Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Developing a New Approach to Case Management in Youth Mental Health: Strengths Model for Youth Case Management

  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Strengths Model (SM) case management has been utilized as a community based intervention with adults diagnosed with a mental illness since the 1980s. This paper describes the developmental, familial, and systemic adaptations made to the model so that it can be used with youth with mental illness. The resulting SM for Youth provides an alternative framework for providing case management to youth with mental illness which allows the youth to drive goal development and attainment by identifying and capitalizing on the youth’s strengths and resources. The model has the potential to positively impact youth mental health services by equipping supervisors and case managers with a formal model and tools, helping the case managers to feel more prepared and less stressed in their roles, and by empowering youth to engage in services that are positive and driven by their desires.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abram, K. M., Paskar, L. D., Washburn, J. J., & Teplin, L. A. (2008). Perceived barriers to mental health services among youths in detention. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 301–308.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, E. M., Walsh, A. K., Oldham, M. S., & Rapp, C. A. (2007). Strengths-based case management: Implementation with high risk youth. Families in Society, 88, 86–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, K. L., Zeber, J. E., Blow, F. C., & Valenstein, M. (2003). Effect of strengths model versus assertive community treatment model on participant outcomes and utilization: Two-year follow-up. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27, 268–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benshoff, J. M., & Alexander, S. J. (1993). The family communication project: Fostering parent–child communication about sexuality. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 27, 288–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz, M. R., Lindstrom, L., & Yovanoff, P. (2000). Improving graduation and employment outcomes of students with disabilities: Predictive factors and student perspectives. Exceptional Children, 66, 509–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. J. (1995). Psychological therapies for children and youth: Overview and future directions. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23, 141–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research designs: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, S., Sarver, M. D., & Shaw, S. F. (2003). Self-determination: A key to success in postsecondary education for students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 339–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fristad, M. A., & Clayton, T. L. (1991). Family dysfunction and family psychopathology in child psychiatry outpatients. Journal of Family Psychology, 5, 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grube, W. A., & Mendenhall, A. N. (2015). Adolescent mental health case management: Provider perspectives. Social Work in Mental Health, 97, 86–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grube, W. A., & Mendenhall, A. N. (2016). Adolescent mental health case management: Consumer perspectives. Families in Society, 92, 86–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, G., & MacQueen, K. (2008). Handbook for team-based qualitative research. Lanham, MD: AltaMira.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (2002). The state of child and youth psychotherapy research. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 7, 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (2003). Psychotherapy for children and youth. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 253–268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, D. P. (1990). Adolescent thinking. In G. R. Elliott & S. S. Feldman (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 54–89). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim-Cohen, J., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Harrington, H., Milne, B. J., & Poulton, R. (2003). Prior juvenile diagnoses in adults with mental disorder developmental follow-back of a prospective-longitudinal cohort. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 709–717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kisthardt, W. (1993). The impact of the strengths model of case management from the consumer perspective. In M. Harris & H. C. Bergman (Eds.), Case management: Theory and practice (pp. 112–125). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klasen, H., & Crombag, A. C. (2013). What works where? A systemic review of child and youth mental health interventions for low and middle income countries. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 48, 595–611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs, M., & Lohr, W. D. (1995). Research on psychotherapy with children youth: An overview of evolving trends and current issues. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23, 11–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macias, C., Farley, O. W., & Jackson, R. (1997). Case management in the context of capitation financing: An evaluation of the Strengths Model. Administration and Policy and Mental Health, 24, 535–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macias, C., Kinney, R., Farley, O. W., Jackson, R., & Vos, B. (1994). The role of case management within a community support system: Partnership with psychosocial rehabilitation. Community Mental Health Journal, 30, 323–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marta, E. (1997). Parent–adolescent interactions and psychological risk in adolescents: An analysis of communication support and gender. Journal of Adolescence, 20, 473–487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, M. M., & Bannon, W. M. (2004). Engaging families in child mental health services. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 13, 905–921.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merikangas, K. R., He, J., Burstein, M., Swanson, S. A., Avenevoli, S., Cui, L., … Swendsen, J. (2010). Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. youth: Results from the National Comorbidity Study-Youth Supplement (NCS-A). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Youth Psychiatry, 49, 980–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modrcin, M., Rapp, C., & Poertner, J. (1988). The evaluation of case management services with the chronically mentally ill. Evaluation and Program Planning, 11, 307–314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moses, T. (2009). Self-labeling and its effects among adolescents diagnosed with mental disorders. Social Science and Medicine, 68, 570–578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, C. A., & Chamberlain, R. (1985). Case management services to the chronically mentally ill. Social Work, 30, 417–422.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, C. A., & Goscha, R. J. (2004). The principles of effective case management of mental health services. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27, 319–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, C. A., & Goscha, R. J. (2012). The Strengths Model: A recovery-oriented approach to mental health services (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, C. A., & Wintersteen, R. (1989). The strengths model of case management: Results from twelve demonstrations. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 13, 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riesch, S. K., Jackson, N. M., & Chanchong, W. (2003). Communication approaches to parent–child conflict: Young adolescents to young adult. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 18, 244–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, C. S., Sherman, P. S., & Judd, C. M. (1994). Accounting for case management effects in the evaluation of mental health services. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 965–974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saleebey, D. (1996). The strengths perspective in social work practice: Extensions and cautions. Social Work, 41, 296–305.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, E. H., Lawrence, C. N., & Dodge, K. A. (2012). The impact of system of care support in adherence to wraparound principles in Child and Family teams in child welfare in North Carolina. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 639–647.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soni, A. (2009). The five most costly childrens conditions: Estimates for the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized children, ages 017. April Contract No.: Statistical Brief #242. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

  • Stanard, R. P. (1999). The effect of training in a strengths model of case management on outcomes in a community mental health center. Community Mental Health Journal, 35, 169–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staudt, M. (2007). Treatment engagement with caregivers of at-risk children: Gaps in research and conceptualization. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16, 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirman, S. W., Miller, C. J., Toder, K., & Calloway, A. (2013). Development of a framework coding system for modifications and adaptations of evidence-based interventions. Implementation Science, 8, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmire, K. A. (2000). Adolescence as a developmental phase: A tutorial. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom, J. P., Clarke, G. N., & Green, C. A. (2006). What teens want: Barriers to seeking care of depression. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 33, 133–145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This Project was conducted as part of a Contract with the Kansas Department of Aging and Disability Services and funded through Kansas Medicaid.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy N. Mendenhall.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Mendenhall declares that she has no conflict of interest. Ms. Grube declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Research Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Appendix 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mendenhall, A.N., Grube, W. Developing a New Approach to Case Management in Youth Mental Health: Strengths Model for Youth Case Management. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 34, 369–379 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-016-0467-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-016-0467-z

Keywords

Navigation