Abstract
The present study highlights the dynamics of a body moving about a fixed point and provides analytical closed form solutions. Firstly, for the symmetrical heavy body, that is the Lagrange–Poisson case, we compute the second (precession, \(\psi \)) and third (spin, \(\varphi \)) Euler angles in explicit and real form by means of multiple hypergeometric (Lauricella) functions. Secondly, releasing the weight assumption but adding the complication of the asymmetry, by means of elliptic integrals of third kind, we provide the precession angle \(\psi \) completing the treatment of the Euler–Poinsot case. Thirdly, by integrating the relevant differential equation, we reach the finite polar equation of a special motion trajectory named the herpolhode. Finally, we keep the symmetry of the first problem, but without weight, and take into account a viscous dissipation. The use of motion first integrals—adopted for the first two problems—is no longer practicable in this situation; therefore, the Euler equations, faced directly, are driving to particular occurrences of Bessel functions of order \(-\,1/2\).
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We use, according to Exton (1976) the term “multiple” meaning that the hypergeometric is a function of two, or more, variables.
We assume that the spinning top mass M does not change during its motion.
The periods of elliptic function \(\mathrm {sn}\) are \(4\varvec{K}(k)\) and \(2i\varvec{K}'\). The periods of \(\mathrm {cn}\) are \(4\varvec{K}\) and \(2\varvec{K}+2i\varvec{K}'\) being \(\varvec{K}(k)\) the complete elliptic integral of first kind and \(k'\) the complementary modulus. The imaginary period of such functions is meaningless to the motion. Nevertheless Appell (1898) showed that in the Poinsot torque-free motion, under convenient initial conditions one can associate the body movements twice so that the real period of the former equates the latter imaginary period divided by \(i=\sqrt{-\,1}\).
References
Agostinelli, C., Pignedoli, A.: Meccanica Razionale, vol. I. Zanichelli, Bologna (1974)
Andoyer, H.: Cours de mécanique céleste, I. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1923)
Appell, P.: Interprétation de la période imaginaire dans un mouvement à la Poinsot. Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 26, 98–102 (1898)
Appell, P.: Traité de Mécanique Rationelle, Tome Deuxième, Dynamique des Systemes. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1923)
Appell, P., Lacour, E.: Principes de la Théorie des Fonctions Elliptiques et Applications. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1922)
Arribas, M., Elipe, A.: Attitude dynamics of a rigid body on a Keplerian orbit: a simplification. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 55(3), 243–247 (1993)
Aslanov, V.: Rigid Body Dynamics for Space Applications. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (2017)
Aslanov, V., Yudintsev, V.: Dynamics and control of dual-spin gyrostat spacecraft with changing structure. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 115, 91–105 (2013)
Bailey, W.N.: Generalized Hypergeometric Series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1935)
Bloch, A., Gurfil, P., Lum, K.: The Serret–Andoyer formalism in rigid-body dynamics, II. Geometry, stabilization and control. Regul. Chaotic Dyn. 12(4), 426–447 (2007)
Bogoiavlenskii, A.: On particular cases of motion of a heavy rigid body about a fixed point. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 22(5), 873–906 (1958)
Burgatti, P.: Dimostrazione della non esistenza di integrali algebrici (oltre i noti) nel problema del moto d’un corpo pesante intorno a un punto fisso. Rend. Circ. Matem. Palermo 29(1), 369–377 (1910)
Byrd, P.F., Friedman, M.D.: Handbook of Elliptic Integrals for Engineers and Scientists. Springer, Berlin (1971)
Calvo, M., Franco, J.M., Montjano, J.I., Rández, L.: A note on same exact analytical solutions of the rotation of a rigid body with a external torque. Monografias de la Real Academia de Ciencias de Zaragoza 35(–), 27–39 (2011)
Cauchy, A.L.: Exercices de Mathématiques, vol. 2. De Bure Frères, Paris (1827)
D’Alembert, J.L.R.: Recherches Sur la Précession des Equinoxes et Sur la Nutation de l’axe de la Terre Dans le Systême Newtonien. David Palné, Paris (1749)
D’Alembert, J.L.R.: Opuscules mathématiques ou Mémoires sur différens sujets de géométrie, de méchanique,&C. Briasson, Paris (1768)
Deprit, A.: Free rotation of a rigid body studied in the phase plane. Am. J. Phys. 35(5), 424–428 (1967)
Deprit, A., Elipe, A.: Complete reduction of the Euler–Poinsot problem. J. Astronaut. Sci. 41(4), 603–628 (1993)
Dutka, J.: The early history of the hypergeometric function. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 31(1), 15–34 (1984)
Elipe, A., Vallejo, M.: On the attitude dynamics of perturbed triaxial rigid bodies. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 81(1–2), 3–12 (2001)
Euler, L.: De progressionibus transcendentibus. Comment. Acad. Sci. Petropolitanæ 41, 36–57 (1738)
Euler, L.: Découverte d’un nouveau principe de mécanique. Mém. Acad. Sci. Berlin 6(6), 185–217 (1752)
Euler, L.: Theoria Motus Corporum Solidorum seu Rigidorum. A. F. Röse, Rostock (1765)
Euler, L.: De curva hypergeometrica hac aequatione expressa \(y=1\cdot 2\cdot 2\cdot 3\dots x\). Novi Comment. Acad. Sci. Petropolitanæ 13, 3–66 (1769)
Euler, L.: Institutionum Calculi Integralis, vol. II. Academia Imperialis Scientiarum, Petropoli (1792)
Exton, H.: Multiple Hypergeometric Functions and Applications. Ellis Horwood, Chichester (1976)
Fedorov, Y.N., Maciejewski, A.J., Przybylska, M.: The generalized Euler-Poinsot rigid body equations: explicit elliptic solutions. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 46(41), 415,201 (2013)
Golubev, V.: Lectures on Integration of the Equations of Motion of a Rigid Body About a Fixed Point. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Haifa (1960)
Gomes Teixeira, F.: Traité des Courbes Speciales Remarquables Planes et Gauches, Tome II. Impresa da Universidade, Coimbra (1909)
Gradshteyn, I.S., Ryzhik, I.M., Jeffrey, A., Zwillinger, D.: Table of Integrals, Series, and Products. Academic Press, New York (2007)
Grammel, R.: Der Kreisel: Seine Theorie und Seine Anwendungen. Springer, Berlin (1950)
Greenhill, A.G.: The Applications of Elliptic Functions. Dover, New York (1959)
Grioli, G.: Esistenza e determinazione delle precessioni regolari dinamicamente possibili per un solido pesante asimmetrico. Ann. Math. 36(3/4), 271–281 (1947)
Gurfil, P.: Canonical formalism for modelling and control of rigid body dynamics. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1065(1), 391–413 (2005)
Hess, W.: Über die Eulerschen Bewegungsgleichungen und über eine neue particuläre Lösung des Problems der Bewegung eines starren Körpers um einen festen Punkt. Math. Ann. 37, 153–181 (1890)
Ismail, A., Amer, T.: A necessary and sufficient condition for solving a rigid body problem. Tech. Mech. 31(1), 50–57 (2011)
Ivanova, E.: A new approach to the solution of some problems of rigid body dynamics. ZAMM 81(9), 613–622 (2001)
Jacobi, C.G.J.: Sur la rotation d’un corps, extrait d’une lettre adressée à l’académie des sciences de Paris. J. Reine Angew. Math. 39, 293–350 (1850)
Jacobi, C.G.J.: Second Mémoire sur la Rotation d’un Corps Non soumis à des Forces Accélératrices, Gesammelte Werke, zweite Band. Reimer, Berlin (1882)
Klein, F., Sommerfeld, A.: The Theory of the Top, vol. III. Springer, New York (2010)
Kovalèvskaja, S.: Sur le problème de la rotation d’un corps solide autour d’un point fixe. Acta Math. 12(1), 177–232 (1889)
Kovalevski, N.: Eine neue particuläre Lösung der Differentialgleichungen der Bewegung eines schweren starren Körpers um einen festen Punkt. Math. Ann. 65, 528–537 (1908)
Kraniotis, G.: Periapsis and gravitomagnetic precessions of stellar orbits in Kerr and Kerr de Sitter black hole spacetimes. Class. Quantum Gravity 24(7), 1775–1808 (2007)
Lagrange, J.L.: Mécanique Analytique, Quatrième édition. Courcier, Paris (1889)
Lainé, E.: Exercices de Mécanique. Librairie Vuibert, Paris (1958)
Landau, L.D., Lifshits, E.M.: Theoretical Physics: Mechanics, vol. I. Pergamon Press, Oxford (1988)
Lauricella, G.: Sulle funzioni ipergeometriche a più variabili. Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 7(1), 111–158 (1893)
Lawden, D.F.: Elliptic Functions and Applications. Springer, Boston (2013)
Legendre, A.M.: Exercices de Calcul intégral sur Divers Ordres de Transcendantes et sur les Quadratures. Courcier, Paris (1811)
Legendre, A.M.: Traité des Fonctions Elliptiques et des Intégrales Eulériennes, Tome Premier. Huzard-Courcier, Paris (1826)
Leimanis, E.: The General Problem of the Motion of Coupled Rigid Bodies About a Fixed Point. Springer, New York (1965)
Levi Civita, T., Amaldi, U.: Lezioni di Meccanica Razionale, vol. II. Zanichelli, Bologna (1989)
Liouville, R.: Sur le mouvement d’un corps solide pesant suspendu par l’un des ses points. Acta Math. 20(1), 239–284 (1896)
Longuski, J., Gick, A., Muhammad, A., Randall, L.: Analytical solutions for thrusting, spinning spacecraft subject to constant forces. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 28(6), 1301–1308 (2005)
Lurie, A.I.: Analytical Mechanics. Springer, New York (2002)
Magnus, K.: Kreisel: Theorie und Anwendungen. Springer, Berlin (1971)
Manacorda, T.: Sul moto di un solido attorno a un punto fisso. Ric. Sci. 20, 487–490 (1950)
Mingari Scarpello, G., Ritelli, D.: Exact solutions of nonlinear equation of rod deflections involving the Lauricella hypergeometric functions. Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2011(1), 1–22 (2011)
Moulton, F.R.: Differential Equations. Dover, New York (1958)
Paladini, B.: Sul moto di rotazione di un corpo rigido intorno a un punto fisso. Ann. Sci. Norm. Super. Pisa 5, 165–226 (1888)
Pars, L.A.: A Treatise on Analytical Dynamics. Heinemann, London (1965)
Poinsot, L.: Théorie nouvelle de la rotation des corps. J. Mat. Pures Appl. 1(16), 127 (1851)
Poisson, S.D.: Traité de Mécanique, Troisième édition, vol. 2. Hauman et Compagnie, Bruxelles (1838)
Polyanin, A.D., Zaitsev, V.F.: Exact Solutions for Ordinary Differential Equations. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2003)
Romano, M.: Exact analytic solutions for the rotation of an axially symmetric rigid body subjected to a constant torque. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 101(4), 375–390 (2008)
Rosenberg, R.M.: Analytical Dynamics of Discrete Systems. Plenum Press, New York (1977)
Routh, E.J.: The Advanced Part of a Treatise on the Dynamics of a System of Rigid Bodies. Dover, New York (1955)
Saran, S.: Hypergeometric functions of three variables. Ganita 5(1), 77–91 (1954)
von Segner, J.A.: Specimen Theoriæ Turbinum. Gebauer, Halle (1755)
Serret, J.A.: Mémoire sur l’emploi de la méthode de la variation des arbitraires dans le théorie des mouvements de rotations. Mém. Acad. Sci. Paris 35, 585–616 (1866)
Slater, L.J.: Generalized Hypergeometric Functions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1966)
Soare, M.V., Teodorescu, P.P., Toma, I.: Ordinary Differential Equations with Applications to Mechanics. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)
Staude, O.: Über permanente rotationen bei der Bewegung eines schweren Körpers um einen festen Punkt. J. Reine Angew. Math. 113, 318–334 (1890)
Synge, J.L., Griffith, B.A.: Principles of Mechanics, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1949)
Teodorescu, P.: Mechanical Systems, Classical Models, II. Springer, New-York (2009)
Tisserand, F.: Traité de Mécanique Céleste, II. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1890)
Tsiotras, P., Longuski, J.: Analytic solution of Euler’s equations of motion for an asymmetric rigid body. J. Appl. Mech. 63(1), 149–155 (1996)
Vrbik, J.: Motion of a spinning top. Math.® J. 14, 1–11 (2012)
Whittaker, E.T.: A Treatise on the Analytical Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)
Wittenburg, J.: Dynamics of Multibody Systems. Springer, New York (2007)
Acknowledgements
The second author is partially supported by an Italian RFO research grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix: Hypergeometric identities
We recall hereinafter an outline of the Lauricella hypergeometric functions. The first hypergeometric historical series appeared in the Wallis’s Arithmetica infinitorum (1656):
for \(|x|<1\) and real parameters \(a,\,b,\,c.\) The product of n ascending factors:
called Pochhammer symbol (or truncated factorial), allows to represent \(_{2}F_{1}\) as:
A meaningful contribution on various \(_{2}F_{1}\) topics is ascribed to Euler in three papers (Euler 1738, 1769, 1792), but he does not seem (Dutka 1984) to have known the integral representation:
really due to Legendre (1811), sect. 2. The above integral relationship is true if \(c>a>0\) and for \(\left| x\right| <1,\) even if this limitation can be discarded thanks to the analytic continuation.
Many functions have been introduced in nineteenth century for generalizing the hypergeometric functions to multiple variables. We recall the Appell \(\mathrm{F}_1\) two-variable hypergeometric series, defined as:
The analytic continuation of Appell’s function on \(\mathbb {C}\setminus [1,\infty )\times \mathbb {C}\setminus [1,\infty )\) comes from its integral representation theorem: if \(\mathrm {Re}\,(a)>0\), \(\mathrm {Re}\,(c-a)>0\), then:
The functions introduced and investigated by Lauricella (1893) and Saran (1954) are of our prevailing interest; and among them the hypergeometric function \(F_{D}^{(n)}\) of \(n\in \mathbb {N}^{+}\) variables (and \(n+2\) parameters), see Saran (1954) and Lauricella (1893), defined as:
with the hypergeometric series usual convergence requirements \( |x_{1}|<1,\ldots ,|x_{n}|<1\). If \(\mathrm {Re}\,c>\mathrm {Re}\,a>0\) , the relevant Integral Representation Theorem provides:
allowing the analytic continuation to \(\mathbb {C}^{n}\) deprived of the Cartesian n-dimensional product of the interval \(]1,\infty [\) with itself.
Notice that the integral formula (A.2) allows an easy computer algebra implementation, being (A.2) a parametric integral, which is suitable for each possible numerical computation.
Some integrals evaluation
The reader can find hereinafter some details about the integrations used throughout the text.
1.1 Integral \(I_1\)
Let \(a>b>y>c\) and \(\alpha \) a real number. Consider
To evaluate the integral we normalize the interval of integration, putting:
this leads to this expression for the given integral, where we remark that in the application of our interest we can limit to \(0<c<1\):
which is therefore expressible, via the integral representation theorem, in terms of two Lauricella functions of four variables, that is:
where
Moreover integral \(I_1\) could also have been evaluated in terms of elliptic integrals of third kind; in fact following (Byrd and Friedman 1971) entry 233.20 p. 74 we are led to
where
1.2 Integral \(I_2\)
With the same assumptions of integral \(I_1\), we consider
Using the same change of variable used for \(I_1\), we can also express \(I_2\) in terms of Lauricella functions, namely:
where
Again following Byrd and Friedman (1971) entry 233.20 p. 74 we can express \(I_2\) in terms of elliptic integral of third and first kind as
where \(X_1\) and \(X_2\) are the same as (B.2) while
1.3 Integral \(I_3\)
For \(c>1\) we consider
The integral appears as entry 337.01 p. 201 of Byrd and Friedman (1971), namely
1.4 Integral \(I_4\)
For \(c<1\) we consider:
The integral appears as entry 338.01 p. 202 of Byrd and Friedman (1971), namely
1.5 Integral \(I_5\)
If \(c<a<y<b\) consider the integral
A natural step is a change of variable \(u^2=x\) which gives the elliptic integral of first kind
which is computed in Gradshteyn et al. (2007) entry 2.131.5 p. 250 and Byrd and Friedman (1971) entry 235.00 leading to:
being
1.5.1 Remark
This integral can, of course, be evaluated using the hypergeometric approach. In fact, if in (B.5) we introduce the change of variable \(s=\frac{x-b}{y^2-b}\) and we obtain:
Therefore we can use the relevant integral representation, which allows us to express \(I_5\) in terms of the Appell two-variable hypergeometric function:
1.6 Integral \(I_6\)
With the same parameters of \(I_5\) we consider
Again, the change of variable \(u^2=x\) leads to an elliptic integral, namely
This last integral is tabulated in Gradshteyn et al. (2007) entry 3.137.5 p. 259 and in Byrd and Friedman (1971) entry 235.17, leading to:
where \(\varphi \) and k are the same introduced for the fifth integral.
1.6.1 Remark
This integral also can be evaluated using the hypergeometric approach, so using for (B.6) the same change of variable, used for the fifth integral, we obtain the expression:
which drives, using the integral representation, to express \(I_6\) in terms of a Lauricella function of three variables:
1.7 Integral \(I_7\)
We go back to the parameters of the first and second integral \(a>b>y>c\). Here, the integral is quite a simple one, but here we are concerned about its inversion. The integral, given in Gradshteyn et al. (2007) entry 3.131.3 p. 230 and Byrd and Friedman (1971) entry 233.00 is:
The integral inversion, that is the solution with respect to y of the equation \(I_7(a,b,c;y)=L\), is obtained by recalling the Jacobi amplitude \(\mathrm{am}(u,k),\) which is the inverse of the elliptic integral of first kind \(F(\mathrm{am}(u,k),u)=u\) and the Jacobi sinus amplitude \(\mathrm{sn}(u,k)=\sin \mathrm{am}(u,k).\) The inversion formula is
Observe that the equation has a solution if L is such that
After having cited some books about Lauricella functions we deem to quote papers where their application is best shown as Mingari Scarpello and Ritelli (2011) and Kraniotis (2007).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mingari Scarpello, G., Ritelli, D. Motions about a fixed point by hypergeometric functions: new non-complex analytical solutions and integration of the herpolhode. Celest Mech Dyn Astr 130, 42 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-018-9837-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-018-9837-5
Keywords
- Motion about a fixed point
- Euler angles
- Elliptic integrals
- Herpolhode
- Lauricella hypergeometric functions
- Appell function