Impacts of Antarctic fast dynamics on sea-level projections and coastal flood defense
Strategies to manage the risks posed by future sea-level rise hinge on a sound characterization of the inherent uncertainties. One of the major uncertainties is the possible rapid disintegration of large fractions of the Antarctic ice sheet in response to rising global temperatures. This could potentially lead to several meters of sea-level rise during the next few centuries. Previous studies have typically been silent on two coupled questions: (i) What are probabilistic estimates of this “fast dynamic” contribution to sea-level rise? (ii) What are the implications for strategies to manage coastal flooding risks? Here, we present probabilistic hindcasts and projections of sea-level rise to 2100. The fast dynamic mechanism is approximated by a simple parameterization, designed to allow for a careful quantification of the uncertainty in its contribution to sea-level rise. We estimate that global temperature increases ranging from 1.9 to 3.1 °C coincide with fast Antarctic disintegration, and these contributions account for sea-level rise of 21–74 cm this century (5–95% range, Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5). We use a simple cost-benefit analysis of coastal defense to demonstrate in a didactic exercise how neglecting this mechanism and associated uncertainty can (i) lead to strategies which fall sizably short of protection targets and (ii) increase the expected net costs.
KeywordsSea-level projections West Antarctic ice sheet Coastal flood defense Climate impacts Cliff failure and hydrofracturing
We thank Dave Pollard for lending his insight into reasonable prior ranges and central values for the Antarctic ice sheet fast dynamic parameters and for comments on the initial version of the manuscript. We thank Kelsey Ruckert and Yawen Guan for their assistance in providing and interpreting codes relevant to the original DAIS model and its calibration. We also thank Kelsey Ruckert for manuscript formatting assistance. We thank Aimée Slangen for supplying and assistance interpreting the regional sea-level fingerprinting data. We gratefully acknowledge Richard Alley, Murali Haran, Chris and Bella Forest, Rob Nicholas, Patrick Reed, Michael Oppenheimer, Tad Pfeffer, Rob Lempert, David Johnson, Roger Cooke, and Dale Jennings for invaluable inputs. This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation through the Network for Sustainable Climate Risk Management (SCRiM) under NSF cooperative agreement GEO-1240507 as well as the Penn State Center for Climate Risk Management. Any conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding agencies. Any errors and opinions are, of course, those of the authors.
The BRICK model (with the added fast dynamic module) and analysis codes are freely available from https://github.com/scrim-network/BRICK/tree/fastdy. Large parameter files and model results files are available from https://download.scrim.psu.edu/Wong_etal_BRICK. Code examples and a routine for fingerprinting sea-level rise projections to other locations (aside from New Orleans, as presented in this manuscript) are provided at https://github.com/scrim-network/BRICK. The physical models are coded in Fortran 90 and called from driver scripts coded in the R Programming Language. The analysis was performed using RStudio (version 0.99.903).
T.W. and K.K. initiated the study. T.W., A.B., and K.K. designed the research. T.W. and A.B. produced the model simulations. T.W. designed the initial figures and wrote the first draft. All contributed to the final text.
- Bakker AMR, Louchard D, Keller K (2017a) Sources and implications of the deep uncertainties surrounding sea-level projections. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1864-1
- Bakker AMR, Wong TE, Ruckert KL, Keller K (2017b) Sea-level projections accounting for deeply uncertain ice-sheet contributions. Sci Rep. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04134-5
- Bessette DL, Mayer LA, Cwik B et al (2017) Building a values-informed mental model for New Orleans climate risk management. Risk Anal. doi: 10.1111/risa.12743
- Church JA, Clark PU, Cazenave A, et al (2013) Sea level change. In: Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority of Louisiana (2017) Louisiana’s comprehensive master plan for a sustainable coast. Baton Rouge, LAGoogle Scholar
- Dyurgerov MB, Meier MF (2005) Glaciers and the changing earth system: a 2004 snapshot. Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado BoulderGoogle Scholar
- Gouretski V, Koltermann KP (2007) How much is the ocean really warming? Geophys Res Lett. doi: 10.1029/2006GL027834
- Jones CE, An K, Blom RG et al (2016) Anthropogenic and geologic influences on subsidence in the vicinity of New Orleans, Louisiana. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. doi: 10.1002/2015JB012636
- Joughin I, Smith BE, Medley B (2014) Marine ice sheet collapse potentially under way for the Thwaites Glacier Basin, West Antarctica. Science 735–739Google Scholar
- Kopp R, DeConto RM, Bader D, et al (2017) Implications of ice-shelf hydrofracturing and ice cliff collapse mechanisms for sea-level projections. Preprint at arXiv:1704.05597Google Scholar
- Kriegler E (2005) Imprecise probability analysis for integrated assessment of climate change. Universität Potsdam, PotsdamGoogle Scholar
- Morice CP, Kennedy JJ, Rayner NA, Jones PD (2012) Quantifying uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of observational estimates: the HadCRUT4 data set. J Geophys Res Atmos. doi: 10.1029/2011JD017187
- Urban NM, Keller K (2010) Probabilistic hindcasts and projections of the coupled climate, carbon cycle and Atlantic meridional overturning circulation system: a Bayesian fusion of century-scale observations with a simple model. Tellus A 62:737–750. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0870.2010.00471.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wigley TML, Raper SCB (2005) Extended scenarios for glacier melt due to anthropogenic forcing. Geophys Res Lett. doi: 10.1029/2004GL021238
- Wong TE, Bakker AMR, Ruckert KL et al (2017) BRICK0.2, a simple, accessible and transparent model framework for climate and sea-level projections. Geosci Model Dev 10:2741–2760. doi: 10.5194/gmd-10-2741-2017