Abstract
Objective
The primary objective of this investigation is to delve into the involvement of the long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) SPACA6P-AS in breast cancer (BC) development, focusing on its expression pattern, association with clinical-pathological features, impact on prognosis, as well as its molecular and immunological implications.
Methods
Bioinformatics analysis was conducted utilizing RNA sequencing data of 1083 BC patients from the TCGA database. Functional exploration of SPACA6P-AS was carried out through the construction of survival curves, GO and KEGG enrichment analysis, and single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). Furthermore, its functionality was validated through in vitro cell experiments and in vivo nude mouse model experiments.
Results
SPACA6P-AS showed a remarkable increase in expression levels in BC tissues (p < 0.001) and demonstrated a close relationship to poor prognosis (overall survival HR = 1.616, progression-free interval HR = 1.40, disease-specific survival HR = 1.54). Enrichment analysis revealed that SPACA6P-AS could impact biological functions such as protease regulation, endopeptidase inhibitor activity, taste receptor activity, taste transduction, and maturity-onset diabetes of the young pathway. ssGSEA analysis indicated a negative correlation between SPACA6P-AS expression and immune cell infiltration like dendritic cells and neutrophils, while a positive correlation was observed with central memory T cells and T helper 2 cells. Results from in vitro and in vivo experiments illustrated that silencing SPACA6P-AS significantly inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion capabilities of BC cells. In vitro experiments also highlighted that dendritic cells with silenced SPACA6P-AS exhibited enhanced capabilities in promoting the proliferation of autologous CD3 + T cells and cytokine secretion. These discoveries elucidate the potential multifaceted roles of SPACA6P-AS in BC, including its potential involvement in modulating immune cell infiltration in the tumor microenvironment.
Conclusion
The high expression of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS in BC is closely linked to poor prognosis and may facilitate tumor progression by influencing specific biological processes, signaling pathways, and the immune microenvironment. The regulatory role of SPACA6P-AS positions it as a prospective biomarker and target for therapeutic approaches for BC diagnosis and intervention.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Breast cancer (BC) represents a widely recognized type of cancer that predominantly affects women on a global scale and is a leading factor in cancer-related deaths affecting the female population (Martuszewski et al. 2020). It accounts for 15% of all new cancer cases in females (Siegel et al. 2022; Metcalfe et al. 2023; Lai et al. 2021). The etiology of BC is multifaceted, encompassing genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors (Zou et al. 2022; Najjar and Allison 2022; Howard and Olopade 2021). Despite recent advancements in treatment, the complexity of BC tumor formation and progression mechanisms continues to challenge effective treatment (Han et al. 2023). Typical BC treatments include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy. However, the tumor's high heterogeneity leads to significant variability in treatment outcomes (Sekine et al. 2021; Heitz et al. 2023). Existing biomarkers such as CEA, CA125, and CA153 aid in early detection and prognosis but are limited in precision and specificity (Mirabelli and Incoronato 2013; Liang et al. 2023; Qin et al. 2021). Therefore, exploring more effective biomarkers and therapeutic targets is crucial for enhancing BC diagnosis and treatment efficacy.
Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), RNA molecules exceeding 200 nucleotides, play critical roles in gene expression regulation and disease progression despite not encoding proteins (Nojima and Proudfoot 2022; Chen et al. 2022). LncRNA research has become a focus in oncology (Cervena et al. 2022; He et al. 2024), with these molecules implicated in various mechanisms of tumor initiation and progression, such as gene transcription regulation, mRNA stability and translation, cell cycle, and apoptosis (Shaath et al. 2022; Li and Wang 2023; Liu et al. 2022). In BC, abnormal expression of specific lncRNAs correlates with tumor cell proliferation, migration, and invasion (Li et al. 2023), highlighting their potential as new therapeutic targets or prognostic markers (Tan et al. 2021; Park et al. 2021; Liu et al. 2021; Hashemi et al. 2022).
LncRNA SPACA6P-AS, located at 19q13.41 and recently noted in tumor research (Xu et al. 2021), exhibits aberrant expression in various cancers, including liver cancer, suggesting its significant role in tumorigenesis and progression (Xu et al. 2021). Studies indicate SPACA6P-AS influences the expression and function of several molecules, including miR-125a, by forming novel ceRNA regulatory networks (Di Palo et al. 2020). Prognostic analysis in BC patients reveals a seven-lncRNA signature, including SPACA6P-AS, closely related to survival rates (Xu et al. 2021; Powell et al. 2022; Ciabattoni et al. 2022; Li et al. 2022a). Nevertheless, the specific functions and operational mechanisms of SPACA6P-AS in BC remain underexplored (Xu et al. 2021).
Utilizing public databases such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we comprehensively analyzed SPACA6P-AS's genomic alterations and functional networks, including its potential role in tumor immunity. Our research encompasses bioinformatics analysis and in vitro and in vivo experiments to assess SPACA6P-AS's role and mechanisms in BC. These studies contribute to a deeper understanding of SPACA6P-AS's role in BC progression, particularly in immune microenvironment modulation and cellular behavior regulation.
This study aims to unveil SPACA6P-AS's role in BC by examining its implications on immune cell infiltration and the tumor microenvironment. We aim to identify new therapeutic strategies and biomarkers through a comprehensive evaluation of SPACA6P-AS's expression patterns, correlations with clinicopathological features, and effects on BC patient prognosis. Operating as fresh biomarker and prospective therapeutic aim, SPACA6P-AS research could pave new pathways for diagnosis and treatment, significantly improving survival rates and quality of life for BC patients. Our work may provide more direct evidence for hypotheses regarding SPACA6P-AS expression as a plausible therapeutic target or predictive biomarker within the scope of risk profiling.
Materials and methods
RNA sequencing and clinical data analysis from TCGA database
RNA sequencing data of tumor tissues from 1083 BC patients and 113 adjacent normal tissue samples were sourced from TCGA database, along with clinical data. Furthermore, the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) database provided 179 normal breast tissue samples. Utilization of the DESeq2 R package (version 1.20.0, Bioconductor) enabled the performance of data analysis following the guidelines in PMID: 25516281. The expression levels of the lncRNA SPACA6P-AS were ranked across all patient samples to establish the median expression level. Based on this median expression level, two distinct groups were formulated within the BC patient cohort: the high expression group (N = 542) and the low expression group (N = 541). A comparison of HTSeq-counts data between the high and low expression groups of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS was executed. The threshold was established at |log2 Fold Change (FC)|> 1.5, and adjusted p-values were calculated utilizing the Benjamini–Hochberg approach, considering an adjusted p < 0.05 as significant. Identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was carried out using the R package limma to investigate biological variances between the high and low expression groups.
Construction and evaluation of nomograms
Through the utilization of multivariate Cox regression models, prognostic nomograms were formulated specifically for patients diagnosed with BC using the 'survival' and 'rms' packages in R software (version 4.2.0). The total prognostic score for every individual identified with BC was calculated considering clinical parameters such as age, pathological staging, tumor size, etc. Calibration plots of the nomograms were used to assess prediction accuracy, while the concordance index (C-index) and bootstrapping with 1000 resamples were employed to evaluate the model's discriminative ability.
Enrichment analysis
Enrichment analysis of Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways was carried out employing the clusterProfiler R package (version 3.14.3), involving over-representation analysis (ORA) (Yu et al. 2012). The objective of this stage was to pinpoint key biological processes (BP) and signaling pathways connected to the differential expression of SPACA6P-AS.
Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)
The GSEA software (version 3.0) was employed for the implementation of the GSEA analysis. DEGs between high and low SPACA6P-AS expression groups were subjected to 1000 permutation analyses to obtain normalized enrichment scores (NES), with NOM p-values below 0.05 considered significant.
ssGSEA immune infiltration analysis
The GSVA R package (version 1.34.0) was employed to perform single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) on 24 types of tumor-infiltrating immune cells in order to quantitate immune infiltration in BC tumor samples (Bindea et al. 2013). This analysis was conducted based on 509 gene features linked to various immune cells, including natural killer cells (NK cells), tumor-infiltrating neutrophils (TIN), CD56 bright/dim NK cells, and others. The correlation between immune cell infiltration and lncRNA SPACA6P-AS expression was investigated through Spearman correlation analysis.
Cell culture
In this study, we used two human BC cell lines, MDA-MB-231 (ATCC, CRM-HTB-26™) and MCF-7 (ATCC, HTB-22), to simulate different subtypes of BC. Cellular growth occurred in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, 12484028) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Gibco, 15140–122), providing essential nutrients and preventing microbial contamination. Cultures were upheld at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator (Forma™ Steri-Cult™, 3308E) to replicate physiological conditions. There was a renewal of the medium bi-daily, and cells were passaged upon reaching approximately 80% confluence to maintain vitality and proliferative capacity.
For evaluating the impact of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS on immune cells, tumor cell lysates were prepared as follows: Cell suspensions of MDA-MB-231 were exposed to six rapid freeze–thaw cycles in liquid nitrogen and subsequently treated in a 37 °C water bath. Subsequent ultrasonication lasting 15 s facilitated the extraction of tumor antigens from lysed cancer cells. The cell debris was removed from the lysates by centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. Subsequently, the supernatant was passed through a 0.2 µm filter from Millipore (SLGP033RB). Measurement of protein quantities in the lysates was carried out by employing the Bio-Rad Bradford protein assay kit (500–0006).
Cell transfection
Human BC cell line MDA-MB-231 cells were transfected and grouped as follows: sh-NC group (transfected with the sequence 5'-GGGUGAACUCACGUCAGAA-3'), sh-SPACA6P-AS-#1 group (transfected with the sequence 5'-GAGATAGGCACAGAGACATTC-3'), and sh-SPACA6P-AS-#2 group (transfected with the sequence 5'-GGCACAGAGACATTCTGAGAG-3'). These groups were also utilized in establishing a mouse xenograft model. Subsequent cell experiments were conducted using the transfection of sh-SPACA6P-AS with better transfection efficiency in MDA-MB-231 cells, MCF-7 cell line, and dendritic cells (DCs). The transfection procedures adhered to the manufacturer's guidelines of Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, part number: 11668019) to ensure maximal transfection efficiency and minimal cellular toxicity. After 48 h post-transfection, the silencing efficiency of the sh-SPACA6P-AS sequence was assessed using RT-qPCR (A31673, Applied Biosystems™). The specific primer sequences are detailed in Table S1.
Cell proliferation assay
The impact of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS on the proliferation capability of BC cells was carried out using the CCK-8 assay. After transfection, the cells received treatment involving the CCK-8 reagent (ab228554, Abcam, USA) at 24, 48, and 72 h and incubated for a specified duration adhering to the manufacturer's prescribed guidance. Subsequently, the absorbance values post-reaction were measured using a spectrophotometer (1681150, Bio‐Rad, USA) at a wavelength of 450nm to quantify the proliferative activity of the cells (Nie et al. 2024).
Migration and invasion experiments
The involvement of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS in BC cell migration and invasion was analyzed using Scratch and Transwell invasion assays. For the scratch assay, cultured cells in 6-well plates (Corning, 3516) were allowed to grow until reaching 90% confluency. To initiate the experiment, a scratch of approximately 1 mm in size was meticulously made using a 200 µL pipette tip. Cultivated cells were subjected to serum-deprived conditions for 24 to 48 h, and the healing process was observed and photographed using a phase contrast microscope (Olympus, CKX53). For the Transwell invasion assay, the porous membrane of the upper chamber (Corning, 3422) was coated with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, 354234). The upper compartment received the processed cell suspension, while the lower compartment was filled with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. Post 24 h of incubation, non-migratory cells in the upper chamber were eliminated using a cotton swab, and the migrated cells that traversed the membrane were subsequently fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Catalog: G1101, Servicebio) and stained with 0.1% crystal violet (C0775, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for the purpose of cell enumeration under a microscope (Li et al. 2024; Katz et al. 2017).
Construction of a nude mouse animal model
In this experiment, from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. (catalog number: 401, Beijing, China), 18 healthy female BALB/c Nude mice were procured. Aseptic housing was provided for the mice in a designated animal facility, where conditions involved maintaining a humidity level between 60 and 65% alongside a temperature spectrum ranging from 20 to 25°C. Following a week of acclimation nourishment, the mice were randomly allocated to three separate groups for the study following the end of the adaptation period. The group size was fixed at 6 mice, which were then transfected with sh-lncRNA SPACA6P-AS#1, sh-lncRNA SPACA6P-AS#2, and sh-NC MDA-MB-231 cells, respectively. Health assessments were conducted on the mice before the commencement of the experiment. Each mouse received approximately 1 × 106 cells via subcutaneous injection in the flank (Sang et al. 2018). Post-injection, the mice's health status and tumor growth were regularly monitored and recorded. Tumor size was measured with a ruler, calculated using the formula volume = length × width2/2, and mice were euthanized two weeks after injection.
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry
Nude mouse xenograft tumor tissues were fixed with 4% formaldehyde solution, dehydrated and cleared with xylene (Catalog Number: 214736, Fisher Scientific) and a series of ethanol concentrations (Catalog Number: BP2818-4, Fisher Scientific). Subsequently, the tissues were encased in paraffin and sliced into sections measuring 4 µm in thickness. The slices were melted in an oven at 56 °C, deparaffinized twice with xylene, and sequentially immersed in 100%, 95%, 90%, and 75% ethanol. Subsequent staining steps included immersion in hematoxylin (Catalog Number: 51275, Sigma) for 3 s, rinsing in tap water for 1 min, staining with 1% eosin Y (Catalog Number: 318906, Sigma) for 5 min, followed by a repeated dehydration process (70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 100% ethanol). Coverslips were sealed with neutral gum (Catalog Number: G8593, Beijing Solarbio Science and Technology Co., Ltd.), air-dried, and observed under a microscope for recording (Wu et al. 2023; Yang et al. 2023).
The slides were deparaffinized at 58 °C for 30 min, undergo antigen retrieval with citrate buffer (pH 6.0, Catalog Number: CL-K943, Shanghai Yihai), followed by blocking of endogenous peroxidase with 3% hydrogen peroxide (Catalog Number: H1009, Sigma-Aldrich). Subsequently, non-specific binding was blocked using 5% BSA (Catalog Number: A9647, Sigma-Aldrich). The slides were then incubated with Ki-67 antibody (Catalog Number: ab15580, Abcam) overnight at 4 °C. The next day, staining was performed using secondary antibody and DAB chromogen (Catalog Number: K5007, DAKO), followed by counterstaining of cell nuclei with hematoxylin and mounting with mounting medium. Cell counting under an optical microscope (Optika, XDS-3, Ponteranica, Italy) was conducted by randomly selecting 5 fields per slide and counting 100 cells per field to determine the percentage of Ki-67 positive cells. Immunohistochemistry specificity was confirmed by performing positive control (BC tumor tissues) and negative control (non-immune serum without primary antibody) (Bouraoui et al. 2018; Vieira Costa et al. 2024).
Obtaining peripheral blood mononuclear cells and cultivating DCs
Peripheral blood was collected from healthy donors (n = 3, 2 males, 1 female, average age 34.2 ± 2.3 years) using sterile heparinized Falcon tubes (BD Biosciences, Cat. No. 352054). The separation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from blood samples was carried out utilizing Ficoll gradient separation method (GE Healthcare, Cat. No. 17144002). Monocytes were subsequently separated from PBMCs through adherence to a plastic surface. To achieve this, PBMCs were seeded at a concentration of 5 × 106 cells per milliliter in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, Cat. No. 11875–093) in 6-well plates (Corning, Cat. No. 3516). Following incubating at 37 °C for 2 h, non-adherent cells were discarded, and culturing of the adherent cells was conducted in a medium supplemented with 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. No. M6250), 20 ng/mL recombinant human IL-4 (rhIL-4, PeproTech, Cat. No. 200–04), and 40 ng/mL recombinant human GM-CSF (rhGM-CSF, PeproTech, Cat. No. 300–03). Fresh medium enriched with rhGM-CSF and rhIL-4 was introduced to the remaining culture halves on days 2 and 4. On day 6, immature dendritic cells (iDCs) were harvested, and the culture received an addition of 80 µg/mL of mixed lysate from human BC cell lines. After 5 h of incubation, 100 ng/mL of lipopolysaccharide (LPS, Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. No. L4391) was incorporated into the culture medium. Mature dendritic cells (mDCs) loaded with tumor cell lysates were obtained after a 24-h incubation at 37 °C.
Identification of the morphology and phenotypic characteristics of DCs
The morphology of mononuclear cells and DCs was observed and captured through an inverted optical microscope (Optika, XDS-3, Ponteranica, Italy). To investigate the phenotypic features of iDCs, mDCs, and mDCs with silenced SPACA6P-AS, surface markers including CD11c (anti-CD11c-FITC, BioLegend, catalog number: 301306), HLA-DR (anti-HLA-DR-APC, BioLegend, catalog number: 307606), CD40 (anti-CD40-CF Blue, BioLegend, catalog number: 33432), and CD86 (anti-CD86-PerCP-cy5.5, BioLegend, catalog number: 305430) were used for labeling. Cell evaluation was performed using the MACSQuant flow cytometer (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA, USA), followed by analysis of the results using FlowJo v10.5.3 software (BD Biosciences).
Autologous CD3 + T cell isolation process
Autologous CD3 + T cells were isolated from PBMCs of the same donor used for DC culture using Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting (MACS) and the Human Pan T Cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec, part number: 130–096-535). Briefly, following the separation of PBMCs, the cell suspension was subjected to centrifugation at 300 × g for a period of 10 min. The supernatant was removed, and for every 1 × 107 cells, the mixture contained 10 µL of the pan-T cell biotin antibody mix and 40 µL of MACS buffer was introduced. After incubation at 2–8°C for 5 min, the addition involved introducing 30 µL of MACS buffer along with 20 µL of the pan-T cell microbeads mix. The cells underwent a cleansing process using MACS buffer, were then placed in cold conditions between 2–8°C for 10 min, and finally suspended in 500 µL of MACS buffer. The cell suspension was loaded onto a MACS column and placed in the magnetic field of a MACS separator. Cells flowing through the column without labeling were indicative of the CD3 + T cells selected negatively in the process.
Assessment of CD3 + T lymphocyte proliferation using CFSE labeling
CFSE (Carboxyfluorescein Succinimidyl Ester) was employed to tag the isolated CD3 + T cells, adhering to the instructions outlined by the manufacturer. In a brief outline, the separated T cells were resuspended in PBS and incubated with 5 µM CFSE at 25 °C, under light-protected conditions for 5 min. The reaction was terminated through supplementing RPMI-1640 medium with 20% FBS. After washing, the collected cells were transferred to pre-warmed culture medium. To evaluate the ability of mature DCs and SPACA6P-AS silenced mDCs to promote the proliferation of autologous T cells, co-culture experiments of DCs and T cells were conducted. In a V-bottom 96-well plate, control group mDCs and silenced SPACA6P-AS mDCs were co-cultured with CFSE-labeled autologous CD3 + T lymphocytes at ratios of 1:5 and 1:10. The positive control group included T cells activated with 5% phytohemagglutinin (Sigma Chemical Co., part number: L4144-10MG), while the unstimulated group consisted of T cells co-cultured with iDCs. Upon completion of a four-day incubation period in a light-shielded environment, the expansion of T cells tagged with CFSE was evaluated via flow cytometry analysis. The control group was made up of unlabeled CD3 + T lymphocytes.
Immunohistochemical staining
For immunohistochemical staining, cells were first fixed with 4% formaldehyde solution (Servicebio, G1101) and dehydrated and cleared with xylene (Fisher Scientific, X3-1L) and graded ethanol concentrations (Fisher Scientific, BP2818-4). The tissue samples were subsequently encased in paraffin and cut into sections with a thickness of 4 µm. The segments were subjected to a heating process at 58 °C for a duration of 30 min to remove paraffin, subsequent to antigen retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0, Servicebio, CL-K943). The endogenous peroxidase activity was suppressed by treatment with 3% hydrogen peroxide (Sigma-Aldrich, H1009), and nonspecific binding was blocked with 5% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich, A9647). The specimens were subsequently subjected to an overnight incubation in the presence of the Ki-67 antibody (Abcam, ab15580). The following day, secondary antibodies and DAB chromogen (DAKO, K5007) were applied, and nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin. Slides were then mounted.
Cytokine assay
Recently harvested CD3 + T cells were cultured together with control mDCs and SPACA6P-AS-silenced mDCs at a 1:5 ratio in 24-well plates to study the capabilities of control and SPACA6P-AS-silenced mDCs to stimulate cytokine secretion when autologous T cells are around. Post a 48-h DC stimulation, supernatants were harvested from the co-culture, and the concentrations of IFN-γ, TGF-β, and IL-4 were assessed using ELISA kits from R&D systems (Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, DY285-05, DY240-05, and DY204-05). Levels of IL-12 and IL-10 in the supernatants of control and SPACA6P-AS-silenced mDCs were also assess through ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, DY1270-05).
Statistical analysis
The statistical analysis predominantly employed R software (version 4.2.0). DEGs was identified using the DESeq2 R package, with a threshold set at |log2 FC|> 1.5, and significance determined by Benjamini–Hochberg method with adjusted p-value < 0.05. For survival analysis, the The Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed to evaluate the relationship between lncRNA SPACA6P-AS expression and patient survival rates, calculating the survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years. The estimation of survival curves was carried out utilizing the Kaplan–Meier (KM) approach, while variation in survival outcomes between different cohorts was assessed using log-rank tests. GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses, as well as GSEA, were employed via the clusterProfiler package and GSEA software, respectively. The GSEA analysis was based on 1000 permutations to obtain normalized enrichment scores (NES), with significance set at NOM p < 0.05. Immune infiltration analysis using ssGSEA was carried out with the GSVA R package, and Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used for correlation analysis. Two-tailed statistical tests were utilized with a significance threshold set at p < 0.05. In situations involving multiple comparisons, adjustments of p-values were carried out using the Benjamini–Hochberg technique. A minimum of three trials were performed for each test, with outcomes shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Group contrasts were evaluated utilizing Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) accompanied by post-hoc Tukey HSD analysis when required (GraphPad Prism, GraphPad Software, Version 8.0). Correlation analysis was carried out using Spearman or Pearson correlation coefficients (IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM, Version 25), with significance considered at p < 0.05.
Results
Significant increase in LncRNA SPACA6P-AS expression in BC patients in TCGA
Our study extensively analyzed tumor and standard tissue samples from the TCGA and GTEx databases, focusing on the expression differences of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS across various cancers (Fig. 1A). A careful comparison of the data revealed significant upregulation of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS in multiple cancers, including bladder cancer (Ascione et al. 2023), BC (Nolan et al. 2023), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (Johnson et al. 2020), and pancreatic cancer (Sherman and Beatty 2023), with a particularly notable increase in BC. Detailed clinical and gene expression data of 1083 BC patients were obtained through download from the TCGA database for an in-depth analysis (Table 1). Results showed a notable rise in the lncRNA SPACA6P-AS expression within BC tissues in contrast to the usual mammary tissues (Fig. 1B), further validated by paired sample analysis (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1C). The accuracy of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS in distinguishing BC tissue from normal tissue was evaluated utilizing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The results indicated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.685, surpassing random guessing and demonstrating predictive value (Fig. 1D). These comprehensive findings suggest that the expression of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS is notably upregulated in BC tissue relative to normal tissue, warranting further investigation in clinical and biological research.
LncRNA SPACA6P-AS expression correlation with clinicopathological features in BC patients
In our study, BC patients were grouped taking into consideration the median expression of long non-coding RNA SPACA6P-AS into a high-expression group (N = 542) and a low-expression group (N = 541). By analyzing the correlation between the clinical-pathological characteristics of these two patient groups and the expression levels of SPACA6P-AS, we found a significant association between increased SPACA6P-AS expression and the PAM50 subtypes of BC as well as a history of receiving radiotherapy (Table 1, Fig. 2). Expressly, univariate logistic regression analysis indicated a significant correlation of high SPACA6P-AS expression with LumB subtype compared to LumA (odds ratio (OR) = 1.686, p = 0.02) and individuals who underwent radiation therapy in contrast to those individuals who did not have this therapy (OR = 1.289, p = 0.048) (Table 2, Fig. 3).
Additionally, in the univariate analysis of overall survival (OS) prognostic factors, we found a significant correlation between high expression of the long non-coding RNA SPACA6P-AS and adverse prognosis (p = 0.004, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.616, 95% confidence interval [1.169–2.235]). Similarly, high TNM staging, advanced pathological stage, older age, and specific PAM50 subtypes were significantly associated with poor OS. Specifically, higher T stage (p = 0.012, HR = 1.608, 95% CI [1.110–2.329]), N stage (p < 0.001, HR = 2.163, 95% CI [1.472–3.180]), M stage (p < 0.001, HR = 4.254, 95% CI [2.468–7.334]), higher pathological stage (p < 0.001, HR = 2.391, 95% CI [1.703–3.355]), and older age (p < 0.001, HR = 2.020, 95% CI [1.465–2.784]) were all correlated with poor OS (Table 3). Within PAM50 subtypes, LumA compared to Her2 (p < 0.003, HR = 2.405, 95% CI [1.325–3.859]) also showed a significant adverse prognosis.
Further multivariate Cox regression analysis identified SPACA6P-AS expression level (p = 0.028, HR = 2.189, 95% CI [1.091–4.395]) as an independent predictor of overall survival in BC. Additionally, T stage (p = 0.019, HR = 2.796, 95% CI [1.184–6.603]), N stage (p < 0.018, HR = 5.502, 95% CI [1.340–22.591]), age (p = 0.009, HR = 2.735, 95% CI [1.288–5.809]), menopausal status (p = 0.020, HR = 3.969, 95% CI [1.238–12.722]), and radiation therapy (p = 0.017, HR = 0.424, 95% CI [0.209–0.860]) were also identified as significant factors affecting overall survival in BC patients (Table 3). These results underscore the significant role of SPACA6P-AS in the prognostic assessment of BC, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic target.
Correlation between LncRNA SPACA6P-AS expression and survival in BC patients
In our study utilizing data from TCGA database, KM survival curve analysis revealed that individuals with high SPACA6P-AS expression exhibited significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) when contrasted with the low-expression group, with a HR of 1.62 (95% confidence interval 1.17–2.24) indicating a statistically significant difference (p = 0.004) (Fig. 4A-C). This suggests that elevated levels of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS could serve as a favorable prognostic indicator for BC patients. Furthermore, in the analysis of Progression-Free Interval (PFI), we observed that BC patients with high SPACA6P-AS expression had a shorter PFI, with a HR of 1.40 (95% CI 1.01–1.94) and a p-value of 0.043 (Fig. 4D-F), indicating a higher risk of recurrence or disease progression for these patients. Moreover, in the analysis of Disease-Specific Survival (DSS), patients in the low SPACA6P-AS expression group exhibited higher DSS compared to the high-expression group, with a HR of 1.54 (95% CI 1.00–2.38) and a p-value of 0.049.
Using a multivariate risk model, we further evaluated the impact of SPACA6P-AS in TNM staging on overall survival, PFS, and DSS of BC patients. The analysis demonstrated the significant prognostic value of SPACA6P-AS expression levels across various clinicopathological feature subgroups, including N stage-N0, M stage-M0, pathological stage II, progesterone receptor (PR) positive, Caucasian race, age over 60, invasive ductal carcinoma, no radiation therapy, Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) negative, PAM50-LumA subtype, postmenopausal status, and anatomical tumor subdivision (Fig. 5). In these subgroups, a decrease in lncRNA SPACA6P-AS levels was closely related to poor prognosis, emphasizing the importance of SPACA6P-AS in prognosis assessment and its potential clinical application value in BC.
Construction and validation of a predictive model based on LncRNA SPACA6P-AS
To quantify the prognosis of BC patients, we developed a nomogram that integrates SPACA6P-AS with independent clinical risk factors, including T stage, N stage, age, menopausal status, and radiation therapy. The overall scores of the nomograms for OS, DSS, and PFI were relatively high, indicating a poorer prognosis (Fig. 6). The results demonstrated a high concordance between the model's predictions and actual observations, suggesting excellent model fit. The model's C-index was 0.749, indicating high discriminative ability. The 95% CI for OS prediction, determined through 1,000 bootstrap resamples, was 0.719–0.779. Similarly, the C-index for DSS was 0.749 (95% CI [0.709–0.789]), and for PFI, it was 0.668 (CI [0.636–0.699]). The calibration plots' bias-corrected lines closely approached the ideal curve (Keynesian crossover), further emphasizing the strong correlation between predicted and observed values. Overall, these results demonstrate that our SPACA6P-AS-based predictive model is statistically significant and clinically practical, effectively forecasting both long-term and short-term survival in BC patients and providing a crucial decision-making tool for clinicians.
Potential mechanisms of LncRNA SPACA6P-AS in regulating BC progression
In the scholarly inquiry, we undertook an in-depth analysis of data from the TCGA database using the DESeq2 package to explore genes associated with lncRNA SPACA6P-AS expression in BC. Following stringent selection criteria (adjusted p-value < 0.05, |log2 FC|> 1.5), we identified 1827 DEGs, including 1770 upregulated and 57 downregulated genes (Fig. 7). Additionally, 603 differentially expressed lncRNAs were found, with 596 upregulated and 7 downregulated.
To further understand the function and mechanisms of these DEGs in BC, we utilized the clusterProfiler tool for GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses. In the GO enrichment analysis, we identified three main functional categories. In the molecular function (MF) category, genes associated with protease regulatory activity, endopeptidase regulatory activity, protease inhibitor activity, endopeptidase inhibitor activity, and taste receptor activity were significantly enriched (Fig. 8A). In the cellular component (CC) aspect, genes related to Cajal bodies, cornified squamous layers, Held bodies, and U5 snRNP showed significant enrichment (Fig. 8B). In the BP category, genes linked to taste perception, identifying chemical signals in taste sensation, perception of bitterness, detection of chemical stimuli in perception of bitter taste, peptide cross-linking, mRNA transcriptional splicing, SL addition, and others were enriched (Fig. 8C).
Moreover, our KEGG enrichment analysis revealed essential pathways associated with DEGs, notably taste transduction and the mature onset diabetes of the young pathway (Fig. 8D). These results reveal the biological functions and related pathways in which SPACA6P-AS might be involved in BC and provide important clues for further research into its specific role in disease progression. Overall, through these comprehensive bioinformatics analyses, we can better understand the potential functions of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS in BC and its value as a potential therapeutic target.
GSEA identifies signaling pathways associated with LncRNA SPACA6P-AS
The study employed GSEA to delve into the biological significance of gene sets associated with high and low expression of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS in BC. Using GSEA, we analyzed the enrichment of gene sets related to lncRNA SPACA6P-AS expression within MSigDB collections, including c2.cp.biocarta and h.all.v6.1 symbols. The analysis revealed significant signaling pathway differences with statistical significance under conditions of FDR below 0.25, with the adjusted p-value meeting the 0.05 threshold.
We noted that lncRNA SPACA6P-AS is closely related to critical biological pathways. These pathways include DNA methylation, RNA polymerase I promoter escape, phosphoinositide 3-kinase CI (PI3KCI) pathway, B cell antigen receptor, interleukin 2 (IL2) pathway, and programmed death-1 (PD-1) signaling (Fig. 9). These findings suggest a pivotal role of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS in BC progression, particularly in cancer epigenetic regulation, signal transduction, and immune evasion. For instance, changes in DNA methylation are closely associated with tumor initiation and progression, while alterations in RNA polymerase I activity could affect transcriptional regulation. Moreover, the PI3KCI pathway plays a crucial function in cell growth and viability, commonly aberrantly activated in various cancers. Signaling through the B cell antigen receptor is vital for B cell maturation and function, and changes in the IL2 pathway and PD-1 signaling are related to tumor immune regulatory mechanisms.
Relationship between LncRNA SPACA6P-AS expression and immune infiltration
In our study, we thoroughly analyzed immune cell infiltration characteristics in the BC tumor microenvironment, particularly examining the correlation between lncRNA SPACA6P-AS expression levels and immune cell abundance. For this purpose, we employed ssGSEA, an approach for evaluating the comparative levels of expression within distinct sets of genes in specimens. Through this method, we quantified the proportional richness of different types of immune cells in BC tumor samples and explored their correlation with lncRNA SPACA6P-AS expression using Spearman correlation analysis.
We observed significant associations between the expression of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS and the abundance of specific immune cell types (Fig. 10). For example, lncRNA SPACA6P-AS expression negatively correlated with the abundance of DCs, cytotoxic cells, iDCs, and neutrophils. This suggests that in tumor samples with higher lncRNA SPACA6P-AS expression, the abundance of these immune cells is relatively lower. Conversely, these cell types are more abundant in samples with lower lncRNA SPACA6P-AS expression.
Simultaneously, an affirmative link was observed between lncRNA SPACA6P-AS expression and specific innate immune cells, such as central memory T cells (Tcm) and T helper 2 (Th2) cells (Fig. 10). This indicates that in tumor samples with higher lncRNA SPACA6P-AS expression, the abundance of these innate immune cells is higher. These findings may suggest that lncRNA SPACA6P-AS regulates specific immune cell populations in the tumor microenvironment, potentially affecting tumor immune evasion and response.
The promotive role of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS in BC development
Through cellular and animal experiments, the significance of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS in BC initiation was rigorously studied. Initially, using specific small interfering RNA (siRNA) technology, we effectively reduced the expression of SPACA6P-AS in the BC cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7, as evidenced by quantitative real-time PCR results (Fig. 11A). Subsequent MTT assays revealed that silencing SPACA6P-AS significantly inhibited cell proliferation compared to non-target controls (Fig. 11B). Through Transwell migration and invasion assays, we further showcased that SPACA6P-AS silencing notably reduced the migratory and invasive capabilities of these BC cells (Fig. 11C). Additionally, in vivo experiments in nude mice showed that SPACA6P-AS silencing significantly inhibited tumor volume growth compared to controls (Fig. 11D). Finally, H&E staining revealed alterations in tumor tissue structure following SPACA6P-AS silencing (Fig. 11E), and a reduction in Ki-67 labeling further verified the proliferative role of SPACA6P-AS in BC cells (Fig. 11F). Collectively, the findings point towards a critical role of SPACA6P-AS in BC evolution, offering new insights for future BC therapy.
SPACA6P-AS silencing enhances DC activation of T cells
The ssGSEA analysis unveiled an inverse relationship between SPACA6P-AS expression and immune cell infiltration, such as DCs and neutrophils, while showing a positive correlation with Tcm and Th2 cells. The study sought to methodically examine the role of siRNA-mediated silencing of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS in DC function and its impact on the proliferation and cytokine secretion of autologous CD3 + T cells. First, qPCR was used to verify SPACA6P-AS expression levels in DCs loaded with BC cell lysates, revealing significant expression changes in iDCs and mDCs post SPACA6P-AS silencing (Fig. 12A). Further analysis through flow cytometry revealed altered viability of DCs after silencing SPACA6P-AS (Fig. 12B). There were changes observed in the expression of cell surface markers CD11c and HLA-DR on DCs, indicating a potential shift in the activation state of DCs (Fig. 12E).
Subsequently, our research focused on the functional characteristics of SPACA6P-AS silenced DCs, specifically their proficiency in promoting autologous T cell proliferation and regulate cytokine secretion. Utilizing quantitative PCR and ELISA techniques, we measured key immunomodulatory factors and observed a significant reduction in IL-12 and IL-10 secretion by DCs upon SPACA6P-AS silencing (Fig. 12C and Fig. 12E).
With the aim of precisely measuring the influence of SPACA6P-AS silencing on T cell activation, we conducted co-culture experiments of DCs with autologous CD3 + T cells, and analyzed the expression of T cell surface activation markers using flow cytometry. The results revealed that SPACA6P-AS silencing notably advanced the capacity of DCs to induce T cell proliferation, confirmed through CFSE staining and flow cytometry histograms (Fig. 12D and Fig. 12F). Additionally, we observed an upregulation in the expression of DC surface co-stimulatory molecules CD86 and CD40 upon SPACA6P-AS silencing, which are vital for T cell activation (Fig. 12D).
Discussion
Within the scope of this investigation, through analysis of RNA sequencing and clinical data from 1083 BC patients in the TCGA database, we confirmed a significant upregulation of SPACA6P-AS in BC tissues, closely correlated with unfavorable outcome. This finding is consistent with previous studies (Woolston 2015; Michaels et al. 2023; Ibrahim et al. 2018; Zavala et al. 2019; Schnitt 2010), further underscoring the role of lncRNA in BC development (Li et al. 2022b; Shi et al. 2023; Hu et al. 2023). For the first time, this study validated the differential expression of SPACA6P-AS in BC and normal tissues in the TCGA and GTEx databases, revealing its potential as a biomarker to distinguish normal from neoplastic tissues.
Through analysis of the BP and signaling pathways concerning SPACA6P-AS, this study further deepened our understanding of its function. Our enrichment analysis revealed associations of SPACA6P-AS with various BP and signaling pathways, potentially impacting immune regulation, growth and proliferation, glucose metabolism, and DNA methylation among others. These processes play crucial roles in tumor development and metastasis, especially concerning the control of cell migration and invasion capacities. Furthermore, this study also uncovered potential effects of SPACA6P-AS on important signaling pathways such as PI3K/Akt, B cell receptor, IL2 pathway, and PD-1 signaling.
In this study, we found an inverse relationship between the expression of SPACA6P-AS and the infiltration of DCs and neutrophils, and a positive correlation with Tcm and Th2 cells. This discovery reveals the potential role of SPACA6P-AS in regulating the tumor immune microenvironment. Through ssGSEA and Spearman correlation analysis, we further investigated the correlation between SPACA6P-AS expression and the degree of infiltration by immune cells, emphasizing its importance in immune modulation. This contrasts with previous studies on the function of other long non-coding RNAs in immune regulation, highlighting the possible role of SPACA6P-AS in promoting the activation of specific immune cells.
Findings from experiments conducted in vitro and in vivo indicate that silencing SPACA6P-AS through shRNA significantly reduces the proliferation, migration, and invasion abilities of BC cells. Moreover, DCs with silenced SPACA6P-AS show enhanced functionality in promoting the proliferation of autologous CD3 + T cells and cytokine secretion, revealing a potential immunosuppressive role of SPACA6P-AS in DC function. The immunomodulatory impact of SPACA6P-AS on DCs and T cell activation is uncovered in this investigation for the first time. It suggests that inhibiting SPACA6P-AS in DCs could be an effective strategy to enhance DC activation of T cell responses and improve the efficacy of cell-based therapies reliant on DCs. These findings not only put forward a unique viewpoint on the significance of DCs in the BC microenvironment but also provide crucial molecular targets for the development of novel DC-based immunotherapy strategies.
Our research reveals that SPACA6P-AS stands out as a unique therapeutic target for BC. Compared to other potential therapeutic targets mentioned in existing literature, SPACA6P-AS displays unique potential in regulating the immune microenvironment. Additionally, our research indicates that targeting SPACA6P-AS can impact the proliferation, migration, and invasion capabilities of BC cells. This discovery not only offers new treatment strategies but also opens avenues for personalized BC therapy.
The discovery of lncRNA SPACA6P-AS in BC holds significant clinical value. Firstly, the expression levels of SPACA6P-AS can be utilized as a biomarker for BC, aiding in the early-stage differentiation between normal and neoplastic tissues, thereby enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, due to the close association between SPACA6P-AS expression in BC and patient prognosis, it can serve as a prognostic indicator, aiding clinicians in better assessing disease progression and treatment responses. Regarding treatment, as a potential target, SPACA6P-AS offers possibilities for the creation of innovative targeted treatments for BC. Particularly in immune therapy, its close correlation with immune cell infiltration and activation suggests it may be crucial in enhancing the effectiveness of BC immune therapies. Lastly, the construction of a prognostic nomogram based on SPACA6P-AS aids in providing personalized treatment plans and prognostic predictions for each BC patient, thereby improving treatment outcomes and quality of life.
Our study combines bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation, a methodology not commonly seen in current BC research. Through the extensive analysis of data from the TCGA database and validation through in vitro cell and animal experiments, we have strengthened the evidence supporting our research findings. Compared to studies relying solely on single experimental methods, this combination not only enhances the reliability of the research but also increases the generalizability of the discoveries. However, our study has certain limitations. Firstly, as the data primarily stem from public databases, there may be sample selection biases and issues of data incompleteness. For example, samples in the TCGA database may not fully represent the diversity of all BC patients. Secondly, our study did not delve deeply into the specific molecular mechanisms of SPACA6P-AS, limiting a comprehensive understanding of its role in BC development. Additionally, despite some validation with clinical samples in our study, there is still a lack of large-scale preclinical and clinical trials to confirm the effectiveness and safety of SPACA6P-AS as a therapeutic target. Lastly, our study design is retrospective, which may introduce retrospective analysis biases, highlighting the need for future prospective studies to validate these findings.
To address these limitations, future research should focus on several areas. Firstly, broader and more diverse population studies are needed, encompassing different racial groups, BC subtypes, and patients with varying treatment responses, to enhance the universality and translatability of research results. Secondly, in-depth experimental studies essential to delve into the precise molecular pathways associated with SPACA6P-AS in BC, particularly its influence on the tumor microenvironment and immune cell infiltration and activation. Additionally, conducting more preclinical and clinical trials, especially regarding the potential of SPACA6P-AS as a targeted therapy and immunotherapy target, will be crucial. These studies will not only validate the clinical application value of SPACA6P-AS but also drive innovation and development in BC treatment strategies. Ultimately, the design of prospective studies will aid in better understanding the role of SPACA6P-AS in BC and provide more precise guidance for future treatments.
Conclusion
This study comprehensively analyzed the role and impact of the lncRNA SPACA6P-AS in BC development, providing in-depth bioinformatics and clinical data support (Fig. 13). These discoveries underscore the possible involvement of SPACA6P-AS in BC development and offer crucial scientific groundwork for future clinical applications and treatment strategies. In conclusion, this research furnishes robust evidence for utilizing SPACA6P-AS as a point of focus for BC therapy initiatives and lays the foundation for further functional studies and clinical trials.
Author' contributions
WJF, YLJ and LJZ planned the experiments; YHOY, HLL, YBT AND LQL performed the experiments, prepared the figures and analysed the data; LJOY performed some of the experiments; LMX, YRT, YHL contributed to drafting the manuscript All authors have read and approved the final submitted manuscript.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Without restrictions, the raw data could also be obtained from online databases, including the TCGA, and GEO.
References
Ascione CM, Napolitano F, Esposito D, et al. Role of FGFR3 in bladder cancer: treatment landscape and future challenges. Cancer Treat Rev. 2023;115:102530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102530.
Bindea G, Mlecnik B, Tosolini M, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of intratumoral immune cells reveal the immune landscape in human cancer. Immunity. 2013;39(4):782–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.003.
Bouraoui Y, Achour M, Royuela M, Oueslati R. Immune profiling of human prostate epithelial cells determined by expression of p38/TRAF-6/ERK MAP kinases pathways. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018;34(3):125–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2017.10.002.
Cervena K, Vodenkova S, Vymetalkova V. MALAT1 in colorectal cancer: its implication as a diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarker. Gene. 2022;843:146791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2022.146791.
Chen Y, Ji H, Liu S, Xing Q, Zhu B, Wang Y. Survival prognosis, tumor immune landscape, and immune responses of ADAMTS14 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma and its potential mechanisms. Front Immunol. 2022;13:790608. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.790608. (Published 2022 Apr 29).
Ciabattoni A, Gregucci F, De Rose F, et al. AIRO Breast Cancer Group Best Clinical Practice 2022 Update [published correction appears in Tumori. 2022 Sep 20;:3008916221130201] [published correction appears in Tumori. 2022 Oct 21;:3008916221135922]. Tumori. 2022;108(2 suppl):1–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/03008916221088885
Di Palo A, Siniscalchi C, Mosca N, Russo A, Potenza N. A novel ceRNA regulatory network involving the long non-coding antisense RNA SPACA6P-AS, miR-125a and its mRNA Targets in Hepatocarcinoma Cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(14):5068. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21145068. (Published 2020 Jul 17).
Han B, Guan X, Ma M, et al. Stiffened tumor microenvironment enhances perineural invasion in breast cancer via integrin signaling. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13402-023-00901-x. (Published online November 28, 2023).
Hashemi M, Arani HZ, Orouei S, et al. EMT mechanism in breast cancer metastasis and drug resistance: revisiting molecular interactions and biological functions. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;155:113774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113774.
He Y, Du X, Yuan F, et al. Long non-coding RNAs in gallbladder cancer: From mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities (Review). Int J Oncol. 2024;64(2):16. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2023.5604.
Heitz F, Marth C, Henry S, et al. AGO-OVAR 28/ENGOT-ov57. Niraparib alone versus niraparib in combination with bevacizumab in patients with carboplatin-taxane-based chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: a multicenter randomized phase III trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023;33(12):1966–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2023-004944. (Published 2023 Dec 4).
Howard FM, Olopade OI. Epidemiology of triple-negative breast cancer: a review. Cancer J. 2021;27(1):8–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0000000000000500.
Hu B, Chen W, Zhong Y, Tuo Q. The role of lncRNA-mediated pyroptosis in cardiovascular diseases. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1217985. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1217985. (Published 2023 Jun 16).
Ibrahim M, Yadav S, Ogunleye F, Zakalik D. Male BRCA mutation carriers: clinical characteristics and cancer spectrum. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):179. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4098-y. (Published 2018 Feb 13).
Johnson DE, Burtness B, Leemans CR, Lui VWY, Bauman JE, Grandis JR. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [published correction appears in Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2023 Jan 19;9(1):4]. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6(1):92. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-020-00224-3. (Published 2020 Nov 26).
Katz ZB, Novotná L, Blount A, Lillemeier BF. A cycle of Zap70 kinase activation and release from the TCR amplifies and disperses antigenic stimuli. Nat Immunol. 2017;18(1):86–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3631.
Lai E, Ziranu P, Spanu D, et al. BRCA-mutant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2021;125(10):1321–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-021-01469-9.
Li K, Wang Z. lncRNA NEAT1: Key player in neurodegenerative diseases. Ageing Res Rev. 2023;86:101878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2023.101878.
Li J, Shu X, Xu J, et al. S100A9-CXCL12 activation in BRCA1-mutant breast cancer promotes an immunosuppressive microenvironment associated with resistance to immunotherapy. Nat Commun. 2022a;13(1):1481. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29151-5. (Published 2022 Mar 18).
Li M, Liu G, Jin X, et al. Micropeptide MIAC inhibits the tumor progression by interacting with AQP2 and inhibiting EREG/EGFR signaling in renal cell carcinoma. Mol Cancer. 2022b;21(1):181. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-022-01654-1. (Published 2022 Sep 19).
Li W, Cheng Y, Cheng J, et al. Long Noncoding RNA LINC01614 is a diagnostic and prognostic marker for breast cancer. Discov Med. 2023;35(174):19–27. https://doi.org/10.24976/Discov.Med.202335174.3.
Li JK, Jiang XL, Zhang Z, et al. Isoalantolactone exerts anti-melanoma effects via inhibiting PI3K/AKT/mTOR and STAT3 signaling in cell and mouse models. Phytother Res. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.8132. (Published online March 25, 2024).
Liang Y, Hao M, Guo R, et al. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao. 2023;39(4):1425–1444. https://doi.org/10.13345/j.cjb.220699
Liu S, Sun Y, Hou Y, et al. A novel lncRNA ROPM-mediated lipid metabolism governs breast cancer stem cell properties. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-021-01194-z. (Published 2021 Oct 29).
Liu F, Tian T, Zhang Z, et al. Long non-coding RNA SNHG6 couples cholesterol sensing with mTORC1 activation in hepatocellular carcinoma [published correction appears in Nat Metab. 2022 Sep 6;:]. Nat Metab. 2022;4(8):1022–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-022-00616-7.
Martuszewski A, Paluszkiewicz P, Nowak M, Szewczyk K, Staszek-Szewczyk U. Triple discordances in receptor status during breast cancer local progression and metastases: case report and literature review [published correction appears in Onco Targets Ther. 2021 Feb 04;14:807]. Onco Targets Ther. 2020;13:10343–9. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S260848. (Published 2020 Oct 13).
Metcalfe KA, Gronwald J, Tung NM, et al. The risks of cancer in older women with BRCA pathogenic variants: how far have we come? Cancer. 2023;129(6):901–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.34615.
Michaels E, Worthington RO, Rusiecki J. Breast cancer: risk assessment, screening, and primary prevention. Med Clin North Am. 2023;107(2):271–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2022.10.007.
Mirabelli P, Incoronato M. Usefulness of traditional serum biomarkers for management of breast cancer patients. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:685641. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/685641.
Najjar S, Allison KH. Updates on breast biomarkers. Virchows Arch. 2022;480(1):163–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03267-x.
Nie JL, Li Q, Yin HT, et al. NPS-2143 inhibit glioma progression by suppressing autophagy through mediating AKT-mTOR pathway. J Cell Mol Med. 2024;28(7):e18221. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.18221.
Nojima T, Proudfoot NJ. Mechanisms of lncRNA biogenesis as revealed by nascent transcriptomics [published correction appears in Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022 Dec;23(12):853]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022;23(6):389–406. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-021-00447-6.
Nolan E, Lindeman GJ, Visvader JE. Deciphering breast cancer: from biology to the clinic. Cell. 2023;186(8):1708–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.040.
Park MK, Zhang L, Min KW, et al. NEAT1 is essential for metabolic changes that promote breast cancer growth and metastasis. Cell Metab. 2021;33(12):2380-2397.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2021.11.011.
Powell CA, Modi S, Iwata H, et al. Pooled analysis of drug-related interstitial lung disease and/or pneumonitis in nine trastuzumab deruxtecan monotherapy studies. ESMO Open. 2022;7(4):100554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100554.
Qin S, Yang L, Kong S, Xu Y, Liang B, Ju S. LncRNA HCP5: a potential biomarker for diagnosing gastric cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11:684531. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.684531. (Published 2021 Jun 18).
Sang LJ, Ju HQ, Liu GP, et al. LncRNA CamK-A regulates ca2+-signaling-mediated tumor microenvironment remodeling [published correction appears in Mol Cell. 2018 Nov 1;72(3):601]. Mol Cell. 2018;72(1):71-83.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.014.
Schnitt SJ. Classification and prognosis of invasive breast cancer: from morphology to molecular taxonomy. Mod Pathol. 2010;23(Suppl 2):S60–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2010.33.
Sekine M, Nishino K, Enomoto T. BRCA genetic test and risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: state-of-the-art. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(11):2562. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13112562. (Published 2021 May 23).
Shaath H, Vishnubalaji R, Elango R, et al. Long non-coding RNA and RNA-binding protein interactions in cancer: experimental and machine learning approaches. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022;86(Pt 3):325–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.05.013.
Sherman MH, Beatty GL. Tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer pathogenesis and therapeutic resistance. Annu Rev Pathol. 2023;18:123–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-031621-024600.
Shi H, Nguyen T, Zhao Q, et al. Discovery of transacting long noncoding RNAs that regulate smooth muscle cell phenotype. Circ Res. 2023;132(7):795–811. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.321960.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7–33. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21708.
Tan YT, Lin JF, Li T, Li JJ, Xu RH, Ju HQ. LncRNA-mediated posttranslational modifications and reprogramming of energy metabolism in cancer. Cancer Commun (lond). 2021;41(2):109–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12108.
Vieira Costa R, Balbinot KM, da Silveira GCAR, et al. Prognostic value of the expression and localization of cell proliferation and apoptosis markers in unicystic ameloblastomas. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):3856. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54132-7. (Published 2024 Feb 15).
Woolston C. Breast cancer. Nature. 2015;527(7578):S101. https://doi.org/10.1038/527S101a.
Wu Y, Li Q, Lv LL, et al. Nobiletin inhibits breast cancer cell migration and invasion by suppressing the IL-6-induced ERK-STAT and JNK-c-JUN pathways. Phytomedicine. 2023;110:154610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154610.
Xu M, Chen Z, Lin B, Zhang S, Qu J. A seven-lncRNA signature for predicting prognosis in breast carcinoma. Transl Cancer Res. 2021;10(9):4033–46. https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-747.
Yang S, Wang L, Zeng Y, et al. Salidroside alleviates cognitive impairment by inhibiting ferroptosis via activation of the Nrf2/GPX4 axis in SAMP8 mice. Phytomedicine. 2023;114:154762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2023.154762.
Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16(5):284–7. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2011.0118.
Zavala VA, Serrano-Gomez SJ, Dutil J, Fejerman L. Genetic epidemiology of breast cancer in Latin America. Genes (Basel). 2019;10(2):153. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10020153. (Published 2019 Feb 18).
Zou Y, Xie J, Zheng S, et al. Leveraging diverse cell-death patterns to predict the prognosis and drug sensitivity of triple-negative breast cancer patients after surgery. Int J Surg. 2022;107:106936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106936.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable
Funding
This research was funded by the Key Research Project of Hunan Provincial Education Department (21A0270), Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2023JJ60496 and 2024JJ8232, NO.2021SK51818), Scientific Research Fund Project of Hunan Provincial Health Commission (B202303109577) and Scientific Research Fund Project of Hunan Provincial Health Commission (B202303109577 and D202303109191) and Clinical Medical Research 4310 Program of the University of South China (20224310NHYCG07).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
WJF, YLJ and LJZ planned the experiments; YHOY, HLL, YBT AND LQL performed the experiments, prepared the figures and analysed the data; LJOY performed some of the experiments; LMX, YRT, YHL contributed to drafting the manuscript All authors have read and approved the final submitted manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The animal experimental processes were approved by the Ethnic Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China (No. 2023ll0306001) and conducted in strict accordance to the standard of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People ‘s Republic of China in 2006.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Wenjie Feng, Yiling Jiang, and Lijun Zeng are regarded as co-first authors.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, W., Jiang, Y., Zeng, L. et al. SPACA6P-AS: a trailblazer in breast cancer pathobiology and therapeutics. Cell Biol Toxicol 40, 49 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-024-09870-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-024-09870-9