Abstract
This randomized controlled trial tested the Family Assessment and Feedback Intervention (FAFI), a new intervention to enhance family engagement with emotional and behavioral health services. The FAFI is a guided conversation with families about results of their multidimensional assessment that is set in the context of motivational enhancement. It differs from other assessment-with-feedback interventions by extending the focus of assessment beyond the target child to parents and the family environment, addressing parental emotional and behavioral problems and competencies, spanning a broad range of children’s and parents’ strengths and difficulties, and being generalizable to many settings and practitioners. Participants were 81 families in primary care pediatrics. The FAFI was associated with a significant increase in parental mental health literacy and with an increase in parental attitudinal engagement with health supports and services that closely approached statistical significance (p = .052), while controlling for children’s age and gender and family socioeconomic status.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Despite considerable advances that have been made in prevention and treatment of emotional and behavioral health problems, several comprehensive literature reviews have concluded that poor family engagement with prevention and treatment efforts remains a serious problem [1,2,3,4]. Multidimensional and dynamic, family engagement is predicted by many personal, family, logistic, and therapeutic factors [5, 6]. A review of 40 years of research on engagement with children’s mental health services concluded that the five practice elements that were most frequently included in effective engagement interventions were assessment, psychoeducation, soliciting barriers to treatment, promoting treatment accessibility (i.e., removing the barriers), and goal setting [7]. One type of intervention for improving engagement is to provide clients with personalized assessment feedback that compares data about their emotional and behavioral health to normative benchmarks. Assessment feedback interventions typically address individual, family, and therapeutic, but not logistic predictors of engagement, and include the assessment, psychoeducation, and goal setting practice elements.
Several empirically-supported interventions incorporate personalized assessment feedback. Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET; [8]) combines Motivational Interviewing, a conversation style designed to amplify clients’ disposition for change (MI; [9]), with personalized assessment feedback. Clients are provided with a personalized report about the target behavior (e.g., substance use) that displays their data in relation to normative data (e.g., typical substance use by people their age and gender). When tested in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with youth, MET reduced social media use and risky sexual behavior and improved response to psychotherapy for youth [10,11,12].
The Family Check-Up is a landmark application of MI and therapeutic assessment feedback for reducing children’s oppositional and defiant problems [13, 14]. Parents receive feedback about their parenting behavior based on results of a standardized assessment of their interactions with their children, followed by a behavioral parent training intervention, where indicated [14]. Originally developed for prevention of substance abuse in adolescence, the Family Check-Up reduced rates of substance use initiation and growth over the course of middle school and substance abuse symptoms in young adulthood when tested in a school setting [15,16,17]. When offered to socioeconomically disadvantaged urban families with 2-year-olds, the Family Check-Up was associated with lower children’s disruptive behavior and greater parental involvement when the children were ages three and four [18]. A large, multi-site trial in which it was offered annually to families of toddlers ages two to five demonstrated that it was associated with slower growth of children’s externalizing behavior problems, and lower children’s externalizing behavior problems in primary school [19, 20].
The Family Assessment and Feedback Intervention
The present study tested the efficacy of a new therapeutic assessment feedback intervention, the Family Assessment and Feedback Intervention (FAFI; [21]). The FAFI is a guided conversation with family members about results of their assessment of both parent and child emotional and behavioral health, family relationships, and the family environment in the context of motivational enhancement. The FAFI aims to help family members to “meet themselves” individually and as a family by identifying areas of similarity and differences in emotional and behavioral profiles between family members and exploring how they affect the family environment, including family relationships and health-related practices.
The FAFI was created to facilitate family engagement with children’s treatment for emotional and behavioral problems. It was intended for implementation at any stage of the treatment process. The FAFI can be delivered at the beginning of the intervention to help establish rapport with the family and facilitate collaborative treatment planning. It can also be implemented after some treatment work has been done, to deepen family members’ understanding of themselves and each other and plan next steps.
While supporting families in their exploration of their data, the clinician weaves in several key concepts of mental health literacy, such as the familial nature of mental health and individual differences in profiles of mental health. The FAFI emphasizes mental health literacy, because while it is essential for the identification and help seeking for emotional and behavioral problems, population rates of mental health literacy are low around the globe [22]. This conversation occurs in the context of motivational enhancement, using techniques from Motivational Interviewing [9] and values-based techniques developed for the FAFI [21].
The FAFI differs from other assessment-with-feedback interventions by extending the focus of assessment beyond the target child to parents and the family environment. Parental emotional and behavioral problems and competencies are addressed by the FAFI directly and comprehensively. Another innovation of the FAFI is that it spans a broad spectrum of strengths and difficulties, for both parents and children. It is based on a broad, empirically-derived taxonomic framework of emotional and behavioral problems that is backed by thousands of studies conducted over decades of research [23]. The FAFI takes approximately an hour.
The Present Study
The present study was conducted as part of a larger RCT that tested a comprehensive family-based intervention, the Vermont Family Based Approach (VFBA), in a pediatric primary care setting [24,25,26]. The FAFI was administered immediately after recruited families completed the baseline assessment protocol and before any programmatic offerings of the larger trial of the VFBA. Because the FAFI emphasizes mental health literacy and other assessment feedback interventions increase treatment engagement (e.g., [27,28,29]), we tested the effects of the FAFI on parental mental health literacy and treatment engagement. The FAFI was tested with community families who were not seeking mental healthcare for their children. Given this, we operationalized engagement as dispositional or attitudinal engagement with health promotion and healthcare services that are focused on emotional and behavioral health.
Method
Participants
Participants were 81 children and families recruited at a University of Vermont (UVM) Medical Center primary care pediatric clinic in Burlington, Vermont. The child sample was primarily of preschool age (M = 4.89; SD 1.88; range = 3–14 years old) and was 46% female (37 girls). Children’s racial/ethnic backgrounds were as follows: 10 (12.3%) African, 5 (6.2%) Arab/Middle Eastern, 6 (7.4%) Asian, 3 (3.7%) Hispanic, 53 (65.4%) White, and 4 (4.9%) Mixed. Family socioeconomic status was split evenly between low-, middle-, and high-earning families [26]. Fifteen families identified as immigrant (18.5%). Twenty six families (32%) identified as single-parent households.
Setting and Procedures
Families were recruited during non-acute visits by pediatric practitioners. Families completed the baseline assessment after consenting for participation, and were randomized immediately thereafter (41 FAFI; 40 Control). The FAFI was based on results of the baseline assessment, and delivered to the intervention group within the 1st month after completing the baseline assessment. The post-FAFI reassessment was done immediately after the FAFI session with the family. Therefore, the only contact from study staff that participants received in the first 4 weeks of the study were phone calls to schedule the FAFI visit and post-FAFI assessment (FAFI group) or just the assessment (Control group). When asked to take part in the FAFI, families were invited to a conversation about the results of their initial family assessment. They were told that during this conversation they would collaboratively join the research staff in making sense of the data to better understand their family. They were also told that the results would focus on the emotional and behavioral health and wellbeing of individual family members and their family as a whole. For the Control group that did not receive the FAFI, the parallel reassessment was conducted during the 4th week after the baseline assessment (i.e., the same interval as the reassessment for the FAFI group).
Assessment Instruments
Assessment Instruments Used in the FAFI
During the FAFI, personalized graphic profiles of each family’s normatively-referenced data obtained with the following assessment instruments were shared with families.
Children’s and Parents’ Emotional and Behavioral Health
We used assessments that are part of the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA; [30]). For preschoolers, we used the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 1.5–5 completed by parental figures and the Caregiver-Teacher Report Form completed by caregivers or teachers (CBCL/1.5–5 and CTRF [31]). For school-aged children, we used the Child Behavior Checklist for Ages 6–18, Youth Self-Report, and Teacher’s Report Form (CBCL/6–18, YSR, TRF; [32]). For parents, we used the Adult Self-Report and Adult Behavior Checklist, which are self- and collateral-report questionnaires, respectively (ASR, ABCL [33]). ASEBA forms are normed on a representative U.S. national household sample. Factor analyses of their problem items have yielded syndromes that have been supported by confirmatory factor analyses of tens of thousands of children and adults in dozens of societies [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. All scales have good psychometric properties, and multicultural norms are available in addition to U.S. norms. Indicating the overall level of emotional and behavioral problems, mean Total Problems scale scores fell in the normal range for both parents and children in both study arms, as indicated by the CBCL and ASR t-scores (FAFI: CBCL t = 49.61 (13.86), ASR t = 45.26 (12.34); Control: CBCL t = 52.11 (12.59), ASR t = 45.70 (12.91)).
Family Environment and Relationships
We used the Family Environment Scale (FES; [42]) scales of Cohesion, Conflict, Intellectual-Cultural Orientation, Active-Recreational Orientation, Moral-Religious Emphasis, Organization, and Control. FES scales demonstrate strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.67–0.79), test–retest reliability (r = 0.76–0.86), and construct validity [42].
Assessment Instruments Used for Outcome Assessment
Both outcome assessment instruments were developed for the study because psychometrically validated instruments assessing mental health literacy and engagement from the family perspective and in the context of both health promotion and intervention were not available at the time of the study.
Parental Mental Health Literacy
The Parental Mental Health Literacy Questionnaire (PMHLQ) is a 23-item self-report questionnaire. It is based on Jorm’s multidimensional conceptualization of mental health literacy as knowledge and beliefs about emotional and behavioral health that aid in its promotion and in the recognition and treatment of emotional and behavioral problems [43]. The questionnaire assesses parental recognition of emotional and behavioral problems (e.g., “I can recognize when someone is suffering from an emotional or behavioral problem”), knowledge about their risk factors and causes (e.g., “Emotional and behavioral problems are caused in part by biological factors (e.g., genes)”), knowledge about the promotion of emotional and behavioral health (e.g., “Taking care of my own emotional and behavioral health is one of the best ways to support my child’s emotional and behavioral health”), knowledge that facilitates appropriate help seeking (e.g., “It is best to get help quickly and not wait”), and knowledge supporting help seeking (e.g., “I know where to look for accurate information about emotional and behavioral problems and their treatment”).
Parental Engagement
The Parental Health Engagement Questionnaire (PHEQ) is a 36-item self-report questionnaire that assesses dispositional or attitudinal engagement with family-based activities and services that promote emotional and behavioral health. The PHEQ includes questions assessing (1) recognition of the importance of health-promoting behaviors and practices (e.g., “I believe that health promotion (e.g., healthy nutrition…) is important to family health”), (2) knowledge of the health promoting behaviors and practices (e.g., “I know what food is healthy”), (3) skills for carrying out the behaviors and practices (e.g., “I know how to make healthy food for my family”), and (4) active engagement in health-promoting behaviors and practices (e.g., “I make healthy food for my family”).
The FAFI
Before the FAFI, the clinician decides who will be invited to the conversation. Family members who take part in the FAFI need to be able to comprehend the concepts introduced in the conversation, regulate their emotions while discussing personal topics, and prioritize children’s needs while discussing family matters if the children are present. Topics that can be disturbing or unsettling for children (e.g., parental substance misuse and traumatic history, financial difficulties) are addressed with the parents without the children. Children ages 7 and younger generally do not participate in the FAFI, children ages 7–11 are invited to some parts of the conversation that can be beneficial to them (e.g., ideas of mental health literacy presented in a developmentally accessible language), and typically developing youth ages 12 and older generally can participate in the full conversation. Ivanova [21] provides more strategies for setting up productive conversations with families. While the FAFI can be carried out with any primary caregivers (e.g., grandparents, aunts/uncles), all adult participants in this study were children’s biological parents, so we will refer to them as “parents” in the following.
The FAFI is a guided conversation in four parts. In the Introduction, the clinician introduces several concepts of mental health literacy, including the familial nature of mental health (including the importance of parental mental health for children’s health), individual differences in mental health (i.e., that we are not all created equal with respect to our emotional and behavioral strengths and vulnerabilities), etiological factors predicting mental health problems (i.e., that biology and environment transact over time), and the importance of multi-informant perspectives in assessment. The family is then asked to come up with the Central Question to be answered in the session. In community settings, the question is usually framed in terms of greater self-understanding for each family member, and of how the family works together. In clinical settings, this segment is used as an opportunity to shift the family’s framing of the presenting problem from focusing on the target child to considering the entire family. Family members are presented with an Assessment Summary, in which their data are plotted in relation to data for normative samples. The Assessment Summary highlights areas of relative strengths and difficulties and is organized around the topics of child’s and parents’ adaptive functioning, emotional and behavioral problems, family relationships, and the family environment. Family members are encouraged to explore how the similarities and differences in their profiles of emotional and behavioral strengths and difficulties affect family relationships and routines. The motivational enhancement techniques used in this conversation are Motivational Interviewing [9] and values-based techniques developed for the FAFI. The FAFI ends with the Summary of the main health literacy themes and the family’s results. Where appropriate, a range of family support options are also presented and discussed with the family.
Training in the FAFI
The FAFI was delivered by project staff, including graduate students in mental health (i.e., Clinical Psychology, Social Work, and Mental Health Counseling), a public health professional, and the senior author, who is a Licensed Clinical Psychologist (MI). The senior author provided a group training to project staff, which addressed the FAFI’s conceptual foundations, interpretation of the personalized graphic profile report provided to each family, and step-by-step session procedures. She also led several FAFI sessions with families in the presence of project staff before they carried them out independently. Before each FAFI that was carried out by project staff independently, the senior author reviewed the family’s personalized graphic profile report with the project staff, emphasizing ways in which the delivery of the intervention would need to be adapted based on the sociodemographic characteristics of the family (e.g., parental educational level and occupation, immigration status, ethnic and racial background).
Results
Using general linear modeling (GLM) repeated measures analyses, we compared rates of change in parental ratings of mental health literacy and engagement with family health supports and services from baseline assessment to the 4th week after recruitment, which was immediately after the FAFI intervention for the intervention group. We specified a full factorial model with child gender, age, and family SES as covariates.
As Table 1 shows, receiving the FAFI was associated with significantly different rates of change for mental health literacy between the two groups. For ratings of attitudinal engagement with family health supports and services, the difference in the rates of change between the FAFI and Control groups approached statistical significance (p = 0.052).
Figure 1 plots the significant interaction for parental mental health literacy, adjusted for child age and gender and family SES. Table 2 presents estimated marginal means for parental mental health literacy and attitudinal engagement with health supports and services at baseline and 4-week assessments, separately for the FAFI and Control Groups.
Discussion
The FAFI is a guided conversation that explores topics of emotional and behavioral health literacy and helps family members to better understand their profiles of emotional and behavioral health, including how they contribute to family relationships. The FAFI introduces several key concepts of mental health literacy, such as descriptions of a broad range of possible emotional and behavioral strengths and difficulties, the idea of individual differences in profiles of emotional and behavioral strengths and difficulties, and how to detect significant problems and obtain competent care. Although these concepts may appear self-evident to health professionals, they are often unfamiliar to family members. Reviewing them with family members and exploring their emotional and behavioral health profiles can help promote self and mutual understanding and help parents to take responsibility for their emotional and behavioral health.
Given the FAFI’s emphasis on mental health literacy, it is not surprising that it was associated with significant improvements in mental health literacy in this study. We were also not surprised by our finding that the FAFI was associated with increases in parental attitudinal engagement with health supports and services that closely approached statistical significance. Although we lacked statistical power to test parental mental health literacy as a mechanism through which it affected engagement, we suspect that it served as such a mechanism because others have found that parental mental health literacy predicted family engagement with children’s mental health care over time. Yeh et al. [44] found that parental beliefs in the biopsychosocial etiologies of mental health problems predicted utilization of child mental health services over a 2-year period, while parental beliefs consistent with other etiologies (e.g., sociological, spiritual, and nature disharmony) did not. Similarly, Mendenhall [45] reported that parental understanding of children’s mood disorders (i.e., their etiology, clinical presentation, and course) and of available treatments for these disorders prior to treatment predicted treatment engagement.
An important consideration is the practicality of the FAFI in primary care as an intervention that can facilitate early detection of emotional and behavioral problems for both children and parents and that can enhance parental felt responsibility for the quality of the family environment, the FAFI holds promise in primary care. However, the complex issues affecting current systems of primary care result in the organizational emphasis on patient throughput and efficiency, making it unlikely that even the most willing primary care practitioner would spend an hour with a family. Given this, the FAFI may be best delivered by experienced nurses or co-located mental health professionals. Notably, when implemented in a primary care setting, an adaptation of the Family Checkup for the treatment of children’s overweight was delivered by paraprofessionals and professionals in “behavioral health, social work, public health, exercise science, and health promotion” [46], p. 467.
Our results should be interpreted in the context of the limitations of this trial. Although the FAFI was the first intervention that was offered to families in the intervention group after their baseline assessment, this trial was embedded in a trial of a comprehensive family-based intervention [25, 26]. Participants’ expectancies about the subsequent intervention could have affected their ratings of engagement. Another limitation is that the effects of the FAFI were measured immediately after the intervention, so it is not clear whether they were sustained. The outcomes were also measured solely by parental reports and by new assessment instruments that were developed for this trial. Although all project staff were trained and supervised by the author of the FAFI (MI), we did not formally assess intervention fidelity and staff performance during the FAFI.
Despite these limitations, results of this trial are encouraging, considering that the FAFI is a one-session intervention that is generally completed within one hour. We are further encouraged that its efficacy was demonstrated with community families where children were not experiencing significant emotional and behavioral problems, a known predictor of parental help seeking (e.g., [5]). Also, although we lacked data to formally compare the fidelity and performance for staff of different backgrounds, the FAFI was delivered by a wide range of project staff, including graduate students in Clinical Social Work or Mental Health Counseling, a public health professional, and master’s- and doctoral-level mental health clinicians. Given such variety of practitioners who can deliver the FAFI, its short length, and breadth of addressed topics, it should be generalizable to a variety of settings and practitioners.
Summary
This randomized controlled trial tested the Family Assessment and Feedback Intervention (FAFI) to enhance family engagement with emotional and behavioral health supports and services. The FAFI is an assessment-with-feedback intervention that differs from other assessment-with-feedback interventions by extending the focus of assessment beyond the target child to parents and the family environment, addressing parental emotional and behavioral problems and competencies, spanning a broad range of children’s and parents’ strengths and difficulties, and being generalizable to many settings and practitioners. The FAFI introduces several key concepts of mental health literacy, such as descriptions of a broad range of possible emotional and behavioral strengths and difficulties, the idea of individual differences in profiles of emotional and behavioral strengths and difficulties, and how to detect significant problems and obtain competent care. Reviewing them with family members and exploring their emotional and behavioral health profiles can help promote self and mutual understanding and help parents to take responsibility for their emotional and behavioral health. Eighty-one families were recruited in a primary care pediatrics office. The FAFI was associated with a significant increase in parental mental health literacy and with an increase in parental engagement with health supports and services that closely approached statistical significance (p = .052), while controlling for children’s age and gender and family socioeconomic status. The FAFI is a short intervention that can be delivered by a wide range of practitioners across a variety of settings.
Data Availability
The authors will consider requests for data sharing, which should be sent to the corresponding author.
References
Aguirre Velasco A, Cruz ISS, Billings J, Jimenez M, Rowe S (2020) What are the barriers, facilitators and interventions targeting help-seeking behaviours for common mental health problems in adolescents? A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 20(1):293. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02659-0
Baweja R, Soutullo CA, Waxmonsky JG (2021) Review of barriers and interventions to promote treatment engagement for pediatric attention deficit hyperactivity disorder care. World J Psychiatry 11(12):1206–1227. https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v11.i12.1206
Chacko A, Jensen SA, Lowry LS, Cornwell M, Chimklis A, Chan E, Lee D, Pulgarin B (2016) Engagement in behavioral parent training: review of the literature and implications for practice. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 19(3):204–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-016-0205-2
Radez J, Reardon T, Creswell C, Lawrence PJ, Evdoka-Burton G, Waite P (2021) Why do children and adolescents (not) seek and access professional help for their mental health problems? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 30(2):183–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01469-4
Gopalan G, Goldstein L, Klingenstein K, Sicher C, Blake C, McKay MM (2010) Engaging families into child mental health treatment: updates and special considerations. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 19(3):182–196
Ingoldsby EM (2010) Review of interventions to improve family engagement and retention in parent and child mental health programs. J Child Fam Stud 19(5):629–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-009-9350-2
Becker KD, Boustani M, Gellatly R, Chorpita BF (2018) Forty years of engagement research in children’s mental health services: multidimensional measurement and practice elements. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 47(1):1–23
Miller WR (1992) Motivational enhancement therapy manual: a clinical research guide for therapists treating individuals with alcohol abuse and dependence. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Miller WR, Rollnick S (2002) Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change, 2nd edn. Guildford Press, New York
Manwong M, Lohsoonthorn V, Booranasuksakul T, Chaikoolvatana A (2018) Effects of a group activity-based motivational enhancement therapy program on social media addictive behaviors among junior high school students in Thailand: a cluster randomized trial. Psychol Res Behav Manag 11:329–339. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S168869
Naar-King S, Wright K, Parsons JT, Frey M, Templin T, Lam P, Murphy D (2006) Healthy choices: motivational enhancement therapy for health risk behaviors in HIV-positive youth. AIDS Educ Prev: Off Publ Int Soc AIDS Educ 18(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2006.18.1.1
Tobon JI, Zipursky RB, Streiner DL, Colvin E, Bahl N, Ouimet AJ, Burckell L, Jeffs L, Bieling PJ (2020) Motivational enhancement as a pretreatment to a transdiagnostic intervention for emerging adults with emotion dysregulation: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 29(3):132–148
Dishion TJ, Kavanagh K (2003) Intervening in adolescent problem behavior: a family-centered approach. Guilford Press, New York
Dishion TJ, Stormshak EA (2007) Intervening in children’s lives: an ecological, family-centered approach to mental health care. Am Psychol Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1037/11485-000
Connell AM, Dishion TJ (2008) Reducing depression among at-risk early adolescents: three-year effects of a family-centered intervention embedded within schools. J Fam Psychol 22(4):574–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.22.3.574
Connell AM, Dishion TJ, Yasui M, Kavanagh K (2007) An adaptive approach to family intervention: linking engagement in family-centered intervention to reductions in adolescent problem behavior. J Consult Clin Psychol 75(4):568–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.4.568
Dishion TJ, Nelson SE, Kavanagh K (2003) The family check-up with high-risk young adolescents: preventing early-onset substance use by parent monitoring. Behav Ther 34(4):553–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(03)80035-7?]
Shaw DS, Dishion TJ, Supplee LH, Gardner F, Arnds K (2006) A family-centered approach to the prevention of early-onset antisocial behavior: two-year effects of the family check-up in early childhood. J Consult Clin Psychol 74:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.1.1
Dishion TJ, Brennan LM, Shaw DS, McEachern AD, Wilson MN, Jo B (2014) Prevention of problem behavior through annual family check-ups in early childhood: intervention effects from home to early elementary school. J Abnorm Child Psychol 42(3):343–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9768-2
Dishion TJ, Shaw D, Connell A, Gardner F, Weaver C, Wilson M (2008) The family check-up with high-risk indigent families: preventing problem behavior by increasing parents’ positive behavior support in early childhood. Child Dev 79(5):1395–1414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01195.x
Ivanova (2022) The family assessment and feedback intervention (FAFI): a training manual. University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry
Tay JL, Tay YF, Klainin-Yobas P (2018) Mental health literacy levels. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 32(5):757–763
Achenbach TM (2017) Future directions for clinical research, services, and training: evidence-based assessment across informants, cultures, and dimensional hierarchies. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 46(1):159–169
Hudziak J, Ivanova MY (2016) The Vermont family based approach: family based health promotion, illness prevention, and intervention. Child Adolesc Psychiatric Clin 25(2):167–178
Ivanova MY, Dewey L, Swift P, Weinberger S, Hudziak J (2019) Health promotion in primary care pediatrics: Initial results of a randomized clinical trial of the Vermont family based approach. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 28(2):237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2018.11.005
Ivanova MY, Hall A, Weinberger S, Buckingham SL, Copeland WE, Crockett P, Dainer-Best J, D’Alberto C, Dewey L, Foret D, Galano M, Goodrich L, Holly L, Lane N, Leahey M, Lerner M, Marsh J, McGinnis E, Paiva-Salisbury M, Hudziak JJ (2022) The Vermont family based approach in primary care pediatrics: effects on children’s and parents’ emotional and behavioral problems and parents’ health-related quality of life. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-022-01329-4
Blongin DM, Timko C, Jacob T, Moos RH (2015) Patient-centered feedback on the results of personality testing increases early engagement in residential substance use disorder treatment: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Addict Sci Clin Pract 10:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-015-0030-9
De Saeger H, Kamphuis JH, Finn SE, Smith JD, Verheul R, van Busschbach JJ, Feenstra DJ, Horn EK (2014) Therapeutic assessment promotes treatment readiness but does not affect symptom change in patients with personality disorders: findings from a randomized clinical trial. Psychol Assess 26(2):474–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035667
Ougrin D, Boege I, Stahl D, Banarsee R, Taylor E (2013) Randomised controlled trial of therapeutic assessment versus usual assessment in adolescents with self-harm: 2-year follow-up. Arch Dis Child 98(10):772–776
Achenbach TM (2009) The Achenbach system of empirically based assessemnt (ASEBA): development, findings, theory, and applications. University of Vermont Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families, Burlington
Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2000) Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms & profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families, Burlington
Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2001) Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families, Burlington
Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA (2003) Manual for the ASEBA adult forms & profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families, Burlington
Ivanova MY, Achenbach TM, Dumenci L, Rescorla LA, Almqvist F, Weintraub S, Bilenberg N, Bird H, Chen WJ, Dobrean A, Döpfner M, Erol N, Fombonne E, Fonseca AC, Frigerio A, Grietens H, Hannesdóttir H, Kanbayashi Y, Lambert M, Verhulst FC (2007) Testing the 8-syndrome structure of the child behavior checklist in 30 societies. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 36(3):405–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410701444363
Ivanova MY, Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA, Bilenberg N, Bjarnadottir G, Denner S, Dias P, Dobrean A, Döpfner M, Esmaeili EM, Frigerio A, Guðmundsson HS, Jusiene R, Kristensen S, Lecannelier F, Leung PWL, Lima VS, Liu J, Lobel SP, Verhulst FC (2011) Syndromes of preschool psychopathology reported by teachers and caregivers in 14 societies using the caregiver-teacher report form (C-TRF). J Early Child Infant Psychol 7:87–103
Ivanova MY, Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA, Dumenci L, Almqvist F, Bathiche M, Bilenberg N, Bird H, Domuta A, Erol N, Fombonne E, Fonseca A, Frigerio A, Kanbayashi Y, Lambert MC, Leung P, Liu X, Minaei A, Roussos A, Verhulst FC (2007) Testing the teacher’s report form syndromes in 20 societies. Sch Psychol Rev 36(3):468–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2007.12087934
Ivanova MY, Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA, Dumenci L, Almqvist F, Bilenberg N, Bird H, Broberg AG, Dobrean A, Döpfner M, Erol N, Forns M, Hannesdóttir H, Kanbayashi Y, Lambert MC, Leung P, Minaei A, Mulatu MS, Nøvik T, Verhulst FC (2007) The generalizability of the youth self-report syndrome structure in 23 Societies. J Consult Clin Psychol 75(5):729–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.5.729
Ivanova MY, Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA, Harder VS, Ang RP, Bilenberg N, Verhulst FC (2010) Preschool psychopathology reported by parents in 23 societies: testing the seven-syndrome model of the child behavior checklist for ages 1.5–5. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 49(12):1215–1224
Ivanova MY, Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA, Turner LV, Ahmeti-Pronaj A, Au A, Maese CA, Bellina M, Caldas JC, Chen Y-C, Csemy L, da Rocha MM, Decoster J, Dobrean A, Ezpeleta L, Fontaine JRJ, Funabiki Y, Guðmundsson HS, Harder VS, Zasepa E (2014) Syndromes of self-reported psychopathology for ages 18–59 in 29 societies. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 37(2):171–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-014-9448-8
Ivanova MY, Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA, Turner LV, Árnadóttir HA, Au A, Caldas JC, Chaalal N, Chen YC, da Rocha MM, Decoster J, Fontaine JRJ, Funabiki Y, Guðmundsson HS, Kim YA, Leung P, Liu J, Malykh S, Marković J, Zasępa E (2015) Syndromes of collateral-reported psychopathology for ages 18–59 in 18 Societies. Int J Clin Health Psychol 15(1):18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2014.07.001
Rescorla L, Ivanova MY, Achenbach TM, Begovac I, Chahed M, Drugli MB, Emerich DR, Fung DSS, Haider M, Hansson K, Hewitt N, Jaimes S, Larsson B, Maggiolini A, Marković J, Mitrović D, Moreira P, Oliveira JT, Olsson M, Zhang EY (2012) International epidemiology of child and adolescent psychopathology II: integration and applications of dimensional findings from 44 societies. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 51(12):1273–1283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2012.09.012
Moos RH, Moos BS (2009) Family environment scale manual and sampler set: development, applications and research, 4th edn. Mind Garden, Palo Alto
Jorm AF (2012) Mental health literacy: empowering the community to take action for better mental health. Am Psychol 67(3):231–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025957
Yeh M, McCabe K, Hough RL, Lau A, Fakhry F, Garland A (2005) Why bother with beliefs? Examining relationships between race/ethnicity, parental beliefs about causes of child problems, and mental health service use. J Consult Clin Psychol 73(5):800–807. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.5.800
Mendenhall AN (2012) Predictors of service utilization among youth diagnosed with mood disorders. J Child Fam Stud 21(4):603–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9512-x
Berkel C, Fu E, Carroll AJ, Wilson C, Tovar-Huffman A, Mauricio A, Smith JD (2021) Effects of the family check-up 4 health on parenting and child behavioral health: a randomized clinical trial in primary care. Prev Sci 22:464–474
Funding
This study was funded by the University of Vermont Medical Center (UVM MC) and by K23MH123031-03A1 (PI: E.W. McGinnis).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Masha Ivanova: 1. made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data used in the work; 2. drafted the work; 3. approved the version to be published; 4. agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. Allison Hall, Stanley Weinberger, Sara L. Buckingham, William E. Copeland, Phoenix Crockett, Justin Dainer-Best, Casey D’Alberto, Lauren Dewey, DeShan Foret, Maria Galano, Lisa Goodrich, Lindsay Holly, Nalini Emily Lane, Maureen Leahy, Mathew Lerner, Jasmine Marsh, Ellen McGinnis, Melissa Paiva-Salisbury, Judith S. Shaw, Pamela Swift, Rebekah Tinker, James J. Hudziak: 1. made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; 2. revised the work critically for important intellectual content; 3. approved the version to be published; 4. agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
None to declare.
Ethical Approval
All study procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Vermont.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ivanova, M.Y., Hall, A., Weinberger, S. et al. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the Family Assessment and Feedback Intervention (FAFI): Effects on Mental Health Literacy and Attitudinal Engagement with Health Supports and Services. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-024-01707-0
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-024-01707-0