Skip to main content
Log in

Physics-informed neural networks for gravity field modeling of the Earth and Moon

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-fidelity representations of the gravity field underlie all applications in astrodynamics. Traditionally these gravity models are constructed analytically through a potential function represented in spherical harmonics, mascons, or polyhedrons. Such representations are often convenient for theory, but they come with unique disadvantages in application. Broadly speaking, analytic gravity models are often not compact, requiring thousands or millions of parameters to adequately model high-order features in the environment. In some cases these analytic models can also be operationally limiting—diverging near the surface of a body or requiring assumptions about its mass distribution or density profile. Moreover, these representations can be expensive to regress, requiring large amounts of carefully distributed data which may not be readily available in new environments. To combat these challenges, this paper aims to shift the discussion of gravity field modeling away from purely analytic formulations and toward machine learning representations. Within the past decade there have been substantial advances in the field of deep learning which help bypass some of the limitations inherent to the existing analytic gravity models. Specifically, this paper investigates the use of physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to represent the gravitational potential of two planetary bodies—the Earth and Moon. PINNs combine the flexibility of deep learning models with centuries of analytic insight to learn new basis functions that are uniquely suited to represent these complex environments. The results show that the learned basis set generated by the PINN gravity model can offer advantages over its analytic counterparts in model compactness and computational efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. https://www.tensorflow.org/.

  2. https://www.blender.org/.

  3. https://numba.pydata.org/.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 2040434.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Martin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin, J., Schaub, H. Physics-informed neural networks for gravity field modeling of the Earth and Moon. Celest Mech Dyn Astr 134, 13 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-022-10069-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-022-10069-5

Keywords

Navigation