Skip to main content
Log in

Infinity and Beyond: The Poetic List in Children’s Poetry

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Children's Literature in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Amongst the wide variety of poetic forms found across children’s poetry, the list is strikingly prevalent. Drawing on Umberto Eco’s theory of lists, the article examines how the poetic list plays out in the work of a number of children’s poets, distinguishing four sub-categories, each of which operates in a slightly different way. After a brief consideration of early exponents, including Christina Rossetti, it focuses on the children’s poetry of Carol Ann Duffy, Ted Hughes, Philip Gross and Allan Ahlberg to demonstrate how list poems may create complex effects that belie the simplicity of the form, pointing beyond themselves to the infinite and the ineffable, even as they contain them within embodied language.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This survey, which I undertook in the course of a wider doctoral research project on children’s poetry, was based on a corpus of 1,101 poems, comprising all the children’s poetry of Christina Rossetti (first published in 1872), Ted Hughes (published 1961–1993), Charles Causley (published 1970–1994), Michael Rosen (published 1974–2009), John Agard (published 1990–2011), Philip Gross (published 1993–2011) and Carol Ann Duffy (published 1999–2009).

  2. It appears that written symbols, as opposed to representative drawings, were developed for accounting purposes (Wolf, 2008; Robinson, 2007). One of the very earliest known examples of pictogram writing is a set of clay tablets from Uruk, about 3300 BC, listing sacks of cereal and heads of cattle.

  3. Oral compositions typically use additive style, also known as parataxis: a relatively simple syntactical structure in which phrases are straightforwardly added, and if conjoined at all are linked only by co-ordination—that is, marked by the conjunction “and” or “then.” One thing and another. This then that. This stands in contrast to hypotaxis, the elaborate grammatical and syntactical subordinative structures characteristic of written expression, in which logical relationships between elements are made explicit, creating a layered or more three-dimensional representation of the world (like this sentence).

  4. In his seminal work on the psychodynamics of orality, Walter Ong states that “orality knows no lists and figures” (Ong, 2002, p. 97). However, it is clear from his discussion that Ong does not mean that lists do not exist in oral culture. Rather, he is referring to the fact that primary oral cultures’ lists have a different function.

  5. The Infinity of Lists is essentially an annotated anthology, but embedded in its annotation is a developed theory of how and why we make lists. A similar though not identical theory is advanced by Robert Belknap (2004).

  6. In the Iliad.

  7. A duality perfectly encapsulated in the recent publishing trend, which has produced a steady flow of titles with the formula, “50 things to see/do/eat/etc. before you die.”

  8. “Prattle” in Wordsworth is a recurring motif that connotes the young child’s ability to break apart verbal sound symbols and meanings (Rowland, 2012).

  9. The meaning of ‘city plum’ seems a little uncertain, but several sources suggest it was slang for someone possessing £100,000.

  10. Coined by John Rowe Townsend (1965), the term refers to the sea change in the early 1970s, in which children’s poetry broke free of its romanticised (in the popular sense) view of childhood and from traditional poetic forms, adopting vernacular speech and making forays into free verse.

References

  • Agard, John. (2011). Goldilocks on CCTV. London: Frances Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agard, John. (1990). Laughter is an Egg. Harmondsworth: Puffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agard, John. (1996). We Animals Would like a Word With You. London: Random House.

  • Ahlberg, Allan. (1983). Please Mrs Butler. Harmondsworth: Puffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlberg, Allan. (1989). Heard it in the Playground. Harmondsworth: Puffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Stacey Menzel and Gentry, James W. (1996). Kids As Collectors: A Phenomenological Study of First and Fifth Graders. Advances in Consumer Research, 23, 132–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, Robert E. (2004). The List. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benton, Michael. (1978). Poetry for Children: A Neglected Art. Children’s Literature in Education, 9(3), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyer, Susanne, and Gorris, Lothar. (2009). Interview with Umberto Eco: “We Like Lists Because We Don’t Want to Die.” Spiegel Online. Accessed January 2014 from http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/spiegel-interview-with-umberto-eco-we-like-lists-because-we-don-t-want-to-die-a-659577.html.

  • Brogan, T. V. F. (1993). Nonsense Verse. In Alex Preminger and T. V. F. Brogan (Eds.), The New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics (pp. 839–840). New York: MJF Books.

  • Causley, Charles. (1991). The Young Man of Cury. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Causley, Charles. (1994). All Day Saturday. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Causley, Charles. (1996). Charles Causley: Collected Poems for Children. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleridge, Sara. (1839). Pretty Lessons in Verse for Children; with Some Lessons in Latin, in Easy Rhyme. London: John W. Parker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danet, Brenda and Katriel, Tamar. (1994). No Two Alike: Play and Aesthetics in Collecting. In Susan M. Pearce (Ed.), Interpreting Objects and Collections (pp. 220–239). London: Routlege.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, Carol Ann. (2007). The Hat. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, Carol Ann. (2009). New and Collected Poems for Children. London: Faber and Faber.

  • Eco, Umberto. (2009). The Infinity of Lists. London: MacLehose.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, T.S. (1939). Old Possum’s Book of Practical Cats. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Philip. (2010). Off Road to Everywhere. London: Salt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Ted. (1961). Meet My Folks. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Ted. (1963). The Earth-Owl and Other Moon People. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Ted. (1970). Myth and Education. Children’s Literature in Education, 1(1), 58–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Ted. (1975). Season Songs. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Ted. (1976). Moon-Whales and Other Moon Poems. New York: Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Ted. (1978). Moon-Bells. London: Chatto and Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Ted. (1981). Under the North Star. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Ted. (1984). What is the Truth? London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Ted. (1987). The Cat and the Cuckoo. Bideford: Sunstone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Ted. (1999). The Mermaid’s Purse. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, Tove. (1961). Finn Family Moomintroll (Ernest Benn, Trans.). London: Puffin Books.

  • Kay, Jackie. (1992). Two’s Company. London: Puffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, Jackie. (2007). Red Cherry, Red. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lear, Edward. (1846). A Book of Nonsense. London: Routledge, Warne and Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerer, Seth. (2008). Children’s Literature: A Reader’s History from Aesop to Harry Potter. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, Glyn. (2012). On Poetry. London: Oberon.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGough, Roger. (1983). Sky in the Pie. London: Kestrel.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGough, Roger. (2003). All the Best: The Selected Poems of Roger McGough. London: Puffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, A.A. (1927). Now We Are Six. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, Heather. (1995). The Nature of Poetry. Times Educational Supplement Magazine. Accessed February 2012 from http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=10719.

  • Ong, Walter. (2002). Orality and Literacy (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

  • Oxford English Dictionary. 4th Ed. (1993) Print. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Pearce, Susan.M. (1995). On Collecting: An Investigation into Collecting in the European Tradition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Andrew. (2007). The Story of Writing: Alphabets, Hieroglyphs and Pictograms. London: Thames and Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, Rachel. (2011). The Language of Cat and Other Poems. London: Frances Lincoln.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, Michele, and Root-Bernstein, Robert. (2011). Childhood Collecting: A Neglected Connection between Playing and Learning Psychology Today. Accessed March 2013 from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/imagine/201107/childhood-collecting-neglected-connection-between-playing-and-learning.

  • Roscoe, William. (1808). The Butterfly’s Ball and the Grasshopper’s Feast. London: Griffith and Farran.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Michael. (1983). Quick, Let’s Get Out of Here. Harmondsworth: Puffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, Michael. (2010). Michael Rosen’s Big Book of Bad Things. London: Puffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossetti, Christina. (1968/1872). Sing-Song: A Nursery Rhyme Book. New York: Dover.

  • Rowland, Anne Wierda. (2012). Romanticism and Childhood: The Infantilization of British Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skea, Ann. (2008). Ted Hughes: Timeline. Accessed May 2013, from http://ann.skea.com/timeline.htm.

  • Townsend, John Rowe. (1965). Written for Children: An Outline of English Language Children’s Literature, 2nd ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Maryanne. (2008). Proust and the Squid. Thriplow: Icon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zettelman, Eva Müller. (2003). “Skeleton, Moon, Poet”: Carole Ann Duffy’s Postmodern Poetry for Children. In Angelica Michelis and Anthony Rowland (Eds.), The Poetry of Carol Ann Duffy: “Choosing tough words” (pp. 186–200). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debbie Pullinger.

Additional information

Debbie Pullinger is a Research Associate on the Poetry and Memory project at the University of Cambridge, where she also teaches on Children’s Literature courses. Her doctoral project, completed in 2013 at the University of Cambridge, was on orality and textuality in poetry written for children.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pullinger, D. Infinity and Beyond: The Poetic List in Children’s Poetry. Child Lit Educ 46, 207–225 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-014-9230-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-014-9230-2

Keywords

Navigation