Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Vulnerabilities of irrigated and rainfed corn to climate change in a humid climate in the Lower Mississippi Delta

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of fossil fuels for energy needs increases atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations to levels that can significantly exacerbate the climate on earth. Assessing the vulnerability of regional crop production systems to such an altered climate in the future is essential for implementing appropriate adaptation and mitigation strategies for sustainable agriculture. We investigated the possible impacts of climate change (CC) projected by multiple global climate models (GCMs) on rainfed and irrigated corn (Zea mays L., a C4 plant) in the Lower Mississippi Delta region (LMD), USA. The CSM-CROPGRO-Maize v4.6 module in the RZWQM2 model (hereafter referred to as the “corn model”) was previously calibrated and validated for modeling corn at Stoneville, Mississippi, a representative location in the LMD was used. The CC scenarios considered in this study were ensembles of climate projections of multiple GCMs (97 ensemble members) that participated in the Climate Model Inter-comparison and Improvement Program 5. These CC scenarios were bias-corrected and spatially downscaled (BCSD) at the location for the years 2050 and 2080. Four representative GHG concentration pathways (RCP) 2.6, 4.5, 6.0, and 8.5 drove these CC scenarios. Under both irrigated and rainfed conditions, corn yield responses to enhanced CO2 were weak; thus, yield declined significantly in response to the enhanced air temperatures under all the RCP scenarios in both 2050 and 2080. The yield declines across RCPs ranged between 10 and 62% under irrigated conditions, and between 9 and 60% under rainfed conditions, mainly due to increased frequency of extreme temperatures and reduced crop durations. Water use efficiency declined between 22 and 150% under irrigated, and 8 and 54% under rainfed management. As an adaptation measure, planting corn up to 9 weeks earlier in the season, in general, failed to boost yields from increased crop duration and reduction in upper extreme air temperatures, as incidences of lower extreme temperatures also increased alarmingly. Development of cultivars that are more heat tolerant and produce higher yields under extreme temperatures would be required to combat corn yield decline in the region from climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aeschbach-Hertig W, Gleeson T (2012) Regional strategies for the accelerating global problem of groundwater depletion. Nat Geosci 5(12):853–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, L.R., K.W. Rojas, J. Hanson, M.J. Shafer, and L. Ma (Eds.). 2000. Root zone water quality model. Modeling management effects on water quality and crop production. Water Resources Publications, LLC, Colorado, USA. Pp. 372

  • Allen LH, Boote KJ, Jones JW, Valle RR, Acock B, Rogers HH, Dahlman RC (1987) Response of vegetation to rising carbon dioxide: photosynthesis, biomass, and seed yield of soybean. Global Biochem Cycles 1:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anapalli SS, Fisher DK, Reddy KN, Pettigrew WT, Sui R, Ahuja LR (2016) Vulnerability and adaptation of cotton to climate change in the Mississippi Delta. Climate 4(55):1–20

  • Anapalli SS, Reddy KN, Jagadamma S (2018) Conservation tillage impacts and adaptations in irrigated corn (Zea mays L.) production in a humid climate. Agron J 110:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attavanich W, McCarl BA (2014) How is CO2 affecting yields and technological progress? A statistical analaysis. Clim Chang 124:747–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1128-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter B, Eggleston S, Schmitt J, Nehrbass-Ahles C, Stocker TF, Fischer H, Kipfstuhl S, Chappellaz J (2015) Revision of the EPICA Dome C CO2 record from 800 to 600-kyr before present. Geophys Res Lett 42(2):542–549. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014gl061957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernacchi CJ, Calfapietra C, Davey PA, Wittig VE, Scarascia-Mugnozza GE, Raines CA, Long SP (2003) Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance responses of poplars to free air CO2 enrichment (PopFACE) during the first growth cycle and immediately following coppice. New Phytol 159:609–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bita CE, Gerats T (2013) Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: scientific fundamentals and heat stress-tolerant crops. Front Plant Sci 4:1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boote, K.J., Pickering, N.B., Allen, L.H., Jr., 1997. Plant modeling: advances and gaps in our capability to project future crop growth and yield in response to global climate change. In: Allen, L.H., Jr., Kirkham, M.B., Olszyk, D.M., Whitman, C.E. (Eds.) Advances in Carbon Dioxide Effects Research (Special Publication No. 61). ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 179-228

  • Christensen NS, Lettenmaier DP (2007) A multimodel ensemble approach to assessment of climate change impacts on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci:3727–3770

  • Deryng D, Conway D, Ramankuty N, Price J, Warren R (2014) Global crop yield response to extreme heat stress under multiple climate change futures. Environ Res Lett 9:034011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra FA, Blumenthal D, Morgan JA, Pendall E, Carrillo Y, Follett RF (2010) Contrasting effect of elevated CO2 and warming on nitrogen cycling in a semiarid grassland. New Phytol 187:426–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake BG, Gonzalez-Meler MA, Long SP, S.P. (1997) More efficient plants: a consequence of rising atmospheric CO2. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48:609–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durand J-LK, Delusca KJ, Boote J, Lizaso R, Manderscheid HJ, Weigel AC, Ruane C, Rosenzweig J, Jones L, Ahuja SS, Anapalli B, Basso C, Baron P, Bertuzzi C, Biernath CD, Deryng F, Ewert T, Gaiser S, Gayler F, Heinlein K, Kersebaum S-H, Kim C, Müller C, Nendel A, Olioso F, Priesack E, Villegas JR, Ripoche D, Rötter RP, Seidel SI, Srivastava A, Tao F, Timlin D, Twine T, Wang E, Webber H, Zhao Z (2018) How accurately do maize crop model simulate the interactions of atmospheric CO2 concentration with limited water supply on water use and yield? European J Agron. 100:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, C.B V.R. Barros, D.J. Dokkan, K.J. Mach, M.D. Mastrandre, T.E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K.L. Ebi, Y.O. Estrada, R.C. Genova, R.C B. Girma, E.S. Kissel, A.N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P.R. Mastrandrea, L.L. White, L.L. (Eds.), 2014. Climate change: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Working Group II to the 5th assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New York

  • Ghannoum O, von Caemmerer S, Ziska LH, Conroy JP (2000) The response of C4 plants to elevated CO2 partial pressure: a reassessment. Plant Cell Environ 23:931–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield JL, Preuger JH (2015) Temperature extremes: the effect on plant growth and development. Weather and Clim Extremes 10:4–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogenboom, G., J.W. Jones, and K.J. Boote. 1991. A decision support system for predictions of crop yield, evapotranspiration, and irrigation management. In: Proc. Irrig. and Drainage. ASCE, Reston, VA, 198–204

  • Hussain, H.A., S. Men, S. Hussain, Y. Chen, S. Ali, S. Zhang, K. Zhang, Y. Li, Q. Xu, and C. Liao. 2019. Interactive effects of drought and heat stresses on morpho-physiological attributes, yield, nutrient uptake and oxidative status in maize hybrids. Sci. Rep.3890. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40362-7

  • IPCC. 2007. Climate change: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by S. Solomon et al., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.

  • IPCC. 2014. Summary for policymakers. In: Field, C.B., Barros, V.R., Dokken, D.J., Mach, K.J., Mastrandrea, M.D., Bilir, T.E., Chatterjee, M., Ebi, K.L., Estrada, Y.O., Genova, R.C., Girma, B., Kissel, E.S., Levy, A.N., MacCracken, S., Mastrandrea, P.R., White, L.L. (Eds.), Climate change: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspect. Contribution of Working Group II to Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA. pp. 1–32

  • IPCC. 2018. Global Warming of 1.5°C: an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P.R. Shukla, A. Pirani, W. Moufouma-Okia, C. Péan, R. Pidcock, S. Connors, J.B.R. Matthews, Y. Chen, X. Zhou, M.I. Gomis, E. Lonnoy, T. Maycock, M. Tignor, and T. Waterfield (eds.)]. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/06/SR15_Full_Report_High_Res.pdf

  • Islam A, Ahuja LR, Garcia LA, Ma L, Saseendran SA (2012a) Modeling the effect of elevated CO2 and climate change on reference evapotranspiration in the semi-arid great plains. Transactions of ASABE 55(6):2135–2146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam A, Ahuja LR, Garcia LA, Ma L, Saseendran SA, Trout TJ (2012b) The impacts of climate change on irrigated corn production in the Central Great Plains. Agric Water Manag 110:94–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CA, Kiniry JR (1986) CERES-Maize: a simulation model of maize growth and development. Texas A&M Univ, Press, College Station, TX

  • Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Porter CH, Boote KJ, Batchelor WD, Hunt LA, Wilkens PW, Singh PWU, Gijsman AJ, Ritchie JT (2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur J Agron 18:235–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiniry JR, Bonhomme R (1991) Predicting maize phenology. In: Hodges T (ed) Predicting crop phenology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 115–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Ko J, Ahuja LR, Saseendran SA, Green TR, Ma L (2010) Simulation impacts of GCM-projected climate change on dryland cropping systems in the U.S. Central Great Plains. Agric For Meteorol 150:1331–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko J, Ahuja LR, Kimball BC, Saseendran SA, Ma L, Green TR, Wall G, Pinter P (2012) Simulation of climate change impacts on cropping systems in the Central Great Plains. Int Journal of Climatic Change 111:445–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kottek M, Grieser J, Beck C, Rudolf B, Rubel F (2006) World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Z 15:259–263. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebig MA, Franzluebbers AJ, Follett RF (2012) Agriculture and climate change: mitigation opportunity and adaptation imperatives. In: Liebig MA, Franzluebbers AJ, Follett RF (eds) Managing agricultural greenhouse gases: coordinated agricultural research through GRACEnet. Academic Press, New York, pp 3–11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Hoogenboom G, Ahuja LR, Ascough JCII, Saseendran SA (2006) Evaluation of the RZWQM-CERES-Maize hybrid model for corn production. Agric Syst 87:274–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma L, Hoogenboom G, Saseendran SA, Bartling PNS, Ahuja LR, Green TR (2009) Estimates of soil hydraulic properties and root growth factors on soil water balance and crop production. Agron J 101:572–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peart RM, Jones RB, Curry K, Boote KJ, Allen LH (1989) Impacts of climate change on crop yield in the south-eastern USA. In: Smith JB, Tirpak DA (eds) The potential effects of global climate change on the United States. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, pp 118–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Priya M, Sharma L, Kaur R, Bindumadhava H, Nair RM, Siddique KHM, Nayyar H (2019) GABA (γ-aminobutyric acid), as a thermo-protectant, to improve the reproductive function of heat-stressed mungbean plants. Sci Rep 9:7788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig C, Tubiello FN (1996) Effects of changes in minimum and maximum temperature on wheat yields in the central US: a simulation study. Agric For Meteorol 80(2–4):215–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saseendran SA, Singh KK, Rathore L, Singh S, Sinha SK (2000) Effects of climate change on rice production in Kerala. International Journal of Climatic Change 44(4):495–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saseendran SA, Trout TJ, Ahuja LR, Ma L, McMaster G, Andales AA, Chaves J, Ham J (2015) Quantification of crop water stress factors from soil water measurements in limited irrigation experiments. Agric Syst 137:191–205

  • Shuttleworth WJ, Wallace JS (1985) Evaporation from sparse crops-an energy combination theory. Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 111:839–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tans, P., and R. Keeling. 2016. Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Available at http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/

  • Tubiello FN, Donatelli MC, Rosenzweig C, Stockle CO (2000) Effect of climate change and elevated CO2 on cropping systems: model predictions at two Italian locations. Eur J Agron 13:179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kanuma M, Riahi K, Thomson A, Hubbard KG, Hurtt GC, Kram T, Krey V, Lamarque JF, Masui T, Meinshausen M, Nakicenovic N, Smith SJ, Rose SK (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Chang 109:5–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Caemmerer S, Furbank RT (2003) The C4 pathway: an efficient CO2 pump. Photosynth Res 77:191–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Caemmerer S, Ludwig M, Millgate A, Farquhar GD, Price D, Badger MR, Furbank RT (1997) Carbon isotope discrimination during C4 photosynthesis: insights from transgenic plants. Aust J Plant Physiol 24:487–493

    Google Scholar 

  • White JW, Hooogenboom G, Kimball BA, Wall GW, G.W. (2011) Methodology for simulating impacts of climate change on crop production. Field Crop Res 124:357–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sustainable Water Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 350, Stoneville, MS, 38776, USA

    Saseendran S. Anapalli, Srinivasa R. Pinnamaneni & Daniel K. Fisher

  2. Crop Production Systems Research Unit, USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 350, Stoneville, MS, 38776, USA

    Krishna N. Reddy

Authors
  1. Saseendran S. Anapalli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Srinivasa R. Pinnamaneni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel K. Fisher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Krishna N. Reddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saseendran S. Anapalli.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 85 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anapalli, S.S., Pinnamaneni, S.R., Fisher, D.K. et al. Vulnerabilities of irrigated and rainfed corn to climate change in a humid climate in the Lower Mississippi Delta. Climatic Change 164, 5 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-02999-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-02999-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation