Climatic Change

, Volume 118, Issue 3–4, pp 521–536 | Cite as

Do we know each other? Bilateral ties and the location of clean development mechanism projects

Article

Abstract

This paper examines how bilateral ties between developed (home) countries and developing (host) countries influence the location of Clean Development Mechanism projects (CDMs). With the home-host country pair as the unit of analysis (2,058 country-pairs), we employ a logistic regression model to analyze decisions of home countries in selecting the location for their CDMs. We are most interested in examining how home countries’ familiarity with the host country influences CDM location decisions. The familiarity factors are: (1) colonial history; (2) bilateral trade; and (3) bilateral aid. Using a binary logistical model, we find that that bilateral familiarity factors strongly influence CDM location decisions. Further, with respect to host country characteristics, we find that total carbon dioxide emissions and UNFCCC specific domestic institutions influence CDM location decisions, but not general investment institutions or high carbon intensity of host country economies.

References

  1. Ahlquist J, Prakash A (2008) The influence of foreign direct investment on contracting confidence in developing countries. Regul Govern 2(3):316–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Bengal R (2008) “Drivers of Outward Foreign Direct Investment from Asian Developing Economies.” http://www.unescap.org/tid/publication/tipub2469.asp. Downloaded on December 8, 2012
  4. Breitmeier H, Young OR, Zuern M (2006) Analyzing international environmental regimes: from case study to database. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell NC et al (1988) Marketing negotiations in France, Germany, United Kingdom, and the United States. J Mark 52(April):49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caves RE (1996) Multinational enterprise and economic analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson WH (1980) The location of foreign direct investment activity: country characteristics and experience effects. J Int Bus Stud 11(2):9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Groot HLF et al (2004) The institutional determinants of bilateral trade patterns. Kyklos 57(1):103–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dechezlepretre A, Glachant M, Meniere Y (2008) The clean development mechanism and the international diffusion of technologies. Energ Pol 36(4):1273–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dolšak N (2009) Climate change policy implementation. Rev Pol Res 26(5):551–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dolšak N, Dunn M (2006) Investments in global warming mitigation. Pol Sci 39(3):233–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dolšak N, Brondizio ES, Carlsson L, Cash DW, Gibson CC, Hoffmann M, Knox A, Meinzen-Dick R, Ostrom E (2003) Adaptations to challenges. In: Dolšak N, Ostrom E (eds) The commons in the new millennium. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 337–360Google Scholar
  13. Drupp MA (2011) Does the gold standard label hold its promise in delivering higher sustainable development benefits: a multi-criteria comparison of CDM projects. Energ Pol 39(3):1213–1227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunning JH (1981) International production and the multinational enterprise. Allen and Unwin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  15. Feng Y (2001) Political freedom, political instability, and policy uncertainty. Int Stud Q 45:271–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Georgiou P, Tourkolias C, Diakoulaki D (2008) A roadmap for selecting host countries of wind energy projects in the framework of the clean development mechanisms. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 12(3):712–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greif A, Milgrom P, Weingast B (1994) Coodination, commitment, and enforcement. J Polit Econ 102(4):745–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang Y, Barker T (2012) The clean development mechanism and low carbon development. Energ Econ 34(4):1033–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IPCC. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001) Third Assessment Report. Retrieved July 27, 2006, from http://www.ipcc.ch/
  20. Jung M (2006) Host country attractiveness for CDM non-sink projects. Energ Pol 34(2006):2173–2184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kimura H, Todo Y (2010) Is foreign Aid a vanguard of foreign direct investment? World Dev 38(4):482–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Long SJ (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  23. Luterbacher U, Sprinz DF (2001) International relations and global climate change. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. McMillan J, Woodruff C (2000) Private order under dysfunctional public order. Mich Law Rev 98(8):2421–2457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McNish T et al (2009) Sweet carbon. Energ Pol 37(12):5459–5468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Michaelowa A (2002) The AIJ pilot phase as laboratory for CDM and JI. Int J Global Environ Issues 2(2002):260–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Michaelowa A, Jotzo F (2005) Transaction costs, institutional rigidities and the size of the clean development mechanisms. Energ Pol 33:511–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miles EL, Underdal A, Andresen S, Wettestad J, Skjaerseth JB, Carlin EM (2002) Environmental regime effectiveness: confronting theory with evidence. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  29. Mody, A, Assaf R, Effraim S (2003) “The role of information in driving FDI flows.” NBER working paper no. 9662Google Scholar
  30. North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolšak N, Stern PC, Stonich S, Weber EU (eds) (2002) The drama of the commons. Committee on the human dimensions of global change. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Powell M, Lile R, Toman M (1997) Assessing the constraints and opportunities for private-sector participation in activities implemented jointly. Resources for the Future, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  33. Raftery AE (1996) Bayesian model selection in social research. In: Marsden PC (ed) Sociological methodology. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 111–163Google Scholar
  34. Selaya P, Sunesen ER (2012) Does foreign aid increase foreign direct investment? World Dev 40(11):2155–2176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seres S, Haites E, Murphy K (2009) Analysis of technology transfer in CDM projects. Energ Pol 37(11):4919–4926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Springer U (2003) Can the risks of the Kyoto mechanisms be reduced through portfolio diversification? Environ Resour Econ 25:501–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tadesse B, White R (2009) Cultural distance as a determinant of bilateral trade flows. Appl Econ Lett 17(2):147–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tse DK et al (1988) Does culture matter? J Mark 52(March):81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Victor D (2001) The collapse of the Kyoto protocol and the struggle to slow global warming. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  40. World Bank (2002) World development report: building institutions for a market. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Young O (ed) (1999) The effectiveness of international environmental regimes: causal connections and behavioral mechanisms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences; and School of Marine and Environmental AffairsUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Interdisciplinary Arts and SciencesUniversity of Washington BothellBothellUSA

Personalised recommendations