Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transition towards sustainability in a post-conflict country: a neo-institutional perspective on the Lebanese case

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we aim to understand how transition towards sustainability processes might arise and develop in a post-conflict country. We analyse the case of the development of renewable energy in Lebanon to understand how green initiatives might emerge, without a prior master plan in a country that was torn by war. We focus on the structured action being developed in cooperation with the UNDP to enable Lebanon to fulfil its international commitment of achieving a 12% target of renewable energy in its energy mix by 2020. The process began in 2010 with the installation of photovoltaic systems in the capital Beirut. This initiative has led to the creation of what appears to be today a viable business ecosystem which makes the 12% a target that seems within reach. We analyse this “success” using a sociotechnical approach with a neo-institutional perspective. We show that the support of international agencies in post-conflict reconstruction modifies radically the dynamic evolution of sociotechnical regimes and links the transition context to the different phases leading to the institutionalization of a new technology. Finally, we propose a framework based on a critical interpretation of the multi-level perspective for the sustainability transition process in post-conflict countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 2
Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In 2018, UNHCR estimates the exact number of Syrian refugees in Lebanon at 991,917. In addition, there is a “circular immigration” involving another 300,000 to 400,000 Syrian “commuters”, who traditionally come and go to work temporarily in agriculture and construction. It should be noted that Lebanese officials use often the number of 1,500,000. An accurate count of the refugees in Lebanon is practically impossible, for unlike in Jordan, the Lebanese authorities follow a “no-camp policy” that puts a comprehensive census out of reach.

  2. 1,916,100 persons in 2017 (http://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/lebanon-population/cities/)

  3. https://knoema.com/LBPS2014/population-statistics-of-lebanon-2014?tsId=1000100

  4. Israel evacuated in 1985 most of the occupied territories retaining control of a strip of territory along the southern border. In 2000, Israel withdrew almost completely its forces from Lebanon keeping the control of the area of Shebaa Farms located near the border.

  5. https://www.edl.gov.lb/page.php?pid=37

  6. See full list and profiles of interviewees in Appendix 1

  7. The CDR was entrusted by the political authorities with the task of preparing a national reconstruction strategy and implementing the subsequent recovery program.

  8. The emergency Power Sector Master Plan for the years 1992–2002 focused on the rehabilitation and expansion of power generation as well as the restoration of the transmission and distribution capacity.

  9. According to UNDP, 33% of the reconstruction budget (USD 4 billion) was allocated to electricity sector (UNDP 2000).

  10. According to the UNDP (2000), the demand was growing at the time at a rate of 4–6% annually.

  11. In 1996, for example this intensity was evaluated at 0.35 Toe/1000 USD.

  12. The pivot of environmental and sustainable activities in Lebanon is without any doubt the UNDP. It deals exclusively with the Lebanese Ministry of Environment (MoE) that was created 1 year before the ratification of the UNFCCC. This exclusive collaboration continued until it became clear that the MoE, given the prevailing political climate, had difficulty coordinating with other ministries to inject sustainable development principles into their policies and programs.

  13. LEB/95/G32 “Enabling activities (building capacities for GHG inventory and action plans in response to UNFCCC communications obligations)”.

  14. As the preparation of this type of documents needs considerable activities, the Conference of Parties (COP) decided during its first session to facilitate the task of developing countries by giving priority to the funding of the agreed full cost they incurred to comply with their obligations. The project LEB/95/G32 falls within this framework.

  15. This decision was taken after Lebanon’s first national communication to the UNFCCC in 1999. The document showed that energy was among the sectors responsible of the largest GHG emissions in Lebanon: transport accounted for 34% of CO2 emissions, electricity for 31% and industry for 24% (UNDP 1996).

  16. Supply-side energy management looks at the efficiency with which the end-user is supplied while demand-side management aims to influence the behaviour of consumers using different methods including financial incentives.

  17. The Lebanese ministry of Energy and Water launched officially “net-metering” in 2011.

  18. Megawatt peak

References

  • Akrich M (1987) Comment décrire les objets techniques? Technol Cult:49–64

  • Akrich, M. (1991). L’analyse socio-technique. Dans D. Vinck (Éd.), Gestion de la recherche: Nouveaux problèmes, nouveaux outils (pp. 339–353). Louvain-la-Neuve: Editions De Boeck

  • Amine J, Risk S (2017) 2016 Solar PV status report for Lebanon. UNDP - DREG, Beirut. Retrieved February 2018, from http://www.databank.com.lb/docs/2016%20Solar%20PV%20Status%20Report%20for%20Lebanon%20Updated.pdf

  • Avelino F, Grin J, Pel B, Jhagroe S (2016) The politics of sustainable transition. J Environ Policy Plan 18(5):557–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1216782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassil G (2010) Policy paper for the electricity sector. Republic of Lebanon - Ministry of Energy and Water, Beirut

    Google Scholar 

  • CDR (2017) Progress report. Republic of Lebanon - Council for Development and Reconstruction, Beirut

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G (1982) Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: a suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Res Policy 11(3):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EDL. (2019). Enterprise Facilities. Retrieved from Electricity of Lebanon: https://www.edl.gov.lb/page.php?pid=37.

  • Forgues, B., & Vandangeaon-Derumez, I. (2003). Analyses longitudinales. in R.-A. Thiétart (Éd.), Méthodes de recherche en management. Paris: Dunod

  • Foxon TJ, Hammond GP, Pearson PJ (2010) Developing transition pathways for a low carbon electricity system in the UK. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77(8):1203–1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrad H (2011) The National Wind Atlas of Lebanon. A study prepared for the UNDP CEDRO project. UNDP-CEDRO, Beirut

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31:1257–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2010) Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Res Policy 39:495–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2011) The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ Innov Soc Trans 1(1):24–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW, Kemp R (2007) Dynamics in socio-technical systems: typology of change processes and contrasting case studies. Technol Soc 29:441–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW, Schot J (2007) Typology of sociotechnocal transition pathways. Res Policy 36:399–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen UE, Nygaard I, Romijn H, Wieczorek A, Kamp LM, Klerlx L (2018) Sustainability transitions in developing countries: stocktaking, new contributions and a research agenda. Environ Sci Policy 84:198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hölsgens R, Lübke S, Hasselkuß M (2018) Social innovations in the German energy transition: an attempt to use the heuristics of the multi-level perspective of transitions to analyze the diffusion process of social innovations. Energy Sustain Soc 8(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-018-0150-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasparek M (2007) Lebanon: evaluation of the energy & environment programme - an outcome evaluation. UNDP, Beirut

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Schot J, Hoogma R (1998) Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Tech Anal Strat Manag 10(2):175–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LCEC (2018) Call for expression of interest (EOI) to participate in proposal submissions of wind farms in Lebanon (2nd round - January 2018). Republic of Lebanon - Ministry of Energy and Water, Lebanon

    Google Scholar 

  • MoE (1999) Lebanon initial communication to the UNFCCC. Republic of Lebanon - Ministry of Environment, Beirut

    Google Scholar 

  • MoE, UNDP, & GEF (2016) Lebanon’s third national communication to the UNFCCC. Republic of Lebanon - Ministry of Environment – United Nations Development Programme, Beirut

    Google Scholar 

  • MoE, UNDP, & GEF (2017) Lebanon’s second biennial update report to the UNFCCC. Republic of Lebanon - Ministry of Environment, United Nations Development Programme, Beirut

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan G (1980) Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organization theory. Adm Sci Q 25(4):605–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RN, Winter SG (1977) In search of a useful theory of innovation. Res Policy 6:36–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osseiran K (2014) Hydropower electricity in Lebanon. Republic of Lebanon - Ministry of Energy and Water, Beirut

    Google Scholar 

  • Osunmuyiwa O, Biermann F, Kalfagianni A (2018) Applying the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions to rentier states: the case of renewable energy transitions in Nigeria. J Environ Policy Plan 20(2):143–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1343134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew AM (1997) What is a processual analysis? Scand J Manag 13(4):337–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picard, E. (2012). La guerre civile au Liban, Violence de masse et Résistance. Réseau de recherche. Retrieved February 2018, from http://www.sciencespo.fr/mass-violence-war-massacre-resistance/fr/document/la-guerre-civile-au-liban#title0.

  • Rao H, Monin P, Durand R (2003) Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. Am J Sociol 108(4):795–843

  • Rosenbloom D (2017) Pathways: an emerging concept for the theory and governance of low-carbon transition. Glob Environ Chang 43:37–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford J, Coutard O (2014) Urban energy transitions: places, processes and politics of socio-technical change. Urban Stud 5(17):1353–1377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schot J, Geels FW (2008) Strategic niche management ans sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Tech Anal Strat Manag 20(5):537–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schot J, Kanger L (2018) Deep transitions: emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality. Res Policy 47:1045–1059. Retrieved March 2018, from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2834854

  • Smith A, Stirling A, Berkhout F (2005) The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Res Policy 34(10):1491–1519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannous N (2011) Energy crisis. In: Ecodit; MoE &.UNDP (ed) State and Trends of the Lebanese Environment. Ecodit, Beirut

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, P. S., & Zucker, L. G. (1999). Studying organization. Theory & method. 169–184 in S. R. Clegg, & C. Hardy (Éds.), Studying organization: theory and method. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.

  • Torbey R (2016) Current laws and regulations governing the electricity sector,with desirable enhancements. Eptalex -Aziz Torbey Law Firm, Beirut

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (1996) LEB/95/G32 - enabling activity (building capacity for GHG inventory and action plans in response to UNFCCC communication obligations). UNDP, Beirut

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2000) Lebanon- cross sectoral energy efficiency and removal of barriers to ESCO operation. UNDP, Beirut

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2007). UNDP’s participation in Lebanon’s recovery from the aftermath of the July 2006 war. Beirut: UNDP

  • UNDP/CEDRO. (2013). Solar Photovoltaic Electricity for your House! Beirut. Retrieved, from http://www.cedro-undp.org/content/uploads/Publication/141010120115339~PV-booklet-EN.pdf. Accessed January 2018

  • UNHCR (2018) 3RP regional refugees plan 2018–2019 in response to the Syrian crisis . UNHCR. Retrieved, from https://data2.unhcr.org/en/situations/syria. Accessed February 2018

  • van de Poel I (2003) The transformation of technological regimes. Res Policy 32:49–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven AH, Poole MS (1990) Methods for studying innovation development in the Minnesota innovation research program. Organ Sci 1(3):313–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel H, Schot J (2005) Radical innovation as a multilevel process : introducing floating grain elevators in the port of Rotterdam. Technol Cult 46(1):51–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velkavrh, A. P., Asquith, M., Ribeiro, T., & Lung, T. (2015). European environment – state and outlook 2015 - Towards a More Urban World (GMT2). European Environment Agency. Retrieved, from  https://www.eea.europa.eu/soer-2015/global/urban-world. Accessed February 2018

  • World Bank. (2017). City resilience program. The World Bank Group. Retrieved, from http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/disasterriskmanagement/brief/city-resilience-program1. Accessed February 2018

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdel-Maoula Chaar.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of a Special Issue on Win-Win Solutions to Climatic Change edited by Diana Mangalagiu, Alexander Bisaro, Jochen Hinkel and Joan David Tàbara

Appendix

Appendix

Table 2 List of interviewees

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaar, AM., Mangalagiu, D., Khoury, A. et al. Transition towards sustainability in a post-conflict country: a neo-institutional perspective on the Lebanese case. Climatic Change 160, 691–709 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02478-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02478-7

Keywords

Navigation