Abstract
The Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Children (PSWQ-C) is one of the most frequently used instruments to assess worry in children. The current study examines the measurement invariance of the PSWQ-C in a Romanian sample. Participants (n = 759) were recruited from both community and clinical populations. Our findings have replicated the good psychometric properties of the PSWQ-C and of the short PSWQ-C (the original scale with the negative items deleted). Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis has supported measurement invariance (configural, metric, scalar) across gender, age and clinical diagnosis. Convergent validity with other assessment measures has also been established. Finally, the implications of the use of the PSWQ-C in the assessment of anxiety in children and adolescents are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Borkovec TD, Robinson E, Pruzinsky T, DePree JA (1983) Preliminary exploration of worry: some characteristics and processes. Behav Res Ther 21:9–16
Borkovec TD (1994) The nature, functions, and origins of worry. In: Davey GCL, Tallis F (eds) Worrying: perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment. Wiley, Oxford, pp 5–33
Pruzinsky T, Borkovec TD (1990) Cognitive and personality characteristics of worriers. Behav Res Ther 28:507–512
Henker B, Whalen CK, O’Neil R (1995) Worldly and workday worries: contemporary concerns of children and young adolescents. J Abnorm Child Psychol 23:685–702
Orton GL (1982) A comparative study of children’s worries. J Psychol 110:153–162. doi:10.1080/00223980.1982.9915336
Silverman WK, La Greca AM, Wasserstein S (1995) What do children worry about? Worries and their relation to anxiety. Child Dev 66:671–686
Kertz SJ, Bigda-Peyton JS, Rosmarin DH, Björgvinsson T (2012) The importance of worry across diagnostic presentations: prevalence, severity and associated symptoms in a partial hospital setting. J Anxiety Disord 26:126–133. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.10.005
McEvoy PM, Watson H, Watkins ER, Nathan P (2013) The relationship between worry, rumination, and comorbidity: evidence for repetitive negative thinking as a transdiagnostic construct. J Affect Disord 151:313–320. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.06.014
Chorpita BF, Tracey SA, Brown TA et al (1997) Assessment of worry in children and adolescents: an adaptation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behav Res Ther 35:569–581
Meyer TJ, Miller ML, Metzger RL, Borkovec TD (1990) Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behav Res Ther 28:487–495
Esbjørn BH, Reinholdt-Dunne ML, Caspersen ID et al (2012) Penn State Worry Questionnaire: findings form normative and clinical samples in Denmark. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 35:113–122. doi:10.1007/s10862-012-9320-7
Gosselin P, Tremblay M, Dugas MJ, Ladouceur R (2002) Les inquiétudes chez les adolescents: Propriétés psychométriques de la version français du Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Children. [Adolescent worries: Psychometric properties in the French version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Children.]. Can Psychol Psychol Can 43:270–277. doi:10.1037/h0086923
Kang S-G, Shin J-H, Song S-W (2010) Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in primary school children. J Korean Med Sci 25:1210–1216. doi:10.3346/jkms.2010.25.8.1210
Muris P, Meesters C, Gobel M (2001) Reliability, validity, and normative data of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in 8-12-yr-old children. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 32:63–72
Pestle SL, Chorpita BF, Schiffman J (2008) Psychometric properties of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for children in a large clinical sample. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 37:465–471. doi:10.1080/15374410801955896
Conrad KJ, Wright BD, McKnight P et al (2004) Comparing traditional and Rasch analyses of the Mississippi PTSD Scale: revealing limitations of reverse-scored items. J Appl Meas 5:15–30
Rodebaugh TL, Woods CM, Heimberg RG (2007) The reverse of social anxiety is not always the opposite: the reverse-scored items of the social interaction anxiety scale do not belong. Behav Ther 38:192–206. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2006.08.001
Carlson M, Wilcox R, Chou C-P et al (2011) Psychometric properties of reverse-scored items on the CES-D in a sample of ethnically diverse older adults. Psychol Assess 23:558–562. doi:10.1037/a0022484
Sechrest L, Davis M, Stickle TR, McKnight P (2000) Understanding “method” variance. In: Bickman L (ed) Donald Campbell’s legacy. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 63–87
Brown T (2006) CFA with equality constraints, multiple groups, and mean structures. In: Brown T (ed) Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp 236–319
Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE (2000) A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ Res Methods 3:4–69. doi:10.1177/109442810031002
Horn JL, McArdle JJ (1992) A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Exp Aging Res 18:117–144. doi:10.1080/03610739208253916
Meredith W (1993) Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika 58:525–543. doi:10.1007/BF02294825
Millsap RE, Meredith W (2007) Factorial invariance: historical perspectives and new problems. In: Cudeck R, MacCallum RC (eds) 100 years of factor analysis. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 131–152
Gottlieb D, Bronstein P (1996) Parents’ perceptions of children’s worries in a changing world. J Genet Psychol 157:104–118. doi:10.1080/00221325.1996.9914849
Vasey MW (1993) Development and cognition in childhood anxiety: the example of worry. Adv Clin Child Psychol 15:1–39
World Health Organization (WHO) (1993) The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: diagnostic criteria for research. World Health Organization, Geneva
American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Association Task Force, Washington DC. doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
Muñiz J, Elosua P, Hambleton RK (2013) International test commission guidelines for test translation and adaptation: second edition. Psicothema 25:151–157. doi:10.7334/psicothema2013.24
Birmaher B, Brent DA, Chiappetta L et al (1999) Psychometric properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): a replication study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 38:1230–1236. doi:10.1097/00004583-199910000-00011
Achenbach TM, Rescorla L (2001) Manual for ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families, Burlington, VT
Rescorla L, Achenbach TM, Ivanova MY et al (2007) Epidemiological comparisons of problems and positive qualities reported by adolescents in 24 countries. J Consult Clin Psychol 75:351. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.2.351
Rescorla LA, Ginzburg S, Achenbach TM et al (2013) Cross-informant agreement between parent-reported and adolescent self-reported problems in 25 societies. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 42:262–273. doi:10.1080/15374416.2012.717870
Finney SJ, DiStefano C (2006) Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. Struct Equ Model Second Course 269–314
Arbuckle JL (2006) Amos (Version 22.0) (Computer Program). SPSS, Chicago
Bollen KA (1989) A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociol Methods Res 17:303–316
DiStefano C, Motl RW (2006) Further investigating method effects associated with negatively worded items on self-report surveys. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 13:440–464. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1303_6
Motl RW, DiStefano C (2002) Longitudinal invariance of self-esteem and method effects associated with negatively worded items. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 9:562–578. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_6
van Sonderen E, Sanderman R, Coyne JC (2013) Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: let’s learn from cows in the rain. PLoS One 8:e68967. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068967
Wang W-C, Chen H-F, Jin K-Y (2015) Item response theory models for wording effects in mixed-format scales. Educ Psychol Measur 75:157–178. doi:10.1177/0013164414528209
Brown TA (2003) Confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Multiple factors or method effects? Behav Res Ther 41:1411–1426
Hazlett-Stevens H, Ullman JB, Craske MG (2004) Factor structure of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: examination of a method factor. Assessment 11:361–370. doi:10.1177/1073191104269872
Byrne BM (2013) Structural equation modeling with EQS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
Cheung GW, Rensvold RB (2002) Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model 9:233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Lenhard W, Lenhard A (2014) Hypothesis tests for comparing correlations. Bibergau (Germany): Psychometrica. http://www.psychometrica.de/correlation.html
Widaman KF, Ferrer E, Conger RD (2010) Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: measuring the same construct across time. Child Dev Perspect 4:10–18. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x
Carter MM, Sbrocco T, Miller O et al (2005) Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: differences between African–American and White-American college students. J Anxiety Disord 19:827–843. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.11.001
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a grant from the Romanian Executive Unit for Financing Education, Higher Research, Development and Innovation (the “Effectiveness of an empirically based web platform for anxiety in youths”, Grant Number PN-II-PT-PCCA-2011-3.1-1500, 81/2012) awarded to Dr. Anca Dobrean.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Păsărelu, C.R., Dobrean, A., Balazsi, R. et al. The Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Children: Age, Gender and Clinical Invariance. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 48, 359–369 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-016-0663-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-016-0663-2