Correction to: Cellulose (2019) 26:6555–6569 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-019-02567-x

Due to an equipment error, the values for the energy consumption of samples which were subjected to the milling process (presented in Table 2) are incorrect in the original publication. The value for sample M-20 is 20.2 kWh/kg and for sample M-40 is 33.2 kWh/kg. Those corrections will respectively affect values for other “dual processed” samples, which have been extruded and then milled, i.e., X-M samples, as the energy of these is the sum of energies for combined extrusion and milling processes. Finally, as a conclusion for this aspect of the publication, it should be noted that the milling process is less energy intensive compared to high-pressure homogenization.

Table 2 Mechanical and physical properties and energy consumption of handsheets produced with different processing methods
Full size table

The correct version of Table 2 is provided in this article.