Chromosome Research

, Volume 21, Issue 8, pp 805–819 | Cite as

Karyotype evolution in monitor lizards: cross-species chromosome mapping of cDNA reveals highly conserved synteny and gene order in the Toxicofera clade

  • Kornsorn SrikulnathEmail author
  • Yoshinobu Uno
  • Chizuko Nishida
  • Yoichi MatsudaEmail author


The water monitor lizard (Varanus salvator macromaculatus (VSA), Platynota) has a chromosome number of 2n = 40: its karyotype consists of 16 macrochromosomes and 24 microchromosomes. To delineate the process of karyotype evolution in V. salvator macromaculatus, we constructed a cytogenetic map with 86 functional genes and compared it with those of the butterfly lizard (Leiolepis reevesii rubritaeniata (LRE); 2n = 36) and Japanese four-striped rat snake (Elaphe quadrivirgata (EQU); 2n = 36), members of the Toxicofera clade. The syntenies and gene orders of macrochromosomes were highly conserved between these species except for several chromosomal rearrangements: eight pairs of VSA macrochromosomes and/or chromosome arms exhibited homology with six pairs of LRE macrochromosomes and eight pairs of EQU macrochromosomes. Furthermore, the genes mapped to microchromosomes of three species were all located on chicken microchromosomes or chromosome 4p. No reciprocal translocations were found in the species, and their karyotypic differences were caused by: low frequencies of interchromosomal rearrangements, such as tandem fusions, or centric fissions/fusions between macrochromosomes and between macro- and microchromosomes; and intrachromosomal rearrangements, such as paracentric inversions or centromere repositioning. The chromosomal rearrangements that occurred in macrochromosomes of the Varanus lineage were also identified through comparative cytogenetic mapping of V. salvator macromaculatus and V. exanthematicus. Morphologic differences in chromosomes 6–8 between the two species could have resulted from pericentric inversion or centromere repositioning.


Monitor lizard Toxicofera Squamata Synteny and gene order Karyotype evolution Cytogenetic map 



Basic Local Alignment Search Tool


Complementary DNA


Elaphe quadrivirgata


Fluorescence in situ hybridization


Gallus gallus


Leiolepis reevesii rubritaeniata


Million years ago


Ribosomal RNA


Varanus salvator macromaculatus



This work was financially supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (no. 23113004) and Scientific Research (B) (no. 22370081) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.

Supplementary material

10577_2013_9398_MOESM1_ESM.xls (20 kb)
Supplementary Table 1 Species and their accession numbers of the mitochondrial ND2 gene fragments used for molecular identification of V. exanthematicus(XLS 20 kb)
10577_2013_9398_MOESM2_ESM.xls (40 kb)
Supplementary Table 2 The cDNA fragments of L. reevesii rubritaeniata (LRE), G. hokouensis (GHO), L. agilis (LAG), and E. quadrivirgata (EQU) homologues of chicken genes, and nucleotide sequence identities between chicken and these squamate reptile cDNA fragments(XLS 39.5 kb)


  1. Alföldi J, Di Palma F, Grabherr M et al (2011) The genome of the green anole lizard and a comparative analysis with birds and mammals. Nature 477:587–591PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amer SAM, Kumazawa Y (2008) Timing of a mtDNA gene rearrangement and intercontinental dispersal of varanid lizards. Gene Genet Syst 83:275–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ast JC (2001) Mitochondrial DNA evidence and evolution in Varanoidea (Squamata). Cladistics 17:211–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett D, Thakoordyal R (2003) The Savannah Monitor Lizard: the truth about Varanus exanthematicus. Viper Press, UK, pp 1–83Google Scholar
  5. Chaiprasertsri N, Uno Y, Peyachoknagul S et al. (2013) Highly species-specific centromeric repetitive DNA sequences in lizards: molecular cytogenetic characterization of a novel family of satellite DNA sequences isolated from the water monitor lizard (Varanus salvator macromaculatus, Platynota). J Hered 104:798–806Google Scholar
  6. Glor RE, Laport RG (2012) Are subspecies of Anolis lizards that differ in dewlap color and pattern also genetically distinct? A mitochondrial analysis. Mol Phylogenet Evol 64:255–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium (ICGSC) (2004) Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432:695–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. King M, King D (1975) Chromosomal evolution in the lizard genus Varanus (Reptilia). Aust J Biol Sci 28:89–108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. King M, Mengden GA, King D (1982) A pericentric-inversion polymorphism and a ZZ/ZW sex-chromosome system in Varanus acanthurus Boulenger analyzed by G- and C-banding and Ag staining. Genetica 58:39–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M (2004) MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5:150–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kumazawa Y, Endo H (2004) Mitochondrial genome of the Komodo dragon: efficient sequencing method with reptile-oriented primers and novel gene rearrangements. DNA Res 11:115–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Matsubara K, Tarui H, Toriba M et al (2006) Evidence for different origin of sex chromosomes in snakes, birds, and mammals and step-wise differentiation of snake sex chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:18190–18195PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Matsubara K, Kuraku S, Tarui H et al (2012) Intra-genomic GC heterogeneity in sauropsids: evolutionary insights from cDNA mapping and GC3 profiling in snake. BMC Genomics 13:604PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Matsuda Y, Chapman VM (1995) Application of fluorescence in situ hybridization in genome analysis of the mouse. Electrophoresis 16:261–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Matsuda Y, Nishida-Umehara C, Tarui H et al (2005) Highly conserved linkage homology between birds and turtles: bird and turtle chromosomes are precise counterparts of each other. Chromosome Res 13:601–615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nishida-Umehara C, Tsuda Y, Ishijima J, Ando J, Fujiwara A, Matsuda Y, Griffin DK (2007) The molecular basis of chromosome orthologies and sex chromosomal differentiation in palaeognathous birds. Chromosome Res 15:721–734PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Olmo E, Signorino G (2005) Chromorep: a reptile chromosomes database. Internet references. Available from Accessed 06/04/2013
  18. Shedlock AM, Edwards SV (2009) Amniota. In: Kumar S, Hedges SB (eds) The timetree of life. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 375–379Google Scholar
  19. Srikulnath K, Matsubara K, Uno Y et al (2009a) Karyological characterization of the butterfly lizard (Leiolepis reevesii rubritaeniata, Agamidae, Squamata) by molecular cytogenetic approach. Cytogenet Genome Res 125:213–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Srikulnath K, Nishida C, Matsubara K et al (2009b) Karyotypic evolution in squamate reptiles: comparative gene mapping revealed highly conserved linkage homology between the butterfly lizard (Leiolepis reevesii rubritaeniata, Agamidae, Lacertilia) and the Japanese four-striped rat snake (Elaphe quadrivirgata, Colubridae, Serpentes). Chromosome Res 17:975–986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Srikulnath K, Matsubara K, Uno Y et al (2010) Genetic relationship of three butterfly lizard species (Leiolepis reveesii rubritaeniata, Leiolepis belliana belliana, Leiolepis boehmei, Agamidae Squamata) inferred from nuclear gene sequence analysis. Kasetsart J (Nat Sci) 44:424–435Google Scholar
  22. Townsend TM, Larson A, Louis E, Macey JR (2004) Molecular phylogenetics of Squamata: the position of snakes, amphisbaenians, and dibamids, and the root of the squamate tree. Syst Biol 53:735–757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Uetz P (2013) The TIGR reptile database. The EMBL reptile database. Available from
  24. Uno Y, Nishida C, Tarui H et al (2012) Inference of the protokaryotypes of amniotes and tetrapods and the evolutionary processes of microchromosomes from comparative gene mapping. PLoS ONE 7:e53027PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vidal N, Hedges SB (2005) The phylogeny of squamate reptiles (lizards, snakes, and amphisbaenians) inferred from nine nuclear protein-coding genes. C R Soc Biol 328:1000–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wiens JJ, Hutter CR, Mulcahy DG et al (2012) Resolving the phylogeny of lizards and snakes (Squamata) with extensive sampling of genes and species. Biol Lett 8:1043–1046PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Young MJ, O’Meally D, Sarre SD, Georges A, Ezaz T (2013) Molecular cytogenetic map of the central bearded dragon, Pogona vitticeps (Squamata: Agamidae). Chromosome Res 21:361–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Department of Applied Molecular Biosciences, Graduate School of Bioagricultural SciencesNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Laboratory of Animal Cytogenetics and Comparative Genomics, Department of Genetics, Faculty of ScienceKasetsart UniversityBangkokThailand
  3. 3.Center for Advanced Studies in Tropical Natural Resources, National Research University-Kasetsart University (CASTNAR, NRU-KU, Thailand)Kasetsart UniversityBangkokThailand
  4. 4.Department of Natural History Sciences, Faculty of ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations