Abstract
Distinct splitting of the cellulosic polymer signal was seen in thermogravimetric analysis of cashew shell (CS). The splitting was more pronounced in CS as compared to cashew shell cake. The splitting of cellulosic polymer peaks was ascribed to cellulosic depolymerization occurring in two phases during thermal degradation of CS. Three protective tissue configurations of CS was considered responsible for this phenomenon. Kinetics were compared by using two model free isoconversional methods, namely the Friedman and Ozawa-Flynn-Wall.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antal MJJ, Varhegyi G (1995) Cellulose pyrolysis kinetics: the current state of knowledge. Ind Eng Chem Res 34:703–717
Asogwa EU, Mokwunye IU, Yahaya LE (2007) Evaluation of cashew nut shell liqiud (CNSL) as a potential natural insecticide against termites (soldiers and workers castes). Res J Appl Sci 2:939–942
Brems A, Baeyens J, Beerlandt J, Dewil R (2011) Thermogravimetric pyrolysis of waste polyethylene–terephthalate and polystyrene: a critical assessment of kinetics modelling. Resour Conserv Recycl 55:772–781
Burhenne L, Messmer J, Aicher T, Laborie M (2013) The effect of the biomass components lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose on TGA and fixed bed pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrol 101:177–184
Caballero JA, Conesa JA, Front R, Marcilla A (1997) Pyrolysis kinetics of almond shells and olive stones considering their organic fractions. J Anal Appl Pyrol 42:159–175
Chen W, Kuo P (2011) Isothermal torrefaction kinetics of hemicellulose, cellulose, lignin and xylan using thermogravimetric analysis. Energy 36:6451–6460
Damartzis T, Vamvuka D, Sfakiotakis S, Zabaniotou A (2011) Thermal degradation studies and kinetic modeling of cardoon (Cynara cardunculus) pyrolysis using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Bioresour Technol 102:6230–6238
Gangil S (2014a) Dominant thermogravimetric signatures of lignin in cashew shell as compared to cashew shell cake. Bioresour Technol 155:15–20
Gangil S (2014b) Beneficial transitions in thermogravimetric signals and activation energy levels due to briquetting of raw pigeon pea stalk. Fuel 128:7–13
Gangil S (2014c) Thermogravimetric evidence for better thermal stability in char produced under unconfined conditions. Environ Eng Sci 31(4):183–192
Gangil S (2014d) Polymeric consolidation in briquetted biofuel as compared to raw biomaterial: a TG-Vision for pigeon pea stalks. Energy Fuels 28(5):3248–3254. doi:10.1021/ef5004304
Gedam PH, Sampathkumaran PS (1986) Cashew nut shell liquid: extraction, chemistry and applications. Prog Org Coat 14:115–157
Janković B (2008) Kinetic analysis of the nonisothermal decomposition of potassium metabisulfite using the model-fitting and isoconversional (model-free) methods. Chem Eng J 139:128–135
Jordan CA, Akay G (2012) Speciation and distribution of alkali, alkali earth metals and major ash forming elements during gasification of fuel cane bagasse. Fuel 91:253–263
Ledakowicz S, Stolarek P (2002) Kinetics of biomass thermal decomposition. Chem Pap 56:378–381
López-González D, Fernandez-Lopez M, Valverde JL, Sanchez-Silva L (2013) Thermogravimetric-mass spectrometric analysis on combustion of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 143:562–574
Lu C, Song W, Lin W (2009) Kinetics of biomass catalytic process. Biotechnol Adv 27:583–587
Muniz CR, Freire FCO, Soares AA, Cooke PH, Guedes MIF (2013) The ultrastructure of shelled and unshelled cashew nuts. Micron 54–55:52–56
Mwangi PM, Aule C, Thiong’o GT (2013) Energy studies of some cashew nut by-products in Kenya. Int J Adv Res 1:880–887
Ogunsina BS, Bamgboye AI (2014) Pre-shelling parameters and conditions that influence the whole kernel out-turn of steam-boiled cashew nuts. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 13:29–34
Patel RN, Bandyopadhyay S, Ganesh A (2006) Extraction of cashew (Anacardium occidentale) nut shell liquid using supercritical carbon dioxide. Bioresour Technol 97:847–853
Sanchez-Silva L, López-González D, Villaseñor J, Sánchez P, Valverde JL (2012) Thermogravimetric–mass spectrometric analysis of lignocellulosic and marine biomass pyrolysis. Bioresour Technol 109:163–172
Sbirrazzuoli N, Vincent L, Mija A, Guigo N (2009) Integral, differential and advanced isoconversional methods Complex mechanisms and isothermal predicted conversion–time curves. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 96:219–226
Shen DK, Gu S, Bridgwater AV (2010) The thermal performance of the polysaccharides extracted from hardwood: cellulose and hemicellulose. Carbohydr Polym 82:39–45
Tsamba AJ, Yang W, Blasiak W (2006) Pyrolysis characteristics and global kinetics of coconut and cashew nut shells. Fuel Process Technol 87:523–530
Van de Velden M, Baeyens J, Brems A, Janssens B, Dewil R (2010) Fundamentals, kinetics and endothermicity of the biomass pyrolysis reaction. Renewable Energy 35:232–242
Vasile C, Popescu C, Popscu M, Brebu M, Willfor S (2011) Thermal behavior/treatment of some vegetable residues. IV. Thermal decomposition of Eucalyptus wood. Cellul Chem Technol 45:29–42
White JE, Catallo WJ, Legendre BL (2011) Biomass pyrolysis kinetics: a comparative critical review with relevant agricultural residue case studies. J Anal Appl Pyrol 91:1–33
Yuliana M, Tran-Thi NY, Ju Y-H (2012a) Effect of extraction methods on characteristic and composition of Indonesian cashew nut shell liquid. Ind Crops Prod 35:230–236
Yuliana M, Huynha L-H, Hob Q-P, Truongb C-T, Ju Y-H (2012b) Defatted cashew nut shell starch as renewable polymeric material: isolation and characterization. Carbohydr Polym 87:2576–2581
Acknowledgments
The work was conducted under project 623 of the Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal. The author is thankful to Dr. Pitam Chandra, Director (CIAE), Dr. K.C. Pandey, PC (AICRP on RES), Dr. R.C. Singh, Head (AEP) and Dr. A.K. Dubey, CPI (NAIP-Biomass) for providing the facilities and materials. Mr. P.K. Das is acknowledged for his help.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gangil, S. Distinct splitting of polymeric cellulosic signals in cashew shell: a TG-diagnosis. Cellulose 21, 2913–2924 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0309-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0309-0