Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Building Research Capacity in Residential Treatment Centers: An Approach for Empirical Studies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child and Youth Care Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Residential treatment centers (RTCs) for children in the United States face growing pressures to engage in research and to conduct scientifically rigorous studies demonstrating treatment effectiveness and outcomes. At the same time, the existing research suggests that evidence regarding the effectiveness of residential treatment is limited and, more specifically, offers few illustrations of RTCs engaged in rigorous scientific research. This article reviews the benefits and challenges of conducting agency-based research and offers an approach to building institutional capacity for conducting research within RTCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asarnow, J. R., Aoki, W., & Elson, S. (1996). Children in residential treatment: A follow-up study. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 25(2), 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, B. C., English, D. J., & Kouidou-Giles, S. (1997). Residential treatment and its alternatives: A review of the literature. Child & Youth Care Forum, 26(1), 7–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, A. S., Rauktis, M. E., Kurnot-Moore, J., & Rumberger, D. (2004). Applied research in therapeutic wilderness camp settings: The research, administrative and clinical perspectives. Journal of Therapeutic Wilderness Camping, 4(1), 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budde, S., Mayer, S., Zinn, A., Lippold, M., Avrushin, A., Bromberg, A., & Goerge, R., et al. (2004). Residential care in Illinois: Trends and alternatives: Final report. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.

  • Connor, D. F., Doerfler, L. A., Toscano, P. F., Volungis, A. M., & Steingard, R. J. (2004). Characteristics and children and adolescents admitted to a residential treatment center. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 13(4), 497–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, D. F., Miller, K. P., Cunningham, J. A., & Melloni, R. H. (2002). What does getting better mean? Child improvement and measure of outcome in residential treatment. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 72(1), 110–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curry, J. F. (1991). Outcome research on residential treatment: Implications and suggested directions. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61(3), 348–357.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foltz, R. (2004). The efficacy of residential treatment: An overview of the evidence. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 22(2), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frensch, K. M., & Cameron, G. (2002). Treatment of choice or a last resort? A review of residential mental health placements for children and youth. Child & Youth Care Forum, 31(5), 307–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goocher, B. E. (1997). A comment on “Residential treatment and its alternatives”: A call to action. Child & Youth Care Forum, 26(1), 53–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groak, C. J., & McCall, R. B. (1993). Building mutually beneficial collaborations between researchers and community service professionals. Newsletter of the Society for Research in Child Development, Newsletter 6, Vol. 14.

  • Groak, C. J., & McCall, R. B. (1996). Building successful university-community human service agency collaborations. In C. D. Fisher, J. P. Murray & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Applied developmental science: Graduate training for diverse disciplines and educational settings (pp. 237–251). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, P. K., & Rosenberg, L. A. (1997). Children’s behavioral response to residential treatment. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53(6), 567–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landsman, M. J., Groza, V., Tyler, M., & Malone, K. (2001). Outcomes of family-centered residential treatment. Child Welfare, 80(3), 351–379.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, R. B. (1990). Promoting interdisciplinary and faculty-service professional relations. American Psychologist, 45, 1319–1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monette, D. R., Sullivan, T. J., & DeJong, C. R. (2005). Applied social research: A tool for the human services (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

  • Pew Commission on Children in Foster Care. (2004). Fostering the future: Safety, permanence and well-being for children in foster care. Washington, DC: Author Care at Georgetown University.

  • Rauktis, M. E., Andrade, A. R., & Doucette, A. (in press). Therapeutic alliance and re-ED: Research on building positive relationships with youth. In R. P. Cantrell & M. L. Cantrell (Eds.), Helping troubled and troubling children: Continuing evidence for Re-ED's ecological approach (Book 2 in the Troubled and Troubling Child series). Cleveland, OH: American Re-Education Association.

  • Rosado, L. (2002). Serving the mental health needs of youth in the juvenile justice system. Sharing: A newsletter of the Parents Involved Network of Pennsylvania, Vol. XVIII, No 1.

  • Sanders, J. S. (1997). Linking the past to the future. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 15(2), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teather, E. C. (2001). A peek into the trenches: Changes and challenges in residential care. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 19(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1999). Mental health: A report of the Surgeon General–Executive Summary. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health.

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2003). New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America. Final Report. (DHHS Pub. No. SMA-03–3832). Rockville, MD: Author.

  • U.S. General Accounting Office. (2003). Child welfare and juvenile justice: Federal agencies could play a stronger role in helping states reduce the number of children placed solely to obtain mental health services (Report GAO-03–397). Washington, DC: Author.

  • U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means. (2000). 2000 Greenbook: Background material and data on the programs within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways and Means. Washington, DC: General Printing Office.

  • U.S. Public Health Service. (2000). Report of the Surgeon General’s Conference on Children’s Mental Health: A national action agenda. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Suzanne Boyd.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyd, A.S., Einbinder, S.D., Rauktis, M.E. et al. Building Research Capacity in Residential Treatment Centers: An Approach for Empirical Studies. Child Youth Care Forum 36, 43–58 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-006-9030-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-006-9030-y

Keywords

Navigation