Skip to main content
Log in

Effective Thermal Design Concept of Sabatier Reactor by Controlling Catalyst Distribution Profile

  • Published:
Catalysis Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents the effective thermal design concept of exothermic Sabatier reactor, which shall convert carbon dioxide with hydrogen to produce water and methane (so-called “methanation”) assisted by the catalytic activity. Pellet type of Ru-based catalyst is packed in the preheated reactor tube and stoichiometric reactant gas mixture (CO2 and H2) flows at the prescribed flow rate. By employing the present system, steady 1-D reaction field is successfully achieved. Bundled thermocouples are inserted from the downstream through the sealed yet movable connectors to obtain the steady-state temperature profile in the reactor. End gas is analyzed by gas chromatography to check the conversion performance. The following two series of reactor are tested; it has (1) uniform or (2) stepwise catalyst distribution. By using uniform catalyst bed, relatively strong peak in the temperature profile is appeared at the inlet and thermal damage of catalyst is highly expected to lose the durability. No significant improvement on reduction of the peak as well as the conversion performance even when the shorter heating regime is employed, although the peak location moves to downstream. Adopting the non-uniform (stepwise) catalyst distribution are effectively modifying the thermal structure in the reactor having the less-peak in the temperature profile without losing the conversion performance. Our study reveals the control of catalyst distribution is simple yet effective approach to achieve the uniform temperature profile even in 1-D flow reactor design at high conversion performance.

Graphic Abstract

The reactor temperature profile was achieved to be uniform by adopting stepwise catalyst distribution to prevent hot spots in the Sabatier reactor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tada S, Ochieng OJ, Kikuchi R, Haneda T, Kameyama H (2014) Int J Hydrog Energy 39:10090–10100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Marocco P, Morosanu EA, Giglio E, Ferrero D, Mebrahtu C, Lanzini A, Abate S, Bensaid S, Perathoner S, Santarelli M, Pirone R, Centi G (2018) Fuel 225:230–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kok E, Scott J, Cant N, Trimm D (2011) Catal Today 164:297–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gonzalez LM, Vries DC, Claeys M, Schaub G (2015) Catal Today 242:184–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bossel U, Eliasson B (2003) Energy and the hydrogen economy. ABB Switzerland Ltd, Oberrohrdorf

    Google Scholar 

  6. Müller K, Fleige M, Rachow F, Schmeiber D (2013) Energy Procedia 40:240–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson MS, Ewert MK, Keener JF, Wagner SA (2015) Life support baseline values and assumptions document. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aeronautics N, Administration S (2018) National space exploration campaign report. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  9. Drake BG (2009) Human exploration of mars design reference architecture 50 addendum. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shima A, Sakurai M, Sone Y, Ohnishi M, Yoneda A, Abe T (2018) In: Proceedings of the Japan society for aeronautical and space sciences JSASS-2018-4494 (in Japanese)

  11. Samplatsky DJ, Grohs K (2011) In: Proceedings of the 41st international conference on environmental systems AIAA-2011-5151

  12. Miyakoshi A (2015) JP6209398B2. Japan Patent Office, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Greenwood ZW, Abney MB, Wall T (2017) In: Proceedings of the 47th international conference on environmental systems ICES-2017-182

  14. Sakai Y, Tachihara S, Oka T, Waseda S, Sakurai M, Shima A, Nakanoya S (2018) In: Proceedings of the 62st space sciences and technology conference JSASS-2018-4493 (in Japanese)

  15. Rostrup-Nielsen JR, Pedersen K, Sehested J (2007) Appl Catal A-Gen 330:134–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bartholomew CH (2001) Appl Catal A-Gen 212:17–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kiewidt L, Thöming J (2015) Chem Eng Sci 132:59–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Brooks KP, Hu J, Zhu H, Kee RJ (2007) Chem Eng Sci 62:1161–1170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sun D, Khan FM, Simakov DSA (2017) Chem Eng J 329:165–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Takeno T, Sato K (1979) Combust Sci Technol 20:73–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Technical advices and fruitful discussions brought by Drs. Shima and Sakurai from JAXA, are very much appreciated. Assistance provided by Ms. Tomita from TUT for providing GC data is greatly helpful.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuji Nakamura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakamoto, S., Matsuoka, T. & Nakamura, Y. Effective Thermal Design Concept of Sabatier Reactor by Controlling Catalyst Distribution Profile. Catal Lett 150, 2928–2936 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-020-03195-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-020-03195-y

Keywords

Navigation