Conclusions
The results of the present evaluation strongly support the essential need for formal case management in providing community support for individuals with serious mental illness. When compared to a control condition in which consumers received CMHC-wide support from therapists, day treatment personnel, and residential staff, the Strengths case management program was considerably more effective in achieving three specific community support goals: increasing consumer personal incomes, providing needed social support, and maintaining consumer physical health. Surprisingly, the case management program was also found to be effective in achieving a goal that is usually not targeted by case management: consumers in the case management group improved in therapist-assessed psychiatric symptomatology more than control group consumers. Since the control and the case management groups had comparable increases in attendance at primary therapy and medication management over the study period, we conclude that the case management program was directly responsible for the improvements in psychiatric symptoms within its caseload. Whether these improvements in mood and cognitive processing are attributable to co-occuring improvements in quality of life variables (i.e., social support or personal income) or whether psychiatric improvement is more directly attributable to case managerin vivo counseling must be decided by future research.
While formal Strengths case management appears to be efficacious as a community support—and perhaps as a psychiatric rehabilitation—intervention, a formal program of case management does not appear to be essential to CMHC preparation for Medicaid capitated financing. The Valley Mental Health case management program significantly increased consumers' residential autonomy and attendance at primary therapy, but improvements on these two Medicaid-related variables were nearly matched within the control group through the efforts of other program staff. Taken as a whole, the study findings demonstrate that a formal case management program can work effectively in league with other CMHC programs to achieve specific managed care-related administrative goals, but that these delineated administrative goals can also be attained through a CMHC-wide mobilization of dedicated front-line staff.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Broskowski, A., & Eaddy, M. (1994). Community mental health centers in a managed care environment.Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 21, 335–352.
Carter, C., Heugly, B., Jackson, R., Kirkman, D., Marias, C., & Saderholm, Z. (1990).The Utah Case Management Consumer Assessment Record (Utah CCAR). Salt Lake City: University of Utah, Graduate School of Social Work.
Dangerfield, D., & Betit, Rod L. (1993). Managed mental health care in the public sector.New Directions for Mental Health Services, 59, 67–80.
Dupuy, H. J. (1984). The Psychological General Well-Being (PGWB) Index. In N. K. Wenger, M. E. Mattson, C. D. Furberg, & J. Elinson (Eds.),Assessment of quality of life. Le Jacque Publishers.
Ellis, R. H., Wilson, N. Z., & Foster, F. M. (1984). Statewide treatment outcome assessment in Colorado: The Colorado Client Assessment Record (CCAR).Community Mental Health Journal, 20, 72–89.
Hargreaves, W. (1992). A capitation model for providing mental health services in California.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 43, 275–277.
Landress, H. J., & Bernstein, M. A. (1993). Managed care 101: An overview and implications for psychosocial rehabilitation services.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 17, 5–11.
Langman-Dorwart, N., Wahl, R., Singer, C.J., & Dorwart, R.A. (1992). Managed mental health: From cost containment to quality assurance.Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 19, 345–353.
Lehman, A. F. (1989). Strategies for improving services for the chronic mentally ill.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 40, 916–920.
Macias, C., & Jackson, R. (1990).The Self-Report Inventory: An interview schedule for adults with serious mental illness. Salt Lake City: University of Utah, Graduate School of Social Work.
Macias, C., & Kinney, R. (1990).The Brief Psychological Well-Being Index. Salt Lake City: University of Utah, Graduate School of Social Work.
Macias, C., Kinney, R., Farley, O. W., Jackson, R., & Vos, B. (1994). The role of case management within a community support system: Partnership with psychosocial rehabilitation.Community Mental Health Journal, 30, 323–339.
Mechanic, D., & Aiken, L. H. (1989). Capitation in mental health: Potentials and cautions.New Directions for Mental Health Services, 43, 5–18.
Minkoff, K. (1994). Community mental health in the nineties: Public sector managed care.Community Mental Health Journal, 30, 317–321.
Modrcin, M., Rapp, C. A., & Poertner, J. (1988). The evaluation of case management services with the chronically mentally ill.Evaluation and Program Planning, 11, 307–314.
Moos, R. H., Cronkite, R. C., & Finney, J. W. (1984).Health and Daily Living Form. Palo Alto, CA: Department of Veterans Affairs and Stanford Medical Centers.
Rapp, C. A. (1993). Theory, principles, and methods of the Strengths model of case management. Unpublished manuscript.
Rapp, C. A., & Wintersteen, R. (1989). The Strengths model of case management: Results from twelve demonstrations.Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 13, 23–32.
Reed, S. K. (1994). Serious mental illness and capitation financing.Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 12, 379–388.
Scheffler, R., Grogan, C., Cuffel, B., & Penner, S. (1993). A specialized mental health plan for persons with severe mental illness under managed competition.Hospital & Community Psychiatry, 44, 937–942.
Schinnar, A.P., Rothbard, A.B., & Hadley, T.R. (1992). A prospective management approach to the delivery of public mental health services.Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 19, 291–308.
Schlesinger, M. (1989). Striking a balance: Capitation, the mentally ill, and public policy.New Directions for Mental Health Services, 43, 97–115.
Sullivan, W.P. (1992). Reclaiming the community: The Strengths perspective and deinstitutionalization.Social Work, 37, 204–209.
Weick, A., Rapp, C. A., Sullivan, W. P., & Kisthardt, W. (1989). A Strengths perspective for social work practice.Social Work, 34, 350–354.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The case management program and the research project were both supported by a research demonstration grant (#R18 MH46070-03) from the Community Support Program of the NIMH.
The authors are grateful to the following individuals: Barbara Heugly, R.N. and Catherine Carter, Ph.D., Executive Director David Danger-field, and Clinical Director Craig Brown of Valley Mental Health; to Dr. Mary Elizabeth Fraser of the Utah Department of Mental Health; to Dr. Frances Randolph of the Community Support Program of the NIMH; to Betty Vos, Ph.D. of the University of Utah; to case managers Alicia Buckley, Paul Olavson, and Debbra Marie; and to project staff members Christine Clark and Georgia Beletos.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Macias, C., William Farley, O., Jackson, R. et al. Case management in the context of capitation financing: an evaluation of the strengths model. Adm Policy Ment Health 24, 535–543 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02042831
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02042831