Skip to main content
Log in

Comment on the paper of Willems, P.: Multidecadal oscillatory behaviour of rainfall extremes in Europe. Published in: Climatic Change 120 (4), p. 931–944

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Response to this article was published on 05 March 2015

The Original Article was published on 30 July 2013

Abstract

In his article Willems (Clim Chang 120(4):931–944, 2013) proposed a methodology to analyse extremes in rainfall series. When applying it to artificially generated, non-cyclic random variables we were able to detect cyclic behavior. Therefor we had a closer look on the methodology. Here we discuss our considerations, why this method generates cycles, depending on chosen subperiods and their coherence between detected cycle lengths. To verify these relationships some examples based on random data samples are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Willems P (2013) Multidecadal oscillatory behaviour of rainfall extremes in Europe. Clim Chang 120(4):931–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Svenja Fischer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fischer, S., Schumann, A. Comment on the paper of Willems, P.: Multidecadal oscillatory behaviour of rainfall extremes in Europe. Published in: Climatic Change 120 (4), p. 931–944. Climatic Change 130, 77–81 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1361-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1361-y

Keywords

Navigation