:1267–1281. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.00845
Morrone JJ (2014) Biogeographical regionalisation of the Neotropical region. Zootaxa 3782:1–110. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3782.1.1
Morueta-Holme N, Blonder B, Sandel B et al (2016) A network approach for inferring species associations from co-occurrence data. Ecography 39:1139–1150. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01892
Muscarella R, Galante PJ, Soley-Guardia M et al (2014) ENMeval: an R package for conducting spatially independent evaluations and estimating optimal model complexity for Maxent ecological niche models. Methods Ecol Evol 5:1198–1205. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12261
Naimi B (2015) usdm:Uncertainty analysis for species distribution models. R package version 1. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/usdm/. Accessed 9 February 2021
Nowak L, Kissling W, Bender I et al (2019) Projecting consequences of global warming for the functional diversity of fleshy-fruited plants and frugivorous birds along a tropical elevational gradient. Divers Distrib 25:1362–1374. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12946
Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120:321–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18644.x
Osorio-Olvera L, Lira-Noriega A, Soberón J et al (2020) ntbox: an r package with graphical user interface for modelling and evaluating multidimensional ecological niches. Methods Ecol Evol 11:1199–1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13452
Owens HL, Campbell LP, Dornak LL et al (2013) Constraints on interpretation of ecological niche models by limited environmental ranges on calibration areas. Ecol Model 263:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.04.011
Palacio FX, Girini JM (2018) Biotic interactions in species distribution models enhance model performance and shed light on natural history of rare birds: a case study using the straight-billed reedhaunter Limnoctites rectirostris. J Avian Biol 49:e01743. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.01743
Pandey R, Papeş M (2018) Changes in future potential distributions of apex predator and mesopredator mammals in North America. Reg Environ Change 18:1223–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1265-7
Pastore AI, Barabás G, Bimler MD et al (2021) The evolution of niche overlap and competitive differences. Nat Ecol Evol 5:330–337. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-01383-y
Pearson R, Martínez-Meyer E, Velázquez MA et al (2019) Research priorities for maintaining biodiversity’s contributions to people in Latin America. UCL Open Environ 1:02. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000002
Pérez-Navarro MA, Broennimann O, Esteve MA et al (2021) Temporal variability is key to modelling the climatic niche. Divers Distrib 27:473–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13207
Peterson AT, Papeş M, Soberón J (2008) Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling. Ecol Model 213:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.11.008
Peterson AT, Soberón J, Pearson RG et al (2011) Ecological niches and geographic distributions (MPB-49). Princeton University Press
Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Dudík M et al (2017) Opening the black box: an open-source release of Maxent. Ecography 40:887–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03049
Phillips BB, Shaw RF, Holland MJ et al (2018) Drought reduces floral resources for pollinators. Glob Change Biol 24:3226–3235. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14130
Poisot T, Canard E, Mouillot D et al (2012) The dissimilarity of species interaction networks. Ecol Lett 15:1353–1361. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12002
Ponti R, Sannolo M (2022) The importance of including phenology when modelling species ecological niche. Ecography e06143. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.06143
Potts SG, Ngo HT, Biesmeijer JC, et al (2016) The assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production. https://www.ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/pdf/individual_chapters_pollination_20170305.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2022
Powers JM, Briggs HM, Dickson RG et al (2022) Earlier snow melt and reduced summer precipitation alter floral traits important to pollination. Glob Change Biol 28:323–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15908
Prieto-Torres DA, Lira-Noriega A, Navarro-Sigüenza AG (2020) Climate change promotes species loss and uneven modification of richness patterns in the avifauna associated to Neotropical seasonally dry forests. Perspect Ecol Conserv 18:19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2020.01.002
Prieto-Torres DA, Nuñez RLE, Remolina FD, del Arizmendi MC (2021) Most Mexican hummingbirds lose under climate and land-use change: long-term conservation implications. Perspect Ecol Conserv 19:487–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2021.07.001
Ramírez-Ortiz H, Dáttilo W, Yañez-Arenas C, Lira-Noriega A (2020) Potential distribution and predator-prey interactions with terrestrial vertebrates of four pet commercialized exotic snakes in Mexico. Acta Oecologica 103:103526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2020.103526
Regolin AL, Muylaert RL, Crestani AC et al (2020) Seed dispersal by Neotropical bats in human-disturbed landscapes. Wildl Res 48:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR19138
Reis Jr R, Oliveria ML, Borges GRA (2015) RT4Bio: R tools for biologists. R package version 1.0. https://sourceforge.net/projects/rt4bio/. Accessed 13 November 2021
Rheingantz ML, de Menezes JFS, de Thoisy B (2014) Defining Neotropical otter Lontra longicaudis distribution, conservation priorities and ecological frontiers. Tropical Conservation Science 7:214–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291400700204
Riahi K, van Vuuren DP, Kriegler E et al (2017) The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob Environ Change 42:153–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009
Robertson MP, Visser V, Hui C (2016) Biogeo: an R package for assessing and improving data quality of occurrence record datasets. Ecography 39:394–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.02118
Rodríguez-Flores CI, Ornelas JF, Wethington S, del Arizmendi MC (2019) Are hummingbirds generalists or specialists? Using network analysis to explore the mechanisms influencing their interaction with nectar resources. PLoS ONE 14:e0211855. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211855
Roubicek AJ, VanDerWal J, Beaumont LJ et al (2010) Does the choice of climate baseline matter in ecological niche modelling? Ecol Model 221:2280–2286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.06.021
Scaven VL, Rafferty NE (2013) Physiological effects of climate warming on flowering plants and insect pollinators and potential consequences for their interactions. Curr Zool 59:418–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/59.3.418
Schweiger O, Settele J, Kudrna O et al (2008) Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting species. Ecology 89:3472–3479. https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1748.1
Scully AE, Fisher S, Miller DAW, Thornton DH (2018) Influence of biotic interactions on the distribution of Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) at the southern edge of their range. J Mammal 99:760–772. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyy053
Şekercioğlu ÇH, Primack RB, Wormworth J (2012) The effects of climate change on tropical birds. Biol Conserv 148:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.019
Senapathi D, Biesmeijer JC, Breeze TD et al (2015) Pollinator conservation—the difference between managing for pollination services and preserving pollinator diversity. Curr Opin Insect Sci 12:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2015.11.002
Shepherd TG, Boyd E, Calel RA et al (2018) Storylines: an alternative approach to representing uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change. Clim Change 151:555–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2317-9
Simmons BI, Sutherland WJ, Dicks LV et al (2018) Moving from frugivory to seed dispersal: incorporating the functional outcomes of interactions in plant–frugivore networks. J Anim Ecol 87:995–1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12831
Soberón J, Peterson AT (2005) Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. https://doi.org/10.17161/bi.v2i0.4
Sonne J, Martín González AM, Maruyama PK et al (2016) High proportion of smaller ranged hummingbird species coincides with ecological specialization across the Americas. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 283:20152512. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2512
Sonne J, Maruyama P, Martín González A et al (2022) Extinction, coextinction and colonization dynamics in plant–hummingbird networks under climate change. Nat Ecol Evol 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01693-3
Sousa NOM de, Lopes LE, Costa LM et al (2021) Adopting habitat-use to infer movement potential and sensitivity to human disturbance of birds in a Neotropical Savannah. Biol Conserv 254:108921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108921
Stoerk T, Wagner G, Ward RET (2018) Policy brief—recommendations for improving the treatment of risk and uncertainty in economic estimates of climate impacts in the sixth intergovernmental panel on climate change assessment report. Rev Environ Econ Policy 12:371–376. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rey005
Takkis K, Tscheulin T, Petanidou T (2018) Differential effects of climate warming on the nectar secretion of early- and late-flowering Mediterranean plants. Front Plant Sci 9:874. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00874
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, Chase MW, Christenhusz MJM et al (2016) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot J Linn Soc 181:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12385
Thompson JN (2009) The coevolving web of life(American society of naturalists presidential address). Am Nat 173:125–140. https://doi.org/10.1086/595752
Tylianakis JM, Didham RK, Bascompte J, Wardle DA (2008) Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Lett 11:1351–1363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01250.x
Vilela B, Villalobos F (2016) Package letsR: tools for data handling and analysis in macroecology. https://cran.microsoft.com/snapshot/2016–11–02/web/packages/letsR/letsR.pdf. Accessed 9 February 2021
Visser ME, Both C (2005) Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstick. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 272:2561–2569. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3356
Zelinka MD, Myers TA, McCoy DT et al (2020) Causes of higher climate sensitivity in CMIP6 Models. Geophys Res Lett 47:e2019GL085782. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085782
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA-UNAM-PAPIIT IN221920) and the Programa de Investigación en Cambio Climático (PINCC, UNAM) for financial and logistical support for this study. DRF was supported by a master’s scholarship [grant number 1084487] from the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT Mexico). DAP-T extends his gratitude to the Rufford Foundation (Projects: 16017-1, 20284-2, and 28502-B) for the financial sources received for the compilation of species occurrence data in Mexican dry forest used in this study and the development of workshops that provided the tools and skills necessary to students (as DRF) for this type of research. Also, we appreciate the technical assistance provided by Javier Fajardo with the use of GCM compareR´s web application and thank Lynna M. Kiere for English language editing. WD received support from CONACyT (project FOP16-2021-01, no. 319227).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Remolina-Figueroa, D., Prieto-Torres, D.A., Dáttilo, W. et al. Together forever? Hummingbird-plant relationships in the face of climate warming. Climatic Change 175, 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03447-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-022-03447-3