Skip to main content
Log in

Culture methods of allograft musculoskeletal tissue samples in Australian bacteriology laboratories

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cell and Tissue Banking Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Samples of allograft musculoskeletal tissue are cultured by bacteriology laboratories to determine the presence of bacteria and fungi. In Australia, this testing is performed by 6 TGA-licensed clinical bacteriology laboratories with samples received from 10 tissue banks. Culture methods of swab and tissue samples employ a combination of solid agar and/or broth media to enhance micro-organism growth and maximise recovery. All six Australian laboratories receive Amies transport swabs and, except for one laboratory, a corresponding biopsy sample for testing. Three of the 6 laboratories culture at least one allograft sample directly onto solid agar. Only one laboratory did not use a broth culture for any sample received. An international literature review found that a similar combination of musculoskeletal tissue samples were cultured onto solid agar and/or broth media. Although variations of allograft musculoskeletal tissue samples, culture media and methods are used in Australian and international bacteriology laboratories, validation studies and method evaluations have challenged and supported their use in recovering fungi and aerobic and anaerobic bacteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aho AJ, Hirn M, Aro HT, Heikkila JT, Meurman O (1998) Bone bank service in Finland: experience of bacteriologic, serologic and clinical results of the Turku bone bank 1972–1995. Acta Orthop 69:559–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baron EJ, Thomson RB Jr (2011) Specimen collection, transport and processing: bacteriology. In: Versalovic J, Carroll KC, Funke G, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Warnock DW (eds) Manual of clinical microbiology, 10th edn. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, pp 228–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrios RH, Leyes M, Amillo S, Oteiza C (1994) Bacterial contamination of allografts. Acta Orthop Belg 60:293–295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • British Pharmacopoeia Commission (2012) British Pharmacopoeia, London, United Kingdom

  • Cartwright CP, Stock F, Gill VJ (1994) Improved enrichment broth for cultivation of fastidious organisms. J Clin Microbiol 32:1825–1826

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu CK, Lau PY, Chan SWW, Fong CM, Sun LK (2004) Microbial contamination of femoral head allografts. Hong Kong Med J 10:401–405

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deijkers RLM, Bloem RM, Petit PLC, Brand R, Vehmeyer SBW, Veen MR (1997) Contamination of bone allografts. Analysis of incidence and predisposing factors. J Bone Jt Surg Br 79-B:161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derby P, Davies R, Oliver S (1997) The value of including broth cultures as part of a routine culture protocol. J Clin Microbiol 35:1101–1102

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz FR, Koontz FP, Found EM, Marsh JL (1991) The importance of positive bacterial cultures of specimens obtained during clean orthopaedic operations. J Bone Jt Surg 73:1200–1207

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington M, Matthews I, Foreman J, Richardson K, Caffrey E (1998) Microbiological monitoring of bone grafts: two years’ experience at a tissue bank. J Hosp Infect 38:261–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb PA (1999) Plates are better than broth for recovery of fastidious organisms from some specimen material. J Clin Microbiol 37:875

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guelich DR, Lowe WR, Wilson B (2007) The routine culture of allograft tissue in allograft tissue in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35:1495–1499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Health Outcomes International Pty Ltd. October (2009) Australian Organ and Tissue Donation and Transplantation Authority National Eye and Tissue Network Implementation Final Report—October 2009

  • Holman WL (1919) The value of a cooked meat medium for routine and special bacteriology. J Bacteriol 4:149–155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hou CH, Yang RS, Hou SM (2005) Hospital-based allogenic bone bank—10-year experience. J Hosp Infect 59:41–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim T, Stafford H, Esler CAN, Power RA (2004) Cadaveric allograft microbiology. Int Orthop 28:315–318

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ivory JP, Thomas JP (1993) Audit of a bone bank. J Bone Jt Surg 75-B:355–357

    Google Scholar 

  • James LA, Gower A (2002) The clinical significance of femoral head culture results in donors after hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 17:351–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James LA, Ibrahim T, Esler CN (2004) Microbiological culture results for the femoral head, are they important to the donor? J Bone Jt Surg 86-B:797–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JW, Chao LH, Su LH, Wang JW, Wang CJ (2002) Experience with a bone bank operation and allograft bone infection in recipients at a medical centre in southern Taiwan. J Hosp Infect 50:293–297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meermans G, Roos R, Hopkens L, Cheyns P (2007) Bone banking in a community hospital. Acta Orthop Belg 73:754–759

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miles RS, Hood N, Bundredr J, Jeffrey G, Davies A, Collee JG (1985) The role of Robertson’s cooked meat broth in the bacteriological evaluation of surgical specimens. J Med Microbiol 20:373–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morris AJ, Wilson SJ, Marx CE, Wilson ML, Mirrett S, Reller LB (1995) Clinical impact of bacteria and fungi recovered only from broth cultures. J Clin Microbiol 33:161–165

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhold CE, Nickolai DJ, Piccinini TE, Byford BA, York MK, Brooks GF (1988) Evaluation of broth media for routine culture of cerebrospinal and joint fluid specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 89:671–674

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saegeman VSM, Lismont D, Verduyckt B, Ectors NL, Verhaegen J (2007) Comparison of microbiological culture methods in screening allograft tissue. Swab versus nutrient broth. J Microbiol Methods 10:374–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert T, Bigare′ E, Van Isacker T, Gigi J, Delloye C, Cornu O (2012) Analysis of predisposing factors for contamination of bone and tendon allografts. Cell Tiss Banking 13:421–429. doi:10.1007/s10561-011-9291-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scythes KD, Louie M, Simor AE (1996) Evaluation of nutritive capacities of 10 broth media. J Clin Microbiol 34:1804–1807

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Segur JM, Suso S, Garcia S, Combalia A, Farinas O, Llovera A (2000) The procurement team as a factor of bone allograft contamination. Cell Tiss Banking 1:117–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silletti RP, Ailey E, Sun S, Tang D (1997) Microbiological and clinical value of primary broth cultures of wound specimens collected with swabs. J Clin Microbiol 35:2003–2006

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland AG, Raafat A, Yates P, Hutchinson JD (1997) Infection associated with the use of allograft bone from the North East Scotland bone bank. J Hosp Infect 35:215–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Therapeutic Goods Administration (2000) Australian Code of Good Manufacturing Practice—Human Blood and Tissues Commonwealth Department of Health & Aged Care, Canberra

  • Therapeutic Goods Administration (2006) TGA Guidelines for sterility testing of therapeutic goods department of health and ageing. Australian Government, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomford WW, Thongphasuk KJ, Mankin HJ, Feraro MJ (1990) Frozen musculoskeletal allografts: a study of the clinical incidence and causes of infection associated with their use. J Bone Jt Surg 72A:1137–1143

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Pol GJ, Sturm PDJ, van Loon CJ, Verhagen C, Schreurs BW (2007) Microbiological cultures of allografts of the femoral head just before transplantation. J Bone Jt Surg 89:1225–1228

    Google Scholar 

  • Varettas K (2012) Bacteriology laboratories and musculoskeletal tissue banks in Australia. ANZ J Surg 82:775–779. doi:10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06145.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veen MR, Bloem RM, Petit PL (1994) Sensitivity and negative predictive value of swab cultures in musculoskeletal allograft procurement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 300:259–263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vehmeyer SBW, Bloem RM, Deijker RLM, Veen MR, Petits PLC (1999) A comparative study of blood and bone marrow cultures in cadaveric bone donation. J Hosp Infect 43:305–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vehmeyer SBW, Slooff ARM, Bloem RM, Petits PLC (2002) Bacterial contamination of femoral head allografts from living donors. Acta Orthop Scand 73:165–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Winn WC, Allen SD, Janda WM, Koneman EW, Procop GW, Schreckenberger PC, Woods GL (eds) (2006) Koneman’s colour atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams & Williams, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank staff at the Australian bacteriology laboratories and tissue banks who participated in the survey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerry Varettas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Varettas, K. Culture methods of allograft musculoskeletal tissue samples in Australian bacteriology laboratories. Cell Tissue Bank 14, 609–614 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-012-9361-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10561-012-9361-x

Keywords

Navigation