Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 77, Issue 3–4, pp 415–429 | Cite as

A Decade of Plant Species Changes on a Mire in the Italian Alps: Vegetation-Controlled or Climate-Driven Mechanisms?

  • Luca BragazzaEmail author
Open Access
Article

Abstract

Variation of plant species cover on a Sphagnum-dominated mire in the south-eastern Alps of Italy was assessed over a 10-year period in relation to depth to the water table, peat accumulation rate, and climate. Population dynamics of vascular species appeared to be primarily affected by the autogenic process of peat accumulation, which determined the lowering of water-table position at microhabitat scale. Increase of depth to the water table through peat accumulation resulted in increased cover of ericaceous shrubs at previously moister microhabitats. Conversely, graminoid species such as Eriophorum vaginatum, Trichophorum caespitosum, and Scheuchzeria palustris being negatively affected by autogenic peat growth, were forced to shift their niche towards the wetter end of the water-table gradient. Carex limosa and Carex rostrata decreased their cover along the whole gradient in depth to the water table, likely due to multiple processes related to peat accumulation, competition with bryophytes, and a negative feedback due to increased litter deposition. Bryophytes, in particular Sphagnum mosses, appeared more sensitive to climatic conditions, with higher precipitation favouring faster-growing species. Accordingly, Sphagnum fallax and Sphagnum magellanicum increased their cover much more than Sphagnum capillifolium, whereas Polytrichum strictum showed the strongest decrease at sites where S. magellanicum cover increased most.

Keywords

Peat Accumulation Sphagnum Species Ericaceous Shrub Peat Accumulation Rate Polytrichum Strictum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andrus, R. E.: 1986, ‘Some aspects of Sphagnum ecology’, Can. J. Bot 64, 416–426.Google Scholar
  2. Backéus, I.: 1972, ‘Bog vegetation re-mapped after sixty years’, Oikos 23, 384–393.Google Scholar
  3. Backéus, I.: 1988, ‘Weather variables as predictors of Sphagnum growth on a bog’, Holarctic Ecol. 11, 146–150.Google Scholar
  4. Barber, K. E.: 1981, Peat Stratigraphy and Climatic Change: A Palaeoecological Test of the Theory of Cyclic Peat Bog Regeneration, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, p. 242.Google Scholar
  5. Bayley, S. E., Zoltek, J. Jr, Herman, A. J., Dolan, T. J. and Tortora, L.: 1985, ‘Experimental manipulation of nutrients and water in a freshwater marsh: Effects on biomass, decomposition, and nutrient accumulation’, Limnol. Oceanogr 30, 500–512.Google Scholar
  6. Bergamini, A., Pauli, D., Peintinger, M. and Schmid, B.: 2001, ‘Relationships between productivity, number of shoots and number of species in bryophytes and vascular plants’, J. Ecol. 89, 920–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernard, J. M., Solander, D. and Kvet, J.: 1988, ‘Production and nutrient dynamics in Carex wetlands’. Aquat. Bot. 30, 125–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bragazza, L.: 1996, ‘Delimitation of the aerobic peat layer in a Sphagnum mire on the Southern Alps’, Oecol. Mont. 5, 41–46.Google Scholar
  9. Bragazza, L.: 1997, ‘Sphagnum niche diversification in two oligotrophic mires in the southern Alps of Italy’, The Bryologist 100, 507–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bragazza, L. and Gerdol, R.: 1999, ‘Hydrology, groundwater chemistry and peat chemistry in relation to habitat conditions in a mire on the South-Eastern Alps of Italy’, Plant Ecol. 144, 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bragazza, L.: 1999, ‘Spatial pattern of plant species in a poor mire on the Southern Alps (Italy)’, Plant Biosystems 113, 83–92.Google Scholar
  12. Breeman van, N.: 1995, ‘How Sphagnum bogs down other plants’, Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 270–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bridgham, S.D, Pastor, J., Janssens, J. A., Chapin, C. and Malterer, T. J.: 1996, ‘Multiple limiting gradients in peatlands: A call for a new paradigm’, Wetlands 16, 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brock, T. C. M. and Bregman, R.: 1989, ‘Periodicity in growth, productivity, nutrient content and decomposition of Sphagnum recurvum var. mucronatum in a fen woodland’, Oecologia 80, 44–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crowder, A. A., Pearson, M. C., Grubb, P. J. and Langlois, P. H.: 1990, ‘Drosera L. Biological Flora of the British Isles’, J. Ecol. 78, 233–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daniels, R. E. and Eddy, A.: 1990, Handbook of European Sphagna, Balogh Scientific Books, p. 263.Google Scholar
  17. De Ridder, F. and Dhondt, A. A.: 1992, ‘The demography of a clonal herbaceous perennial plant, the longleaved sundew Drosera intermedia in different heathlands habitats’, Ecography 15, 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frahm, J.-P. and Frey, W.: 1987, Moosflora UTB, Stuttgart, p. 528.Google Scholar
  19. Frankl, R. and Schmeidl, H.: 2000, ‘Vegetation change in a South German raised bog: ecosystem engineering by plant species, vegetation switch or ecosystem feedback mechanisms?’, Flora 195, 267–276.Google Scholar
  20. Gerdol, R., Tomaselli, M. and Bragazza, L.: 1994, ‘A floristic- ecological classification of five mires sites in the montane-subalpine belt of South Tyrol (S Alps, Italy)’, Phyton (Horn, Austria) 34, 35–56.Google Scholar
  21. Gerdol, R.: 1995, ‘The growth dynamics of Sphagnum based on field measurements in a temperate bog and on laboratory cultures’, J. Ecol. 83, 431–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gorham, E.: 1991, ‘Northern peatlands: Role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming’, Ecol. Appl. 1, 182–195.Google Scholar
  23. Grosvernier, P., Matthey, Y. and Buttler, A.: 1997, ‘Growth potential of three Sphagnum species in relation to water-table level and peat properties with implications for their restoration in cut-over bogs’ J. Appl. Ecol. 34, 471–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gunnarsson, U., Rydin, H. and Sjörs, H.: 2000, ‘Diversity and pH changes after 50 years on the boreal mire Skattlösbergs Stormosse, central Sweden’, J. Veg. Sci. 11, 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gunnarsson, U., Rydin, H. and Malmer, N.: 2002, ‘Dynamic or constancy in Sphagnum dominated mire ecosystems? A 40-year study’, Ecography 25, 685–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haith, D. A. and Shoemaker, L. L.: 1987, ‘Generalized watershed loading functions for stream flow nutrients’, Water Res. Bull. 23, 471–478.Google Scholar
  27. Hayward, P. M. and Clymo, R. S.: 1983, ‘The growth of Sphagnum: experiments on, and simulation of, some effects of light flux and water-table depth’, J. Ecol. 71, 845–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hogg, P., Squires, P. and Fitter, A. H.: 1995, ‘Acidification, nitrogen deposition and rapid vegetational change in a small valley mire in Yorkshire’, Biol. Conserv. 71, 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klinger, F.: 1996, ‘The myth of the classic hydrosere model of bog succession’, Arct. Alp. Res. 28, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kratz, T. K. and DeWitt, C. B.: 1986, ‘Internal factors controlling peatland-like ecosystem development’, Ecology 67, 100–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laine, J., Vasander, H. and Laiho, R.: 1995, ‘Long-term effects of water level drawdown on the vegetation of drained pine mires in southern Finland’, J. Appl. Ecol. 32, 785–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li, Y. and Vitt, D. H.: 1995, ‘The dynamics of moss establishment: temporal responses to a moisture gradient’, J. Bryol. 18, 677–687.Google Scholar
  33. Malmer, N. and Wallen, B.: 1993, ‘Accumulation and release of organic matter in ombrotrophic bog hummocks: processes and regional variation’, Ecography 16, 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Malmer, N., Svensson, B. M. and Wallen, B.: 1994, ‘Interactions between Sphagnum mosses and field layer vascular plants in the development of peat-forming systems’, Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 29, 483–496.Google Scholar
  35. Mitsch, W. and Gosselink, J. G.: 2000, Wetlands John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, p. 917.Google Scholar
  36. Moore, P. D.: 2002, ‘The future of cool temperate bogs’, Environmental Conservation 29, 3–20.zbMATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. Moore, T. R., Roulet, N. T. and Waddington, J. M.: 1998, ‘Uncertainty in predicting the effect of climatic change on the carbon cycling of Canadian peatlands’, Clim. Change 40, 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Moore, T. R.: 1989, ‘Growth and net production of Sphagnum at five fen sites, subarctic eastern Canada’, Can. J. Bot. 67, 1203–1207.Google Scholar
  39. Nordbakken, J.-F.: 1996, ‘Plant niches along the water-table gradient on an ombrotrophic mire expanse’, Ecography 19, 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nordbakken, J.-F.: 2000, ‘Fine scale persistence of boreal bog plants’, J. Veg. Sci. 11, 269–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nordbakken, J.-F.: 2001, ‘Fine scale five year vegetation change in boreal bog vegetation’, J. Veg. Sci. 12, 771–778.Google Scholar
  42. Pignatti, S.: 1982, Flora d'Italia Edagricole, Bologna.Google Scholar
  43. Rydin, H.: 1993, ‘Mechanisms of interactions among Sphagnum species along water-level gradients’, Adv. Bryol. 5, 153–185.Google Scholar
  44. Rydin, H. and Barber, K. E.: 2001, ‘Long-term and fine-scale coexistence of closely related species’, Folia Geobot. 36, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Silvola, J.: 1992, ‘Moisture dependence of CO2 exchange and its recovery after drying in certain boreal forest and peat mosses’, Lindbergia 17, 5–10.Google Scholar
  46. Sonesson, M., Carlsson, B. A., Callaghan, T. V., Halling, S., Bjorn, L. O., Bertgren, M. and Johanson, U.: 2002, ‘Growth of two peat-forming mosses in subarctic mires: species interactions and effects of simulated climate change’, Oikos 99, 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Svensson, G.: 1988, ‘Fossil plant communities and regeneration patterns on a raised bog in South Sweden’, J. Ecol. 76, 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tallis, J. H. and Birks, H. J. B.: 1965, ‘The past and present distribution of Scheuchzeria palustris L. in Europe’, J. Ecol. 53, 287–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thormann, M. N. and Bayley, S. E.: 1997a, ‘Aboveground net primary production along a bog-fen-marsh gradient in southern boreal Alberta, Canada’, Ecoscience 4, 374–384.Google Scholar
  50. Thormann, M. N. and Bayley, S. E.: 1997b, ‘Aboveground plant production and nutrient content of vegetation of six peatlands in Alberta, Canada’, Plant Ecol. 131, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thormann, M. N., Bayley, S. E. and Szumigalski, A. R.: 1998, ‘Effects of hydrologic changes on aboveground production and surface water chemistry in two boreal peatlands in Alberta: Implications for global warming’, Hydrobiologia 362, 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Titus, J. E. and Wagner, D. J.: 1984, ‘Carbon balance for two Sphagnum mosses: water balance resolves a physiological paradox’, Ecology 65, 1765–1774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weltzin, J. F., Bridgham, S. D., Pastor, J., Chen, J. and Harth, C.: 2003, ‘Potential effects of warming and drying on peatland plant community composition’, Global Change Biol. 9, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weltzin, J. F., Harth, C., Bridgham, S. D., Pastor, J. and Vonderharr, M.: 2001, ‘Production and microtopography of bog bryophytes: Response to warming and water-table manipulations’, Oecologia 128, 557–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weltzin, J. F., Pastor, J., Harth, C., Bridgham, S. D., Updegraff, K. and Chapin, C. T.: 2000, ‘Response of bog and fen plant communities to warming and water-table manipulations’, Ecology 81, 3464–3478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wieder, R. K.: 2001, ‘Past, present, and future peatland carbon balance: An empirical model based on 210Pb-dated cores’, Ecol. Appl. 11, 327–342.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Natural and Cultural ResourcesUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly

Personalised recommendations