Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impacts of climate change on crop evapotranspiration with ensemble GCM projections in the North China Plain

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As one of the key grain-producing regions in China, the agricultural system in the North China Plain (NCP) is vulnerable to climate change due to its limited water resources and strong dependence on irrigation for crop production. Exploring the impacts of climate change on crop evapotranspiration (ET) is of importance for water management and agricultural sustainability. The VIP (Vegetation Interface Processes) process-based ecosystem model and WRF (Weather Research and Forecasting) modeling system are applied to quantify ET responses of a wheat-maize cropping system to climate change. The ensemble projections of six General Circulation Models (GCMs) under the B2 and A2 scenarios in the 2050s over the NCP are used to account for the uncertainty of the projections. The thermal time requirements (TTR) of crops are assumed to remain constant under air warming conditions. It is found that in this case the length of the crop growth period will be shortened, which will result in the reduction of crop water consumption and possible crop productivity loss. Spatially, the changes of ET during the growth periods (ETg) for wheat range from −7 to 0 % with the average being −1.5 ± 1.2 % under the B2 scenario, and from −8 to 2 % with the average being −2.7 ± 1.3 % under the A2 scenario/consistently, changes of ETg for maize are from −10 to 8 %, with the average being −0.4 ± 4.9 %, under the B2 scenario and from −8 to 8 %, with the average being −1.2 ± 4.1 %, under the A2 scenario. Numerical analysis is also done on the condition that the length of the crop growth periods remains stable under the warming condition via breeding new crop varieties. In this case, TTR will be higher and the crop water requirements will increase, with the enhancement of the productivity. It is suggested that the options for adaptation to climate change include no action and accepting crop loss associated with the reduction in ETg, or breeding new cultivars that would maintain or increase crop productivity and result in an increase in ETg. In the latter case, attention should be paid to developing improved water conservation techniques to help compensate for the increased ETg.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnell NW, Livermore MJL, Kovats Levy JPE, Nicholls R, Parry ML, Gaffin SR (2004) Climate and socio-economic scenarios for global-scale climate change impacts assessments: characterising the SRES storylines. Glob Environ Chang 14:3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker JF (2004) Yield responses of southern US rice cultivars to CO2 and temperature. Agr For Meteorol 122:129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron C, Sultan B, Balme M, Sarr B, Traore S, Lebel T, Janicot S, Dingkuhn M (2005) From GCM grid cell to agricultural plot: scale issues affecting modelling of climate impact. Phil Trans R Soc B 360:2095–2108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RA, Rosenberg NJ (1994) Sensitivity of crop yield and water use to change in a range of climatic factors and CO2 concentrations: a simulation study applying EPIC to the central USA. Agric For Meteor 83:17l–203l

    Google Scholar 

  • Challinor AJ, Wheeler TR, Slingo JM, Hemming D (2005) Quantification of physical and biological uncertainty in the simulation of the yield of a tropical crop using present-day and doubled CO2 climates. Phil Trans R Soc B 360:2085–2094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavas DR, Izaurralde RC, Thomson AM, Gao X (2009) Long-term climate change impacts on agricultural productivity in eastern China. Agric For Meteor 149:1118–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doll P (2002) Impact of climate change and variability on irrigation requirements: a global perspective. Clim Change 54:269–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feddersen H, Andersen U (2005) A method for statistical downscaling of seasonal ensemble predictions. Tellus 57A:398–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu Q, Weiss A, Feng S, Baenziger P (2005) Earlier winter wheat heading dates and warmer spring in the U.S. Great Plains. Agric For Meteor 135:284–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jhajharia D, Dinpashoh Y, Kahya E, Singh VP, Fakheri-Fard A (2012) Trends in reference evapotranspiration in the humid region of northeast India. Hydrol Process. doi:10.1002/hyp.8140

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball BA, LaMorte RL, Seay RS, Pinter PJ Jr, Rokey RR, Hunsaker DJ, Dugas WA, Heuer ML, Mauney JR, Hendrey GR, Lewin KF, Nagy J (1994) Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment on energy balance and evapotranspiration of cotton. Agric For Meteor 70:259–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucharik CJ, Ramankutty N (2005) Trends and variability in U.S. corn yields over the 20th century. Earth Interact 9:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Erickson JE, Peresta G, Drake B (2010) Evapotranspiration and water use efficiency in a Chesapeake Bay wetland under carbon dioxide enrichment. Glob Change Biol 16:234–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Mo X, Lin Z, Xu Y, Ji J, Wen G, Richey J (2010a) Crop yield response to climate change in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain of China. Agric Water Manag 97(8):1195–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Wang E, Yang X, Wang J (2010b) Contributions of climatic and crop varietal changes to crop production in the North China Plain, since 1980s. Glob Change Biol 16(8):2287–2299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig F, Milroy SP, Asseng S (2009) Impacts of recent climate change on wheat production systems in Western Australia. Clim Change 92:495–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McVicar TR, Roderick ML, Donohue RJ et al (2012) Global review and synthesis of trends in observed terrestrial near-surface wind speeds: implications for evaporation. J Hydrol 416–417:182–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel A, Sparks T, Estrella N et al (2006) European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob Change Biol 12:1969–1976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo X, Liu S, Lin Z (2009) Regional crop productivity and water use efficiency and their responses to climate change in the North China Plain. Agric Ecosys Environ 134:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mo X, Liu S, Lin Z (2012) Evaluation of an ecosystem model for wheat-maize double cropping system over the North China Plain. Environ Model Softw 32:61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polley HW, Dugas WA, Mielnick PC, Johnson HB (2007) C3–C4 composition and prior carbon dioxide treatment regulate the response of grassland carbon and water fluxes to carbon dioxide. Funct Ecol 21:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks WJ, Kucharik CJ (2011) Crop management and phenology trends in the U.S. Corn Belt: impacts on yields, evapotranspiration and energy balance. Agric For Meteor 151:882–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker W, Roberts MJ (2009) Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(37):15,594–15,598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stainforth DA, Aina T, Christensen C, Collins M, Faull N, Frame DJ, Kettleborough JA, Knight S, Martin A, Murphy JM, Piani C, Sexton D, Smith LA, Spicer RA, Thorpe AJ, Allen MR (2005) Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature 433:403–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan GX, Shibasaki R (2003) Global estimation of crop productivity and the impacts of global warming by GIS and EPIC integration. Ecol Model 168:357–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao F, Zhang Z (2012) Climate change, wheat productivity and water use in the North China Plain: a new super-ensemble-based probabilistic projection. Agric For Meteor. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.10.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Tubiello FN, Rosenzweig C, Volk T (1995) Interactions of CO2, temperature and management practices: simulations with a modified version of CERES-Wheat. Agric Sys 49:135–l52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter MT, Wilks DS, Parlange J, Schneider RL (2004) Increasing evapotranspiration from the conterminous United States. J Hydrometeorol 5:405–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong W, Declan C, Lin E, Xu Y, Ju H, Jiang J, Ian H, Li Y (2009) Future cereal production in China: the interaction of climate change, water availability and socio-economic scenarios. Glob Environ Change 19:34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Chen S, Sun H, Shao L, Wang Y (2011) Changes in evapotranspiration over irrigated winter wheat and maize in North China Plain over three decades. Agric Water Manage 98:1097–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was jointly supported by the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology Projects (2010CB428404), the Natural Science Foundation of China grants (31171451), and the Key Project for the Strategic Science Plan in IGSNRR, CAS (2012ZD003), Thanks to Prof. Zongliang Yang at the University of Arizona, USA for his support in using WRF system when the second co-author was working with him supported by Sino-US PhD joint-training program. Many thanks to Marilyn Pomeroy for polishing the English of the manuscript in its final stage.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xingguo Mo.

Electronic supplementary material

Following is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 25 kb)

Figure 1

(DOC 34 kb)

Table 1

(DOC 40 kb)

Table 2

(DOC 37 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mo, X., Guo, R., Liu, S. et al. Impacts of climate change on crop evapotranspiration with ensemble GCM projections in the North China Plain. Climatic Change 120, 299–312 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0823-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0823-3

Keywords

Navigation