Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study on the antimutagenicity of atorvastatin and lovastatin against directly acting mutagens

  • Published:
Cell Biology and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Elevated levels of oxidative DNA lesions have been noted in many tumors and such damage is strongly implicated in the etiology of cancer. The cumulative risk of cancer increases with the fourth power of age and is associated with an accumulation of oxidative DNA damage. Many agents, synthetic or natural, that can inhibit mutation have been depicted as cancer chemopreventive agents. Antimutagenicity of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylgutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors atorvastatin and lovastatin was studied using the Ames Salmonella typhimurium assay. Directly acting mutagens, sodium azide (NaN3) and 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine (NPDA), were used to induce mutation in Salmonella strains TA98 and TA100. The antimutagenicity of lovastatin and atorvastatin was found to be significant (p < 0.01) and dose-dependent. The percentage inhibition of a 3 mg lovastatin-treated plate was found to be 79.9% and 61.8% against NPDA- and NaN3-induced mutation to TA98 and TA100, respectively. Atorvastatin (0.5 mg/plate) inhibited NPDA-and NaN3-induced mutation to TA98 and TA100 by 78.6% and 45.5%, respectively. Atorvastatin showed antimutagenic activity at lower concentrations than lovatstatin. The results of the present study regarding the antimutagenic activity of atorvastatin and lovastatin suggested their therapeutic application as cancer chemopreventive agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

APC:

adenomatus polyposis coli

ATC:

anaplastic thyroid carcinomas

DMSO:

dimethyl sulfoxide

HMG-CoA:

3-hydroxy-3-methylgutaryl-CoA

MDA:

malondialdehyde

NPDA:

4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine

NaN3 :

sodium azide

SR:

spontaneous revertants

References

  • Appleton BS, Landers RE. Oil gavage effects in tumor incidence in the national toxicology programmers two year carcinogenesis bio assay. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1985;206:99–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong B, Doll R. Environmental factor and cancer incidence and mortality in different countries, with special reference to dietary practice. Int J Cancer. 1975;15:617–21.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balmin A, Brown K. Oncogene activation in chemical carcinogenesis. Adv Cancer Res. 1988;51:147–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beltowski J. Statins and modulation of oxidative stress. toxicol Mech Methods. 2005;15:61–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bos JL. Ras oncogene in human cancer: a review. Cancer Res. 1989;49:4682–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cerutti P, Ghosh R, Oya Y, Amstad P. The role of the cellular antioxidant defense in oxidant carcinogenesis. Environ Health Perspect. 1994;102:123–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KKW, Oza AM, Siu LL. The statins as anticancer agents. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:10–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crick DC, Andres DA, Danesi R, Macchia M, Waechter CJ. Geranylgeraniol overcomes the block of cell proliferation by lovastatin in C6 glioma cells. J Neurochem. 1998;70:2397–404.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giacosa A, Filiberti R, Hill MJ, Faivre J. Vitamins and cancer chemoprevention. Eur J Cancer Prev. 1997;6:S47–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ip C. Review of the effects of trans fatty acids, oleic acid, n−3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and conjugated linolenic acid on mammary carcinogenesis in animals. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997;66:1523–29s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobisiak M, Golab J. Potential antitumor effects of statins (review). Int J Oncol. 2003;23:1055–69.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelloff GJ, Boone CW, Steele VE, Crowell JA, Lubet R, Sigman CC. Progress in cancer chemoprevention: perspectives on agent selection and short-term clinical intervention trials. Cancer Res. 1994;54:2015–24s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch WH, Henrikson EN, Kupchella E, Cebula TA. Salmonella typhimurium strain TA100 differentiates several classes of carcinogens and mutagens by base substitution specificity. Carcinogenesis. 1994;15:79–88.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larner J, Jane J, Laws E, Packer R, Myers C, Shaffrey M. A Phase I–II trial of lovastatin for anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme. Am J Clin Oncol. 1998;21:579–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maron DM, Ames BN Revised methods for the salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutat Res. 1983;113:173–215.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin HM, Filipe MI, Morris RW, Lane DP, Silvestre F. p53 expression and prognosis in gastric carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 1992;50:859–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moller P, Wallin H. Adduct formation, mutagenesis and nucleotide excision repair of DNA damage produced by reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxidation product. Mutat Res. 1998;410:271–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quiros RM, Ding HG, Gattuso P, Prinz RA, Xu X. Evidence that one subset of anaplastic thyroid carcinomas are derived from papillary carcinomas due to BRAF and p53 mutations. Cancer. 2005;103:2261–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ray G, Batra S, Shukla NK, et al. Lipid peroxidation, free radical production and antioxidant status in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;59:163–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rugge M, Shio YH, Correa P, Baffa R, Di Mario F. Immunohistochemical evidence of P53 over expression in gastric epithelial dysplasia. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1992;1:551–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Struewing JP, Hartge P, Wacholder S, Backer SM, Berlin M, McAdams M, Timmerman MM. The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA 2 among Ashkenazi Jews. N Engel J Med. 1997;336:1401–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun SY, Hail N, Lotan JR. Apoptosis as a novel target for cancer chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:662–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tahara E. Growth factors and oncogenes in human gastrointestinal carcinomas. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1990;116:121–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vaca CE, Wilhelm J, Harms-Rihsdahl M. Interaction of lipid peroxidation product with DNA. A Review. Mutat Res Rev Genet Toxicol. 1988;195:137–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wright PA, Williams GT. Molecular biology and gastric carcinoma. Gut. 1993;34:145–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. A. Ajith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ajith, T.A., Soja, M. A comparative study on the antimutagenicity of atorvastatin and lovastatin against directly acting mutagens. Cell Biol Toxicol 22, 269–274 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-006-0064-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-006-0064-6

Keywords

Navigation