Skip to main content
Log in

Agency, Power, and Disability: A Textual Analysis of The Silence Between Us

  • Emerging Scholar Award
  • Published:
Children's Literature in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript
  • 3 Altmetric

Abstract

This textual analysis examines Alison Gervais’ 2019 young adult novel The Silence Between Us through the framework of Critical Disability Theory (CDT). It investigates the ways in which the text conceptualizes disability according to three principles of CDT, and how the main character navigates interactions between impairment, response, and environment, which shape how she is perceived by and interacts with non-disabled peers. Gervais’ (The silence between us, Blink Young Adult Books, Grand Rapids, MI, 2019) book proves to be groundbreaking in its characterization of the main character, who has a sense of agency and power that allows her to overcome several obstacles and determine her own path in life. This analysis investigates the notion of disability in the text and offers implications for teachers, parents, and researchers who can use this text to promote and create a more inclusive society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adomat, D. S. (2014). Exploring issues of disability in children’s literature discussions. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34(3).

  • Aho, T. & Alter, G. (2018). “Just Like Me, Just Like You”: Narrative erasure as disability normalization in children’s picture books. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 12(3), 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Library Association (2021). Schneider family book award. http://www.ala.org/awardsgrants/awards/1/all_years.

  • Beaudry, J. S. (2016). Beyond (models of) disability? The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhv063.

  • Brigham Young University (2020). Dolly Gray children’s literature award. https://www.education.byu.edu/cpse/dolly-gray-award.

  • Collins, K. M. (2011). “My mom says I’m really creative!”: Dis/ability, positioning and resistance in multimodal instructional contexts. Language Arts, 88(6), 409–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curwood, J. S. (2013). Redefining normal: A critical analysis of (dis)ability in young adult literature. Children’s Literature in Education, 44(15), 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erevelles, N. & Kafer, A. (2010). Committed critique: An interview with Nirmala Erevelles. In S. Burch and A. Kafer (Eds.). Deaf and disability studies: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 204–221). Gallaudet University Press.

  • Ganahl, D. J. & Arbuckle, M. (2001). The exclusion of persons with physical disabilities from prime time television advertising: A two year quantitative analysis. Disability Studies Quarterly, 21(2).

  • Garland- Thomson, R. (2002). Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory. NWSA Journal, 14(3), 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gervais, A. (2019). The silence between us. Grand Rapids, MI: Blink Young Adult Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goering, S. (2002). Beyond the medical model? Disability, formal justice, and the exception for the “profoundly impaired.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 12(4), 373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2019). Provocations for critical disability studies. Disability & Society, 34(6), 972–997. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1566889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamraie, A. (2016). Beyond accommodation: Disability, feminist philosophy, and the design of everyday academic life. PhiloSOPHIA, 6(2), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1353/phi.2016.0022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasson, D. (2015). Representing youth with disability on television—Glee, Breaking Bad and Parenthood (Doctoral dissertation, McGill University). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.

  • Hosking, D. L. (Ed.). (2008). Proceedings from Biennial Disability Studies Conference: Critical Disability Theory. UK: Lancaster.

  • Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, L., Lauer, E., Coleman, R., & Houtenville, A. (2018). 2017 disability statistics annual report. Durham, NH: University of New Hampshire.  https://disabilitycompendium.org/sites/default/files/useruploads/2017_AnnualReport_2017_FINAL.pdf.

  • Low, J. T. (2016). Where is the diversity in publishing? The 2015 diversity baseline survey results.  https://blog.leeandlow.com/2016/01/26/whereisthediversityinpublishing-the-2015-diversity-baseline-survey-results/.

  • McDermott, R. & Varenne, H. (1995). Culture “as” disability. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 26(3), 324–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minich, J. A. (2016). Enabling whom? Critical disability studies now. Lateral. https://doi.org/10.25158/L5.1.9.

  • Mitchell, D. T. & Snyder, S. L. (2000). Narrative prothesis: Disability and the dependencies of discourse. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of the Deaf. (2019). Community and culture – frequently asked questions. https://www.nad.org/resources/americansignlanguage/community-and-culturefrequently-asked-questions/.

  • National Centre for Writing (2021). The barbellion prize. https://www.thebarbellionprize.com/.

  • National Council of Teachers of English. (2015). Resolution on the need for diverse children’s and young adult books. https://www2.ncte.org/statement/diverse-books/.

  • Padden, C. & Humphries, T. (1988). Deaf in America: Voices from a culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pothier, D. & Devlin, R. (Eds.). (2006). Critical disability theory: Essays in philosophy, politics, policy, and law. Vancouver, Canada: UBC Press.

  • Preston, D. L. (2010). Finding difference: Nemo and friends opening the door to disability theory. The English Journal, 100(2), 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalk, S. (2017). Critical disability as methodology. Lateral, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.25158/L6.1.13

  • Sleeter, C. (2010). Building counter-theory about disability. Disability Studies Quarterly, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v30i2.1244.

  • Sparrow, R. (2005). Defending Deaf culture: The case of cochlear implants. Journal of Political Philosophy, 13(2), 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Justice (2021). Information and technical assistance on the Americans with Disabilities Act. https://www.ada.gov/.

  • Watson, N. (2012). Theorising the lives of disabled children: How can disability theory help? Children & Society, 26, 192–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • We Need Diverse Books. (2019). Q&A with Alison Gervais: The Silence Between Us. https://diversebooks.org/qa-alison-gervais-the-silence-between-us/.

  • Yenika-Agbaw, V. (2011). Reading disability in children’s literature: Hans Christian Andersen’s tales. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 5(1), 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erin M. Faeth.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Erin M. Faeth is a k-12 teacher, current doctoral student, and part-time faculty member in the Department of Literacy, Teaching, & Learning at the University at Albany, State University of New York. Her research interests include literacy development, teacher education, and professional learning.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faeth, E.M. Agency, Power, and Disability: A Textual Analysis of The Silence Between Us. Child Lit Educ 52, 433–448 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-021-09453-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-021-09453-w

Keywords

Navigation