Abstract
In a commentary paper, Bamber et al. (Nat Clim Change 3:424–427, 2016) respond to our recent assessment (De Vries and Van de Wal Clim Change 1–14, 2015) of their expert judgment based study on projections of future sea level rise due to the melting of the large ice sheets (Bamber and Aspinall Nat Clim Chang 3:424–427, 2013). In this response we comment on their remarks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bamber JL, Aspinall WP (2013) An expert judgment assessment of future sea level rise from the ice sheets. Nat Clim Change 3:424–427. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1778
Bamber JL, Aspinall WL, Cooke RM (2016) A commentary on “how to interpret expert judgment assessments of 21st century sea-level rise. Climatic Change
De Vries H, Van de Wal RSW (2015) How to interpret expert judgement assessments of 21st century sea level rise. Clim Change:1–14. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1346-x
Horton BJ, Rahmstorf S, Engelhart SE, Kemp AC (2014) Expert assessment of sea-level rise by AD 2100 and AD 2300. Quat Sci Rev 84:1–6
Oppenheimer M, Little CM, Cooke RM (2016) Expert judgement and uncertainty quantification for climate change. Nat Clim Change 6(5):445–451
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This reply refers to the comment available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1672-7.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Vries, H., van de Wal, R.S.W. Response to commentary by J. L. Bamber, W. P. Aspinall and R. M. Cooke (2016). Climatic Change 137, 329–332 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1712-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1712-3